The future of treating biceps tendons will rely on doctors identifying new, creative ways to stimulate the tendons without major attachments of muscle. (Courtesy photo)

The future of treating biceps tendons will rely on doctors identifying new, creative ways to stimulate the tendons without major attachments of muscle. (Courtesy photo)

Biceps tendon: A mistreated, misunderstood friend

The biceps tendon is not having a good era. It is frequently implicated in shoulder pain, injected with steroids, cut out at surgery or severed and reattached — all in the belief that it is the primary generator of shoulder pain in active people. As with the meniscus tissue of olden days, top surgeons around the world believe that removing the tendon is the best way to affect a cure. How old-fashioned and unfortunate does that sound?
The biceps is the “Popeye” muscle of the arm. It not only flexes the arm, but stabilizes the shoulder by exerting downward pressure on the humeral head. The biceps is attached by a strong tendon inside the shoulder, just underneath the four tendons that make up the rotator cuff. It is this tendon that can become inflamed or partially torn when the arm is overused, or when the rotator cuff is impinged from bony spurs or the swollen inflammation of bursitis.

Athletes and others who use their arm in overhead activities often irritate the tendon and present to their doctor with shoulder pain.
Traditional treatments of shoulder pain from inflammation have been rest, ice, physical therapy and cortisone injections. Unfortunately, cortisone weakens all of the tissues of the shoulder while shutting down the inflammatory process. When these non-operative methods fail, or if there is an associated tear of the rotator cuff, surgery is often deployed. The inflamed biceps tendon is removed from the shoulder by cutting it free or cutting and then re-anchoring it away from the rotator cuff.

The thinking behind this is that the inflamed tendon is a pain generator, and its role in shoulder function is not very important. This logic sounds uncomfortably similar to the reasoning once used to justify excising the meniscus cartilage when torn — a procedure we now know leads to arthritis in the knee joint. While tendon amputation may not lead to arthritis, the function of the shoulder cannot be normal without all of its key structures.

The obvious question asked by my insightful patients is: “Why can’t you doctors figure out a way to heal the inflamed or frayed tendon? It has been there for millions of years, and just because you don’t understand its full role doesn’t mean you should amputate it! Figure out how to repair it!”
The future, clearly, is not in the removal of major attachments of muscles. It will lie in novel ways of stimulating the healing of injured tendons, such as the biceps. These advances are on the way. They include the integration of new matrices, such as collagen sheets, pre-loaded with the patient’s stem cells and growth factors and surgically wrapped around the injured tendons or injected into their sheaths. Another novel approach is to provide a self-assembling, injectable collagen material, which is then melded with UV light stimulation. A third approach will use a resorbable artificial material that will stimulate tendon regeneration.

Stay tuned for the new era of anabolic tissue healing — brought to you by biologists, chemists and tissue engineers — in the hopes of ending the primitive amputation of temporarily damaged joint structures.

Dr. Kevin R. Stone is an orthopedic surgeon at The Stone Clinic and chairman of the Stone Research Foundation in San Francisco. He pioneers advanced orthopedic surgical and rehabilitation techniques to repair, regenerate and replace damaged cartilage and ligaments.

bicepsdr stonefeatureKevin R. Stonemedicaltendon

Just Posted

The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
Whistleblowing hasn’t worked at the SF Dept. of Building Inspection

DBI inspectors say their boss kept them off connected builders’ projects

A felled tree in Sydney G. Walton Square blocks part of a lane on Front Street following Sunday’s storm on Monday, Oct. 25, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
After the rain: What San Francisco learned from a monster storm

Widespread damage underscored The City’s susceptibility to heavy wind and rain

Plan Bay Area 2050 is an expansive plan guiding the region’s growth and development over the next three decades. The regional plan addresses progressive policy priorities like a universal basic income and a region-wide rent cap, alongside massive new spending on affordable housing and transportation infrastructure. (Shutterstock)
$1.4 trillion ‘blueprint’ would address Bay Area’s housing, transit woes

Analyzing the big ticket proposals in ‘Plan Bay Area 2050’

Educators have found high-tech solutions to teaching during the pandemic. (Jeshu John/EdSource)
Can you teach reading on Zoom? ‘We do the best that we can’

By Karen D’Souza EdSource After spending years in the classroom, Jessica Reid… Continue reading

A felled tree in San Francisco is pictured on Fillmore Street following a major storm that produced high winds and heavy rains on Oct. 24, 2021. (Photo courtesy of Philip Ford)
Storm updates: Rainiest October day in San Francisco history

Rainfall exceeded 10 inches in parts of the Bay Area

Most Read