Accused of sexual harassment, these California lawmakers may not be able to use campaign funds to defend themselves

Four state lawmakers who face sexual harassment allegations have $2 million in surplus campaign funds, but experts believe they might not be able to tap the money to defend themselves against ongoing investigations.

State law allows elected officials to accept political contributions into legal defense funds to defray the cost of defending themselves against criminal, civil or administrative probes involving their actions as public officials.

The Legislature has hired outside attorneys to investigate claims of sexual misconduct against Assemblyman Matt Dababneh, Sen. Tony Mendoza and recently resigned Assemblymember Raul Bocanegra. There also is an inquiry into allegations from a former lawmaker of unwanted hugging from Sen. Bob Hertzberg. None of them has yet filed papers to create a legal defense fund.

Political attorneys and observers say there are doubts about whether the men can create legal defense funds given that some of the allegations involve actions taken in nightclubs, hotels and other places away from their official offices.

Legal defense funds are allowed by state law because “legislators have legal risks,” which include lawsuits and investigations involving their official actions, according to Chapman University law professor Ronald D. Rotunda, a former member of the state Fair Political Practices Commission.

Currently, 24 state and local politicians in California have active legal defense funds for which they can solicit unlimited political contributions from supporters. Experts say the law is subject enough to interpretation that it may take a court decision or a clarifying opinion by the FPPC on a specific case should any of the politicians under investigation opt to create one.

Former staff members to Mendoza have alleged he treated female aides inappropriately, inviting them to a hotel stay and asking one to visit his home to work on her resume. Mendoza has $567,000 in surplus campaign funds.

Dababneh, who has $1.1 million in his campaign accounts, announced he plans to resign at the end of December as he faces an investigation by the Legislature into allegations that he masturbated in front of a lobbyist in a bathroom at a 2016 party at a Las Vegas hotel.

Bocanegra resigned last month after multiple women accused him of making unwanted sexual advances that included groping legislative staffers at a Sacramento bar. He has $293,000 in surplus campaign funds.

Hertzberg, who has $290,000 in surplus campaign funds, faces a complaint from former Assemblymember Linda Halderman that she was uncomfortable with his repeated hugs after she asked him not to touch her.

All four men have denied wrongdoing.

The FPPC declined to comment on specific cases, pointing instead to state law. It says legal defense funds can be raised and spent only on defending against investigations and legal challenges “arising directly out of the conduct of an election campaign, the electoral process, or the performance of the officer’s governmental activities and duties.”

Money from the legal defense funds may be spent on attorneys’ fees and “other legal costs related to the defense,” including court filing fees, travel for attorneys to meet with investigators and payment of fines, except for allegations involving personal benefit of campaign funds.

When state Sen. Ron Calderon was indicted in 2014 on charges of using his official position to promise legislative action in exchange for bribes, he was able to tap political contributions raised in a legal defense fund to help pay for high-profile attorney Mark Geragos.

It is unclear whether the others might consider using legal defense funds. Bocanegra and Dababneh did not return calls seeking a comment.

“Not knowing the scope of the investigation, we’re unable to comment on how the Senator plans to defend himself,” Hertzberg spokesperson Katie Hanzlik said.

Private attorneys including former FPPC general counsel Bob Stern say Mendoza may have the best case to do so because the accusations involve female staff members in his office.

Republican political attorney Thomas Hiltachk has doubts about whether any of the legislators can use legal defense funds. “I don’t think sexual harassment ever arises out of either one’s status as a candidate or officeholder,” he said.

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

A San Francisco Unified School District program that gave would-be teachers extra training in the classroom has lost a key partner. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/2019 S.F. Examiner)</ins>
USF ends partnership with SFUSD in teacher residency program

District launched training effort to improve low retention rates for new hires

The Rev. Norman Fong of the Chinatown Community Development Center joined San Francisco city leaders and community partners in a “Campaign for Solidarity” at Civic Center Plaza on Saturday, Apr 17, 2021. (CraigLee/Special to the S.F. Examiner)
City launches ‘Campaign for Solidarity’ to combat racial violence

Mayor London Breed, the city’s Human Rights Commission and community leaders launched… Continue reading

It’s time to break the code of silence and end the stigmatism against infertility, which is fairly common. <ins>(Shuttterstock)</ins>
Struggles with infertility are common

We all can support friends, ask legislators to mandate sppropriate insurance

Former Stockton Mayor Michael Tubbs spoke to San Francisco’s new Guaranteed Income Advisory Group on April 16. (Courtesy SFGOV)
City launches task force to explore Universal Basic Income programs

San Francisco on Friday launched a guaranteed income task force that could… Continue reading

Muni’s K-Ingleside line will return six months earlier than previously announced. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
K-Ingleside train to return on May 15

Announcement comes on the heels of pressure from Supervisor Myrna Melgar

Most Read