Covering up Fannie’s crimes

The Wall Street Journal has an important rejoinder today to Democratic efforts to rewrite Fannie Mae’s role in the housing bubble and the recent economic panic.

The Journal’s Brian Carney (my brother) started this back and forth with an op-ed last week critiquing the financial reform bill for ignoring Fannie & Freddie, which didn’t fit neatly into the Democrats’ narrative of Wall Street greed, and which undermined the rationale behind the bill by showing how well-intentioned government officials can often make things worse.

Former Fannie exec Franklin Raines fired back a letter defending Fannie, and today’s WSJ editorial re-rebuts Raines. The editorial makes a couple great points, including this response to an absurd Raines claim:

Mr. Raines is signaling the coming political debate when he says “that Wall Street and the commercial banks have virtually abandoned the mortgage market.” But this is like murdering your parents and demanding clemency because you’re an orphan. No private bank can compete with the federal government’s borrowing costs, so no one can afford to compete with Fannie and Freddie. It was hard enough to compete when the two companies had to maintain a (subsidized) profit margin for their shareholders. Now that they’re being run at an intentional loss, it’s impossible.

But the editorial leaves out some very relevant background: Fannie wasn’t just propping up banks, realtors, and some lucky homeowners at the expense of today’s taxpayers — it was enriching well-connected Democrats.

Raines was paid obscenely by Fannie Mae, but the federal government later charged that $90 million of that pay was based on overstated earnings. In the end, Raines settled the civil suit by giving up a few million dollars and his worthless stock options. He made out like a bandit by running Fannie like Enron.

Jamie Gorelick was a top Clinton aide who was paid $26 million by Fannie Mae as she helped build the housing bubble.

There are plenty of others, but you get the idea: Fannie Mae was a slush-fund for the politically well-connected — mostly Democrats. Its money came from fraud, and from an implicit government guarantee, which is now an explicit subsidy. In other words, our ballooning debt today is financing Franklin Raines’ life as a millionaire.

Beltway Confidentialfannie maeUS

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

Gov. Gavin Newsom, show here speaking at the City College of San Francisco mass vaccination site in April, faces a recall election due to anger on the right over his handling of the pandemic, among other issues. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Why Gavin Newsom’s popularity could work against him in the recall election

Top pollster: ‘We’re not seeing the Democrats engaged in this election. And that may be a problem…’

Passengers ride the 14-Mission Muni bus on Friday, March 12, 2021. (Jordi Molina/Special to S.F. Examiner)
Transit officials fear Free Muni pilot could hurt already-strained service levels

Supporters say fare cuts could increase ridership, help low-income residents

The vacant property at 730 Stanyan St. in the Haight currently houses a safe sleeping site for the homeless. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Affordable housing project on former McDonald’s site delayed as city adds units

The start of construction on an affordable housing project on the site… Continue reading

A second Hummingbird Place is set to open at 1156 Valencia St. following the success of a facility at San Francisco General Hospital. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner) —
Shelter contract for mentally ill to get five-year, $17.2M extension

San Francisco is expected to give a five-year extension to a pilot… Continue reading

Historic streetcars are undergoing testing on The Embarcadero to prepare for their return to service on May 15.<ins></ins>
What to expect for Muni Metro’s relaunch on May 15

Significant service restoration includes downtown subway tunnels and historic streetcars

Most Read