Chinese President Xi Jinping, left, walks with French President Emmanuel Macron as they review the honour guard during a welcome ceremony on Jan. 9, 2018 at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China. (Ludovic Marin/Pool/Abaca Press/TNS)

Chinese President Xi Jinping, left, walks with French President Emmanuel Macron as they review the honour guard during a welcome ceremony on Jan. 9, 2018 at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China. (Ludovic Marin/Pool/Abaca Press/TNS)

China’s parliament drops term limit, allowing Xi to rule for life

BEIJING — President Xi Jinping can now rule China for as long as he’d like.

On Sunday afternoon, nearly 3,000 delegates at China’s ceremonial parliament cast ballots in Beijing’s Great Hall of the People to amend the nation’s constitution, allowing Xi to remain president well past 2023, when he was due to step down.

The amendment was widely expected — the parliament, called the National People’s Congress, hasn’t voted down a Communist party decision in its 64-year history. Yet it is a striking break from precedent. China added term limits to the constitution in 1982, after decades of Mao Zedong’s disastrous political campaigns showed the dangers of one-man rule.

Two delegates voted against the change, and three abstained, giving Xi 99.8 percent approval.

Xi would have likely been unhappy with much less, said Willy Lam, an expert on Chinese politics at the Chinese University of Hong Kong who has written a book about the Xi era.

“This constitutional revision came from him — it is fully his initiative, and it has been controversial within the party and among the people,” he said. “So he needs that extremely high approval reading to show that this is not a selfish initiative — this is not him wanting to become an emperor for life, but this is the will of the people.”

Xi holds three posts: general secretary of the Communist Party, chairman of the Central Military Commission, and president of the nation. The last is the least consequential, and the only one that carried term limits — China’s last two presidents, Hu Jintao and Jiang Zemin, each stepped down after two five-year terms. State media has cast the revision as a common-sense move to bring the presidency into line with the other two posts.

Yet Xi’s landslide vote belies a deep anxiety among Chinese intellectuals, students and former officials about the implications of his seemingly limitless power.

Li Rui, a 100-year-old former secretary to Mao, sees parallels between Xi and his former boss. “The Soviet Union collapsed, but China didn’t collapse, because China’s cultural traditions preserved the Communist Party,” Li told the Hong Kong-based newspaper Ming Pao. “A country like China produced people like Mao Zedong. Now it gives birth to a Xi Jinping.”

Chinese students abroad, in a rare show of dissent, have reportedly strewn flyers on campuses showing a photo of Xi superimposed with the words: “not my president.” Censors have rushed to block open discussion of the revisions on social media sites; on Sina Weibo, China’s version of Twitter, forbidden terms include “re-election,” “proclaiming oneself an emperor,” and “I don’t agree.” They have also banned images of Winnie the Pooh, a cartoon character that many Chinese internet users believe shares some of Xi’s features.

“My greatest feeling is confusion and worry,” said a graduate student studying social sciences in Beijing who requested anonymity to avoid official retaliation. The student questioned whether the revision implied “that there are no institutional barriers to the return of totalitarianism.”

Xi, 64, took the nation’s top post in 2012, and has since consolidated power with extraordinary speed and efficiency. He has punished millions of officials in a wide-ranging war on graft, eliminating rivals and shoring up public support; silenced or jailed scores of activists and intellectuals, effectively quashing dissent; and entrenched party control across all levels of the economy, society, and military. Some call him the “chairman of everything.”

The National People’s Congress meets annually, ostensibly to debate and discuss political decisions that will guide China for the coming year. Delegates come from all walks of life; they include low-ranking party secretaries and CEOs of powerful companies.

Other constitutional changes approved Sunday include the removal of term limits on the vice president, the establishment of a new national anti-corruption agency, and the inclusion of Xi’s political ideology, “Xi Jinping Thought,” in the constitution’s preamble.

China’s Politburo — its highest decision-making body — decided on the revisions at a meeting led by Xi in September, and decided to introduce them to the parliament in January. It kept the proposal secret until a state media announcement on Feb. 25.World

Just Posted

Dreamforce returned to San Francisco in person this week – but with a tiny sliver of past attendance. (Courtesy Salesforce)
Dreamforce returns with hundreds on hand, down from 170,000 in the past

High hopes for a larger Salesforce conference shriveled during the summer

The numbers show nearly 14 percent of San Francisco voters who participated in the Sept. 14 recall election wanted to oust Gov. Gavin Newsom from elected office. (Shutterstock photo)
(Shutterstock photo)
How San Francisco neighborhoods voted in the Newsom recall

Sunset tops the list as the area with the most ‘yes’ votes

Alison Collins says that she and other members of San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education facing potential recall “represent constituents that are often erased or talked over.” <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Alison Collins speaks: Embattled SF school board member confronts the recall effort

‘It’s important for folks to know what this recall is about. It’s bigger than any one of us.’

Is the Black Cat incident a distraction from the recovery of The City’s storied nightlife industry or does Mayor London Breed’s behavior inadvertently highlight the predicament the industry’s been in since San Francisco reinstated indoor mask requirements on Aug. 20?<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner, 2021)</ins>
Club owners to maskless mayor: Are we the new fun police?

Black Cat affair highlights difficult recovery for nightlife industry

BART’s Powell Street station in The City was the site of a fatal accident on Sept. 13.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Powell Station death serves as a grim reminder. BART doors don’t stop for anyone

What you need to know about safety sensors on the trains

Most Read