CA Supreme Court: SF can seek discipline against cops in racist text scandal

San Francisco can officially begin disciplinary proceedings against officers caught sending racist and homophobic text messages after a California Supreme Court ruling on Wednesday in the scandal.

The Supreme Court upheld a May appellate court decision that found former police Chief Greg Suhr had appropriately waited until after the federal trial of a sergeant to seek discipline against the nine officers who sent the text messages.

The messages were discovered in an FBI investigation into San Francisco police misconduct that netted convictions against three officers at Mission Police Station including former Sgt. Ian Furminger. Sent between 2011 and 2012, the messages disparaged black people and included jokes about burning crosses.

An excerpt of the racist text messages filed in federal court (S.F. Examiner file photo)

Officer Rain Daugherty sued The City on behalf of himself and eight other cops after Suhr filed disciplinary charges against them in 2015, arguing that the chief had waited too long from the time police learned of the text messages to seek punishment. The City Attorney’s Office argued that Suhr could not have filed the charges earlier without jeopardizing the criminal case.

“Officers accused of misconduct don’t get a free pass just because their texts came to light during a corruption investigation,” City Attorney Dennis Herrera said in a statement. “That is not what the law says, and it would make no sense. Now these officers can answer to the Police Commission.”

The City initially lost the case when a San Francisco Superior Court judge ruled against the chief in December 2015, but the California Court of Appeal for the First District in San Francisco overturned the decision in May. The Supreme Court declined to review that decision Wednesday.

SEE RELATED: Racist text scandal: Appeals court finds SF can pursue discipline against officers

“The court made the right decision,” Herrera said. “Police should not have to compromise a criminal case in order to discipline officers accused of appalling behavior, like these text messages revealing prejudice against the very communities our officers are sworn to protect. Both the California Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal recognized what the law says: SFPD can and should investigate and prosecute corrupt officers before moving on to police misconduct revealed during the investigation.”

Alison Berry Wilkinson, the lead attorney for the officers, could not immediately be reached for comment.

The disciplinary hearings will be held in closed session at the Police Commission, where the officers will still have a chance to contest the allegations and punishment.

Michael Barba
Published by
Michael Barba

Recent Posts

1-alarm blaze contained at Mission District residential building

A fire broke out at a four-story residential building in the Mission District on Sunday morning, according to fire officials.…

2 hours ago

SF begins first step in official audit of November election

San Francisco's elections department on Saturday randomly chose 1 percent of the precincts used in the Nov. 6 election to…

4 hours ago

SF Preps Football: St. Ignatius ousted in regional quarterfinal by Sacred Heart Prep

GILROY — As was often the case throughout a season filled with tough opponents, the St. Ignatius Wildcats ran into…

12 hours ago

Badasses’ and basketball players have brought good news in tumultuous year for women

This has been a tumultuous year for women. The Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh hearings and the #MeToo movement highlighted…

13 hours ago

SF Preps Football: Sacred Heart Cathedral shuts out one of NorCal’s most productive offenses in first round of playoffs

MORGAN HILL — Exactly a year before Sacred Heart Cathedral's first-round playoff game against Live Oak on Saturday, the Acorns…

13 hours ago

Goodbye Stem Cells?

The stem cell tsunami overwhelming all of medicine is evolving. Where once it was thought that these cells could morph…

13 hours ago