Ken Garcia

[Print]  [Email]        

Paradise is already paved

By: Ken Garcia
Examiner Staff Writer
April 10, 2009

What’s become abundantly clear in the battle about a proposed modern-art museum in the Presidio is that even if the architect came up with the most beautiful design, if a quiet spot could be found for it and if a majority of San Franciscans voted in favor of it, a small band of activists would rather have a parking lot than a billion-dollar gift.

This is what passes as reasonable discourse in San Francisco. The situation is not unlike the tiny group who opposed the underground parking garage in Golden Gate Park that serves two of The City’s newest and finest cultural attractions, which cost a number of individuals millions of dollars in legal fees.

The garage was built and the museums opened, and now record crowds are pouring in to Golden Gate Park. And, miracle of miracles, no one is complaining.

Gap Inc. founder Don Fisher and his wife want to build the museum in the Presidio, and his original plan for a boxy 50-foot-tall design was found to be a poor fit for the site. He was asked to either move the building or scale it back. His architectural team did just that, coming up with a graceful, unobtrusive structure that fits with the original Army post grounds much better than before.

Still, the protests continue.

Too much traffic, too much history, you name it — there is no argument being left unturned. The truth is, critics do not want any new buildings in San Francisco’s only national park — it’s just that kind of open thinking that makes The City a planner’s nightmare.

Here’s a thought: Maybe Fisher could start inviting the public to view what is unquestionably one of the finest modern-art collections in the world. Then, they could travel to the Presidio and view the giant asphalt parking lot that is the main landscape feature of the site and decide if they would rather see Calder sculptures or dusty cars.

Somehow, the Presidio survived the building of the new Lucas Film Digital Arts Center, and there is little doubt it could easily handle a new lodge, restaurants or other tourist attractions — and that certainly includes the Contemporary Art Museum of the Presidio. Neighborhood groups and military historians fighting so hard to stop the museum fail to remember one thing: The Presidio is not their backyard, it’s San Francisco’s.

 

Names you can forget in the race for governor
 

Hard to believe that so many people are battling to become leader of a state teetering on bankruptcy. But as the race for California governor shows, political ambition is not steeped in any sense of reality.

That would explain why two new candidates have surfaced recently, one being from the field of education and the other from the world of denim.

Needless to say, the campaigns of Jack O’Connell, state superintendent of public instruction, and Guess Inc. guru Georges Marciano have received little attention, and probably will continue to, because they are not likely to go anywhere. O’Connell scored all of 2 percent in a recent field poll of Democratic candidates, and Marciano did not score at all because he had yet to announce his candidacy.

O’Connell is a good and competent guy, running from the worst possible office perch (see Bill Honig), and Marciano is apparently thinking of running as an independent, which makes him a curiosity at best. The truth is, we did not even know he lived in California, let alone was considering expanding his jeans franchise to Sacramento.

Somehow, being a fashion-apparel promoter seems like the wrong fit for any candidate.
 


Can’t bring a bike to the Big House


Remember when Lance Armstrong’s bike was stolen during this year’s Tour of California and he asked for its return, no questions asked? Well, Armstrong is not asking questions, but the police are.

Sacramento police arrested two men this week in connection with the theft of Armstrong and two of his teammates’ bikes. Lee Crider, 39, was charged with burglary and grand theft, and Dung Le, the man who returned Armstrong’s bike, was charged with possession of stolen property.

Le had described himself as an Armstrong fan when he returned the $10,000 bike that was stolen from a parked truck during the Sacramento time trials. The other two bikes were never returned.

Police said Le purchased the bike from Crider, before returning it amid much publicity three days later. Chances are pretty good that Le wishes he had just asked for an autograph.
 

Endangered species not only ones who like golf


Proving once again that a constituency exists for just about every reptile, marsh and plant in San Francisco, self-styled eco warrior Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi is trying to make the world, or at least a tiny part of the Peninsula, safe for garter snakes and red-legged frogs.

A noble goal, for sure, though the many loyal golfers who think Pacifica’s Sharp Park Golf Course is the poor man’s Augusta would much prefer that San Francisco tackle a more saintly pursuit — say global warming — and leave their beloved greens alone.

Mirkarimi’s proposed legislation, which would turn the golf course into a nature preserve and hand it to the National Park Service, is about as absurd as turning Harding Park into a flying-disc arena. But it’s a headline-grabber, and the supervisor’s colleagues know how much Mirkarimi enjoys that.

If officials were really serious about taking leave of one of The City’s popular golf courses, it would make a lot more sense to lease it to the city of Pacifica — which actually does want it. The National Park Service has neither the time nor personnel and money to do anything with the site other than let it be, as we know from its fine stewardship of the Presidio.

Golf hacks and frogs have peacefully coexisted for decades, as anyone who has ever visited Florida or Hawaii can attest. The course’s boglike nature in winter can be a problem, but it’s also part of its enduring charm.

Check out Ken Garcia’s new blog at www.sfexaminer.com/opinion. If you’d like to dish the dirt, chew the fat or wag the tongue, e-mail kgarcia@sfexaminer.com

 





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Carolyn Black

Apr 10, 2009

There is a lot of history of the Presidio. I have some old pictures of my father-in-law, Lt. Col. Charles H. Black, Jr. working there and when he retired. I cannot see any reason why Don Fisher has to build on the Presidio. Why can't he just use one of the existing buildings. Turning the officer barracks into a hotel is a great idea. JROTC was voted by the people to keep it. It is not constitutional for our city leaders to do otherwise. That takes the rights of the people away. The vote should be honored. There is nothing wrong with being in the military or having ROTC programs in school. This is how some kids get a chance for a career and education. Not every kid has parents who have money for education. Think about it.

 

Apr 11, 2009

What a perceptive article on the public's response to CAMP. I particularly liked your suggestion that the public have a visit to the Fishers' extraordinary art collection (at the very least in the public spaces of the GAP headquarters), then visit the asphalt parking lot in the proposed site in the Presidio. Brilliant! The picture you paint so vividly with your words makes one laugh aloud. Thanks for the compassionate and sensible response to the small group of the public who oppose anything new and outstanding in our city. I wonder where they park when they go to the new CAS or FAM?

 

Douglas L. Saunders

Apr 12, 2009

While I generally agree on your take on obstructionists in the Presidio (though I wish it would have blended more into the historic buildings), I think the announced move of the Exploratorium to the Embarcadero presents an even better alternative of housing the Fisher collection in the Palace of Fine Arts. This would both enliven the Palace of Fine Arts with a great museum, and avoid even minor distractions to the historic character of the Main Post at the Presidio. Whaddya say, Ken? Good option? It seems like a classic San Francisco solution to me - a win-win all around.

 

joe perrelli

Apr 13, 2009

Dear Mr. Garcia. I read your column almost always, and almost always agree with you. A guiding principle that the few informed critics ignore is that the Secretary's (of the Interior) Standards for the Rehabilitation of Historic Buidings or the Construction of New Buildings in an Historical Landmark District clearly state that new structures' designs are to reflect the era in which they are built - - not try to imitate history. When people say the new structure should "blend" more with the old buildings, that's counter to the Secretary's intent. The Trust has to follow those standards. Thanks for your comments on so many important issues facing us. jp

 

Douglas L. Saunders

Apr 13, 2009

Fortunately for us, and what may have escaped Mr. Perelli's notice, is that most current architects actively incorporate "blending" a building into it's natural and architectural context as part of the design process. There is no conflict between a nod to history and the current "guidelines". Only one of those dinosaur, ego-maniac architects would try to impose anything else. The neo-modern Lucas complex is a perfect example of this principle. I still say utilizing the soon to be vacated Palace of Fine Arts would be the best answer to EVERYONE's concerns. Let's just see if anyone picks up that ball and runs with it.

 

K Albrecht

Apr 14, 2009

As far as the Main Post parking lot goes, whether or not the Fisher museum or any other facility is built nearby, destroying the lot to 'green' the main post sounds like a lovely idea. However, there are far too many events that take place on the Main Post to not have parking available. The reason the new Lucas office space and the deYoung/CalAcademy spaces work so well is because parking was added, not taken away. If a parking structure can be put under the current main post parking lot, I say go for the greening. Otherwise, I would say you are going to get a lot less people going to the Main Post to see ANY new or renovated building/facility just because there is not enough parking available, and bus service to the Presidio is ridiculous.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Cardinal has Luck going into Big Game showdown

Though he’s just a redshirt freshman, Andrew Luck... Full story

Entertainment

Reno Santa event inspired by SF revelers

About 5,000 Santa costume-clad folks are expected to... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Is J. Lo having ex tailed?

Is Jennifer Lopez playing hardball in her battle with... Full story