Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Bill would increase vehicle registration fees

By: Mike Aldax
Examiner Staff Writer
05/25/09 3:09 PM PDT

The Bay Area’s overarching transit planning agency is pushing legislation to increase vehicle registration fees and opposing a bill offering emergency vehicles free passes on toll bridges when responding to urgent calls.

On Wednesday, the legislative arm of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission will present to the full commission its stance on certain bills being proposed that would impact the state’s drivers.

One piece of legislation would authorize counties, with a simple majority vote, to raise the vehicle registration fee by as much as $10. The extra fee would have to be used toward “critically needed transportation maintenance and improvements” such as road fixes, the addition of high-occupancy toll lanes, bus rapid transit infrastructure and bicycle and pedestrian amenities, among other projects.

MTC’s legislative staff is also opposing a bill offering “authorized emergency vehicles responding to urgent or emergency’ calls” toll free access on any crossing or toll highway. It also rejects legislation allowing military veterans driving alone in a vehicle to access high-occupancy lanes, as well as another allowing plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles access to those lanes regardless of how many people are inside the vehicle.
 





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Marinette

May 26, 2009

An increase in the VLF is long overdue, and represents a far more practical revenue generation method than the high-tech systems currently in vogue (HOT lanes, congestion pricing). The VLF represents an in-place revenue collection method that not only would generate more funds for CA, but might also discourage auto ownership and usage, if only slightly. The heavier the vehicle, the more damage it causes to the road. Given this, VLF rates should be based on the weight of the vehicle, not the age or monetary value, and not the flat fee as proposed. If rates increased significantly with vehicle weight, perhaps we would see fewer Tundras, Expeditions and Yukons on the road, and more Jettas, Coopers, and Focuses (Foci?). Less road damage would lower the need for funds to fix the roads. Additionally, a portion of the revenue should be earmarked for transit operations.

 

Not Green

May 26, 2009

If you raise the VLF we will hurt commercial business. How are the trucks that provide a service to out infrastructure going to absorb more costs? The current trend is to tax, add a surcharge, or increase fees. What we need to do is trim the fat and crack down on our overpaid politicians. Make people accountable for what they do. Yes I do drive a big SUV but how am I supposed to fit my 3 children (in car seats), and my wife in a Cooper???? I'm all about not hurting the environment and not being dependent on oil but this, "Be Green" mentality has gotten out of control! How is a HOV lane good for the environment when your sitting in bumper to bumper traffic and the HOV lane is practically empty? Yes the few cars using the HOV lane is really saving the environment.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Cardinal has Luck going into Big Game showdown

Though he’s just a redshirt freshman, Andrew Luck... Full story

Entertainment

Reno Santa event inspired by SF revelers

About 5,000 Santa costume-clad folks are expected to... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Is J. Lo having ex tailed?

Is Jennifer Lopez playing hardball in her battle with... Full story