Categories: Editorials Opinion

Support both Prop. 30 and Prop. 38 for education

Voters in California are being asked to consider two competing tax measures on the November ballot, propositions 30 and 38. If both are approved, the one with the higher percentage of votes will prevail.

But to avoid confusion, the best strategy is to vote yes on both measures.

The propositions, if approved, would send more money to public education in the state.

Prop. 30, which has the backing of Gov. Jerry Brown, gives money to education and public safety. To do so, the measure would increase for seven years the income tax on people whose income exceeds $250,000. It also would hike the California sales tax by one-quarter of 1 percent for the same time period.

Prop. 38, backed by millionaire Molly Munger, would steer slightly more funds to education. But in exchange, more Californians would have to start paying more income taxes.

The big difference between these two tax measures is what will happen if they don’t pass. If Prop. 38 fails, California education simply will not receive any additional funding beyond what is currently budgeted.

But the failure of Prop. 30 would trigger immediate cuts of nearly $6 billion from the state budget. The San Francisco Unified School District stands to lose nearly $24 million if the proposition fails. City College of San Francisco could lose $10 million. The California State University system might watch $250 million evaporate.

Critics of Brown’s proposal say the governor is extorting voters into approving taxes under the threat of drastic cuts. But education funding in the state has been cut to the point that these new funds are needed. And the governor recently convinced legislators to take a first step toward reforming public employee pensions in
California.

The San Francisco Examiner would prefer that Prop. 30 triumph at the polls, since it would place a greater share of the new tax burden upon the state’s very wealthiest individuals. But should voters not approve the Brown proposal, Prop. 38 needs to be approved as a safety net since it will provide key funding for schools, but not as equitably as Prop. 30 would do. Education is an investment in the future, and these propositions, albeit neither one perfect, are the way to do it.

SF Examiner
Share
Published by
SF Examiner

Recent Posts

Vital healthcare funds extended for Marriott workers on picket line, boosting strike

Striking Marriott workers just got renewed wind behind their efforts: Their healthcare was extended until the end of January. Previously,…

22 mins ago

SF City Attorney questions legality of Trump’s pick to replace Sessions

City Attorney Dennis Herrera, who is representing San Francisco in four lawsuits against the federal justice department, criticized President Donald…

1 hour ago

SF mayor lends support to striking Marriott workers at rally

On day 40 of the Marriott hotel workers strike, San Francisco Mayor London Breed lent her support to UNITE HERE…

1 hour ago

Bank robber linked to cold case homicides booked into SF jail on suspicion of murder

A convicted bank robber who San Francisco police identified earlier this year as the suspect in two nearly 20-year-old cold…

3 hours ago

What it means to be a veteran on Veterans Day

Several years ago, I wrote an article on the meaning of Memorial Day for the San Francisco Examiner. You see,…

4 hours ago

SF firefighters extinguish 1-alarm blaze at building near Interstate 280

A one-alarm fire broke out early Monday morning at a commercial structure in the area below U.S. Interstate 280 in…

4 hours ago