Gregory Kane

[Print]  [Email]        

Chucky The Lip has struck again, but this time it’s a good thing

By: Gregory Kane
Examiner Columnist
September 8, 2009

You know Chucky The Lip better as Rep. Charles Rangel of New York. Rangel is chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, and he’s also a well-known hatchet man and race baiter for the Democratic Party.

Chucky The Lip’s latest race-baiting salvo came last week when he spoke at a health-care forum in the Washington Heights section of New York City. Those opposed to President Obama’s health care plan are motivated, sayeth The Lip, by “bias” and “prejudice.” Translation from Lip-ese into standard English: they have a problem with a black man sitting in the Oval Office.

In case that wasn’t clear enough, Rangel added this:

“Some Americans have not gotten over the fact that Obama is president of the United States. They go to sleep wondering, ‘How did this happen?’”

Actually, I go to bed wondering how race-baiting demagogues like Rangel and Michigan Rep. John Conyers get re-elected term after term. I’m still miffed at Rangel for calling former President Bush “our Bull Connor,” and it’s not because I have any great love for Bush. It’s because the allegation was scandalous, darned near slanderous and downright untrue. Comparing the president who named the first two black secretaries of state and who had one of the most diverse Cabinets in history to the man who turned fire hoses and police dogs on black civil rights demonstrators in Birmingham, Ala., in 1963 was a new low in demagoguery.

But with that quote about how some Americans go to sleep wondering how Obama became president, Rangel is absolutely right, but not for the reasons he thinks. And we should thank him for dredging up the issue of race. It allows us, once again, to point out how race worked FOR Obama during his run for president, not against him.

What most of those Americans who are wondering how Obama got to be president are wondering about is not how a black man got to be president, but how a guy with only two years experience as a U.S. senator, less than 10 years experience as a state senator and absolutely zero years of military experience got elected president of the United States, leader of the free world and commander in chief of our armed forces.

Really, could a white guy with those same credentials have run for president of the United States and won? Or would a white guy with those same credentials have been laughed out of the presidential race before he was barely in it?

Perhaps some full disclosure is in order at this point. I’m a registered Republican. I didn’t vote for Obama, for a laundry list of reasons. Obama’s view on abortion and the Roe v. Wade Supreme court decision was at the top of my list.

But on that list, right behind abortion, was the matter of experience. There was no way I could see myself voting for a guy who was, basically, a state senator, and helping to elect him to what is in essence the most powerful office in the world. I dismiss, out of hand, Obama’s two years of experience in the U.S. Senate. I consider that no experience at all. (Yes, I know that as of November 2008, Obama had technically been a U.S. senator for three years and 10 months. But he declared his candidacy for the presidency and started running in 2007. I don’t consider running for president legitimate experience as a senator.)

In addition to his woeful inexperience, there are the matters of Obama’s age — he was only 47 when he was elected — and his politics, which are far to liberal for my tastes. (The only two other Democrats who’ve been elected president since 1968, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, at least had the wisdom to campaign as moderates.) Obama’s liberal leanings may explain why he’s appointed to the Supreme Court a justice who thinks white male judges don’t quite cut the mustard, and a black man who’s compared Republicans to a well-known bodily orifice and who’s also a 9/11 conspiracy theorist to an administration post.

Rangel has a point: if his race didn’t help get this far-left liberal, wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper elected president, then what did?

Examiner columnist Gregory Kane is an award-winning journalist who lives in Baltimore.





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

EasTexan

Sep 8, 2009

Mr. Kane is absolutely correct. President Obama, a man totally lacking in relevant experience, was elected PRECISELY because he is black. And yes, any white man with an equivalent background would have been laughed off stage before getting to a microphone.

 

Robert

Sep 8, 2009

Race-baiting is a common tactic used when they have no rational answer. They feel that by crying discrimination it legitimizes their remarks. Unfortunately it just shows how shallow they really are.

 

Tish

Sep 9, 2009

Mr. Kane has asked a question which no liberal will ever answer!

 

4insure

Oct 30, 2009

Mr. Kane is absolutely correct. President Obama, a man totally lacking in relevant experience, was elected PRECISELY because he is black. And yes, any white man with an equivalent background would have been laughed off stage before getting to a microphone. auto insurance quotes

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Cardinal has Luck going into Big Game showdown

Though he’s just a redshirt freshman, Andrew Luck... Full story

Entertainment

Reno Santa event inspired by SF revelers

About 5,000 Santa costume-clad folks are expected to... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Is J. Lo having ex tailed?

Is Jennifer Lopez playing hardball in her battle with... Full story