OpEd Contributors

[Print]  [Email]        

Tort reform must be part of health care reform

By: Gov. Rick Perry
Special to The Examiner
August 13, 2009

To hear federal officials tell it, they’ve got all the answers on health care and it’s up to the rest of us to sit, wait and embrace whatever solution — if any — they may eventually provide.

I find this troubling, since states have shown they know a thing or two about solving problems that affect their citizens.

Texas, in fact, stands as a good example of how smart, responsible policy can help us take major steps toward fixing a damaged medical system, starting with legal reforms.

Just six years ago, Texas was mired in a health care crisis. Our doctors were leaving the state, or abandoning the profession entirely, because of frivolous lawsuits and the steadily increasing medical malpractice insurance premiums that resulted.

Two-thirds of our state’s counties had no practicing obstetricians, and for pregnant women that meant long trips in cramped cars and higher fuel bills. Sixty percent of our counties had no pediatricians, which often meant delayed, or denied, health care for sick children.

And 24 counties in the Rio Grande Valley had no primary care doctors.

Each of those factors made it more likely that patients in underserved areas would postpone seeking care, which meant minor issues became major issues, and illnesses that could have been treated simply, easily and economically in a doctor’s office turned into severe health crises that had to be treated in the emergency room.

And the situation was worsening with every passing day. By 2002, 13 of the state’s 17 liability insurance carriers had left, leaving less competition and leaving doctors with insurance bills that were seeing double-digit increases, if they could get insurance at all.

That same year, applications for medical licenses plummeted to their lowest level in a decade.

This being Texas, instead of throwing money at the problem or debating endlessly, we identified the root causes and decided to do something about it.

In 2003, I declared the medical liability crisis an emergency item and the Legislature responded by passing sweeping reforms that protected the patient, but also shielded doctors and hospitals from unscrupulous trial lawyers eager to make a quick buck.

We capped noneconomic damages at $250,000 per defendant, or up to $750,000 per incident, while placing no cap on more easily determined economic damages, such as lost wages or costs of medical care due to injury.

We ended the practice of allowing baseless but expensive lawsuits to drag on indefinitely, requiring plaintiffs to provide expert witness reports to support their claims within four months of filing suit or drop the case.

These measures were supported by the people of Texas, who in September 2003 approved a ballot measure, Proposition 12, authorizing all the changes.

Changes were seen immediately, and continue to be felt. All major liability insurers cut their rates upon passage of our reforms, with most of those cuts ranging in the double-digits. More than 10 new insurance carriers entered the Texas market, increasing competition and further lowering costs.

As a result, Texas doctors have seen their insurance rates decline by an average of 27 percent.

The number of doctors applying to practice medicine in Texas has skyrocketed by 57 percent. In 2008, the Texas Medical Board received 4,023 license applications and issued a record 3,621 new ones.

In all, in just the first five years after reforms passed, 14,498 doctors either returned to practice in Texas or began practicing here for the first time.

And our reforms finally brought critical specialties to underserved areas. The number of obstetricians practicing in rural Texas is up by 27 percent, and 12 counties that previously had no obstetricians now have at least one. The statistics show major gains in fields like orthopedic surgery, pediatrics, neurosurgery and emergency medicine.

The Rio Grande Valley has seen an 18 percent growth in applications to practice medicine, adding about 200 doctors to this critically underserved area.

And what about the money that used to go to defending all those frivolous lawsuits? You can find it in budgets for upgraded equipment, expanded emergency rooms, patient safety programs and improved primary and charity care.

Success stories like ours need to be told and need to be remembered as we continue this national debate.

Instead of handing down one-size-fits-all mandates on how it’s going to be, Washington, D.C., should be enabling states to set their own agendas and solve their own problems when it comes to health care.

Rick Perry is the Republican governor of Texas.





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Ymal Brucker

Aug 13, 2009

I'd go farther. Punative damages, those that act as a "fine" on the offender to discourage future rascally behavior, should go to the state rather than the plaintiff (with no skim by the plaintiff bar).

Another good idea is "loser pays," if not the expenses of the opposing side, at least some significant amount for bothering the court. I wouldn't mind if this decision is left with the court as long as it serves the purpose of discouraging frivolous suits.

 

POed

Aug 13, 2009

obamacare wants to limit a doctors to pay. Let's say that limit is set below congressional pay at $120,000. After all congress critters do so much more for the collective good. How is that doctor going to be able to buy malpractice insurance of $200,000 per year, or more. My wife's malpractice is close to $400,000. She does anesthesia, you know, the drugs that makes surgery tolerable. She has frivolous lwawsuits thrown at her all the time. "was in pain for 2 days" or "intollerable headache" or "felt dizzy" or "got sick to my stomache"... Yeah, all the side affects were outlined as per law in the stack of paper work you complained about when you were admitted to the hospital. Usually from people who can not or will not pay their bills.

 

freemort

Aug 13, 2009

Wait a minute. How's John Edwards and his type going to make millions channeling dead babies so that they can give it to the DNC, or run for office and encite class warefare to get power? Trial lawyers aren't lobbyist according to the lame street media, so they ignore the 800 lb gorilla in the room. Tort reform first! Then Health Care reform. Makes sense to anyone with half a brain...

 

herewegoagain

Aug 13, 2009

The Texas Governor is outright lying. Insurance premiums have not gone down for either individual or employer-paid insurance plans in Texas; they've risen every year just like every where else. In fact, they rose by 18% in 2007 alone. For heaven's sake, Texas leads the nation in proportion of state residents without insurance!

Yet Rick Perry brags about a law in place that would make it impossible to receive more than $250K if your child was paralyzed for life because a doctor made a terrible mistake during the delivery. It happens, you know. Be careful what you pull out your pitchforks for, people.

 

Flint

Aug 13, 2009

Don't you fools realize that malpractice litigation represents only 1% of total health care costs? You can check the facts on DU and many other progressive sites. The trial lawyers are the backbone of America.

 

Easy Rider

Aug 13, 2009

Where do you get the statistic that malpractice litigation represents only 1% of total health care costs? What about the fact that most doctors are forced to practice defensive medicine and order unnecessary tests because if something goes wrong the trial lawyer can say "so why didn't you order that test doctor?" and here we go down the huge dark hold of big settlements making the problem worse. Look at the trial lawyer commercials on television advertising for heparin lawsuits. It is ridiculous. Any type of healthcare reform needs to include tort reform. But of course, the lawyers are the ones who make our laws so why would they want torn reform.

 

Whitehorse

Aug 13, 2009

Hey! herewegoagain Gov. Perry meant insurance premiums for doctors' liability insurance, as in the insurance to protect them from malpractice suits. My niece and her husband are anesthesiologists in Texas; fortunately "unsued" to date. But, they've got plenty of horror stories. It's amazing, but a surprising number of surgeries doctors perform for free for charity cases end in malpractice suits. Patients come to the hospital in bad shape from self abuse and hope to get rich. Nice people!

 

Nate

Aug 13, 2009

If more people, would support unbuckling the doctors and the hospitals from the huge chains the government is weighing them down with, some real savings could be had. Deregulating healthcare would make it more affordable for everyone, and this Obamacare nonsense wouldn't even be considered (it shouldn't be considered anyway). Take the government off medicine's back and out of our businesses, and you will see a strong economy again very soon, with a successful healthcare and insurance industry to boot.

 

CrawfordBill

Aug 14, 2009

OK, a little clarification needed here: physicians premiums in Texas HAVE gone down substantially, since tort reform in 2003. For the plaintif: economic losses, medical care costs, rehabilitative costs (ie, the necessities) have NO cap or limit in Texas . . . only those subjective "pain and suffering" costs, which were the Lotto jackpot for many fortune-seeking lay people and their attorneys. Now Texans have a much better chance at access to care (since doctors are choosing to stay in, or come to, Texas), because if you have no doctor, then it doesn't matter what the total healthcare costs are, does it?

 

ieatmyveggies@yahoo.com

Aug 14, 2009

Whitehorse writes: "Hey! herewegoagain Gov. Perry meant insurance premiums for doctors' liability insurance, as in the insurance to protect them from malpractice suits."

But that hasn't lowered Texans' health insurance premiums, which is supposed to be the main point of tort reform, is it not? If it isn't, why on earth would you support restricting your 7th amendment rights to civil litigation?

It also hasn't resulted in more Texans being covered; Texas leads the country in percentage of uninsured.

Medical malpractice is not the leading cause of rising health care costs, people!

I cannot for the life of me understand why some of you are fighting for LESS access to the courts and spending MORE of your dollars on health insurance each year. I can only surmise that some of you must be really, really demoralized people.

 

Aug 14, 2009

CrawfordBill writes: "...if you have no doctor, then it doesn't matter what the total healthcare costs are, does it?"

With all due respect, if you have no insurance, it doesn't matter how many doctors are in Texas, does it? I am not trying to mock you, this is just how I honestly view the situation.

Governor Perry is heralding so-called "tort reform" as the magic bullet that saved Texas health care, without addressing at all that it hasn't lowered health insurance premiums for Texan employers, employees, or individual policy holders; or expanded coverage to more Texans.



 

ieatmyveggies@yahoo.com

Aug 14, 2009

Folks, sorry for the triple posts, allow me to address just this one last point...

Nate writes: "Deregulating healthcare would make it more affordable for everyone, and this Obamacare nonsense wouldn't even be considered (it shouldn't be considered anyway). Take the government off medicine's back and out of our businesses, and you will see a strong economy again very soon, with a successful healthcare and insurance industry to boot."

Like doing away with Medicare? Do you honestly think our senior citizens would receive low coverage from the insurance companies? We're talking about the phase of life when people generally use more health care than any other time.

You do away with Medicare, and watch how many seniors will instantly plunge into poverty. And talk about death panels! Doing away with Medicare would be a death sentence for millions of retired seniors who would never be able to pay for what would be available in the markets.

 

ahoffmanCJD

Aug 14, 2009

Governor Perry's analysis is so flawed on so many levels, it is difficult to know where to begin. Nevertheless, here's one suggestion...http://tinyurl.com/qv6lb4

 

hoser

Aug 18, 2009

I appreciate that Texans want to do it for themselves:i.e.- pay more for insurance, maintain one of the, if not the, highest rates of uninsured in the country, get more drs. (and apparently they have) that are on which side of this debate? as in, what lower rates. Truth be known, if Texans don't care about what's good for themselves I suspect the rest of us will not be concerned either. Let'er buck lone star!

 

Ms.Melly

Aug 20, 2009

ieatmyveggies@yahoo.com writes:

Aug 14, 2009

CrawfordBill writes: "...if you have no doctor, then it doesn't matter what the total healthcare costs are, does it?"

With all due respect, if you have no insurance, it doesn't matter how many doctors are in Texas, does it? I am not trying to mock you, this is just how I honestly view the situation.

Do you honestly believe if you have no health insurance you won't be treated? You need to talk to some doctors. EVERYONE in the US will get necessary medical care whether they have insurance or not. The same is not true in countries with socialized medicine.


 

Ms.Melly

Aug 20, 2009

herewegoagain writes: Yet Rick Perry brags about a law in place that would make it impossible to receive more than $250K if your child was paralyzed for life because a doctor made a terrible mistake during the delivery.

Read it again: We capped noneconomic damages at $250,000 per defendant, or up to $750,000 per incident, while placing no cap on more easily determined economic damages, such as lost wages or costs of medical care due to injury.

"Placing NO CAP on...COSTS OF MEDICAL CARE..."

 

Ms.Melly

Aug 20, 2009

herewegoagain writes: Yet Rick Perry brags about a law in place that would make it impossible to receive more than $250K if your child was paralyzed for life because a doctor made a terrible mistake during the delivery.

Read it again, slowly and carefully: We capped noneconomic damages at $250,000 per defendant, or up to $750,000 per incident, while placing no cap on more easily determined economic damages, such as lost wages or costs of medical care due to injury.

Did you see it this time? "While placing NO CAP on...costs of medical care.."

 

lllee65

Aug 27, 2009

Ms.Melly wrote: "Do you honestly believe if you have no health insurance you won't be treated? You need to talk to some doctors. EVERYONE in the US will get necessary medical care whether they have insurance or not. The same is not true in countries with socialized medicine."

You must be living in a parallel universe. Just try to schedule an MRI to see if you have a brain tumor if you have no insurance. You will be sadly surprised.

Whereas, in Italy (one of those socialist countries), I, as a tourist, carried my unconscious young daughter into a hospital in Turin, where she saw a neurologist, was treated, and discharged, all without being charged one lira, or even being asked to sign a piece of paper. Health care is a right, like public education.

 

Matthew J Barnhart

Sep 4, 2009

This quote (which underpins his entire ridiculous article) from the Governor is a falsehood:

"Just six years ago, Texas was mired in a health care crisis. Our doctors were leaving the state, or abandoning the profession entirely, because of frivolous lawsuits and the steadily increasing medical malpractice insurance premiums that resulted."

The University of Texas studied more than 150,000 medical malpractice claims between 1988 and 2002. What they discovered was that the number and cost of medical malpractice claims stayed CONSTANT through this time of "crisis", while insurance premiums DOUBLED.

Get that? Insurance rates for doctors doubled not because of an increase of frivolous lawsuits, but because of insurance company greed.

Also in the same study, they found that all costs related to medical malpractice (premiums, payouts, etc) made up %0.6 of Texas' medical costs.

 

tim@hangten.com

Nov 25, 2009

Malpractice is the reason healthcare is so expensive. It is not the doctors fault its the lawyers who blow things out of proportion

NJ Website Design

 

Dec 23, 2009

That would be one sweet concert that I really wish I could be a part of. we
nike dunk Louis Vuitton Bags China Wholesale

 

aris

Jan 14, 2010

great opinion, nice analisys. Thank you for sharing it



Aku Cuma Seorang Blogger Yang Cinta Seo | Mbah Gendeng

 

Jan 21, 2010

If you haven't done so already, WAKE UP EVERYBODY! OBAMA IS A FRAUD! THESE PLANS WILL BANKRUPT OUR COUNTRY!

life experience diploma AND adult high school diploma

 

Jan 21, 2010

I’m putting my money on the notion that there was at least one gay-rights group that didn’t cheer when President Barack Obama signed the most recent “hate crimes” bill last week. earn high school diploma AND homeschool curriculum AND high school diploma online

 

minda123

Jan 22, 2010

ok

 

Ann

Jan 24, 2010

Before you leap in at the deep end on male extra, it's important to learn all you can about it. This site/article is about giving you all the information you need on male extra. Discover the secrets of male extra review right here. We've done a large amount of research on it and can now present it all to you. Enjoy! Now get rid of all your worries about getting answers to questions you have about maleextra. We've done your work for you and it's all here, ready for the reading.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story