@Hugh Intactive: A real puzzle. So, are you saying that it has to include prohibiting religious circumcision while being able to specify certain medical exclusions? I'm not a lawyer and it seems that you may know about the legal boundaries. If you answer, please give your qualifications to knowledge along with the reasoning behind medical exemptions, religious inclusion, parental rights, etc. I realize this is a lot to ask, but it is important info that transcends emotion and politics even though this can be argued ad infinitum as well.
@muman613: You don't know how to read. I'm done with replying to your obvious hate-baiting. Oh, to clarify, I don't give a frig what religious do to their infant males. I think that there should be an exemption to that effect. If you can, read this from my post, "Let's at least keep secular male infant children safe from this barbaric practice of making an inner organ into an outer organ..." and "Of course, keep the clause in about exempting religious circumcision 'cause ya never gonna win that one."
@muman613: I wasn't calling it a jewish practice, you are. And, does it seem like I care if I offend you, because I don't. I care about the millions of infant males getting mutilated every day. Apparently, you don't. And, did you finish school, because apparently you can't read. I did not equate circumcision with genocide. You can still spurt your seed even if you cut the glans entirely off. I guess that's next.Why don't you take your religious chip off your shoulder or are your eyes too clouded by dogma and ritual?
This barbaric practice must stop.We hear constantly about female circumcision and how it is oppressive and mutilating. Male circumcision is practiced more widely throughout the world. If a male, 18 years or older, wishes to have it done for whatever reason, it is HIS choice and HIS body to do so. To continually mutilate and abuse infant male children, without their obvious consent, is almost as bad as the practices of Nazism. Of course, keep the clause in about exempting religious circumcision 'cause ya never gonna win that one. Let's at least keep secular male infant children safe from this barbaric practice of making an inner organ into an outer organ, reducing its sensitivity and ease of use and avoiding many botched operations. There should be a clause about infant circumcision being used to prevent or ease an obvious infant health problem. This proposed law needs to be written better with exact reasons for inclusion and exclusion.
The San Francisco Examiner
Website powered by Foundation