Politics

[Print]  [Email]        

Obama backs off pledge of swift immigration reform

By: Julie Mason
Examiner White House Correspondent
April 30, 2009

(ap photo)

President Obama Wednesday backed off a campaign promise to make immigration reform a priority of his first term, saying work on the issue has begun but his agenda is already stretched.

“We want to move this process,” Obama said in a prime-time news conference at the White House. “I'm going to be moving it as quickly as I can — I've been accused of doing too much.”

On the evening of his 100th day in office, Obama met the press in the East Room of the White House for his third formal, nighttime news conference. During the presidential campaign, Obama told the League of United Latin American Citizens that he would make immigration reform a “top priority” in his first year.

Now, faced with two wars, an economic crisis, a flu pandemic and a roster of other issues, the president said on several issues that he already feels stretched thin.

“I'm always amused when I hear these, you know, criticisms of 'Oh, you know, Obama wants to grow government,” Obama said. “No! I would love a nice, lean portfolio to deal with, but that's not the hand that's been dealt to us.”

On the possible swine flu pandemic, the president said he has received no recommendation from health officials to close the border with Mexico or enforce any quarantine, saying that would be like “closing the barn door after the horses are out.”

He urged Americans to take precautions, such as keeping sick kids home from school and asking those who feel sick to avoid public transportation like airplanes.

“We have ramped up screening efforts, as well as made sure that additional supplies are there on the border, so that we can prepare in the eventuality that we have to do more than we're currently doing,” he said.

Obama, who had hoped to use the occasion to highlight the accomplishments of his first three months in office, detailed efforts being made on the economy, toward closing Guantanamo Bay prison and ending the war in Iraq.

He answered carefully when asked by a reporter whether the prior administration used torture.

The president has called waterboarding torture, and recently released a series of Bush administration-era memos detailing the use of waterboarding on detainees. 

But so far, Obama has remained circumspect about whether prosecution is justified, and has not criticized former President Bush directly, despite intense pressure from some in the Democratic Party.

“I believe that waterboarding was torture,” Obama said. “And I think that whatever legal rationales were used, it was a mistake.”
Obama said he has read the classified documents that former Vice President Dick Cheney called on the government to release, purportedly detailing useful information gleaned from using enhanced interrogation methods on detainees.

“The public justifications for these techniques, which is that we got information from these individuals … doesn’t answer the core question, which is could we have gotten that same information without resorting to these techniques?” Obama said. “And it doesn't answer the broader question, are we safer as a consequence of having used those techniques?”

Obama, who formally ended the use of such interrogation techniques, said nothing he's seen in 100 days has made him second-guess that decision.

jmason@washingtonexaminer.com



under the dome

For the second time in four days, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Executive Director Nathaniel Ford will hear from local residents about budget problems currently...

The Fisherman’s Wharf Community Benefit District is inviting residents to a community meeting to discuss the recent shooting at a nearby nightclub over the weekend which...

Board of Supervisors President David Chiu said Monday his legislation establishing tough restrictions on constructing new parking garages on residential buildings is...

Low ridership, despite an extended Bay Bridge closure, was the main culprit for BART’s lower-than-expected financial return during the second quarter of this fiscal...


beltway confidential

Just a few years after scandal nearly destroyed the Buckeye State's GOP, Rasmussen has the Ohio Republican candidates for governor and Senate leading their Democratic...

I've just been in touch with Sen. Christopher Bond, vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Rep. Peter Hoekstra, ranking Republican on the House Intelligence...

The Audi ad mocking overzealous environmentalism "hits home," San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom tweeted during the Super Bowl. The locally conceived advertisement was enough to...

In a brief op-ed in USA Today, White House counterterrorism chief John Brennan charges that critics who question the Obama administration's decision to grant Miranda rights to...



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

TexRancher

Apr 30, 2009

Back off on immigration reform? Why have it at all? We already have laws dealing with illegal immigration and that's what he's really kissing up to.
Why does he want amnesty for 20 million illegals? So he can enslave ALL OF US and have enough illegal votes to overpower the will of the AMERICAN PEOPLE! Doesn't anybody see this? The socialist party sees this as their ticket to permanent power. No more representative government, no more checks and balances, no more freedom of choice. Hey wait! That sounds like a dictatorship! Wake up AMERICA!!
The AMNESTY CONSPIRATORS represent the interests of foreign nationals over the interests of AMERICANS!
No more United States, they want The North American Union better known as The United States of Mexico. These AMNESTY CONSPIRATORS are willing to sell out the future of this country for short term political gains.

 

Rachel

Apr 30, 2009

Backed off immigration reform? Were we watching the same speech? Mr. Obama said he still planned to tackle the issue this year, and waived off claims he was "doing too much." This is lazy reporting and a hopelessly skewed perspective. Obama backed off nothing, and I question this reporter's objectivity.

 

Pearl

Apr 30, 2009

I live in an area in Illinois that has now been hit with the swine flu aka the Mexican flu. We just found out last night, but I had been expecting it. The Aurora area of Illinois is absolutely overrun with illegal Mexicans. You'd have to see it to believe it. I'm not sure what good our economy derives from these illegals, but for some reason our government seems determined to keep them. They work scab construction jobs while good taxpaying men sit home. Yes, I am bitter. Illinois is suffering and California is nearly bankrupt from the burden of these illegals. And I see no relief in sight.

 

ebayinil@gmail.com

Apr 30, 2009

I'd like to know why the average American taxpayer got no stimulus relief. A 3 trillion dollar package, and nothing for the voter. Had Obama given us all all check for $10,000, he would have jump started the economy like nothing before. Those behind on their mortgages could have brought them current. Those current could have remodeled their homes or bought a new vehicle. Instead, he help bankers throw lavish parties and buy new office furniture. The only thing the average American got out of Obama's stimulus package belongs between the covers of a S & M magazine.

 

John (the City)

Apr 30, 2009

Our current immigration policy does NOT need to be reformed. We just need our government to enforce the current immigration policy. We need to stop the flow of illegals coming across our boarder. Build a fence, build a wall 30' feet tall, give our boarder patrol agents authority to do whatever it takes to protect our citizens. Get the illegals out of the shadows and out of this country.


 

wolf

Apr 30, 2009

ehehehe and how many of them u are hire to clean up yr houses and cut yr grass ?U are pathetic.All of u are IMIGRANTS!!!!DOnt u remember ???

 

RB from TX

Apr 30, 2009

Thank you TxRancher. I could not have said it better. We already have laws in place, why the heck aren't they enforced.

 

NativeDC

Apr 30, 2009

Again if we had manage the broder, US would not have this problem. Get real! Mexico is a very poor county, all of South American is poor too, Mexico inputs dieases, drugs, gangs, and cheap labor. What do the Americans get, We need to keep these illegal alliens out of this country-this a public health problem and a national security problem.

 

Pass the Beer Nuts

May 1, 2009

Fact: blacks do support Obama because he's black. Look at the election numbers. And for the post which stated whites reject Obama because he's black is sheer stupidity. How did he get elected if whites didn't elect him? Blacks are 20% of the population and far few actually vote. Believe it or not, there are whites who actually don't care about his skin color. We care about his statist (liberal) policies, agenda and bankrupting the country. In November 2010 he will not have the numbers in Congress to get anything done. The changing tide will be huge and a wonderful thing.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor out on bail, back for April hearing

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story