Newt Gingrich

[Print]  [Email]        

A lot of bark, but not much bite to Blue Dogs’ health reform deal

By: Newt Gingrich
July 31, 2009

Before Blue Dog Coalition Democrats break out the champagne because of the deal they won this week to water down the Big Government health care bill in the House, they should pay close attention to the difference between the way the deal is being spun in public and the way it’s being portrayed in private. 

While some of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s consiglieri were hyping the deal to the media Wednesday as a significant breakthrough, others were huddling in private with liberals to encourage them to keep hope alive.

Exhibit A is what was said in a private Capitol Hill meeting between a representative of Pelosi and disgruntled House liberals.

According to Politico, Pelosi’s emissary to liberal Democrats in the House, Rep. George Miller, D-Martinez, met with progressives who were in near revolt about the Blue Dog deal late Wednesday. Miller reportedly downplayed the importance of the deal, noting that it’s only one of three bills passed by the House and the only one lacking the public option that’s make or break for the left-wing.

Just to be clear, “changing it back” means reverting to the punitive, high-taxing, Big Government bill favored by President Barack Obama, Pelosi and House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles.

House liberals reportedly left the meeting “somewhat reassured.”

Even if it sticks, the Blue Dog deal is still bad for American health care consumers — it’s just slightly less bad than the original House bill.

But under the so-called deal, new taxes and mandates will still be placed on the small businesses that employ 70 percent of all small-business employees. Small businesses that have an average of just 32 employees will be subject to an 8 percent payroll-tax hike. Even small businesses that have an average of just 17 employees will face new taxes and mandates under the deal.

But the larger problem is that it only slightly slows down the train toward mandatory government health care, doing nothing to change the track.

The deal supposedly makes the public insurance plan that would quickly overwhelm the private insurance market optional.

Blue Dog Democrats from conservative rural districts have put their future in the hands of one House leader who represents San Francisco and another who represents Beverly Hills.

As the saying goes, a deal is a deal — until it’s not. Blue Dogs may not think they rolled over, but it sure looks like they got rolled.


Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich has published 19 books, including 10 fiction and nonfiction best-sellers. He’s the founder of the Center for Health Transformation and chairman of American Solutions for Winning the Future. For more information, see www.newt.org. His exclusive column for The Examiner appears Fridays.





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

kazooskibum

Jul 31, 2009

The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise.

 

GoBilly

Aug 1, 2009

kazooakibum:

The Democratic Party is a criminal enterprise. Unlike the Republican party which is an island of ethics, truth, and altruism.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story