web analytics

Survey shows many SF cops unhappy with use of force reforms pushed by Chief Suhr

Trending Articles

       
S.F. Examiner file photo

At least half of San Francisco’s police officers don’t support the use of force reforms proposed by The City’s Police Commission, according to a recent survey conducted by the officers’ union.

In fact, the survey indicates officers — who must eventually buy into to the new rules for them to work — already use “de-escalation techniques” that are being pushed by reformers. Use of force can be anything from an officer scuffling with a suspect to the officer pulling out and firing their gun.

The survey, released in this month’s issue of the San Francisco Police Officers Association Journal, queried nearly 1,000 of The City’s 2,200 officers on a variety of issues around use of force and may indicate more widespread discontent around the matter.

“It will get us hurt, killed and sued,” said one respondent about the proposed policies.

The issue has taken center stage since Mayor Ed Lee called on the Police Commission and department to craft new policies that emphasize de-escalation techniques and keeping suspects alive following the killing of Mario Woods last December by police.

Use of force and reform proposals have been met with a mixed reaction from officers and their union. While the union has said it supports some of the reforms — it sits on the working group crafting the new policy — it has also said publically that it feels left out of the larger process of reforms being pushed by Lee and Chief Greg Suhr.

As recently as March 2, the union held an emergency meeting that mostly addressed rumblings of discontent in the ranks and a possible vote of no confidence in the chief, according to the journal.

One survey respondent seemed to encapsulate rank and file issues with Suhr’s support for the reforms: “The chief should be ashamed of himself for trying to pass this policy.”

Another respondent said: “The command staff needs to remember where they came from and stop being puppets.”

Such grumblings appear to have been addressed by POA President Martin Halloran, who told the March 2 gathering “that while the POA has had disagreements with the chief, he has been very good in other areas. The POA executive board would oppose such a vote.”

But the survey paints a clearer picture of the discontent among police.

Overall, respondents were overwhelming displeased with the proposed changes to use of force rules. Nearly all — 87 percent — “strongly disagree” with the proposed use of force rules being written up by the Police Commission and 67 percent “strongly disagree” with the proposed rules around reporting use of force incidents.

The intended result of the new rules is fewer deaths at the hands of police. That means training officers to using distance and time as tools to decrease tense situations.

The proposals also includes new requirements around proportional reaction, requiring officers to use differing levels of force depending on the crime and incident. More concretely, it prohibits shooting at cars, and expands when officers report use of force incidents.

Despite opposition, the Police Commission President Suzy Loftus said the rules have one main goal: to limiting the use of lethal force.

Not surprisingly, most offices surveyed support the current rules around use of force.

Fifty percent were “very satisfied” with the current use of force rules and 38 percent said they were “somewhat satisfied.”

Nearly 20 percent said they have been involved in a use of force incident within the past month to six months, and 50 percent said they have successfully used de-escalation techniques in the past month.

Union members were were told March 2 by union leaders that the final reforms adopted by the Police Commission can only be implemented after a meet-and-confer process with the union.

Untitled-1

Read more criminal justice news on the Crime Ink page in print. Follow us on Twitter: @sfcrimeink

Click here or scroll down to comment

  • john doe

    Those same use of force rules have been in place in most cities in the Midwest and the east cost for years. Tac Tac-2 shots trained to shot BEFORE thinking if the officers life or a bystanders is in mortal danger I am sorry and surprised a private donor had to pay for automatic service weapons years ago when the whole department had revolvers. That was a very real safety issue for uniformed officers. I trust plain clothes officers had automatic weapons. You need tasers as well. I a sorry for the dept and Chief that the commission does not see the reality. Your dept recently sent officers to training to process a stolen car for finger prints. For years it seems patrol was not trained in lifting prints. I hope this has changed.
    The crime lab had another issue that made the news. I understand the crime lab was under the jurisdiction of the state. Maybe they need to be under state review again. I don’t believe the use of force policy will get any officer killed. I don’t believe the public would agree as well.

  • crabbyolddad

    Aw gee, the fuzz are freaking over rules! WOW! Cops that have to follow the law just like they expect the rest of us to! That ain’t fair yer honor!

  • Gropple

    If you don’t like it, leave the force, but the truth is that the SF police have been pretty shitty when it comes to use of force recently.

  • Allen Jones

    “It will get us hurt, killed and sued.” God forbid that SFPD should empathize.

  • john doe

    Its not just a rule. It is a policy mandated by the commission. The FBI is investigating SFPD for corruption. When they violate this “general order” it makes it much easier to fire them and black list them from employment elsewhere. It makes it much easier for successfully larger civil suits to be awarded. In the academy learned skills like duck and cover and cover and concealment along with a body vest and doubling up on shifts helps. What really helps is community policing which I see SFPD is still fighting. Mission Station is the training station where cadets are paired with an experienced officer for a time but the academy classes are not graduating enough officers for a city its size.
    No tasers yet, patrol officers are typically not certified in processing prints. The crime lab has a 10 yr back log on rape tests, lab techs steal and use drugs and lost their state credential so now evidence is shipped out for processing and the homicide solving rate remains terribly low. SFPD is recruiting but I cant imagine their getting many lateral transfers. They could not pay me enough to put back on the uniform and go good guys vs. bad guys with all the corruption and ineptness. The March down Bryant St of the previous chief with his brass and supporters to his hearing was over the top even for San Francisco.

    Faheta Gate was another one. So was the SFPD officer stopped in his own POV on Sloat for driving the wrong way. The FST and he was charged with DUI. What ever happened to the uniformed officer with the bird on his shoulder while on duty.

    If your considering your dream job of becoming a SFPF Officer remember they are under their mandate of officers and that back up can mean life or death. I would suggest even Daly City or San Jose. Even a sheriff’s office in another jurisdiction would be better until SFPD and SFSO clean up their act.