California Senate votes to end loophole in old rape law

The state Senate unanimously approved a bill on Thursday that would close a loophole in California law that resulted in a rape conviction being overturned because the woman was not married.

The 2nd District Court of Appeal in January reversed the conviction of Julio Morales for impersonating the boyfriend of the woman.

The court ruled that a state law dating to the 1870s specifies that assailants are guilty in such cases only if a woman is married and the perpetrator is pretending to be the spouse.

Defense attorneys said Morales thought the sex was consensual because the woman didn't object to his advances until she saw him in daylight.

AB65 would amend the state's rape definition so victims “will never again be denied justice,” said Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson, D-Santa Barbara, who carried the bill in the Senate.

“This bill would close an archaic loophole in current law,” she said.

The Senate approved the bill 38-0, sending it back to the Assembly for a final vote.

The Assembly could take final action as early as Monday to send the measure to Gov. Jerry Brown for his signature, said an aide to Assemblyman Katcho Achadjian, R-San Luis Obispo, who introduced the bill.

A similar bill, SB59, by Sen. Noreen Evans, D-Santa Rosa, passed the Senate in April and also is awaiting a vote in the Assembly.

A previous bill by Achadjian that would have closed the loophole even before the appeals court decision was stalled in a Senate committee in 2011 because lawmakers feared it would add to crowding in state prisons.

That earlier bill was prompted after Santa Barbara County prosecutors said they couldn't file a rape charge against a man who broke into a woman's home while she was sleeping. The woman consented to sex because she thought the assailant was her live-in boyfriend.

She began resisting and he fled once she realized he was a stranger.

bill 38-0CaliforniaCalifornia NewsCalifornia SenateRape

Just Posted

Badly needed rain cooled off pedestrians on Market Street in The City on Wednesday. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
Storm door opens in San Francisco — what will the rains bring?

‘Come Monday, fire season in Northern California should be done’

Newly appointed City Attorney David Chiu will play a key role in an upcoming legal battle between gig economy companies and The City. (Sheila Fitzgerald/Shutterstock)
City Attorney David Chiu faces immediate test in major gig economy lawsuit

DoorDash and Grubhub are suing San Francisco over price controls

FILE — In-N-Out Burger, the popular California fast-food chain, is resisting San Francisco's public health rules that require indoor diners to show proof of vaccination. (J. Emilio Flores/The New York Times)
When it comes to San Francisco vaccine rules, In-N-Out should heed Biblical advice

Burger chain’s vaccine fight distracts from its tasty burgers and French fries controversy

The Walgreens at 4645 Mission St. in The City is among those slated to close. <ins>(Courtesy photo)</ins>
Walgreens says it’s closing five SF stores due to crime. Where’s the data?

Walgreens should be transparent, enlighten city leaders about crime’s effect on business

Lake Hennessey, a reservoir for Napa, looked dry in June. Gov. Gavin Newsom on Tuesday issued a proclamation extending the drought emergency statewide and asked residents to redouble water conservation efforts. <ins>(Mike Kai Chen/New York Times)</ins>
Newsom declares drought emergency across California

State closed out its second-driest water year on record

Most Read