web analytics

Blue Ribbon Panel: SFPD culture a bar to reforms

Trending Articles

Executive director Anand Subramanian speaks as panel members (front, from left) Judge Cruz Reynoso, Judge Dickran M. Tevrizian and Judge LaDoris H. Cordell sit nearby during a press conference held by the Blue Ribbon Panel announcing their findings on SFPD oversight. (Jessica Christian/S.F. Examiner)
Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

A three-judge panel investigating reports of bias in the San Francisco Police Department determined institutional racism and bias exist among officers and the biggest hurdle to change is the department’s culture.

The Blue Ribbon Panel on Transparency, Accountability, and Fairness in Law Enforcement, which found the department has little real oversight, took strong aim at the Police Officers Association, which panel members said essentially runs the department through a culture of “us against them” and attacks anyone who goes against the so-called thin blue line.

“The findings from this report show that the San Francisco Police Department, for all practical purposes, is really run by the POA,” said Judge LaDoris Cordell, who added that the union sets the tone for the department through intimidation and attitudes that insist there is no systematic bias in need of reforms.

While the report’s findings included recommendations on a variety of topics, at it’s unveiling Monday the body pointed to culture as one of the most difficult things to change, but one of the most vital when it comes to police reforms.

Former Chief Greg Suhr, who resigned in May after the most recent fatal police shooting, has even said previously that culture trumps policy every time.

The union has from the panel’s start opposed the project. Monday’s reaction to the report was no different.

“On Thursday, a sniper in Dallas took aim at police officers and murdered five in cold blood. Today, [District Attorney] George Gascon is taking aim at police officers in San Francisco with half-truths and distortions,” began a statement from the union’s head, Martin Halloran.

“Gascon organized this whole charade to publicize his inflammatory claims of widespread racism in the Police Department, when in fact the problem is much more limited in scope. This panel is nothing more than a kangaroo court orchestrated by Gascon and the three puppets he handpicked.”

Officers are going to have to change how they see themselves by moving from a warrior outlook to a guardian, said Colin West with Morgan Lewis, one of the law firms that worked pro bono on the report.

Ray Marshall of the Sheppard Mullin law firm, who also looked into department’s culture and the POA, said there was a splintered vision of the department.

“It was a tale of two cities,” he said of how police officers saw the department. One group, provided by the POA, said no bias exists in the department. The other group, which came independent of the POA, said there is bias.

The second group said institutional bias, including sexism, racism and homophobia was alive and well in the department, said Marshall.

Despite the officer’s’ opinions on bias, there is “a real fear of being able to speak publicly,” for fear of retaliation, he added.

Untitled-1

Read more criminal justice news on the Crime Ink page in print. Follow us on Twitter: @sfcrimeink

Click here or scroll down to comment

  • PopPopKnows

    I call BS on the POA. Suhr was known for dumping on anyone who dared to question his opinions or who he felt was better liked or a threat to him. He fostered the rift between officers and enabled by the POA(Delagnes) who he owed his job to. The POA did all it could to mimimize Suhrs exposure to the damage he did to the department. Halloran has painted himself into a corner. We will see if he is a leader or still a shill for Delagnes.

  • jhayes362

    The POA’s response to this report is predictable and disheartening. According to national reports, the Dallas PD reformed itself. Why can’t the SFPD?

  • Randy F.

    The group in the accompanying photo , Blue Ribbon Panel I’m assuming , look a lot like the actors who would lecture Inspector Callahan , on the elevator , about being a Neanderthal , in the first two Dirty Harry movies .

  • bob

    The city needs to address the real issue: Reform can only happen when criminals are reformed. It is the typical blame everyone, everything, blame society. When are thugs going to accept responsibility? Next time you cop haters are being beaten, robbed, raped, mugged, don’t call a cop cause you hate them.

  • john doe

    Its a culture. I understand the culture mentality but it can and should be changed in SF. An officer showed up for his psych. appt with his service weapon on his hip and had to reschedule the appt when he was able to show up for his court appointed mental health session without his weapon. Change can be hard especially for a culture that is used to giving direction. SFPD just now is starting to change. Hopefully SFPD will have an easier time of it. If not officers will laterally transfer to other departments with less politics, less work load and less pay.

  • john doe

    The City and County Of San Francisco Sheriff’s Office approves and denies CCW permits. The police are not the only solution.

In Other News