Many employees in the tech industry have stepped forward as whistleblowers because their companies defrauded federal agencies. (Courtesy photo)

Many employees in the tech industry have stepped forward as whistleblowers because their companies defrauded federal agencies. (Courtesy photo)

Whistleblowers provide an invaluable service

This week’s question comes from Amit in San Francisco, who writes:

Q: “Chris, I work for a tech firm that sells products to a federal agency under a contract requiring a 5 to 20 percent discount — depending on the product sold — off of the price the company charges private businesses for the same products. My company discounts its list prices if that is what it takes to make the sale to other businesses. This happens all the time, but the discount we give the government is based solely on our list prices. This bothers me. What can I do about this?”

A: Amit, you are not alone. Over the past few years, many employees in the tech industry nationwide have stepped forward as whistleblowers because their companies defrauded federal agencies. Promising a federal agency a price discount compared to what private businesses are charged and then not providing the discount when charging for the item violates the False Claims Act.

The False Claims Act permits lawsuits against government contractors if they knowingly present a “false or fraudulent claim for payment.” Individuals who uncover fraud in government contracts and programs can “blow the whistle” on the company by filing a lawsuit seeking recovery on the government’s behalf.

While current or former employees often serve as whistleblowers, any person or entity that has evidence of a fraud occurring against the government may act as a whistleblower.

Violations of the False Claims Act can result in judgment in an amount equal to three times the amount of losses the government sustained, plus civil fines. As an incentive for stepping forward, the law allows whistleblowers to retain a percentage (usually 15 to 30 percent) of the damages awarded to the government.

Enacted in 1863, the False Claims Act “was originally aimed principally at stopping the massive frauds perpetrated by large contractors during the Civil War.” (United States v. Bornstein, 1976.)

At Congressional hearings, witnesses “painted a sordid picture of how the United States had been billed for nonexistent or worthless goods, charged exorbitant prices for goods delivered, and generally robbed in purchasing the necessities of war.” (United States v. McNinch, 1958.) Note, California has its own False Claims Act to stop fraud against state agencies.

So, what happens if — in the situation you describe, Amit — nothing was wrong with the products sold the government? That does not get the contractor off the hook.

As the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held last month in the Escobar case (Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Escobar), a claim can be fraudulent not only if it clearly states something that is false, but also because it omits something important. The falsehood must be so serious that the government would have withheld payment.

The deliberate failure to include the discount in the invoices charged the federal agency gravely undermines the entire contractual relationship between the agency and your firm, Amit. The agency would never had paid the invoice in full if it knew the prices stated for the itemized products did not incorporate the agreed upon discount.

Amit, I recognize the decision to report fraudulent activity by an employer is a difficult one. Whistleblowers provide an invaluable service to all Americans. They expose and end corporate wrongdoing that defrauds governmental agencies — and ultimately us, the taxpayers — of billions of dollars of revenue each year. Common types of whistlebower claims include:

• Fraudulent health care billing of Medicare or MediCal

• Military or defense contractor fraud

• Public works and construction contract fraud

• Mortgage/loan fraud against Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac

• Tax fraud

Even though the False Claims Act expressly forbids retaliation by employers, this is an obvious concern whistleblowers share. As a whistleblower, you are protected if you are the first to report new and unique information about fraudulent claims against the government. These claims must be presented in a specialized process, under seal, with copies sent to the U.S. Attorney.

Whistleblower law is complex, so it is important to work with an experienced attorney who handles False Claim Act cases to protect your interests.

Christopher B. Dolan is owner of the Dolan Law Firm. Email questions to help@dolanlawfirm.com.
Chris DolanFalse Claims ActfraudlawlegalSan FranciscoWhistleblower

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

San Francisco plans to reopen the Upper Great Highway, which had been closed for recreational use during the COVID pandemic. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
San Francisco plans to reopen the Upper Great Highway, which had been closed for recreational use during the COVID pandemic. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
San Francisco plans to reopen the Upper Great Highway, which had been closed for recreational use during the COVID pandemic. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Great Highway to reopen on weekdays, sparking renewed debate

The Upper Great Highway soon will reopen to vehicles for the first… Continue reading

Second grader Genesis Ulloa leads students in an after-school community hub in a game at the Mission YMCA on Friday, May 7, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SF parents face school year with hope, trepidation and concern

‘Honestly, I don’t know how I’m going to deal with it’

A fire lookout with the U.S. Forest Service feeds a chipmunk in the Tahoe National Forest. California officials closed some popular trails and nature areas in South Lake Tahoe for the week after a dead chipmunk tested positive for the plague. (Jim Wilson/The New York Times)
Yes, Lake Tahoe chipmunks have the plague. But don’t worry (too much)

By Johnny Diaz New York Times When California officials closed parts of… Continue reading

After nearly 15 years of being part of Google, the most successful money machine in internet history, it’s still not clear that YouTube has fulfilled its financial potential both for itself and everyone involved in its vast digital economy. (Dani Choi/The New York Times)
Is YouTube a success? It’s a serious question

By Shira Ovide New York Times This question will sound ridiculous, but… Continue reading

Most Read