OpEd Contributors

[Print]  [Email]        

Why evangelicals must learn to think like a minority

By: Logan Paul Gage
Special to The Examiner
April 29, 2009

Newsflash: Evangelicals must face a new reality. No, not the advent of the Obama administration but the reality that they are a minority.

On one hand, this is not new at all. Misperceptions notwithstanding, evangelical values didn’t exactly dominate America’s culture or politics during “the last eight years.” Daily Kos prophesies of theocracy failed to materialize.

Yet a shift has occurred; like Earth’s rotation, barely noticeable.

According to the 2009 American Religious Identification Survey, the percentage of self-identifying Christians has steadily declined for almost two decades, dropping 10 percent. During the same period, the percentage of Americans claiming no religious affiliation nearly doubled, rising to 15 percent.

Newsweek’s Pulitzer Prize-winning editor Jon Meacham gave a thoughtful, if predictable, response, writing of “The End of Christian America.” Yet the philosophy he attacks, that of the old-guard Religious Right, as seen in The Moral Majority, vanished 15 years ago in most evangelical circles.

The news here is not that Evangelicals must recognize their Winthropian vision of “A City on a Hill” as a pipe dream. Ask your average evangelical if they want to see a Christian takeover of government and an implementation of “Christian laws” and you are likely to hear laughter.

No. The news stirring the collective evangelical consciousness is that they must assume a new mindset in the public square. Americans’ religious beliefs are becoming more polarized, and without “minority thinking” Evangelicals may lose many of the freedoms they cherish.

The history of Protestants in American public education reveals the imperative nature of this Gestalt shift.

Evangelicals’ advocacy for school vouchers has been rebuffed, often because vouchers run afoul of Blaine Amendments. Most states have one. They stipulate that no money “shall be appropriated to, or used by, or in aid of any sectarian, church, or denominational school.”

In the mid-19th century, tax-funded public schools took over Northern education. Most Protestants liked public education as long as that didn’t mean secularized education. They were pleased with a public system which taught the King James Bible and a milquetoast Protestantism.

To be fair, many Evangelicals, especially Calvinists, saw the public school movement as a Unitarian watering-down of Protestantism. But public schools won the day.

By the 1870s, many Protestants feared what the growing number of Catholic immigrants might mean for public, supposedly nonsectarian — read: Protestant — education.

Then-House Speaker James G. Blaine decided to exploit this angst. Attempting to invigorate Northern Protestant voters, Blaine pushed an amendment — followed by similar state amendments — prohibiting “sectarian” schools from receiving tax money. Protestants were in the majority and the state funded their “public” schools, while barring taxpayer funds from Catholic schools.

This was a dual error. First, it relied upon what Marvin Olasky and others dub “the myth of neutrality” — that neutral-worldview education can exist when teaching kids how to view the world.

Second, and here lies the lesson for Evangelicals today, the Blaine Amendment movement was myopic: It failed to see that one day even those wanting Protestant-infused public education may not be in power.

Today, parents wanting to educate children according to a Protestant worldview must overcome an obstacle their forbearers erected; redeeming a voucher at a religious school is likely against their state’s constitution.

Similarly, if the 2009 ARIS teaches Evangelicals anything, it is not that Christian America just died, whatever that means.

The real lesson, the big picture, is that America is rapidly losing a shared frame of reference, and Evangelicals must think ahead. They must see through the secular stereotype of Evangelicals behind all the levers of power and view themselves as a minority that they might ensure religious freedom for all.

Logan Paul Gage is a policy analyst with Discovery Institute in Washington.





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

GRANDLINS

Apr 29, 2009

Here is "one" evangelist who is a MINORITY. Are you so "STUPID" as to think that only one exists that thinks the way that the "CREATOR OF THE EARTH" thinks. THE CREATOR NEEDS NO ONE, NOT EVEN ONE. THE OUTCOME WILL BE AS THE CREATOR DECIDES FOR IT TO BE, AND IT WILL BE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. SORRY, YOU HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE OUTCOME. GET OVER IT. YOU ARE NOTHING, GOD IS EVERYTHING, AND JUST BECAUSE YOU DON'T THINK SO IS MEANINGLESS, ZERO!!!!!!! GO STICK YOU HEAD IN THE SEWER. YOU MEAN NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ARE NOTHING!!!!!!!!

 

granny

Apr 30, 2009

We are a minority but you forget we have the one and only savior Jesus Christ with us and he will return. After the anti-Christ who will be welcomed and admired by so many he will return in his glory and reside as King of the earth and all shall bow down before him. Some Christians wonder just how close we are to this and I would like to live to see it happen but alive or dead I will know.; We live for the promise and you live for what you gain in the minute.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story