Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Progressives start infighting

By: Joshua Sabatini

11/04/09 2:19 PM PST

While Mayor Gavin Newsom is out of town and looking politically vulnerable, a fight has erupted among the progressives on the Board of Supervisors — who are Newsom’s political adversaries.

The political infighting, which began at a time when the progressives could have banded together to attack the mayor, started when the board’s Budget and Finance Committee held a meeting Wednesday to vote on legislation that would restore millions of dollars to the public health department to prevent layoffs of SEIU 1021 labor union workers — mostly nurses.

One problem: Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi who sits on the committee could not attend because he had to attend the California Coastal Commission meeting. That left progressive committee chair John Avalos and Newsom ally Supervisor Carmen Chu. Avalos would support the bill, while Chu was expected not to. It would take a third vote to send it out of committee.

Under board procedures, the board president can appoint another supervisor to fill the seat as a voting member.

Supervisor David Campos wanted to be that fill-in voting member. The procedure was put in place and Board of Supervisors President David Chiu was notified.

But then, all of a sudden Chiu vanished from City Hall without having named Campos as a voting member.

At the outset of the hearing, Campos slammed Chiu for playing “procedural gamesmanship” and called Chiu out for not adhering to the progressive agenda.

Campos said to members of SEIU 1021 that they had worked “very hard to elect a progressive majority to the Board of Supervisors” and they should expect these members “to deliver on the agenda was promised to you.”

Campos accused Chiu of playing games and caring more about his ego or reputation.

“What is at stake here is not the egos or reputation of elected officials. But it is the lives of the workers , the lives of the families that are being impacted.”

“Even though we may not be able to make that vote happen today — No one — whether it’s the Board of Supervisors president — is going to get in the way of justice.”

Chiu did not return a phone message asking for comment.





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

RAJ

Nov 4, 2009

Sounds like kindergartners fighting for toys while the teacher is outside the classroom!

 

SFNATIV

Nov 4, 2009

It used to be ABCD stood for "Anybody but Chris Daly" (still a good option) , but now we've added "Anybody but Campos, David" another PROGRESSIVELY WORSE member of the Bd of Dupes. Ship them all back to wherever they were SPAWNED.

 

ridiculous

Nov 6, 2009

Does SFexaminer want to do any tough work and tell us where this money is coming from and why these positions are being laid off? I'm assuming since Chu is against it and Campos/Daly are for it then it is a bad idea and there is no logic or fiscal responsibility involved.

 

SFNATIV

Nov 6, 2009

The part I love, "not adhering to the progressive agenda"-this so called agenda is what is getting us into so many problems, and wild uncontrolled spending on social issues, instead of problems faced by the TAX PAYING Citizens.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Cardinal has Luck going into Big Game showdown

Though he’s just a redshirt freshman, Andrew Luck... Full story

Entertainment

Reno Santa event inspired by SF revelers

About 5,000 Santa costume-clad folks are expected to... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Is J. Lo having ex tailed?

Is Jennifer Lopez playing hardball in her battle with... Full story