Mark Tapscott

[Print]  [Email]        

Not a Christian nation, Mr. President?

By: Mark Tapscott
Editorial Page Editor
April 15, 2009

President Obama told a news conference in Turkey last week that America “is not a Christian nation,” thus demonstrating that it is indeed possible for a Harvard Law graduate to be correct strictly as a matter of law and otherwise completely out to lunch on the facts of history.

Here’s how our chief executive put it:
“Although…we have a large Christian population, we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation, or a Jewish nation, or a Muslim nation.  We consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values.”
 
Technically, Obama was right. America’s government provides no official support for any particular faith, Christian or otherwise. But he would have been more historically accurate to say America was created by a mostly Christian people based on principles closely reflecting their faith, including the right of individual conscience.
 
Or, to put it in Obama’s terms, America was and remains a nation of citizens bound by ideals and a set of values that make little sense apart from their explicitly Christian history, experience and convictions.
 
Skeptical? Check out the preambles to the 50 state constitutions, each of which refers to God. Surprised? The following list includes the adoption dates of the documents quoted, which span virtually the nation’s whole history:
 
Alabama 1901 “… invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God …”
 
Alaska 1956 “…grateful to God …
Arizona 1911 “… grateful to Almighty God…”
Arkansas 1874 “… grateful to Almighty God …”
California 1879 “… grateful to Almighty God …”
Colorado 1876 “… reverence for the Supreme Ruler of Universe..”
Connecticut 1818 “… Providence of God …”
Delaware 1897 “…Divine Goodness … their Creator …”
Florida 1885 “… grateful to Almighty God …”
Georgia 1777 “ …protection and guidance of Almighty God …”
Hawaii 1959 “…Grateful for Divine Guidance .. “
Idaho 1889 “… grateful to Almighty God …”
Illinois 1870 “… grateful to Almighty God …and looking to Him …”
Indiana 1851 “ … grateful to Almighty God …”
Iowa 1857 “… grateful to the Supreme Being … our dependence on Him …”
Kansas 1859 “… grateful to Almighty God …”
Kentucky 1891 “… grateful to Almighty God …”
Louisiana 1921 “ … grateful to Almighty God …”
Maine 1820 “ … goodness of the Sovereign Ruler of the Universe …”
Maryland 1776 “ … grateful to Almighty God …”
Massachusetts 1780 “… the Great Legislator of the Universe …”
Michigan 1908 “ … grateful to Almighty God …”
Minnesota, 1857 “ … grateful to God …”
Mississippi 1890 “ … grateful to Almighty God …”
Missouri 1845 “ … grateful for His goodness ...”
Montana 1889 “ …grateful to Almighty God …”
Nebraska 1875 “ … grateful to Almighty God …”
Nevada 1864 “ …grateful to Almighty God …”
New Hampshire 1792 “… inalienable right to worship God …”
New Jersey 1844 “… grateful to Almighty God …looking to Him …”
New Mexico 1911 “ … grateful to Almighty God …”
New York 1846 “ … grateful to Almighty God …”
 North Carolina 1868 “ … grateful to Almighty God, the Sovereign Ruler of Nations …”
North Dakota 1889 “… grateful to Almighty God …”
Ohio 1852 “ … grateful to Almighty God …”
Oklahoma 1907 “… Invoking the guidance of Almighty God …”
Oregon 1857 “ … to worship Almighty God …”
Pennsylvania 1776 “ … grateful to Almighty God …”
Rhode Island 1842 “ … grateful to Almighty God …”
South Carolina “ … grateful to God …”
South Dakota 1889 “ … grateful to Almighty God …”
Tennessee 1796 “ … right to worship Almighty God …”
Texas 1845 “ … grace and beneficence of God ...”
Utah 1896 “ … Grateful to Almighty God …”
Vermont 1777 “ … the Author of Existence …”
Virginia 1776 “ … Duty which we owe our Creator … to practice Christian Forbearance, Love and Charity …”
Washington 1889 “ … grateful to the Supreme Ruler of the Universe …”
West Virginia 1872 “ … our faith in and constant reliance upon God ...”
Wisconsin 1848 “ … grateful to Almighty God …”
Wyoming 1890 “ … grateful to God …”
For a non-Christian nation, we sure have been thanking the Christian deity a lot over the years.
NOTE TO THOSE WHO ARE NOW SAYING "AHA, TAPSCOTT WANTS TO MAKE CHRISTIANITY THE OFFICIAL RELIGION OF AMERICA":
No, you are wrong. I'm a Southern Baptist and my denominational ancestors in North Carolina and Virginia were at the forefront of the movement for adding the Bill of Rights to the Constitution, specifically including the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of religion, speech, assembly and petition.
The prolem today is that what you call "separation of church and state" too often turns out to mean separation of Americans from the facts of their history and the enduring roots of their heritage. America is not a theocratic "Christian nation" in the perjorative way that term is often meant.
But America very definitely is a nation explicitly based on Judaeo-Christian vaues, classical virtues and the great wisdom of the people.
What is truly remarkable are the lengths to which some people will go to deny the obvious. "God Almighty," for example, is the specifically Christian translation of the Old Testament's "El Shaddai," thus clearly indicating a Judeao-Christian reference framework, not one that is inclusive of Islam or Hinduism.
UPDATE:
For those with open minds and a desire to know all of the facts, I recommend these three works:
Political Sermons of the American Founding Era, Edited by Ellis Sandoz, two volumes: A remarkable collection of the election sermons of New England ministers in the decades before and during the revolutionary period.
The Christian Life and Character of the Civil Institutions of the United States," by Benjamin F. Morris, a comprehensive collection and analysis of the specifically Christian sources and influences on the colonial and constitutional institutions. 
The Basic Symbols of the American Political Tradition," by Willmoore Kendall and George Carey, the classic political theory analysis of primary symbols in the founding documents, beginning with the Mayflower Compact.
And if you are really serious about understanding these issues, check out:  "The Lamp of Experience: Whig history and the intellectual origins of the American revolution" by Trevor Colbourn. Clarifies why, for example, Edmund Burke, in his memorable address to Parliament on reconciliation with the colonies, reminded his colleagues of the inseparable link between religion and liberty in the minds of the Engishmen living in the American colonies.
Mark Tapscott is editorial page editor of The Washington Examiner and proprietor of Tapscott’s Copy Desk blog on washingtonexaminer.com.
 




To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Jessica

Apr 15, 2009

All 50 of those preambles refer to "God," and while, at the time of adoption, they may have had the Christian God in mind, one wonders why they didn't explicitly refer to Jesus Christ. I believe that some of the Founders have been thought to be Deists, which may shed some light on way they stayed away from any references to Christianity. What are your thoughts on that?

 

Not a Christian

Apr 16, 2009

he most striking is the Treaty of Tripoli, ratified by the U.S. Senate in 1797. Article 11 states: "As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility [sic], of Mussulmen [Muslims]; and, as the said States never have entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."

 

Greg Sefcheck

Apr 16, 2009

Of the 50 listings, only Virginia's specifically refers to Christianity. It is not surprising that this fact escapes Mr. Tapscott and his clear biases. God is not the property of any one religion.

 

Terrence

Apr 16, 2009

I fail to follow Mark Tapscott's logic. While the state constitutions apparently include a reference to God, there is no specific reference in any state constitution to Jesus. Since all religions believe in some form of God, Tapscott's conclusion that this is a Christian nation is weeeeaaaak. Actually, I'm surprised that the Washington Examiners' editors would allow such a inferior reasoned argument to appear in the paper.

 

Gary

Apr 16, 2009

I don't get it . . . how does believing in God make this a "Christian" nation?

 

reader

Apr 16, 2009

There are actually references to Jesus Christ that exist in a number of the founding fathers own writings. I do however have to agree with the other readers. On the surface, the logic here is completely flawed. It may have been more convincing, and no doubt the foundations of the country are irrepressibly Christian in character, had Tapscott focused on those references instead. But in Obama's defense, his quotes should not be taken out of context. The president is doing what presidents do: offering the olive branch to foreign nations who have a warped view that America is unwaveringly Christian to the exclusion of other religions. Therefore, I think reading the quote in this manner is a severe misrepresentation of Obama, like him or not. And our bias shouldn't lead our conclusions if we're sincere about evaluating the evidence.

 

Cindy Melborne Clarke

Apr 16, 2009

Even if the founding fathers referenced Jesus Christ in their own writings, they clearly did not want their own religious beliefs to infiltrate the nation. So, their personal beliefs seem irrelevant to me. It's similar to a contract - conversations made prior to signing the contract are irrelevant. Only the language in the contract itself is relevelant. Here, the constituion is devoid of any specific reference to Christianity. So, it is obvious that the founding fathers did not want this to be a Christian Nation.

 

In Monotheism We Trust

Apr 16, 2009

When Terrence said, "I'm surprised that the Washington Examiners' editors would allow such a inferior reasoned argument to appear in the paper" I said, I thought Mr. Tapscott *was* the editorial page editor. His section, his call, for better or worse.

 

JamesJ

Apr 16, 2009

Last time I looked at what little $$ I have, It says: "In God We Trust" I didn't see: In Allah we trust, In Yahwe we trust, In Jehova we trust, and it doesn't say "we don't believe in $hit

 

Coleman

Apr 16, 2009

Only a non-critical thinker would be sucked in by Tapscott's screed. The President was technically and in every other way correct with his assertion that the U.S. is not a Christian nation.

 

Clint

Apr 16, 2009

Hey JamesJ - My money don't say "In Jesus We Trust" neither!

 

Pastor and Scholar of American Christianity

Apr 16, 2009

In a comment on the search for the Historical Jesus in the 19th century, Lohse, a historian said that searches looked into the deep well of history, saw their own reflection, and called it Jesus. Mr. Tapscott has apparently done the same thing - except his self-deception is even more complete. There are billions on the planet, and tens of millions in the US who believe in God, and are either skeptical about Jesus and his followers, or are outright opposed to them. Of all the horrible abortions that have been presented as "Christian Faith" in the past 250 years of American history, the most disgusting have been the watered-down versions of Christianity that politicians use to validate their own predilections, or use the term "God" to convince undiscriminating voters to support them. If Mr. Tapscott believes that these self-serving references are anything other political spin at religious faith's expense, he is most to be pitied.

 

The Old Perfessor

Apr 16, 2009

However, the Constitution of the United States which, until the Bush Administration was the guiding principal of our country has not a single reference to God or to Jesus. If you want references to God in a national constitution, try Iran. There are lots of them there.

 

Edd Doerr

Apr 16, 2009

We should note that the pious language in state constitutions was generally inserted while we still had slavery or, later, segregation, and while women were not allowed to vote or hold public office. It would seem, then, that the pious language was scarcely more than political boilerplate of little practical significance. But look at the US Constitution. Not a word about a deity, only prohibitions on religious tests for public office and mandatory oaths of office. Look at the First Amendment, which sets up a wall of separation between church and state. And the 1797 treaty with Tripoli, signed by President John Adams and ratified by the US Senate, which states that "the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion". Pious language is meaningless unless it is backed by concern for social justice, democratic values, and dedication to full religious liberty for all. -- Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Liberty.

 

Russell

Apr 16, 2009

Well, there is only one Almighty God. There is only one God who can have the capital. No other religion on the face of the earth refers to God as the Almighty and no other God on earth is known as God but instead either Allah or god with the lower case. So, it is clear in these writings that they refer to the Christian God... for there is no other God but this God.

 

Wendy

Apr 16, 2009

There is but one Almighty God... And He is the God and Father of the Lord Jesus Christ. Any mention of the Almighty God is a direct reference to the Christian God. There is no other religion who references this God. Not Islam, nor any other. The Almighty God is the Christian God. But you would have to know something about God to understand this. This article is correct in it's reference and statements concerning Christianity.

 

Andrew

Apr 16, 2009

The last time I checked the concept of God was not unique to Christianity, but is included in Jewish & Muslim ideology which is what Mr Obama stated.

 

Andrew

Apr 16, 2009

The last time I checked the concept of God was not unique to Christianity, but is included in Jewish & Muslim ideology which is what Mr Obama stated.

 

prsnlsprtUl

Apr 16, 2009

Hmm... None of those "state slogans" advocates a specically CHRISTIAN point of view, though all are undoubtedly a RELIGIOUS point of view (I won't even get into whether they truly reflected anything other than the viewpoint of the individuals who drafted the sayings at the time). Anyhow, try again (a little harder next time); I'm certain that you can still articulate your point...

 

Don Eichelberger

Apr 16, 2009

Only Virginia mentions Christian values, specifically. Otherwise, when did "God, Almighty God, Author of the Universe" become only a Christian God? If Christians try to aggrandize their interpretation that their god is supreme by referring to "Almighty" God, it doesn't mean everyone's god is not, really, "Almighty". I agree that God's inclusion is just template politics.

 

Apr 16, 2009

AMEN!!!

 

Apr 16, 2009

AMEN!!!

 

Apr 16, 2009

Poor "persecuted" Christians, being reminded at every turn that they're not the center of the universe, let alone America. Selfish little things, whining and crying as they're reminded they have to share.

 

drunkalltime@yahoo.com

Apr 17, 2009

Russell & Wendy believe that the word "God" refers to a Christian God. But, that intrepretation is only in your minds. Believe it or not, most of the people on this earth believe that Jesus was not a diety, but just one of many who were killed by the Romans for having delusions of granduer - sorry. So, the word "God" has different meanings to different religions. Obvioulsy, a Jew would never consider the word "God" to refer to Jesus in any way shape or form.

 

In the Dark

Apr 17, 2009

It's already been said, but where in those preambles is Jesus? Jesus is the Christ in "Christian," and he's not there. The identified "God" is the same "God" that Jews and Muslims follow. By this measure, the US is part of the monotheistic tradition, and even so that tradition is unofficial, and polytheists and atheists are (or are supposed to be) perfectly equal welcome, too.

 

Eleanor Duffield

Apr 17, 2009

For Christians, God is the God we know in Jesus Christ, our Savior and Lord. Without Christ, there is no Christianity. A reference, then, to God is not Christianity.

 

Apr 17, 2009

This the first president thats a real smuck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Marty

Apr 17, 2009

So much that our President doesn't know about our wonderful country. Shame, Shame.

 

Marty

Apr 17, 2009

So much that our President doesn't know about our wonderful country. Shame, Shame.

 

Christian

Apr 19, 2009

The Word was God, the very diety that spoke before the world was and brought the world and all creation into existance. The Word was with God and was made flesh and dwelt among us ...and the darkness did not comprehend it. Jesus The Christ was God in the flesh. Dust off a Bible and read starting with John 1

 

EXCUSE ME! I Didn't know 'God' meant 'JESUS CHRIST'

Apr 20, 2009

How incredibly offensive! I suppose Jews pray to "whatchamallit" and Muslims pray to "something in the sky," etc, and only Christians pray to "God." What the hell were you thinking?

 

Christian

Apr 21, 2009

Jesus was a Jew, a Sabbath keeping Jew. In fact He kept the entire Law (Torah) perfectly. He prayed to His Father "God". Christians pray to God the Father as Christ the Son instructed, and if the truth is offensive I am in good company. This country was very much founded on Christian beliefs and Christian beliefs are based on the Old Testament as well as the New. Christ quoted the books of what we call the Old Testament. The Pilgrams and Puritans expected to build a city on the (a reference to Jerusalem)a society based on the practice of biblical principals. A society that would recieve the blessings of God for their adherence to "The Way". A society that Mother England would see prosper and repentively invite back or if you were a sepratist a city on the hill that would outshine any in England because of their good works and faith in God.

 

Sharon Dawson

May 8, 2009

Amen. Thank Almighty God for our Judeo-Christian nation! Secular amd Biblical history show again and again what happens to nations who forget or abolish God from their collective conscience.

 

Lionstudios

May 11, 2009

It says god, not Christ. The nation was founded by Deist. There are many gods. Maybe the god at which they spoke was a god of rain. You religious folk are grasping a straw. Stop forcing your beliefs to the world.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Elin gives Tiger six months of probation

Now that he’s out of sex rehab, what’s next... Full story

Sports

Terry leads the Mavericks past Warriors, 127-117

Jason Terry spent the post-game lying on his back, his feet propped up on a folding chair, with a bag of ice tucked in the waist band of his shorts. It was just his way of relaxing after a hard night at work. Full story