Closing tax loopholes could help California’s budget gap

A couple decades ago, when Silicon Valley was beginning to flex its political muscle, a local Democratic lawmaker carried legislation to exempt custom computer software from California sales taxes.

The rationale — one so illogically thin as to be transparent — was that the creative-design work that went into such programs was essentially an intangible service, and services are not taxable.

Almost every taxable product has a major component of intangible design and labor. Much of a car’s retail value, for instance, consists of labor, marketing, transportation and other “services,” but we tax its complete sales price.

Moreover, exempting custom software programs — many of which sell for millions of dollars — left off-the-shelf programs used by the public on the tax rolls.

That exemption costs state and local governments about $120 million a year in sales tax revenue. Officially it is called a “tax expenditure,” but the more common term is “loophole” — a special break from taxation to benefit a particular class of taxpayers.

Collectively, tax expenditures cost state and local governments around $60 billion a year, about three times as much as the state’s annual budget deficit. They have grown steadily over the years as advocates contend — often without objective evidence — that they will improve the state’s economy.

Also, there is a legal quirk: Punching a new loophole takes just a simple majority vote of the Legislature, but closing one is legally a tax increase and requires a two-thirds vote.

The software loophole is by no means the largest one. The real biggies — those over $1 billion — are mostly time-honored exemptions that enjoy broad support, such as the income tax deductions for home mortgage interest, gains on sale of personal residences, and employer-provided health benefits and pension contributions, or sales tax exemptions for food and drugs.

In fact, two-thirds of the tax expenditure revenue losses are in personal income tax provisions, most of which benefit individuals.

Corporate tax breaks are just 10 percent of personal income tax loopholes, with the credit for research and development expenses the largest at $1.3 billion.

As Gov.-elect Jerry Brown and the Legislature struggle with a seemingly perpetual, multibillion-dollar gap between income and outgo, closing tax loopholes should be on the table.

The Legislature’s budget analyst, Mac Taylor, said they “often have not been shown to be cost-effective” and closing them “raises revenues without having to increase marginal tax rates.” Logically, closing unjustified loopholes with narrow benefits would be the first step toward balancing the budget without reducing vital services or imposing broad new taxes.

However, when it comes to public finance, logic is usually the last consideration.

 

Dan Walters’ Sacramento Bee columns on state politics are syndicated by the Scripps Howard News Service.

CaliforniaCalifornia NewsOp Eds

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

A sign about proposed development of the bluff at Thornton State Beach in Daly City on Friday, Feb. 26, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Retreat center proposed at popular state beach

Daly City residents oppose construction on ocean bluffs

Rev. Roland Gordon shows “The Great Cloud of Witnesses” collage mural at the Ingleside Presbyterian Church, which he began building in 1980.<ins> (</ins>
Rev. Roland Gordon preaches love in action

Pastor promotes peace, hope through art and prayer

San Francisco’s Buster Posey was back at the plate after sitting out last season due to the risk of COVID-19. (David Maialetti/Tribune News Service)
Giants struggle against Angels in first game of Spring Training

By Nick Zeller-Singh Nearly 1,000 fans gathered into a breezy Scottsdale Stadium… Continue reading

Basketball (Shutterstock)
SI alum Begovich gets his moment, but Stanford falls on Senior Day

MAPLES PAVILION — Generally speaking, Stanford’s home finale on Saturday afternoon, a… Continue reading

U.S. Attorney David Anderson announces federal firearms charges against two men for their roles in a March 2019 shooting outside the Fillmore Heritage Center in a news conference alongside SFPD staff at the Phillip Burton Federal Building on Thursday, Jan. 9, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Departing U.S. attorney predicts corruption probe will continue

David Anderson shook up City Hall as top federal prosecutor

Most Read