San Francisco Examiner  circulation | classifieds | autos | real estate | jobs | advertise
   
Monster
Welcome,   My Account |  Log out
Welcome, Guest  Sign In |  Register
Sunday, March 21, 2010 | Last Update 8:42 PDT
View today's E-Dition

click for forecast
Home News Politics Local Opinion Economy Sports Lifestyle Classifieds Jobs Autos Home Listings
Nation World Under the Dome Ken Garcia Beltway Confidential Weather Mobile Site Contact
Under the Dome California Nation World
Under the Dome California Beltway Confidential White House Congress Michael Barone Byron York
Under the Dome Ken Garcia Melissa Griffin Gavin Newsom City Hall People Real Estate Events Calendar
Editorials Nate Beeler's Toons Blogs Michael Barone Byron York
Economy Page Real Estate Technology
49ers/Raiders/NFL Warriors/NBA Sharks/NHL Giants/A's/MLB Soccer Colleges Golf
Movies Television Health Events Calendar

Politics/AP
[Print]  [Email]         Share    

House votes to prohibit abortion coverage in government run insurance plan

By: ERICA WERNER
Associated Press
11/08/09 1:40 AM PST


WASHINGTON — A bipartisan House coalition voted Saturday to prohibit coverage of abortions in a new government-run health care plan that Democrats would establish to compete with private insurers.

The 240-194 vote on an amendment by Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., was a blow to liberals, who would have allowed the Obama administration and its successors to decide whether abortions would be covered by the government plan. Sixty-four Democrats joined 176 Republicans in favor of the prohibition.

Stupak's measure also would bar anyone getting federal health subsidies from purchasing private insurance polices that included abortion coverage.

"Let us stand together on principle — no public funding for abortions, no public funding for insurance policies that pay for abortions," Stupak urged fellow lawmakers before the vote.

The amendment would bar the new government insurance plan from covering abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or where the life of the mother is in danger. The Democrats' original legislation would have allowed the government plan to cover abortions, if the Health and Human Services secretary decided it should.

The amendment also would prohibit people who receive new federal health subsidies from buying insurance plans that include abortion coverage.

The Democrats' original bill would have allowed people getting federal subsidies to pay for abortion coverage with their own money. Abortion opponents dismissed that as an accounting gimmick.

Abortion rights advocates called the measure the biggest setback to women's reproductive rights in decades. Anti-abortion Democrats forced House leaders to bring it up for a vote by threatening to oppose the underlying bill, and efforts to reach a compromise fell apart Friday night.

"Like it or not, this is a legal medical procedure and we should respect those who need to make this very personal decision," said Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo.

Some Republicans considered voting "present" in hopes that might unravel support for the underlying health care bill among anti-abortion Democrats, but only one did, Rep. John Shadegg, R-Ariz.

"If I felt that the (health overhaul) bill could be killed by not advancing the Stupak amendment then it seems it would be prudent to vote in such a way that wouldn't advance the bill, but it doesn't appear that that's a possibility," Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., said before the vote.

The National Right to Life Committee and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops lobbied lawmakers in both parties on the abortion measure. The bishops said they would oppose the bill if it lacked a strict prohibition on any federal funding for abortions.

Stupak's language applies to policies sold in a federally regulated insurance exchange that would be set up in 2013. The overhaul bill envisions both private companies and the government offering policies in the exchange.

Under the Stupak amendment, people who do not receive federal insurance subsidies could buy private insurance plans in the exchange that include abortion coverage. People who receive federal subsidies could buy separate policies covering only abortions if they use only their own money to do it.

Companies selling insurance policies covering abortions would be required to offer identical policies without the abortion coverage.

Abortion-rights supporters say private insurers will not likely offer policies with abortion coverage in the exchange because many potential buyers will be getting federal subsidies and therefore wouldn't be able to purchase them.

Around 21 million people are expected to get coverage through the exchange by 2019, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The majority of Americans who get their insurance coverage from their employers would not be affected.

Abortion-rights supporters say the restrictions in the amendment go further than current law.

A law called the Hyde amendment — which must be renewed annually — bars federal funding for abortion except in cases of rape, incest or if the mother's life is in danger. The restrictions apply to Medicaid, forcing states that cover abortions for low-income women to pay for them with state revenues. Separate laws apply the restrictions to the federal employee health plan and the military.

Currently abortion coverage is widely available in the private market. A Guttmacher Institute study found that 87 percent of typical employer plans covered abortion in 2002. A Kaiser Family Foundation survey in 2003 found that 46 percent of workers in employer plans had abortion coverage. The studies asked different questions, which might help explain the disparity in the results.

Abortions in the first trimester typically cost between $350-$900, according to Planned Parenthood.

A health overhaul bill pending in the Senate also bars federal funding for abortion, but the language is less stringent. Discrepancies between the House and Senate measures would have to be reconciled before any final bill is passed.

(This version corrects the third paragraph to correct the description of the amendment — people getting subsidies could not buy insurance packages covering abortion, instead of people could not get subsidies to buy abortion coverage.)


Topics

US Health Overhaul Abortion

under the dome
Department of Public Works promotes World Water Day

The Department of Public Works has a message for all those parched San Franciscans who are just dying for a cool drink of water on Monday: “Say NO to bottled...

—Mike Aldax

Board of Ed set to vote on possible addition to diplomas

The Board of Education is set to vote Tuesday on a policy to add a special seal onto the diplomas of graduating students who showed “proficiency in speaking, reading and...

—Mike Aldax

Development impact fee changes to be discussed by supervisors

A plan by Mayor Gavin Newsom’s administration to spur construction activity by offering developers relief from some city building fees will be discussed by city...

—John Upton

Chamber returns from DC encouraged

Local business leaders had been hobnobbing at the nation’s capital last week, hoping to drive the money trail back to San Francisco where the unemployment rate continues...

—Erin Sherbert

More Under the Dome posts...

beltway confidential
Senate Dems won't call bipartisan meeting with Parliamentarian on House reconciliation bill's legality

Senate Democrats are "slow-walking" a request from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell for a bipartisan meeting with the Senate Parliamentarian to discuss whether the House...

—Mark Tapscott

Could Democrats vote "present?"

Some Republicans are suggesting that in light of the fact that the administration's Medicare and Medicaid actuary was not able to estimate the cost and impact of the health...

—Chris Stirewalt

Two Tennessee Democrats announce "no" votes

Two southern Democrats, Rep. Lincoln Davis and Rep. John Tanner, both of Tennessee, are voting against the health-care bill. I talked to Davis this afternoon about his decision....

—Susan Ferrechio

Pro-life Democrat Stupak agrees to vote for health care bill

Rep. Bart Stupak and his gang of pro-life Democrats have signed onto a deal with the White House over abortion funding language in the bill. Stupak will announce his intention...

—Susan Ferrechio

More Beltway Confidential posts...


To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines
  1. iPhone bandits target Hayes Valley
  2. Muni may cut down on stops
  3. South City red-light cameras may get ax
  4. Scoop: Bullock’s marriage called a total sham
  5. Rec and Park to reinterview more than 130 employees
  6. Lab-tech’s dispute details surface
  7. Olympic gold medalist to lead AT&T Park stair-climb
  8. Presidio Trust, nonprofit team up for pet cemetery
  9. City lobbyists now have to report monthly
  10. New threat puts Calif. police on heightened alert





ING | Bay to breakers
99 years, 99 reasons to register. What's yours? Pink Participant

 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 200 words.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Sports

Personal Best: Runner competes on home turf

One of the leading contenders to win today’s... Full story

Local

Muni may cut down on stops

Under a plan that would save the agency about $3... Full story

Sports

Airwaves: Tiger’s return will be ratings gold for CBS

Call it what you want: great TV, great theater, a soap... Full story

Olympic Coverage | RSS | Twitter | Facebook | Mobile | Contact Us | Rack Locations | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy