OpEd Contributors

[Print]  [Email]        

Miss California is the Left’s new Sarah Palin

By: Noel Sheppard
May 10, 2009

As our nation struggles with its worst recession in decades, a beauty pageant runner-up, who most Americans probably never heard of three weeks ago, is attracting national headlines.

Such seems absurd given the low interest in these events let alone the improbability of anyone caring about the views expressed by the contestants during the question and answer phase.

Let’s face it: people tuning in to watch such a spectacle aren’t doing so to get a tutorial on current events and pressing issues of the day.

 Defying such conventional wisdom though is Miss California, aka Carrie Prejean, who ever since honestly answering Perez Hilton’s gotcha question about same-sex marriage at April 19’s Miss USA pageant has been the subject of over 800 news stories, most of them filled with hatred for this unlikely tragic figure.

The newest attacks include a supposedly salacious picture of the model wearing only pink panties. Although this is a rear view with her arms covering enough of her breasts to avoid a Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction and subsequent scrutiny by the FCC, the Left have seized on it claiming she’s a hypocrite to pose so scantily-clad.

The pornographic web site that uncovered the picture quipped, “Looks like your dirty photo shoot makes you a sinner too.” Then, Hilton hysterically asked at his smutty website, “What Would Jesus Say About This????”
 
And NBC’s “Today” show proclaimed, “Racy photos of the Miss USA runner-up have surfaced, and some say they’ve gone too far; too far for NBC News to broadcast.”

Imagine that. A picture significantly less provocative than those found in Victoria’s Secret catalogues and Sports Illustrated swimsuit editions has gone too far for NBC News to broadcast.

You’ve got to be kidding!

And what nerve of a model who has done photo-shoots for Target, Saks Fifth Avenue, Bloomingdales, and Nordstrom to allow herself to be used to advertise women’s lingerie.

If this makes here a sinner, then virtually every model in America who believes in God should be immediately fired, and all who desire to be in this profession in the future should have to prove their atheism or agnosticism by burning a Bible or spitting on a Torah.

Of course, that’s not going to happen, as the outrage over these pictures is a smokescreen hiding the real truth.

Much like Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, Prejean represents a threat to the liberal establishment, for here’s another bright, attractive, outspoken woman whose views just don’t fit into the stereotypical box the Left has created for those who disagree with them.

As a result, she needs to be smeared and smeared good, for much as liberals used Palin as a clarion call to scare folks from voting for Sen. John McCain in last November’s presidential race, Prejean now represents fodder for gay rights activists, and she needs to be pummeled on a regular basis to further their goals.

Irrespective of one’s position on this social issue, of much greater concern should be this strategy by the Left to attack and silence all those who disagree with them.

After all, Prejean’s views on gay marriage are decidedly mainstream. A recent Quinnipiac University Poll found 55 percent of registered voters opposing proposals to allow same-sex couples to marry.

As only 38 percent said they’d support such legislation, it is indeed those attacking and looking to silence Prejean who are in the minority.

But even that is beside the point, for once we decide that only popular views are allowed to be expressed in our country the United States of America will cease to exist.

In response to this most recent attack against Prejean, the National Organization for Marriage’s Maggie Gallagher accurately stated, “The level of hatred directed at her is astonishing.”

Maybe so, but after what we saw directed at Palin last year, Americans should no longer be surprised how far the Left are willing to go to achieve their goals.

Noel Sheppard is associate editor of the Media Research Center’s NewsBusters.org.
 





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Wow!

May 11, 2009

Congratulations to the Examiner for printing this. In anticipation of the typical liberal reaction to this example of American freedom of speech, I'd hire a couple of rent-a-cops to protect your front windows for a few days.

 

Wow!

May 11, 2009

Congratulations to the Examiner for printing this. In anticipation of the typical liberal reaction to this example of American freedom of speech, I'd hire a couple of rent-a-cops to protect your front windows for a few days.

 

mumu

May 11, 2009

She's a bigot, end of story.

 

Ohiolad

May 11, 2009

It is shameful that NBC, which by the way is owned by GE, would stoop so low as to be a part of the contemptible smear campaign against this young woman.

 

Ohiolad

May 11, 2009

It is shameful that NBC, which by the way is owned by GE, would stoop so low as to be a part of the contemptible smear campaign against this young woman.

 

Dwaxe

May 11, 2009

If she is as worked up as the author is on this, she should sue for defamation of character. "As a result, she needs to be smeared and smeared good, for much as liberals used Palin as a clarion call to scare folks from voting for Sen. John McCain in last November’s presidential race, Prejean now represents fodder for gay rights activists, and she needs to be pummeled on a regular basis to further their goals." *Cough* RepublicansandClinton *Cough*

 

Dwaxe

May 11, 2009

If she is as worked up as the author is on this, she should sue for defamation of character. "As a result, she needs to be smeared and smeared good, for much as liberals used Palin as a clarion call to scare folks from voting for Sen. John McCain in last November’s presidential race, Prejean now represents fodder for gay rights activists, and she needs to be pummeled on a regular basis to further their goals." *Cough* RepublicansandClinton *Cough*

 

Nick in Virginia

May 11, 2009

I've pointed this out several times, but one more won't hurt. Does anyone remember what Californians did about 7 months ago? They voted to amend their Constitution to outlaw gay marriage. So if you ask ANY Californian about gay marriage, the odds are they will be against it. This is a logical thought process that liberals are apparently unable to conduct on their own, so we need to treat them like 9-year olds and explain it to them. As for the "uproar" over Ms. Prejean's modelling photos, I get very upset when a non-religious person tells me how I am supposed to react in terms of my religious faith. I will judge people based on MY opinions, not on the opinions of the liberal phonies out there. As far as I am concerned, they can kiss off (and I'm being polite because I don't want to be bounced from the site).

 

hermie

May 11, 2009

Why all this hatred from the Left and their minions in the MSM? If you heard her answer, it wasn't a diatribe against gays, or that gays should be beheaded or stoned to death. She said that she believed that marriage was between a man and a woman: The same belief publically stated by a certain Presidential candidate and now resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. But now, there is this need to totally destroy her. If gay marriage advocates have decided this campaign of hate is justified, no wonder the majority of Californians are not on their side.

 

MissButterfly

May 11, 2009

After seeing the foaming-at-the-mouth hatred that gays have for beautiful, successful, confident, pageant winners - Sarah Palin was one, too - I had a 'light bulb' moment - duh! Gays are jealous of these women, because that's what they'd themselves love to be! They aren't called 'queens' for nothing.

 

firsty

May 11, 2009

No one is printing that her opinion of same sex marriage is the same as Obama's. What a bunch of hypocrites

 

jahpdq

May 11, 2009

The left always sics the hounds on anyone who dares disagree with its "moral" agenda.

 

mr.sadface

May 11, 2009

Moral agenda ≠ basic human rights. Carrie Prejean, however, does claim to 'represent' the 55% of CA that voted down basic human rights for gays and lesbians. *Sadface* If Miss CA represents the 'majority' opinion of CA (and asks to be respected for it), she needs to get off her bandwagon and keep taking off clothes. I really hope people don't think that the Miss USA Competition has any sort of social validity for anything other than enforcing the 'negative' American stereotype. Finally, the left goes as far as we can because the right always seems to have enough money to get there before us.

 

Commonsense

May 11, 2009

2010 can't come soon enough!

 

Commonsense

May 11, 2009

2010 can't come soon enough!

 

Tim

May 11, 2009

Let's not judge those who have taken a stand against Ms. Prejean based on her marriage beliefs. She is of course entitled to her opinion, but the truth of the matter is that her opinion should have no relevance under the law, and as we've seen by Prop 8, rights don't matter in this state, it's all about what's popular. Especially where committed same-sex couple who should be able to marry is concerned.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story