Gregory Kane

[Print]  [Email]        

Mssrs. Smith, Wesson for Pink Pistols

By: Gregory Kane
November 1, 2009

I’m putting my money on the notion that there was at least one gay-rights group that didn’t cheer when President Barack Obama signed the most recent “hate crimes” bill last week.

That would be the group known as the “Pink Pistols.” They’re the one gay-rights group you can bet Obama, Attorney General Eric Holder and virtually every other liberal in the country have absolutely no use for, but more about it later.

First, let’s get down to the real nitty gritty about what the new “hate crimes” bill will do, and what it won’t do. If you live in the alternate universe our president frequents all too often, then you really believe the new law “will strengthen the protections against crimes based on the color of our skin, the faith in your heart, or the place of your birth.”

Yes, Obama really said that. And he added this: “We will finally add federal protections against crimes based on gender, disability, gender identity, or sexual orientation. And prosecutors will have new tools to work with states in order to prosecute to the fullest those who would perpetrate such crimes.”

Have you noticed that when our president talks, he sometimes lets his inner demagogue kind of ooze out of him? Early in his prepared statement he mentioned the name of the new law, the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.
Shepard was a gay man beaten to death in Wyoming in 1998. That same year, three white supremacists chained Byrd to the back of a pickup truck in Jasper, Texas, and dragged him to death.

In BOTH cases the accused murderers were tried, convicted and sentenced. In Byrd’s case, two of his murderers were sentenced to death.

In Obamaworld, this does not constitute being “prosecuted to the fullest.” In Obamaworld, the death penalty for a brutal murder is wrist-slap stuff. In Obamaworld, Byrd’s murderers — and Shepard’s — got off easy. If we really wanted to get tough, we’d have nailed ’em with violating “hate crimes” laws. Why?

Let’s visit Obamaworld again. There, Americans must legislate against those crimes that “are meant not only to break bones, but [also] to break spirits. Not only to inflict harm, but to instill fear.”

Now if you believe that’s a definition of all violent crime — not just crimes committed against people in those groups Obama has a preference for — then, apparently, you’re just being silly. Our president says we’re not prosecuting “to the fullest” those crimes that “instill fear” and “break spirits.”

The families of Jennifer Morelock and Jason Woycio had their spirits broken in April 2006, when both were fatally shot on a Baltimore street.

The suspect — nailed dead to rights with a cell phone that contained a text message in which he said he committed the crime — walked on a technicality. The suspect is black; Morelock and Woycio were white.

And the man suspected of murdering them hasn’t been prosecuted at all, much less “to the fullest.” And you can bet that with Obama in the White House and Holder as the head of the Justice Department, he certainly won’t be, our president’s crowing about the passage of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act notwithstanding.

That law was designed to make gays and lesbians feel good. It won’t protect them. If they want protection, they’ll have to sign up with a group formed for precisely that purpose. I’m talking about my favorite gay rights group in the entire country, the Pink Pistols.

The group’s Web site describes its purpose: “We are dedicated to the legal, safe, and responsible use of firearms for self-defense of the sexual-minority community. We no longer believe it is the right of those who hate and fear gay, lesbian, bi, trans, or polyamorous persons to use us as targets for their rage. Self-defense is our right.”

They’re danged skippy it is their right. Gays and lesbians who face violent attacks don’t need the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act to protect them. They don’t need Mr. Obama hailing a new law for them; they don’t need Mr. Holder prosecuting gay bashers for them.

Gays and lesbians seeking protection need two other guys, the ones who go by the name Mr. Smith and Mr. Wesson.

Examiner columnist Gregory Kane is a Pulitzer-nominated news and opinion journalist who has covered people and politics from Baltimore to the Sudan.





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Ed Dunn

Nov 2, 2009

Mr. Kane, another great column that tells it like it is. My wife and I always have readily at hand our two body guards, Mssrs. Smith & Wesson, where ever we go. Our motto is "WE DON'T CALL 911"!

 

pastol

Nov 2, 2009

Mr. Kane misses the point. One could hope that the article is an attempt at humor. As such, it is inappropriate at best. Taken seriously, it does not take a genius to see the fallacies committed in his argument. Any of us could cherry pick a court case, then infer the selected outcome is status quo. As a person who has been a victim of a hate crime, the insinuations are an insult. I was “jumped” from behind with absolutely no warning. A concealed gun would not have prevented the cowardly attack. When perpetrators begin to habitually assault and murder white male heterosexuals for no other reason than the fact that they are white male heterosexuals, the author may have a change of heart, especially if he has sons. I have no desire to carry a weapon. The old “Take’em out back and shoot’em” sense of justice is archaic and ineffective. I prefer to use intelligence and civil law for protection. Mr. Kane’s view fails at that point.

 

Virtue

Nov 2, 2009

"I prefer to use intelligence and civil law for protection"

So would Civil Law have done a better job of protecting you when you got jumped from behind?

 

here@home.com

Nov 2, 2009

So "pastol" cares more about the balkanized nature of the victim of crime, to determine an appropriate level of punishment for the criminal, than he does about the crime itself. Perhaps it would work better if all assaults were treated equally in the eyes of the law, rather than having a law that allows prosecutors to selectively prosecute someone under federal guidelines, even if the defendant was found not guilty in state court, for having politically incorrect thoughts about a protected group.

I personally think all citizens should be given equal protection under the law, and I would want someone who hit me over the head to be punished equally with someone who hits pastol over the head, even if they cry racial or sexual epithets over one or both of us while attacking us.82

 

Jim In Houston

Nov 2, 2009

pastol: You're probably right that a firearm wouldn't help you in THAT PARTICULAR situation. However, there are many other situations where they have proven to be highly valuable: in fact, 1-3 million times per year in the US. (http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcdguse.html)

 

Bearman

Nov 2, 2009

I've got nothing against Smith & Wesson but I prefer Mr. Walther PPK.

 

Henry Bowman

Nov 2, 2009

"I have no desire to carry a weapon."

Then pastol, who exactly do you feel is responsible for your personal safety? The police? The government?

Personal responsibility aside, what you're advocating for is unequal protection under the law. By calling for a stronger penalty for a criminal attacking a gay victim vs. a straight victim, you're saying that a gay man's life is more valuable than a straight man's. And that rings of prejudice. Maybe Orwell was right that "All animals are equal; but some animals are more equal than others."

 

Atomic

Nov 2, 2009

Smith and Wesson and Walthers are fine weapons. I prefer Berettas, but then if your life is at stake, any reliable Saturday night special will do the job.

 

RealDoktor

Nov 3, 2009

For two decades I have carried the the same pistol the Secret Service carries to protect the Presidents.
German made, Mr. Sig-Sauer..and have never had the need nor desire to use it. But it is there.
Hollow-points too ! It is a crazy World now. Finis !

 

Greg

Nov 15, 2009

"I was “jumped” from behind with absolutely no warning." Two questions: Did the people who did this know you, or know of you? Whether they did or not, the motivation is some form of hate, either sexual or otherwise. If it wasn't, they would not have attacked you in the first place. 2nd question: How likely do you think they would have been to attack you if they knew you were carrying a gun? I'm not a homosexual myself, but I think the Pink Pistols are a fantastic group, and a fantastic idea. I think the idea that homosexuals openly carrying, and being vocal about the fact that they're armed, will make "gay-bashers" think twice before trying something stupid. You don't have to be a genius to know that a gun pointed at you is serious.

 

aris

Jan 14, 2010

great opinion, nice analisys. Thank you for sharing it



Aku Cuma Seorang Blogger Yang Cinta Seo | Mbah Gendeng

 

Jan 21, 2010

Simply because it’s true, and it actually makes some sense.

Business management school AND fire science degree

 

Jan 21, 2010

Gascón, who spent most of his career in Los Angeles rising up the ranks to assistant police chief before taking the helm of Mesa, Ariz.’s department, said he loves being in San Francisco because it’s an "incredible, world-class city." And not many people would ever describe the metropolis known as L.A. that way, but I digress.

Must University AND Online journalism degree AND Online Nursing school

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story