Early voters cast their ballots at City Hall in San Francisco on Nov. 1, 2016. (Dan Chambers/Special to S.F. Examiner)

Early voters cast their ballots at City Hall in San Francisco on Nov. 1, 2016. (Dan Chambers/Special to S.F. Examiner)

Employers required to provide time off to vote

This week, I will address a few questions that I have received by email or have been posted on the Dolan Law Firm’s Facebook page, and tell you about a scholarship program we have launched.

With the presidential and statewide election next Tuesday, I have been asked how California’s “Time Off To Vote” law works.

California Elections Code Section 1400 mandates that an employer must provide an employee time off to vote if the employee does not have sufficient time outside of working hours to vote. The intent of the law is to provide an opportunity to vote to workers who would not be able to because of work.

An employee can be given as much time as he or she needs in order to vote, but the employer is obligated to pay only a maximum of two hours of wages. Importantly, you may not automatically take the time off to vote and expect to be paid. You must first notify your employer at least two working days prior to the election of your need for time off to vote. Furthermore, the employer is allowed to require that the time to taken off occur at the beginning or end of your shift.

Don’t delay in submitting your request if you need time off. Also, keep in mind that it is a lengthy ballot in San Francisco this year, which will likely lead to long lines at polling locations during peak voting hours. Make sure you allocate enough time to vote.

A reader recently asked me about the legality of her employer paying her less than a male employee with the same duties and educational background as her. In my column two weeks ago, I explained that on Jan. 1, 2016, the California Fair Pay Act went into effect and significantly expanded the California Equal Pay Act, the state’s law against gender pay inequality. Under the law, employers must pay men and women equally for performing “substantially similar” work under similar working conditions.

I recieved a follow up question, asking if the law prohibits pay inequality among employees of different races or ethnicities. The answer is yes.

On Sept. 30, 2016, Gov. Jerry Brown signed Senate Bill 1063 into law. The legislation amended the Equal Pay Act to prohibit employers from paying employees a wage rate less than the rate paid to employees of a different race or ethnicity for substantially similar work. Exceptions for pay differentials are permitted. However, the employer must prove the different wage is due specific factors not based or linked to race or ethnicity and consistent with an overriding legitimate business purpose.

Another reader asked if employers may discourage employees from sharing their salary information. This is widespread in the workplace and illegal. California Labor Code Section 232 prohibits an employer from requiring an employee to refrain from disclosing the amount of his or her wages or discharging, formally disciplining or otherwise discriminating against an employee who discloses the amount of his or her wages.

I also wish to announce that we have created the Dolan Law Firm Justice Empowerment Scholarship for college students with passion for justice. One $2,500 scholarship will be given to a current U.S. college student. Applicants are required to create a short video on the topic of justice and post the video on YouTube by Jan. 6, 2017.

Through the Justice Empowerment Scholarship, we want to encourage students to advance the cause of social justice. We also hope that the videos applicants submit will inspire other young persons across America to strive for social justice in their communities. For details on how to apply for the scholarship, visit www.dolanlawfirm.com/about-us/scholarship.

Finally, thank you San Francisco Examiner’s readers for honoring my law firm with the 2016 Examiner Readers’ Choice Best Law Firm award. At the Dolan Law Firm, our job is stand up for those who otherwise would have no access to the courthouse. We take great pride in obtaining justice for our clients and holding the powerful accountable. I am extremely grateful to all persons that voted for my firm.

Christopher B. Dolan is owner of the Dolan Law Firm. Email questions to help@dolanlawfirm.com.

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Jill Bonny, owner of Studio Kazoku tattoo parlor in the Haight, tattoos client Lam Vo on Friday, March 5, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
No one was fighting for tattoo artists, so they started advocating for themselves

Jill Bonny has been tattooing in the Bay Area since 2000. Four… Continue reading

The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted changes to The City's streets including Slow Streets closures to increase open space access and the Shared Spaces program, which allows businesses to use public right-of-ways for dining, retail and services. (Examiner illustration)
COVID is reshaping the streets of San Francisco

Walk down Page Street, which is closed to thru-traffic, and you might… Continue reading

At a rally in February, Monthanus Ratanapakdee, left, and Eric Lawson remember Vicha Ratanapakdee, an 84-year-old Thai man who died after he was pushed to the pavement in San Francisco. (Ekevara Kitpowsong/Examiner file photo)
The criminal justice system can’t fix what’s wrong in our community

My 87-year-old mother walks gingerly, slowly, deliberately, one step in front of… Continue reading

Superintendent Vincent Matthews said some students and families who want to return will not be able to do so at this time. “We truly wish we could reopen schools for everyone,” he said. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SFUSD sets April reopening date after reaching tentative agreement with teachers union

San Francisco Unified School District has set April 12 as its reopening… Continue reading

José Victor Luna and Maria Anabella Ochoa, who cite health reasons for continuing distance learning, say they have been enjoying walking in Golden Gate Park with their daughters Jazmin, a first grader, and Jessica, a third grader. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Some SFUSD families prefer distance learning

Health issues, classroom uncertainties among reasons for staying home

Most Read