Bush critics use pretzel logic in debate over phone records

The National Security Agency has been examining a couple of trillion phone call records in what seems a perfectly legal, constitutionally allowable program that invades no one’s privacy and could save your life, so here’s what we should do: Impeach President Bush.

After all, the program could be abused. Yes, it’s true that no one is listening into phone calls. No one will learn that John Doe is having an affair with Mary Smith. But someone could someday, right? There could be abuse.

OK, I concede that virtually every program in government could also be abused. The Internal Revenue Service has intimate details on American families that this program will never come close to having, and that information could be abused. Even the U.S. military could be abused. Why, someday, the generals might march their troops over to the Capitol and arrest every member of Congress in sight.

So I have to admit that the potential for abuse and actual abuse are two very different things, on the order of night and day. Logic tells us that much. But let’s not get too logical when there’s a chance to bash Bush and his administration.

And if there is abuse, why, that could be illegal — that could be unconstitutional. Then we would really have a case against Bush, wouldn’t we? Most experts quoted in newspapers say the program is probably legal, based on what is now known. But maybe, just maybe, we will learn more, and maybe it will be awful, and then we will have this guy Bush dead to rights, and anyway, why wait for evidence? Let’s just assume the worst.

We can strengthen the case for impeachment by saying what a lot of people with no background in intelligence-gathering are saying — that the program will achieve nothing beneficial for the nation. And isn’t there at least some small chance they know far more than those who have spent their lives in the field and have been running the program?

I know the other side of it, namely that this program is helping to protect us against terrorist attacks. We all know Islamic extremists want to kill big bunches of us, and it seems evident that this program could show how an overseas al-Qaida member is making calls to phone line B, which also contacts C and D, who seem to be contacted by everyone the al-Qaida member calls. Investigating computer-disclosed patterns could lead to the prevention of some future 9/11. But we don’t know that for sure, and in the meantime, there’s an administration to kick.

Oh, and while we are spitting in Bush’s face, let’s have a round of applause for USA Today and wish it well when the next Pulitzer Prizes are awarded. Thanks to its story, this program is no longer secret. That fact may render the program wholly ineffective, making the nonexperts right as Americans get murdered. But USA Today gets slaps on the back, even if the people providing the information were breaking the law.

Darn, I hate it when this happens, but I just changed my mind. I don’t think we should impeach or even criticize Bush for this program. I think we should instead criticize the critics whose arguments don’t hold up except as demonstrations of political grandstanding in some cases, paranoia in others and pure hogwash in all of them.

OpinionUS

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

BART Ambassadors are being called on to assist riders in social situations that don’t require police force. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Unarmed BART ambassadors program formalized with a focus on community service

Public safety and police reform are key elements in campaigns of Board members Dufty and Simon

On Oct. 13, people lined up to vote early for the presidential election in Southlake, Texas. <ins>(Shutterstock)</ins>
<ins></ins>
Five things to watch for in the run-up to Nov. 3

Down-ballot races, as much as the presidency, will determine the future course of this nation

WeChat (Shutterstock)
U.S. District Court denies Trump request to shutdown WeChat app

A federal judge in San Francisco denied a request by the U.S.… Continue reading

School board members Gabriela Lopez (left) and Alison Collins (right) say they have been the subject of frequent hateful, racist and sexist attacks during their time on the school board. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F Examiner)
Angered by Lowell decision, SFUSD grad targets school board members with violent imagery

Facebook page depicts two women of color on board with swastikas and x-marks on their faces

Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer, a former school board member, said it was ‘ridiculous’ that the school district did not yet have a plan to reopen. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Supervisors demand SFUSD set a timeline for reopening

Pressure grows on district to resume in-person learning as The City’s COVID-19 case count goes down

Most Read