Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

The Examiner endorses McCain-Palin


Examiner Editorial
September 24, 2008

Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin arrive at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Penn., October 8, 2008 for a rally. (AFP/Getty Images)

America is at war overseas and in an economic crisis here at home. Many of her citizens believe the country is on the wrong track. It is for times such as these that men like John McCain are made, to put country first so that it can be put right in its time of need. For this reason, The Examiner endorses McCain for president and his running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, for vice president.

Cut through the high-toned speeches and campaign cut and thrust, and the pre-eminent issues of 2008 become strikingly clear. First, the next president must have the hard-earned experience, unrelenting toughness and uncompromising character to wage and win the war against al Qaeda and other terrorists who seek the destruction of America. Second, he must have an unshakable commitment to restoring honest taxing and spending by government at all levels, the essential first step of which is ridding Washington of pork-barrel "earmarks," the gateway drug to budget deficits and political corruption.

Most importantly, the next president must be an inspirational leader who can restore for future generations of Middle Americans the enduring virtues – nurturing the energy and innovation inspired by individual liberty, preserving the life-giving bonds of faith, family and fellow citizens, raising up a new generation of public servants who will speak the truth to the American people, appointing judges bound by the actual words of the Constitution, and, finally, never forgetting that, for all her faults, America remains for billions of people around the world the light of freedom, the shining city on a hill that must be defended and preserved.

McCain's adult life has been devoted to this nation's service, including five excruciatingly painful years in a North Vietnamese prison cell in which he provided his countrymen a stirring example of honor lived. He came home, completed his Navy career with distinction, and was elected to Congress -  where, as he delicately puts it, he has "never been elected Miss Congeniality." He has since been an unwavering voice for strong national defense – from support of President Ronald Reagan's bold leadership in winning the Cold War against the Soviet Union to his courageous, early advocacy of the successful U.S. military surge in Iraq.

Domestically, McCain is unique in never seeking an earmark to benefit a family member, political ally back home, or financial contributor. As president, he will veto all earmarks and other pork barrel spending. He believes Americans know better than government how best to spend their hard-earned money, and he promises – in words that make many of his colleagues in Congress swallow very hard – to make famous those in government who waste or steal tax dollars.

Ever the maverick, McCain selected Palin because her record mirrors his own in courageously standing up to corrupt special interests regardless of party and cutting government waste. She has the instincts, temperament and backbone to help restore the Republican Party to its conservative principles and the country as a whole to those foundational ideals of individual freedom, equal justice and government that truly is of law, not of men.

Some friendly closing advice: McCain must rein in his legendary temper and his tendency to personalize differences over policy. Presidential leadership requires a steady hand, always, and McCain must lead from his head, not from his heart. He should surround himself with the best appointees available, then demand their candid advice, especially when it hurts. Palin possesses magnificent political gifts now, but her limited experience in national and international affairs makes it incumbent on her to be extra diligent in mastering the realities of higher office.

While no candidate is perfect, presidents like Harry Truman remind us that defending and enriching America's place in a dangerous world often requires the sometimes rough-hewn character of men and women who always put country first, no matter the cost to them personally. It is precisely for times like these that America needs John McCain and Sarah Palin.



under the dome

The homeless in San Francisco will have an additional shelter option during the cold days of winter, Mayor Gavin Newsom’s office announced Friday. A winter shelter...

NBC show "Trauma" has been revived. The show, which is being filmed in The City, is not finished just yet, according to the head of the Film Office, Stefanie...

Well-known public relations guru Sam Singer has been hired to represent the Hotel Council of San Francisco during the ongoing hotel labor dispute, the council announced...

Mayor Gavin Newsom is conducting meetings at City Hall on Friday and has no public appearances scheduled — at least that is what his official schedule says. Then again,...


beltway confidential

The perils of popularity! (ap) While President Obama's approval ratings are hovering at 50 percent, first lady Michelle Obama is enjoying a 62 percent...

It seems that former Treasury secretary Henry Paulson has a new book coming out. It's supposed to be an inside account of the collapse of the global banking system. Though the...

Republican Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida agrees with our editorial last month on the heavily redacted contract for redesigning Recovery.gov. The irony we noted more than a...

Former CNN anchor and program host Lou Dobbs will be grilled tonight by Larry Kudlow on CNBC at 7:00 pm EST to discuss the economy, interest rates, immigration, TARP, health...



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Jamie Whitaker

Sep 24, 2008

Seriously? The candidates who are blacking out media from talking to their candidates as much as possible? John McCain who keeps reading talking points that he physically, clearly disagrees with but will say in order to hopefully win the Presidency? You know what men who talk out of both sides of their mouths do? They lie ... lie a lot. THanks for endorsing the liar. Obama is the better man and will be the better President - he doesn't need to read what he thinks, and he's not saying stuff he's physically communicating that he totally disagrees with like McCain. No Way, No How, No McCain ...

 

torr melling

Sep 24, 2008

you must be joking. this has to be the most pathetic 'endorsement' of a candidate i've ever read. but, of course, i'm of the opinion that media outlets (does the examiner qualify?) should keep their position to themselves and stick to reporting the facts.

 

jimsr

Sep 24, 2008

jamie wrote,'Obama is a better man' wow! That's a powerful argument. The Examiner may need to reconsider.

 

leelaa

Sep 24, 2008

wow! i am appalled! i am offended! i read the examiner daily. i may just stop because of this pathetic opinion for favoring yet another idiot in the white house.

 

tmoir

Sep 24, 2008

Just because the "Maverick" tag is constantly spoken about does not mean it is true. McCain is only a maverick on issues that don't get implemented, like real campaign finance that reins in 527s, and immigration policies that actually make it into law. And his selection of the obviously unqualified Sarah Palin is a sad publicity stunt of the most cynical kind. If she represents conservative principles, then the conservatives have veered off the road towards theocracy much more than they think they have. Even in your own assessment, when you add "Friendly closing advice," it shows that there are even issues in your own decision that belie a true conviction. Also, don't you think that "magnificent political gifts" is a bit of an overstatement? Wait until after a debate and a few appearances on Meet the Press, and or a weathering of a scandal of some sort after the honeymoon is over and we will see if that is a correct assessment of her skills.

 

Mark

Sep 24, 2008

This MUST be a joke. Did someone hack onto the website?

 

Eric

Sep 24, 2008

This is fantastic news and a glimmer of hope that not everyone in my beloved city (and birthplace) is a leftist. I honestly listened to Obama and his speeches. I watched him modulate his answers to get votes. He has changed positions so many times I don't know where he truly, currently, stands on them. The surge in Iraq worked wonders and he cannot bring himself to admit he was wrong. And on and on and on. Obama's record in the Illinois and US Senates are devoid of any significant legislation. He's a great orator and a nice enough guy, it seems. I don't doubt he's a patriot or that he's Christian. I just think he's a hyped up candidate with almost no accomplishments.

 

Cody L.

Sep 24, 2008

For those who question this endorsement, one must assume they aren't fully aware of Obama's background. He is a confirmed radical socialist. His accomplishments are non-existant, unless being deeply corrupt and deceitful count. "Change?" The mindless have embraced this motto but in essence it only means "not Bush." Perhaps they haven't noticed, but Bush is not running. McCain is far superior to the alternative. Bravo Examiner! Vote FOR America - vote McCain and Palin.

 

guyinsf

Sep 24, 2008

One has to remember that a newspaper's endorsements don't necessarily reflect the feelings of its readers or the news staff; but that of the ownership. I would imagine that this endorsement was reflects the opinion and direction of the Examiner's out of town owner.

 

Dan Kearns

Sep 24, 2008

"Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency." Do we really want four more years of this crap! No Way, No How, No McCain.

 

craig kasnoff

Sep 24, 2008

It says something about a newspaper that endorses the sleeziest campaign in the last 40 years. A campaign which not only lies on a daily basis but also hides the vice presidential candidate from the press. Apparently the Examiner doesn't care much about truth as a pre-requisite for those leading this country. And did I mention this is also the campaign that supported the lack of government oversight of the financial institutions that drove this country to the brink of economic disaster. And now acts as if they are shocked and had nothing to do with it (yet another lie). The Examiner's endorsemtn shows it is one newspaper that doesn't care much about the truth or the well being of this country and it's citizens.

 

Kelly Coppin

Sep 25, 2008

Last week, according to John McCain, the "principles of our economy" were strong. This week John McCain has decided that the state of our economy is in such crisis, that the only responsible and "country first" action to take, is to not participate in the most important presidential debate in modern history. Senator, with all due respect, even with my battles with schizophrenia, I am still able to multi-task!

 

amcrab

Sep 25, 2008

Congratulations! Surprised, overwhelmed, and delighted!!! Perhaps there is a chance that San Francisco has not totally gone to the dark side.

 

Anthony Soni

Sep 25, 2008

Thank You! I am an ex-soldier who came to this city 3 years ago and created a Forex firm. I have served and now am utilizing the entrepreneurial spirit that my parents and country have instilled in me. I love this city and consider it home. The people have been kind and the culture amazing. But I have always felt that in general that capitalism is a bad word here and the City's politics were slogan oriented and close minded with no substance. Thank you for a breath of fresh air. Your endorsement is intensely intelligent, and takes into consideration all the variables concerning this issue. I've become your number one fan. Anthony Soni Managing Partner Soni and Stringer LLC

 

Sep 25, 2008

thank you

 

MattCain

Sep 25, 2008

Congratulations, Examiner! You just lost the very slim amount of credibility you had in this city.

 

Jimmy

Sep 25, 2008

I'll never look at The Examiner again, no wonder you have to give it out for free.

 

Pathetic.

Sep 25, 2008

This is gross propaganda. If you could write one reason for supporting this pair that WASN'T easily contradicted by the record, I would accept this endorsement. However, since it's such a blatant fluff-piece completely set in some kind of alternate reality where "mastering the realities of high office" could happen in 40 days or while on the job. This is terrible and now I can't take anything this rag has to say seriously.

 

Who Cares

Sep 25, 2008

That the right wing nut job who owns the examiner franchise is various cities endorses anyone is non-news. I read your paper for its rare local color in a town deprived of local coverage. I do not read your newspaper out of curiosity with respect to its owner's long standing political bias. Same goes for the Bay Guardian. Restaurant reviews? Yes. Opinions of hack "editors" Nope.

 

miguel

Sep 25, 2008

You forgot about how he helped cause the Savings and Loan crisis in the 80's, and then continued supporting the same reckless deregulation of financial markets that has caused the current economic crisis. Johnny never learns, does he? And neither do you guys.

 

bobR

Sep 25, 2008

If you can't clearly see how much better a choice Obama/Biden is over the confused pandering of the GOP ticket than one does begin to wonder how much race really is an issue for folks. sad.

 

Jen

Sep 25, 2008

I can't believe that the Examiner is endorsing McCain/Palin...I mean really?? McCain has been part of the Bush agenda for 8 years and is part of the reason we are even in this economic and international mess to begin with. This is the man who said going to a Bagdad market with what was it 5 tanks, 5 helicopters, 100 army troop, helmet and bullet proof vest was like a country fair in Indiana....really this is the perspective that you think is right for American? McCain might be a war hero but he has admitted that the "economy" is not his strong suit....maybe that's why he is suspending his campaign...he need some economic tutoring by the Bush administration - great just what we need from a potential next president. This country need change and a person willing to understand both side of an issue not run in guns blazing demanding that the US is right about everything...cause since 2001 clearly we have NOT. I proudly vote Obama-Biden! A former reader of the SF Examiner.

 

Dont need another Idiot in the White House!

Sep 25, 2008

Are you serious??!! I may also stop reading “The Examiner” because of them favoring another Idiot (with the un-qualified Palin included) in the White House. This newspaper is free so it really is just that and not as important as “The Chronicle.” Now, if “The Examiner” starts charging readers, well, I will definitely stop reading this newspaper! GO OBAMA!!!

 

madeline

Sep 25, 2008

Oh please! How can anyone still think that this ticket is best for the US? Palin is an idiot, McCain a senile old man and not a very smart one. The republicans got us into the financial mess, war, etc. We cannot survive another 4 years of their 'leadership.'

 

AB

Sep 25, 2008

Once the truth is revealed about McCain and his lies, the campaign will be over for him. Even McCain is aware of this now! Look for even more political insanity as we march off to Nov. 4!

 

kato

Sep 25, 2008

What the deuce?

 

martywme

Sep 25, 2008

This endorsement reflects the owner's opinion, not the writers, and financial entanglement with the current administration. Scary though. BTW, it makes me sick the way the Republican tout McCain's war record after the smear they did on Kerry.

 

Sep 25, 2008

Was there a rationale for this endorsement other than differentiating yourself from the San Francisco Chronicle? If the last 24 hours has confirmed anything, it's that Palin pales to John McCain, and is an unbelievable lightweight on issues that are critical to this country.

 

Andrea

Sep 25, 2008

Sometimes I would take out the paper and read a few pages before using the plastic bag to pick up my dogs dudu. Now I am just going to use it as dudu bag. How dare the Examiner print such a bunch of BS and endorse McBush. The credibility of the Examiner just suffered a total loss. Did the chief editor get a big check in a hidden account in the Bahamas to write such nonsense or did he fall from the escalator this morning?

 

Ken Ireland

Sep 25, 2008

Does your taste for believing lies extend throughout your entire news coverage? If your paper didn't completely fail in recent history, it deserves to now.

 

Obama Girl

Sep 25, 2008

This is stupid. America doesn't need a other Bush in office or a pit bull with lipstick. Please, save it.

 

ijamala

Sep 25, 2008

Hey Examiner! It's been really great, seeing what happens to publication when there aren't any editors left to do any fact checking. You know, where you go and research the veracity of a given candidates' grossly distorted claims? I remember a few months back when you guys endorsed Airborne as a cold preventive *after* a huge, widely publicized study proved it false. That was fun AND funny. Oh, you mavericks, you!

 

Pamela Pollette

Sep 25, 2008

Shame on you Examiner!!! How can you possibly endorse another 4 years of George Bush?? I have lived in San Francisco fo 35 years and have raised a son who is now a second year student at U.C. Davis and formerly a Lowell graduate. I was a regular reader of your newspaper but as of today I will cease reading your paper. Shame on you, shame on you! I hope you will be proud when this country is further in shambles knowing that you have contributed to our ruins. I am abhorred by your decision to endorse John McCain and I know many many people who share the same view! Embittered in San Francisco!

 

Sfsyder

Sep 25, 2008

Are you serious!? TELL me this is a joke, right? We're living in an era in which we are facing the most grave sets of circumstances in decades, and the Examiner endorses a ticket in which a former mayor of a town of 6,000 in Alaska is a heartbeat away? "Ever the maverik"? Are you serious? McCain has voted with Bush, a man who is leaving behind a catastrophic track record, 90% of the time! Now, I'm not one to expect much from the Examiner. But this is just too much.

 

chico's bail bonds

Sep 25, 2008

you guys are clowns. drop the san francisco from the name of your rag, it's not deserved.

 

eli

Sep 25, 2008

wow. this is really a second rate newspaper. do you realize that you are the SAN FRANCISCO examiner? this isn't the waco examiner or topeka examiner. this is pathetic. "ever the maverick". are you kidding? he was the maverick when he ran before and that didn't work so now he's toeing the party line. it's amazing that a woman who has never left the US has the potential to be this close to the presidency in a time when our international relations are at an all time low. Are you guys making a play for the San Francisco Republican readership? I hope so, because if you aren't, this is pathetic and uninformed. Once I hit the submit button on this one, i'm probably never going to glance at the Examiner again.

 

dood

Sep 25, 2008

I will literally never pick up the Examiner ever again. Talk about being deaf tone to your target market.

 

TONY

Sep 25, 2008

ARE YOU KIDDING! JUST HOW ARE YOU FOOLING. ITS AMAZING HOW THE FOLKS AT THE EXAMINER FALL FOR THE PROPAGANDA AND NOT THE FACTS..AND DUMB AMERICA.

 

Kyle

Sep 25, 2008

Let's just go with the ideas you present as having any amount of veracity regarding McCain/Palin. (Do you REALLY think Palin could lead this country???? Somebody over there is smoking something!) It is time to have someone who is thoughtful and willing to bring different ideas into the fold. McCain is more of the same thing that has brought us to what is now an UNDENIABLE mess. Whatever you hoped to achieve by endorsing the McCain/Palin ticket, you've destroyed any credibility your paper ever presumed to have.

 

dood

Sep 25, 2008

Look what I just found! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Anschutz You don't have to read too much before you stumble onto a little bit of info on the owner of the Examiner: "Philip Frederick Anschutz (born 28 December 1939 in Russell, Kansas) is an American businessman and supporter of conservative Christian causes."

 

dood

Sep 25, 2008

More about the owner of The Examiner: "Reports at the time noted that Anschutz had donated $300,000 to Republican causes in the previous four years." The Examiner's endorsement is becoming even more transparent.

 

who

Sep 25, 2008

c'mon guys. the examiner is a great paper. you can use it to pick up dog crap if you forget a plastic bag, or use it to line a cat's litter box. Young kids can use it to make paper maché dinosaurs and robots and teenagers can easily have fun finding the papers many grammatical and factual errors. But if we ever had to pay a nickel for it...

 

James in SF

Sep 25, 2008

When the SF Examiner endorses a ticket with 2 nominees that lack the skills, knowledge, experience, and vision to even be CONSIDERED for the 2 highest offices in our land, that signals my death knell for even bothering with the SF Examiner. Good riddance to your regressive, insular ideology!

 

David in Corte Madera

Sep 25, 2008

Well what would you expect from a newspaper used to line the trashcan.

 

Joe

Sep 25, 2008

BOO!!!!

 

Angelo

Sep 25, 2008

Thank goodness someone recognizes the reality of Obama's secret ties to the Japanese mob and baby-killing Mission street bicycle nazi hipsters. Too long has our country suffered from the tyrrany of the satanic liberal homosexual agenda which serves to rape our people and subjugate them to the horrors of socialist cuisine. McCain is the only true champion of the people. The only one who speaks truth to power. The only one who will put women in their place and men in their rightful birthright as the true inheritons of the Free Market and Her glorious gifts to mankind! Halleluyha, halleluyha, amen. I got mine, vote John McCain on November 5, 2008!!!!!

 

Cora Wright

Sep 25, 2008

This is insane! You've got to be out of your minds!

 

THELOME

Sep 25, 2008

what are doing? the better candidate is in front or ur eyes, but u look the other way!!! i'm disapointed with you examiner

 

MRK

Sep 25, 2008

ummm... is it April First?

 

Someone in Seattle

Sep 25, 2008

I just threw up in my mouth!

 

Travis O.

Sep 25, 2008

I'll say one thing for the fundies: at least they're consistent.

 

kittybookate

Sep 25, 2008

this is the most self righteous b.s. i've ever read. you've bought into the mccain pr machine hook line and sinker. seeing his campaign's nonsense spelled out as you have done makes me that much more sure of my vote for OBama. I am no longer subscribing to this rag.

 

Chanel

Sep 25, 2008

You have GOT to be kidding me? Is this endorsement REAL or some kind of a "ha ha" joke??? McCain/Palin is NOT the ticket to move this country forward. Have you seen Sarah Palin in the few interviews that the campaign has allowed her? Because if you've seen her rehearsed, memorized and incoherent answers, and you're still ok with her being a heartbeat away from the presidency, then there's some reexamination needed. John McCain has tried to pull political stunt after political stunt, with the latest trying to cancel the presidential and vice presidential debates because he and his running mate are obviously NOT READY. I truly thing that the San Francisco Examiner needs to rethink their position on this endorsement of McCain/Palin.

 

geojazz46

Sep 25, 2008

Is this paper associated with "the onion"!!

 

kayce.

Sep 25, 2008

if i lived in SF and had a subscription to the examiner, i would totes cancel it... unfortunately, i don't, so i can do nothing but express my shock, disbelief, and outrage. clearly, the examiner cares nothing about what it's readers think and feel, only about the opinions of the few individuals that finance their payroll (i can't help but wonder what conglomerate this paper is a part of). PS: dear examiner editor: next time, why not use some of your own words and dare to stray from the campaign talking points and mccain buzzwords a lil bit? i would at least respect and believe your sincerity if you did. hate you sincerely: kayce.

 

GS

Sep 25, 2008

I've read it said that a big piece of the uproar over Sarah Palin and her inexperience is that, to paraphrase, "she'd only be one heartbeat away from the Presidency." To which the writer replied that the inexperienced Barack Obama would be ZERO heartbeats away from the Presidency. Obama is a celebrity with fans, not a politician with supporters. Half of his political career has been spent campaigning for the White House. He speaks of "change"--but "change" is not a strategy. And for someone who is supposed to be all about changing the system, why in the hell did he pick BIDEN? If Biden was such a great choice, he'd have been a stronger contender when he was running for President in this same race. I can't believe how easily fooled all of the Obama supporters are. Lemmings.

 

humm

Sep 25, 2008

all i hear from you people is whining. get over it. move on. quit reading the paper if it offends you so much. flip on some MSNBC so you can hear your biased media-that'll make you feel better. whine whine whine....

 

Christian

Sep 25, 2008

Unbelievable! I mean San Francisco is known for being one of the most highly advanced cities in this country and this puts them back some spaces. All these right wink cooks who are grateful for this decision makes me wonder: what are you doing in San Fran in the first place? You might be better off in a hick red state where "morals" and "family values" are higher there.

 

J

Sep 25, 2008

I am not longer reading the Examiner! I thought I was reading a paper dedicated to the truth and justice. I guess I was wrong! NO WAY, NO HOW, NO MCCAIN/PALIN!

 

mdp2000

Sep 25, 2008

Wow. You really must be a radical leftist for even a San Francisco paper to turn away from you. I can't wait to see Palin's children running on the White House lawn.

 

Annie Breen

Sep 25, 2008

I can't believe that the phrase "America needs..." and the name "Sarah Palin" were used in the same sentence - connectively. Shame on the Examiner for being nothing more than a pawn for the Fongs to advertise and promote their personal politics.

 

foxiemommie

Sep 25, 2008

shame on you... for the biggest community of gay and lesbians how dare you!

 

jason Gagnon

Sep 25, 2008

my god people wake up. Look where we are. The country has never been worse off. We are falling apart and the laughing stock of the rest of the world. Wake up and vote for change...Obama!!!! Something, anything else!!! Just use your heads for once people and get past your ignorant "american" attitude of kick ass and such. This way of non thinking must stop. A news paper supporting a candidate....what happened to a newspaper reporting the news....who got bought out? The level of ignorance being displayed over the last 7 years and continuing to be displayed now is frightening.

 

Jesus

Sep 25, 2008

hmm.... sounds like something shady is going on...

 

WTF

Sep 25, 2008

This has to be a joke. Wow.

 

Courtney

Sep 25, 2008

John McCain is the best man!!!! Anyone out there please tell me one thing Obama has done?.... that's right he has done NOTHING!!!!! I think people are scared not to vote for him because he is black and he will play the race card. Obama sucks!!!!!!!!!

 

Chloe

Sep 25, 2008

This is a sad day in San Francisco...and a sadder day for the Examiner.

 

jcase

Sep 25, 2008

Talk about not knowing your audience! Are you actually comparing Truman to McPain? This isn't even good enough for the bottom of my bird cage ...

 

se

Sep 25, 2008

This is ridiculous. I would hope that a liberal and democratic city like San Francisco would support the better, stronger and more qualitifed man...Obama. Thank goodness I still vote in California because clearly we need the democratic vote. GO OBAMA!

 

se

Sep 25, 2008

This is ridiculous. I would hope that a liberal and democratic city like San Francisco would support the better, stronger and more qualitifed man...Obama. Thank goodness I still vote in California because clearly we need the democratic vote. GO OBAMA!

 

KK

Sep 25, 2008

Living in PA we hear a lot about San Francisco's radical ways of conducting itself. The Examiner has brought a little redemption to your town. Glad to read one media source acknowledges the truth. For "James in SF" you have the guts to accuse McCain-Palin of inexperience? Look at Obama and you'll realize what inexperience is. Do you even know what insular means?

 

kmac

Sep 25, 2008

Finally a newspaper that sees through the Obama spin. I applaud you, Examiner.

 

Catie

Sep 25, 2008

Good for The Examiner! It is refreshing to see that not every newspaper in America is so liberal. Thank you for speaking the truth about McCain/Palin and printing it to the public. People need to be correctly informed about the candidates. The Examiner hit it out of the park! McCain/Palin are the brave leaders this country needs right now.

 

Sep 25, 2008

so someone doesn't share your view and you dismiss them? "im disappointed in you, examiner." my gosh. "[the examiner] should keep their position to themselves and stick to reporting facts"-just like the REST of the media, right. i can't believe you people. your newspaper can't have an opinion but the rest of the world can. what newspaper/news station these days is unbiased? get over yourselves and your own opinion. that's what's so great about America. people are allowed the freedom to express themselves. it'd be different if you had a good reason to be upset. the only reason you're upset though is because they're not endorsing your candidate.

 

someoneinPortland

Sep 25, 2008

Wow! Good luck with keeping your circulation up Examiner....

 

Daniel Davyduke

Sep 25, 2008

I just hope that you enjoy cleaning up sloppier messes than Bush.

 

kellyshea

Sep 25, 2008

NOBODY READS NEWSPAPERS ANYMORE!!!

 

S

Sep 25, 2008

Sarah Palin = The Paris Hilton of Washington DC.

 

alpal

Sep 25, 2008

Are you F...ing SERIOUS? Do you not care about America or something? Jeez!

 

BBB

Sep 25, 2008

You have got to be kidding me. It's a good thing no one reads this paper.

 

Misty

Sep 25, 2008

This isn't surprising considering The Examiner is owned by Denver billionaire Philip F. Anschutz, an Evangelical Presbyterian who has bankrolled numerous ultra-conservative causes and has donated at least half a million dollars to Republican committees and political candidates. He helped fund Colorado's 1992 Amendment 2, a ballot initiative designed to overturn local and state laws that prohibit discrimination against individuals on the basis of sexual orientation. He helped fund the Discovery Institute, a think tank based in Seattle, Washington that promotes intelligent design and creationism and criticizes evolution. He supported the Parents Television Council, a group that protests against what they believe to be television indecency.

 

mccainpalinlover

Sep 25, 2008

Yes yes yes! Thank you Examiner! Great to hear!

 

Kelli Brooks

Sep 25, 2008

WHAT THE HELL??? I am SO surprised at my home town newspaper. This has GOT to be a joke.

 

T.N.

Sep 25, 2008

Are you kidding me? How can you laud McCain for having "hard-earned experience" and in the same article praise Palin who has none? And the statement that McCain and Palin have both stood up to political corruption is laughable.

 

Loula

Sep 25, 2008

One more reason to kick this free piece of crap newspaper off my doorstep and into the gutter.

 

Sep 25, 2008

This looks like an attempt by the Examiner to get its name in the media -- shameless self-promotion.

 

katie

Sep 25, 2008

wow, you are going to endorse a candidate who cant even do two things at once? he "suspended" his campaign to go and help in D.C., ended up on Katie Couric's show instead of Letterman's, lied to Letterman about it..and hey, wait a minute, i thought the economy was "fine!" seems to be that john mccain is a liar. and yes, he was a war hero, but there are a million war heros. it doesnt mean they should be president because of it! honestly, people, look past what hes done and look at what he will do!

 

Tang

Sep 25, 2008

Shame, Shame, Shame! Disgusting ... how could you endorse this train wreck? Surely, the Palin pick alone should have disqualified McSame ... but to endorse this farce of a campaign, given the gimmicks and outright lies is just disgusting.

 

Charlie

Sep 25, 2008

You have got to be kidding me. You just took every fictitious talking point from the Republican party for justifying your selection. What a fantasy world you live in.

 

What?

Sep 25, 2008

No wonder you are a free newspaper...

 

GoMcCain08

Sep 25, 2008

Kudos to SF Examiner! California is not lost. Oh happy day! At least we know there are people out there who haven't been sipping the tainted Obama Kool Aid which will lead to nothing but terrible consequences in America. This democrat is going McCain/Palin in 08 because they are the only choice that makes sense in this election.

 

Beatrice Neumann

Sep 25, 2008

I wish this was a joke!

 

Tonya

Sep 25, 2008

Probably not in the best interest of the paper to publish this. I know I won't be reading anymore.

 

Corinne

Sep 25, 2008

open your eyes and LOOK AROUND examiner - mccain /palin are not the answer...

 

Samer

Sep 25, 2008

I cannot believe what I am reading from you guys. Wow after such a lack of judgment I will be canceling my subscription.

 

John Bailey

Sep 25, 2008

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO

 

Susan

Sep 25, 2008

What !?! You get what you deserve, SF, if those 2 idiots get elected!

 

Rick M.

Sep 25, 2008

All credibility lost Examiner. Ridiculous.

 

Kieran

Sep 25, 2008

Great article. Reality... it's a great thing. Eat that Gavin Newsom.

 

HORRIFIED VOTER AND SF RESIDENT

Sep 25, 2008

ARE YOU GUYS OUT OF YOUR MINDS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

 

cc

Sep 25, 2008

besides for hearing about a deal being agreed upon for the financial crisis bail out, this is the best news I've heard all week!

 

coco

Sep 25, 2008

For all of you S.F. Obama suporters...Perhaps he can be your Community Organizer, I hear it's his specialty.

 

Joe M

Sep 25, 2008

APRIL FOOLS!!! Wow. You guys are funny! Oh wait...

 

Examinerisajoke

Sep 25, 2008

There went your credibility! John McCain is an "inspiring leader"? You STILL think McCain is a "maverick"? What a complete JOKE! I won't even get into Palin - she doesn't deserve more coverage. You are a blight on California. I'd laugh if it wasn't so dangerous! You really disappoint.

 

Sep 25, 2008

I don't believe this!! This endorsement from a city that is proud of its liberalism and fight for equality and justice regardless of one's sex, sexual orientation, religion, etc.... You honestly can't say that your endorsement represents your readers and customers. I will never pick up an issue AGAIN!

 

Jg

Sep 25, 2008

A'MEN!

 

Ron

Sep 25, 2008

This is an outrage! I'll never pay for the Examiner again!!

 

Sep 25, 2008

Wow, yep. Never reading this paper again --- stupidest thing I ever read!

 

OBAMA '08

Sep 25, 2008

americans do not stop complaining about what REPUBLICAN president bush has done to this country. lets face it, it is pretty screwed up right now. and yet there are people who ARE VOTING FOR JOHN MCCAIN who might as well be called an older Bush? yes, another four years is exaaacctllyy what we need. i believe a quote from an Obama ad sums this up perfectly: "i only make two gallons of gas an hour." thanks republicans. as for the fact that race is an issue- he is a perfectly respectable man and race should not be in play at all. what is this-the 1800's ? grow up america! i am eighteen years old and even i can see past his race, and i should be the "immature" one right?

 

Vincente

Sep 25, 2008

Wow, someone in San Francisco actually knows a thing or two about real politics? Keep up the good work. Watch out though, those angry liberals might end up burning down your building up there. You know, because their so grounded and peaceful.

 

Maya

Sep 25, 2008

DISGUSTING. Anyone who supports McCain is on a one way street to destructing the country COMPLETELY.

 

ms jackson

Sep 25, 2008

I am never going to read the Examiner again! It did not say exactly what I want to hear and I am too unimaginative to extract useful information from a point of view different than mine). There outght to be a law against this type of free speech! I am going to steal all Examiners from the front porches of San Francicans because it is my right to CENSOR whatever I don't want said! I'm gonna line my cat litter box with the Examiner! I am NEVER going to Scotland!!! How DARE the Examiner be an up and coming periodical with a growing readership when I don't agree with its editorials?! and apopleptically on and on and on...LOL!

 

Adrian

Sep 25, 2008

HA! I don't agree with your endorsement.

 

justin price

Sep 25, 2008

Even with this as a lead story I'm guessing those guys you send out on the street can't get anyone to take your paper for free.

 

Hillary

Sep 25, 2008

Steve Schmidt currently lives in the San Francisco area and prides himself on ability to control the story. Who is to say this "endorsement" is not the product of Schmidt's connections with the editorial board and his presentation of a press release of endorsement?

 

MarkN.

Sep 25, 2008

Cody L. there is vastly more evidence to link McCain to the labels "corrupt" and "deceitful" than to Obama. And there is no daylight between McCain and Bush, so thinking he would substantially change anything in DC is impossible to fathom. The Republican model of trickle down economics is crumbling before our very eyes, and he wants us to try it again? And he picked Palin as his number two, there goes the judgement argument.

 

klief

Sep 25, 2008

Perhaps this article was paid for by the McCain campaign.

 

ashley

Sep 25, 2008

amen jimmy: "I'll never look at The Examiner again, no wonder you have to give it out for free."

 

Erinl

Sep 25, 2008

Thank you! Go McCain. It amazes me how angry some people get about anyone that has an opinion that differs from their own. Yet, they can bash McCain and Palin all they want. Does make much sense.

 

DingBang

Sep 25, 2008

That's it. The examiner just lost a customer. It is the media's role to report, not endorse.

 

Katia

Sep 25, 2008

I'm ashamed to read this paper, and will refrain from reading it if this continues. As the media is carefully scrutinizing and bringing into the light both candidates' past, McCain is revealed to be the biggest flip flopper of all. Palin is no different. They do not represent the new generation that are about to take on the debt left by the Bush administration, nor do they care. Their comments have changed numerous times on various issues, and present a lack of understanding of both the economy and the world. It is time to stop electing senior citizens into office, and it is time to get rid of whoever wrote this editorial from the examiner. As a San Francisco paper, you fail to represent and understand the new generation -- and you underestimate our ability to weed out lies.

 

Stephen

Sep 25, 2008

OMG - you're kidding... McCain?.... PALIN?!?! She's a total idiot!!!!!

 

Bridgette

Sep 25, 2008

I completely disagree! What America needs is someone in tune with the average person and what they need. Education...economy...healthcare...not more billions wasted on a war thats making us more enemies than allies. Out with the old and in with the new!! America doesn't need a third bush term...we won't survive it!

 

OBi

Sep 25, 2008

At times like this, I'm glad print is failing as a form of media.

 

Koo-Koo

Sep 25, 2008

This is disgusting. I will NEVER pick up a copy of the Examiner again.

 

Farren Briggs

Sep 25, 2008

Obviously, someone forgot to review all sides of all the issues. I am surprised by the "pros" surmised, it's a weak argument.

 

Kaitlyn Murphy

Sep 25, 2008

Thank you! I'm a proud McCain/Palin supporter and happy to see the Examiner support our future leaders!!

 

Ginger

Sep 25, 2008

"John McCain are made, to put country first so that it can be put right in its time of need." Could the thesis here be more vague? All of our candidates want to put the country first; this is why they are fighting tooth and nail to become president!

 

I miss Hillary!

Sep 25, 2008

God, I miss Hillary.....

 

Veronica

Sep 25, 2008

A truly irresponsible endorsement!!!

 

Stephen

Sep 25, 2008

Wow, a little shocking, but I think the examiner is correct

 

soprettyinthecity

Sep 25, 2008

Subscription cancelled AND I'm leaving the country if Mr. "Drill baby Drill" and Mrs. "Right to Life" make it to the White House. Doesn't the rest of the world hate us enough already -- do we really have to elect these two?

 

mea

Sep 25, 2008

You must be out of your mind!

 

Kitt

Sep 25, 2008

This has to be a hacker. Otherwise, you have just lost a reader.

 

JJ

Sep 25, 2008

Halleluiah! There is one brain at least in California!

 

Brenda

Sep 25, 2008

So one newspaper decides to support McCain, what about ALL of the other media outlets that are CLEARLY supporting Obama? Do you cry foul at them?? I swear, you Democratic cry-babies are driving me nuts, one little newspaper decides to support a Republican candidate and you're all bent out of shape.

 

radiantfalco

Sep 25, 2008

Two words: Paid. Off. I've got two words I'd like to say to the Examiner...

 

Sarah

Sep 25, 2008

You have got to be kidding me. This hardly reflects the opinions of your readers, but thankfully this won't affect my decision to vote for Obama. He is the change we can believe it. This endorsement is ridiculous.

 

Kate O'Connor

Sep 25, 2008

Prepare yourself for the people who think Obama walks on water. Heaven forbid that people have an opinion other than theirs, since theirs is obviously the correct one.

 

pmw

Sep 25, 2008

finally a paper in the bay area that i can respect, sign me up for my subscription

 

Leighanne

Sep 25, 2008

WTF? How DARE you. I am DONE with you.

 

mercury613

Sep 25, 2008

You're endorsing a candidate who mocks freedom of the press? The Examiner just lost all journalistic credibility.

 

Wendy

Sep 25, 2008

How unexpectedly wonderful! I find this absolutely refreshing and just fantastic. Great going.

 

Whatever

Sep 25, 2008

So.. what experience does Obama have? Ha. That's what I thought..

 

letna

Sep 25, 2008

I am not a united states citizen,But i have lived here for the last 25 years.life was good when the Democrat was in office. America need the democrat again. HELP

 

AWESOME

Sep 25, 2008

"Ill never pay for the examiner again" ooooo, nice threat. Freedom of speech, get over it. And speaking of idiots, thats Obama/Biden. They change their view points every week. Oh and please dont bring up how the Republican party got us in a hole, yes Clinton did way better! hah. Check the stats after his presidency compared to after bush's. Yea lets have some "change". Then he picks Biden as a running mate. What a joke!

 

cori

Sep 25, 2008

what a pathetic paper! why would you endorse a candidate before the debates? this has to be a joke.

 

nicole

Sep 25, 2008

wow. It seems that since this declaration is "propaganda" then if the Examiner decided to endorse Osama, I mean Obama, then would THAT be propaganda? Of course not. Yeah, the Examiner is a joke, but it just proves that there are more people living in the SF Bay Area other than gay, left wing, immoral tree huggers.

 

vsp

Sep 25, 2008

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!?! Whitaker, did you just say that Obama doesnt need to read what he thinks?? The man travels EVERYWHERE with a teleprompter. some people have so bought into the "change" factor...just a reminder..."Hope is not a strategy."

 

Ashley Teodorson-Vau

Sep 25, 2008

McCain/Palin= Bridge to somewhere very scary, Bush's third term!!!

 

Bob

Sep 25, 2008

Did the McCain camp write this tripe? Palin is an idiot, as shown every time she tries to answer a question. McCain is desperate and veering wildly from one extreme to another trying to plug the holes in his sinking ship. Good grief.

 

Jackie1

Sep 25, 2008

Bye Bye Examiner. It was nice knowing you.

 

dogcat

Sep 25, 2008

way to pick the worst possible day to make this endorsement, guys

 

Me

Sep 25, 2008

I am shocked. I will remove you from my favorites on my web pages and never buy your papar. I cannot believe the ignorance of your decision but will no longer have anything to do with your organozation in anyway.

 

Guillermo Perez

Sep 25, 2008

This is not the voice of San Francisco. And I'm not even a huge Obama fan was even going to vote for McCannin until he and his campaign turned into the chamber of secrets. My subscription to this rediculous paper is now canceled!

 

Erin

Sep 25, 2008

Huh? "SUCCESSFUL U.S. military surge in Iraq."

 

Shocked--what a poor decision

Sep 25, 2008

Boo. What a shocker. Poor choice, Examiner team. This may give you a temporary uptick in readership, but this is the wrong choice.

 

Examinerisajoke

Sep 25, 2008

PS - for all the fools (One who has been fooled) that still want McCain - if, GOD FORBID, that were to happen - you will deserve the draft, economic failures, back-alley abortions, no education, no energy policy, many more wars, total loss of respect from the rest of the world, etc, etc ... that your children WILL get. It's not a game where your team/guy wins - we ALL WILL LOSE. (shaking my head in disgust).

 

Sara

Sep 25, 2008

I am beyond impressed that, in times like these and in a very liberal environment, the SF examiner has come out and endorsed the candidate they feel is most qualified to tackle the mountains we face a nation, while still acknowledging his short comings.

 

CaliBoyForever

Sep 25, 2008

New media outlets should be unbiased and never choose sides. This clearly goes against why anyone should read the newspaper for an unbiased account of the news. Thankfully, I don't have a subscription to the SF Examiner otherwise I may just cancel.

 

Jeffrey Drew

Sep 25, 2008

What are they smoking up there?

 

I'm in shock!!!

Sep 25, 2008

You must be kidding. I realize the Examiner is now a 10th rate newspaper at best, but a San Francisco newspaper endorsing John McCain and Sarah Palin. I am saddened by your endorcement of McCain. But what can I expect these days from a newspaper that's been lowsy for years.

 

Jenna

Sep 25, 2008

What a joke. "Domestically, McCain is unique in never seeking an earmark to benefit a family member, political ally back home, or financial contributor. As president, he will veto all earmarks and other pork barrel spending. He believes Americans know better than government how best to spend their hard-earned money, and he promises – in words that make many of his colleagues in Congress swallow very hard – to make famous those in government who waste or steal tax dollars." Okay, that's McCain, but what about Palin?? SFExaminer, there is something wrong with you.

 

amen

Sep 25, 2008

Yea lets have some "change". Then he picks Biden as a running mate. What a joke! Yes the democrats did way better with clinton....oh wait

 

Doi Boi

Sep 25, 2008

I love it! You lib's got your panties all ruffled. "America's place in a dangerous world often requires the sometimes rough-hewn character of men and women who always put country first" putting country first AIN'T B. Hussein O'mama

 

You Must Be Kidding

Sep 25, 2008

McCain might be a good candidate, but his choice of running mate ruined him. A person who said that their international relations experience is based on seeing Russia from their backyard. The Examiner needs to reconsider their vote of confidence. I wonder who paid the publication off.

 

Kate M.

Sep 25, 2008

Are you KIDDING?

 

Examiner newspaper reader no more...

Sep 25, 2008

I glad to see that your paper is doing exceptionally well during these hard days...you just lost another reader. Idiots.

 

Malia Working

Sep 25, 2008

Shut the hell up Whitaker please. I am a proud dem but you my friend are a moron. Obama is a better man.. You ignorant filth. Do you know Barack Obama personally? John McCain? How the hell do you know who is a quote on quote better man. It is idiots like you who ruin the democratic party and Obama's candidacy. You were probably the reason Kerry didn't get election. Smear tactics don't work. Argue why your candidate is best, not why the others suck. IDIOT!

 

cody

Sep 25, 2008

i'm glad to read that even in such a liberal city, the truth and basic facts still shine through. thank you for going against the grain and speaking about what is truly right for the united states.

 

not even from San Fran

Sep 25, 2008

WTF? Its like endorsing Hitler. wrong.

 

HK

Sep 25, 2008

I have to say that this article gives me some hope that people can and will make up thier own minds and not be peer presured into who they vote for. Good Job Examiner

 

Sep 25, 2008

Shame on you

 

Vincent

Sep 25, 2008

WTF?

 

D

Sep 25, 2008

So this is the exact same word for word endorsement given by the Washington Examiner. How meaningless is this? People in either city are supposed to pay attention to this?

 

OBama 08

Sep 25, 2008

To the Examiner:typical - right wing neo-con, fundamentalist endorsements will do nothing for your circulation in this town; to KK in PA: you forgot a K on your display name.

 

Fulanito33131

Sep 25, 2008

OBAMA 2008!!

 

marin mccallen

Sep 25, 2008

since when do newspapers endorse candidates? great journalistic integrity guys.

 

jen

Sep 25, 2008

YES! You guys are RIGHT ON! Congratulations on being fearless and sticking up for what you believe in no matter what any body says!

 

kubutrfly

Sep 25, 2008

Way to go! I am a proud McCain/Palin supporter too! It is nice to see a newspaper do this.

 

Susan Ferriss

Sep 25, 2008

As someone who has lived in SF and read the Examiner for years, I will stop as of today. I will not pick up another copy, nor will I buy copies for my business. I am appalled that you would endorse these two.

 

Emily Williams

Sep 25, 2008

I am disappointed that the media of the city I so love could come to this horribly flawed conclusion. Have you actually thought through the long-term consequences of McCain's policies vs. Obama's? Do you understand that if McCain goes to the White House, the international community will lose ALL remaining respect for the US? How can anyone with two neurons to rub together possibly want Palin in charge of a small town in Alaska, much less the entire country? Obama may not be your ideal candidate (nor is he mine), but he surely has to be better than this repressive, extremist ticket the Republicans have put together! I'm proud to say I've never bought the Examiner and now certainly never will if this is the kind of poorly informed opinion that passes for news.

 

Kate

Sep 25, 2008

How intellegent the examiner must be. Endorsing a man who flip flops on all issues. A VP who can not speak with her own voice, but uses others for their words. What is this wonderful country of ours coming to? Greed? Are you trying to make us a third world country?

 

michael

Sep 25, 2008

the person who wrote this "endorsement" had to of been really drunk

 

Ann

Sep 25, 2008

"Loser newspaper endorses loser"

 

Betty

Sep 25, 2008

You have just lost my business and the business of 90% of this great, democratic city. Good job endorsing the worst choice for the President of the United States!

 

Jonsey Kay

Sep 25, 2008

I'll never read your paper again. I won't even use it to pick up dog crap.

 

shocked

Sep 25, 2008

This reads as if it were written by a high school freshman. Very bizarre.

 

sarahaha

Sep 25, 2008

they only did this to sell more papers, do you think they would have gotten nearly the same reaction with examiner endorses Obama... nah everyone in cali endorses Obama they need to shake it up and sell some more papers........... i was in california from canada for a mini vacation last week and i did not see one mccain/palin sign or anything anywhere, Obama was everywhere, t shirts, posters, yard signs, bumper stickers, EVERYWHERE.. good marketing on the Examiners side.

 

Jigga WHAT?

Sep 25, 2008

Is this a late April Fools Joke? Punk'ed, Come on.....Serious now!

 

Chief

Sep 25, 2008

All of the negative Reader Comments are from ignorant, bitter people! I am born and raised in S.F. and am happy to see the decisions that the Examiner has made. Way to stand up for what is right! It does not take a Rocket Scientist to make correct decisions, so stop living in your Liberal Utopia and do what is best for the Country and not what makes you look cool or popular by voting for beliefs you clearly don’t even understand (Nor does the candidate, Obama)!Sorry folks, the Elephant is to walk again on Capital Hill…..

 

Alison

Sep 25, 2008

Is this a farce?

 

Geo

Sep 25, 2008

This opinion, in San Francisco? Has hell frozen over?

 

Sep 25, 2008

what a joke, you fools!!

 

Jerry

Sep 25, 2008

well Examiner... you just lost my patronage.

 

Stephanie

Sep 25, 2008

Well, I guess we can stop referring to the liberal media. This is a joke. Check your facts, www.factcheck.org. I guess the conservatives in this country got smart and bought the media. Seriously people - think for yourselves. Stop relying on the media to tell you what to think.

 

Sondra

Sep 25, 2008

"America is at war overseas and in an economic crisis here at home." Are we? http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc080922.htm

 

Bulldog With a Nose

Sep 25, 2008

What A Joke!

 

JeffATL

Sep 25, 2008

Pick your Posion! oh where oh where can Hillary be?

 

Dave

Sep 25, 2008

I prefer reading harder-hitting, more in-depth analysis. Like the McCain campaign homepage.

 

Ezra

Sep 25, 2008

I don't know where you think you are, or how much loot McCain has given to SF Examiner, but you better check your opinion. Nobody who reads SF Examiner wants to hear this. We've all had enough secret government where the only ones who get hooked up are those who don't need it. Obama is self made, and for that I respect him. He's more likely to empathise with average folks like me. McCain is a loser, he's not cultured, he has no fresh ideas. You've got to be kidding Examiner, screw you...

 

lauren c

Sep 25, 2008

have you completely missed the fact that john mccain is senile and sarah palin is a terrifying excuse for a human being, not to mention exceptionally unqualified to do anything besides not have an abortion? tsk tsk.

 

Who mad you the Joke Police?

Sep 25, 2008

UUUUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMMMM........ Are you serious? Are you on drugs? Do you NOT SEE what Bush did to this country? Do you really want Bush Part 2 running this country? Do you really want some as close- minded as Palin in office? Do you just not care about the enviorment and the fact that they want to drill in Alaska? DO YOU NOT CARE that about the US period? This has been a reality check for me on how RETARDED America is. P.S. I am no longer coming to this site as this article has caused me extreme nausea

 

FINALLY

Sep 25, 2008

Funny Obamas supporters call this propaganda. Propaganda is what theObama camp has been spinning for a year now. Bravo examiner!

 

Paul ski

Sep 25, 2008

I wonder what kick backs the examiner will be getting for this. we always find out later.

 

Oh Hell No

Sep 25, 2008

"Look what someone else found! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Anschutz You don't have to read too much before you stumble onto a little bit of info on the owner of the Examiner: "Philip Frederick Anschutz (born 28 December 1939 in Russell, Kansas) is an American businessman and supporter of conservative Christian causes.""

 

LisaLisa

Sep 25, 2008

Correct me if i'm wrong but wont the next president be in a position to get 3 supreme court judges? excuse me if i think a womans right to choose is a big issue- rather the governmet taking the control of my choice. they are the wrong choice for america.

 

hdub

Sep 25, 2008

While I have been a (non-exclusive) reader and subscriber of the Examiner for some time, this endorsement has prompted me to cancel my subscription and redirect my news gathering to other more credible sources.

 

applesauce

Sep 25, 2008

Examiner opinions are similar to Sharon Stone parenting skillz.

 

Claire in L.A.

Sep 25, 2008

The truth is that if Obama had not been protected and supported by the liberal media he would not even be in the running for president. People who don't have all the facts and are irrationally attached to their fantasy version of Obama will be upset by this endorsement, However, those who know the real Obama and know how ill-equipped he is to run this country and how much of a fake the Obama persona is will applaud this endorsement.

 

Shocked

Sep 25, 2008

you have GOT to be kidding me....are you seriously proposing McCain/Palin in the Executive wing? Has this country not hit its rock bottom??????

 

ftheexaminer

Sep 25, 2008

Wow. you guys are completely blind. I will never touch another copy of the Examiner!

 

Tony P

Sep 25, 2008

What do you expect. The owner of the the Examiner is a far right-wing nutjob. Philip Anschutz owns interest in several energy companies and participates in several conservative christian groups. He helped fund measure 2 in Colorado to overturn laws prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation. He also participates heavily in several organizations that promote teaching of "Intelligent Design" in public schools. In short, Philip Anschutz is a douchebag of the highest order. Boycott the Examiner's advertisers. Speak with your dollars.

 

embarrassing

Sep 25, 2008

WOW. THIS IS GARBAGE! A PATHETIC AND POORLY WRITTEN OPINION PIECE BY WHAT WILL NOW BECOME ONE OF THE LEAST RESPECTED NEWS RAGS. I, NOR MY FRIENDS AND FAMILY WILL NEVER READ THIS PAPER AGAIN.

 

Dan M.

Sep 25, 2008

Goodbye subscription.

 

Lindsey

Sep 25, 2008

wow did McCain himself write that for you?

 

Baldy

Sep 25, 2008

One more thing, you smelly hippies: This country will never be socialist. You will always have to take responsibility for your actions and decisions, and people will always be given the opportunity to MAKE THEIR OWN WAY in life. Sorry about that. I know you want to government to stop allowing kids sports to have winning teams and losing teams, believe that America is responsible for all the evil on the planet, and the George W. Bush is just like Hitler (JUST. LIKE. HIM.), and that nutjob geonocidal maniac in Iran is right about us, but McCain the better candidate even if you refuse to admit it yourselves and staunchly stand firm alongside the other Obama-lemmings. McCain/Obama '08. Ha ha!

 

Carolina

Sep 25, 2008

Oh please! your editor must be a republican, this is so lame! what a shame, I won't spend my time reading your paper ever again!

 

Sep 25, 2008

"Obama is the better man and will be the better President - he doesn't need to read what he thinks, and he's not saying stuff he's physically communicating that he totally disagrees with like McCain" Actually he hasn't really said anything too much policy-wise that he kept consistant, and he LITERALLY does need to read what he thinks because the man cannot speak a coherant sentence without a teleprompter.

 

MusicIsOurHigh

Sep 25, 2008

This reads like a McCain talking point

 

sarah.north@gmail.com

Sep 25, 2008

AM I on cops? Or candid camera? Have you lost your collective minds? McCain doesn't know what day it is, whether he's running for office, whether he's even on a committee that's relevant to drafting the bailout bill (he's not), and Palin knows, um, squat! You guys jumped the shark right after McCain did!

 

Seags

Sep 25, 2008

Very disappointed. You've lost alot of credibility in my eyes. I doubt I'll read your paper again. I prefer to get my news from more intelligent sources who base their decisions on real issues rather than lame hype.

 

Sarah

Sep 25, 2008

Maybe something put something in YOUR metamucil too?! I'm not entirely certain McCain actually knows what is going on around him at any given moment, and I am SURE Palin doesn't. This has got to be a joke.

 

JKC

Sep 25, 2008

You should report news, not create it. How a publication associated with some of the most liberal movements in our nations history can take a stance that endorses policy so diametricly opposed to the best interests of its community is beyond me. You have no more credibility than the national inquirer. It is obvious that your views are for sale and they have been bought and paid for.

 

McCain Kills Polar Bears

Sep 25, 2008

Oh my god. ...or rather Sarah's God that she thinks can magically make me straight. No way honey

 

MaryJ

Sep 25, 2008

ANGELO! is a dumb*uck! OBAMA/BIDEN

 

Josie

Sep 25, 2008

WTSF?

 

Erin

Sep 25, 2008

This is hilarious. It's official, I'm moving to LA.

 

erin nicole

Sep 25, 2008

you just lost a my entire family of examiner readers. shame on you for endorsing a man who wants to overthrow a woman's right to her own body.

 

sarah hamil

Sep 25, 2008

This is a joke. How disturbing of a media outlet to do such a thing. Sad sad sad. Great timing also as Mc Cain hands the nomination to Obama.

 

lol

Sep 25, 2008

Wow, the examiner is still around? Heh, who knew? FYI - newspapers are going extinct along with the neo-con agenda.

 

shawn

Sep 25, 2008

Great job I very proud of your paper.Youre correct we need a real leader in office not a great speaker.

 

melissa mcchesney

Sep 25, 2008

I would have difficulty taking seriously any paper that felt McCain was a good choice.

 

sfnative

Sep 25, 2008

wow! it takes guts to print an opinion so contrarian to usual sf leanings. although i'm a democrat, i really haven't liked being steamrolled every day with palin/mccain bashing. i've never really paid attention to the examiner before, but i will now.

 

Sep 25, 2008

I will NEVER read this paper again!!! Do you know the main demographic of the people of San Fran?? If McCain wins. blood is on your hands. SHAME ON YOU

 

sandy

Sep 25, 2008

Is this a joke? We're all watching John Mccain become a serious drama queen trying to duck the debates and somehow save little sarah from a serious political beat down in a debate with Joe Biden and you still like the guy?

 

Jack Burden

Sep 25, 2008

This is that free paper that shows up at my door 2 days a week, right? Like pennysaver but with a couple stories mixed in?

 

Anna

Sep 25, 2008

Newspapers should not be endorsing one candidate vs. another. That is not the job of the paper and media. The job of the Examiner is to deliver the news--hence the NEWSpaper. This is ridiculous. And sickening. That aside it is apalling that anyone can even think of voting for these idiots.

 

Caitlin

Sep 25, 2008

WHAT?!?!?! Frisco is the most liberal city in the America - why would such a publication as highly regarded as the Examiner endorse a candidate who is beyond conservative and thinks that gay people aren't allowed to get married?? VERY upsetting!!!

 

dog and pony show

Sep 25, 2008

What are you, nuts? Endorsing a man who, in the past 10 days has flip flopped too many times to count on the state of the economy and is trying to fool the american public into believing that reform=regulation. McCain - as he said himself - is against a bailout now and has always been against regulation. He is only bowing to political opinion and looking to appease main street for votes. Pathetic.

 

Janice

Sep 25, 2008

Its hard to not think that maybe they are publicly backing the McCain Palin ticket in hopes that they might get an interview with some truth to it. Like everyone else, I am so sick of hearing about the personal life of Palin and never hearing any substance.

 

lion

Sep 25, 2008

You are kidding me right??????

 

mike

Sep 25, 2008

My cat has enjoyed your paper...in the litter box...but never again!

 

sarah

Sep 25, 2008

Right Wing Examiner endorses Palin-Mc Cain ticket, A.K.A THE MODERN JOKE OF THE CENTURY!

 

Megan

Sep 25, 2008

Claire in L.A. (and others), can you please inform us all of the "real Obama"? I mean, it seems you know, so why not share it so we can all make an informed decision? People keep saying, "oh, when they find out the truth..." or "Obama is a fake", why don't they list the FACTS behind the information they are SURE are there? Humm?? I'm waiting, inform me.

 

syryn

Sep 25, 2008

This is a joke, right? Palin is Bush in a skirt...cronyism, firing anyone who disagrees with her, can't form a coherent sentence without a teleprompter... and McCain is a sad, pathetic man who's sold his soul to Bush&Co. His latest ploy of "suspending" his campaign and trying to "cut and run" from the debates are typical; he's running out of money, so let's park the ads for awhile and he knows Obama will stand up to his belligerence, so he's dodging that confrontation. And who the hell did the research on this piece? No earmarks? Please!

 

SF Resident who hasn't decided who to vote for...

Sep 25, 2008

Hats off to you Examiner!!!!! This is America people, we should respect each others opinions and it is our DUTY to read and consider BOTH sides of all issues.

 

tjay

Sep 25, 2008

cancel my subscription

 

Janey

Sep 25, 2008

There are Republicans out here? Where are the three of you hiding?

 

mcbush

Sep 25, 2008

Serial liar with 8 houses multiple wives and 13 cars elite Versus a honest man with one wife and one car. Wow, are we that dumb? serial fools?

 

Sep 25, 2008

The meddling conservative christian owner of this fish wrapper, Philip Anschutz, must've sent a directive to get this done. One look at this and you will understand: this man uses his properties to further his own goals, not to serve the public. McSame, eh? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Anschutz

 

Sep 25, 2008

WTK!

 

Michelle

Sep 25, 2008

I am deeply disgusted by your endorsement. You have lost all my respect and support. It is not surprising that you have to give your newspaper away for free, as your views reflect the opinions of its owners. This is very low and your arguements are completely lacking.

 

Nick

Sep 25, 2008

When I saw your headline, I laughed out loud because I was sure it was from The Onion. Seriously, the McCain/Palin ticket is an insult to our country. Pulling out of a debate because "the dog ate my homework"? Repeated, documented lies? Not allowing the Vice Presidential candidate to speak to the American people? citing "being next to Russia" as foreign policy experience? Come on, I know you would prefer a Republican candidate -- but this ticket is not a serious contender for the highest office in the land. I'll bet you dollars to donuts that you will be deeply embarrassed by this endorsement a couple of years down the road.

 

melissa m

Sep 25, 2008

Since you are saying something ridiculous, I feel that I can also quote something ridiculous. Your "opinion" deserves this lovely response taken from the movie Billy Madison: "Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul." I just hope to everything that is good that I do not live in the same community as you, that I do not normally associate myself with the same people as you and hope that I never mirror any of your insane thoughts. I have never been more embarrassed to be from San Francisco, and I even question if you truly are from San Francisco yourself. I just feel sorry for you.

 

Evan WM

Sep 25, 2008

Who the F reads the Examiner anyway? Pet cage lining, trash on my doorstep.

 

Lion

Sep 25, 2008

I'm sorry I just can't stop laughing...it's people like your that created the mess we have in this country..it's a damm shame.

 

echoparkgal

Sep 25, 2008

no amount of inflammatory endorsements will make anyone purchase your crap newspaper.

 

Michelle

Sep 25, 2008

So the Examiner is for higher taxes? The Examiner is for health care VOUCHERS instead of health care plans? The lions share of McCain's proposed tax cuts got to people making OVER 600,000 a YEAR! The majority of Obama's cuts got to those making LESS that 150,000. McCain proposes health vouchers to shore up our healthcare system. So REAL soccer moms will have to make the agonizing choice between using the voucher check for health care, or paying the mortgage and putting food on the table. Look past the personalities to the truth: McCain supports the wealthy and the elite. Obama supports the middle class. Sarah Palin is nothing more than an actress hired by the Republican party to do some lifestyle advertising.

 

Jason C. Brown

Sep 25, 2008

I am trying to figure out if this was a "spoof" or if the writers in SF are that naieve, stupid, and/or ignorant. I take it you were one that "Wanted to have a beer with GW". Have you been reading or watching what's been taking place? (not MSNBC or Fox news either) I wish the writer put their name so I could put them on my black list of "Official Losers". FYI you are just as qualified as Palin to be VP. We know just as much about you as we do about her, which is nothing. Maybe Cindy McCain owns the publisher, that would make sense. SF don't let the Examiner define SF. www.WhatWouldYouSayToJohnMcCain.com

 

KSC

Sep 25, 2008

Cool, appears some people here in California DO still have morals!!!! Go McCain/Palin!

 

Erica

Sep 25, 2008

McCain & Palin 08' Good choice SF Examiner.

 

Michelle

Sep 25, 2008

And one more thing - I will never bother to read the Examiner again, since they clearly cannot see past the McCain Palin advertising. Learn how to do a little research and think for yourselves!!

 

Yvette

Sep 25, 2008

Great news! Obama didn't even know what AIG stood for. He was quoted as saying AIG stood for "American Insurance Group". FYI Mr. Obama, AIG stands for "American International Group".

 

Rosemarg

Sep 25, 2008

hahahahahahahahah! Of course this is the paper that can't even give itself away. Their papers just sit on the doorsteps until recycling day!

 

Bryce

Sep 25, 2008

Wow.. Seriously.. Anyone that thinks that McCain/Palin are going to save this country is crazy. It's the same stupid right wing decisions that have got us into this mess to begin with. I don't understand why America always wants to take 2 steps back instead of 1 step forward.. All I can say is don't blame me.. I voted for Hilary!

 

Gary

Sep 25, 2008

Wise choice. These are serious times.

 

Christie Keith

Sep 25, 2008

Are you stark raving insane? I'm a fourth generation native San Franciscan, and I'm ashamed the name of my City is on your "paper."

 

jissoji

Sep 25, 2008

Truly hilarious! Yes, this country needs four more of the last eight years.

 

Texjamma

Sep 25, 2008

You have got to be kidding. This is why everyone in San Francisco views the Examiner as a piece of trash that dirties up our sidewalks and doorways. People put signs on their doors BEGGING to not get the Examiner. After this, I for one will never read the paper again.

 

Angela Colter

Sep 25, 2008

Did you edit this at all, or did you just reprint the McCain/Palin talking points verbatim?

 

Sam

Sep 25, 2008

After reading too many mindless comments like 'idiot', 'stupid', 'a joke', it really brings to the forefront the agenda of many haters in SF. Many of you preach open-mindedness with one mouth then stage a newspaper boycott with the other. I find your free-spirited willingness to close a door (in your mind) quite humorous.

 

Dixon

Sep 25, 2008

Is it April 1st today? My goodness, and I thought Examiner was a sensible newspaper.

 

Jessie-o

Sep 25, 2008

That's it! I'm lining my birdcage with the Independent from now on instead!

 

JR

Sep 25, 2008

That's it; now I REALLY don't want to see your unasked-for fish-wrap on my doorstep ever again.

 

schmerz

Sep 25, 2008

Are you kidding? Has this newpaper actually taken a moment to examine the issues and where the candidates stand? How do they feel about the press being bashed daily by this candidate and his gun-totin' moose-killin' troopergate-lyin' sidekick?

 

Nick S.

Sep 25, 2008

I am embarrassed for your publication!

 

Thanks but No Thank

Sep 25, 2008

I am sorry, is this the Onion? I seriously could NOT believe this is true. You want to fix the economy? His bus is full of the lobbyist who created this mess int the first place. His economic advisor Phil Gram was the champion of de-regulation. Are you kidding me?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Lizzy

Sep 25, 2008

FINALLLLLLY!!! I LOVE MCCAIN?PALIN!!!!

 

Ian

Sep 25, 2008

Hahahaha. This is hilarious. Who needs the Daily Show with material like this. Top notch satire.

 

Chris

Sep 25, 2008

Why do Liberals get so frothing angry when someone disagrees with them? That's why Conservatives cannot even put bumper stickers on their cars - angry Loony Libs would key them. Obama's utopian socialist world can never exist. Be realistic, not emotional.

 

amy

Sep 25, 2008

Great choice, Great Man!

 

kel

Sep 25, 2008

This is unfortunate and disappointing.

 

Disturbed but not Surprised!

Sep 25, 2008

Is anyone really surprised that SF and the rest of this country is full of idiots? Ya okay vote for McCain, right when all hell breaks loose literally! How Stupid can you be? Well apparently you can be VERY STUPID AND STILL PUBLISH A NEWSPAPER! NEVER READ THE EXAMINER AND NEVER WILL! Obviously Ignorant A** People have an opinion! 2 BAD!

 

I actually use my brain

Sep 25, 2008

An endorsement for McCain is an endorsement for Bush. All of you conservative-wanna live in the 1930's forever- f*cks need to move the hell out of the way. I want our country to move forward, not backwards.

 

fred jones

Sep 25, 2008

PATHETIC!!! WHAT ARE YOU PEOPLE SMOKING!!!

 

Skylor Werden

Sep 25, 2008

Really? This is a horrible idea. Who is paying you?

 

Francois

Sep 25, 2008

I'm going to assume that you guys are enjoying the page views on this news and did it deliberately. If not, you really are just idiots.

 

Danielle in Redwood City

Sep 25, 2008

This article is ridiculous and I will NEVER buy your newspaper again... you people are delusional and makes me embarrased to be a SF Bay Area citizen.

 

Traddad

Sep 25, 2008

This is April.....right?

 

Bob

Sep 25, 2008

Wow! Leela was appalled and offended by the Examiner's endorsement of McCain/Palin. i am impressed by their endorsement! The paper endorses McCain/Palin for all the right reasons.

 

JIM D

Sep 25, 2008

why would you endorse a vice president pick who has no world knowledge and a man who sucks up to right wing hate groups you just lost a reader..

 

JoeMomma

Sep 25, 2008

Good thing no one read The Examiner, so no one will see this.

 

eh

Sep 25, 2008

yes the next candidates need experience, but EXPERIENCE OF ATTEMPTED BOOK BURNING???

 

Meredith M

Sep 25, 2008

I think this endorsement was written using a marketing brochure. The Examiner has blindly spit back the McCain/Palin rhetoric we hear every day in "approved" messages. Way to buy into the ignorant hype. You are now completely devoid of all journalistic integrity.

 

Jay

Sep 25, 2008

The owner of the Examiner is Philip Anschutz, a ridiculously wealthy oil man and right wing evangelist who directly profited from the Bush Administration. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Anschutz

 

Lobbyist Express

Sep 25, 2008

Crazy Christians - the biggest cult in the world.

 

Shawn

Sep 25, 2008

Just when you think the world is in the toilet you see some actual hope...As someone that lives in the real world, Congratulations Examiner! To the rest of you mindless nitwits in liberal la la land-put on a couple of Streisand albums, treat yourself with some green credits; just relax-it will all be over in a few weeks!!

 

Cindy Wang

Sep 25, 2008

I have officially lost all faith in this newspaper.

 

muffin

Sep 25, 2008

yep, when I think middle America, I think John McCain. This endorsement feels like a regurgitation of every catchphrase the McCain camp uses about him. This is generic, unconvincing, and, actually, just sad.

 

Sweetjaay

Sep 25, 2008

I find McCain/Palin not in support of many of the liberties we enjoy here in the SF Bay Area. I cannot understand how much was neglected in your summation of his "successful” career in politics. Furthermore your endorsement doesn't matter anyway because we all know California is heavily in support of Obama/Biden and it will be theirs victoriously!

 

ModerateMom

Sep 25, 2008

Are you kidding me? She's a bad joke and he's a liar.

 

WAKE UP AMERICA!

Sep 25, 2008

yeah... If you read that (completely asinine) racist idiots comments, this is the only type of person who is voting for McCain... Is that REALLY who you want thinking they run OUR country? That is not how we do things here. This is the best place in the world, lets not ruin it with another few years of the "Bush" reign... Please!

 

Mich

Sep 25, 2008

You people may need to examine your heads!!! If you like war so much then you go over there and fight!!! Ridiculous....I will never read your paper again.

 

logan

Sep 25, 2008

this story is a joke, right? it's funny, because all of the reasons you say above make me think of Obama, not McCain. Inspirational???? not McCain. Palin took $27million in earmarks for 5,500 people! she took ALL of the "bridge to nowhere" money. Sounds like earmarks to me!

 

Shirley

Sep 25, 2008

I am voting for John McCain because I am convinced he is a man of principle. I don't know if he will do the right things if in office, but I know he will TRY to do the right thing.

 

Joshy D.

Sep 25, 2008

Examiner, you are pathetic. You are so not SF. You should close up shop and move to Alaska.

 

Christine Baeza

Sep 25, 2008

Reading this stupidity make young voters like myself want to vote even more....change needs to happen asap.

 

Branden

Sep 25, 2008

Apparently the Examiner just wants more of the same. and truly doesn't care about real change. what a shame.

 

Dread Pirate Robert

Sep 25, 2008

Wow. How embarrassing for everyone associated with the Examiner. To have so many factual inaccuracies in an editorial shows that this newspaper has the journalistic sources and integrity of Fox News. Seriously, is it April First?

 

Average Jane

Sep 25, 2008

That was NOT written by someone with a functioning brain!

 

chris rosa

Sep 25, 2008

You have got to be kidding me. Is it April 1st? I for one will never pick up your paper again, because you obviously don't have a brain amongst you.

 

Bevrli

Sep 25, 2008

Vote NADER/GONZALEZ, for spelled-out change in government.

 

AHW

Sep 25, 2008

Wow. I'm shocked. This publication just lost a lot of credibility in my eyes.

 

Sep 25, 2008

"Ever the maverick, McCain selected Palin because her record mirrors his own in courageously standing up to corrupt special interests regardless of party and cutting government waste." LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Ah, you guys are a hoot....

 

wtf

Sep 25, 2008

are you kidding me? how much did mccain/palin pony up for this endorsement? ridiculous. this man has no idea what to do to fix the economy, and his temper will only start more wars.

 

Interested observer

Sep 25, 2008

Wow. All I can say is wow. I cannot beleive that a paper from San Francisco is spouting this sort of opinion completely lacking in critical analysis of either McCain and Palin and completely relying on peddled anachronistic mottos. Palin needs RIGOROUS vetting which she is by noones standards getting. People need to seriously think about how up to the task she is, which she is NOT in my opinion. Sarah Palin is not a credible candidate.....

 

Brian Hampton

Sep 25, 2008

OMG. Have you all moved to Wasilla and started doing meth?

 

you lost my business

Sep 25, 2008

I've been a loyal client for years, but there is no way I can ever support your guys again after this... i'm truly dumbfounded

 

Jamie

Sep 25, 2008

Just when I thought San Francisco was a lost cause, finally some rational thought. And to Jamie Whitaker...Obama is at loss for words without a teleprompter and I have never seen a candidate lie more about what he said and then "didn't say" when he chose incorrectly.

 

Maria

Sep 25, 2008

I'm subscribing to the Examiner right now

 

troy loyd

Sep 25, 2008

Amen! This great country needs to get back to its Christian values. The right people at the right time.

 

Lorraine Bates

Sep 25, 2008

Ah....what? This is the SAN FRANCISCO Examiner, right? Is there still a hazy cloud of doobie smoke hanging over the city that you've been inhaling too deeply? Is it April 1st? You just endorsed a guy who says our economy is "strong" and had to shut down his campaign to fly from Ohio to DC (with a little stopover in NYC to see Katie Couric). Country First?? Is that what he was doing with Keating? With Phil Gramm? Skipping votes on equal pay for women and voting against veteran's benefits? Exactly what country was he putting first, because it sure as heck wasn't this one.

 

t

Sep 25, 2008

i hope this magazine's building has fire insurance, because the gays are about to roll up in their prius-es....Thanks examiner for endorsing setting back society a millenia

 

ao

Sep 25, 2008

Congratulations on killing your San Francisco reader base, Mr. Anschutz. My memory is long and this is not something I will ever forgive.

 

shannon m.

Sep 25, 2008

This paper belongs in the litterbox along side the country when McSame and Failin' are done with it.

 

Free Exposure?

Sep 25, 2008

Is the Examiner disagreeing with the majority of the Californians in order to receive free publicity? (even though their paper is already free haha) Maybe they want to sell for a quarter now.

 

POW

Sep 25, 2008

Hahahahahahaha way to flip off the remnants of your readership. Can you think of a time when McCain has stood up to deregulation of the banking industry, or will you have to get back to us on that? Actually I think this is a trick. McCain supporters will be confused about seeing a SAN FRANCISCO newspaper from SAN FRANCISCO endorse their candidate. Maybe they'll be scared of McCain's SAN FRANCISCO ties and forget to vote. Thanks guys!

 

Angie

Sep 25, 2008

I am truly disgusted and appalled. As a proud San Franciscan I can honestly say that I will never, ever read the examiner again. With the loss of my readership their circulation has gone down to 5 households. Honestly, who cares about the Examiner? P.S.: I wouldn't doubt it if the Republicans threw a boat load of money their way. Go Obama!

 

Laura F

Sep 25, 2008

"America remains for billions of people around the world the light of freedom, the shining city on a hill that must be defended and preserved."- keep the propaganda going! this is NOT how the world sees america, its how america sees america. Wake up!! the guy can't even read a teleprompter properly! And palin doesn't know wut the hell she's doing!

 

Julian

Sep 25, 2008

I LOVE how the most LIBERAL city in the country is so against any opinion outside of it's narrow mindset. TRUE DEMOCRATIC ideals include the idea that EVERYONE is entitled to believe and endorse who they want. It is what makes this country unique, special. The hypocrisy of the uber liberal left in this city is overflowing. If you want to be in a place where only ONE opinion is allowed then please move to Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, or Russia... see how having the RIGHT to your opinion goes over in any of those places. Good for you Examiner... for having the stones to do something like this in this city. I may not agree with all in this endorsement, but I am thrilled to live in a country where we can disagree with each other and our government and still keep our heads on our shoulders.

 

adrock1981

Sep 25, 2008

Oh my god the gays must be burning SF down right now lol

 

rebel rosie

Sep 25, 2008

Good Riddance. it is best they OUT themselves, now that the Asian ownership o of this Insignificant Newspaper can't even give it away anymore. a poop scooper! beware the newpaper print may have a toxic reaction when touched. eek!

 

Katie Holmes

Sep 25, 2008

You've got to f*&^%*(g kidding me!!! If you have a subscription, cancel it now!

 

rockpstar

Sep 25, 2008

This puts journalistic Ethical unbiased qualitites to shame!!!!!!!!!! I am so disgusted that a publication would side on a presidential candidate when isn't it the first thing you learn in your journalism career that you cannot post any bias on any issue!? way to be an omniscient observer who sways their views. For an aspiring soon to be journalist, you have put journalism to a lower level.Thank you for becoming another publication that makes me lose hope in the business.

 

Jenkins

Sep 25, 2008

Wow. So when/if McCain croaks from natural causes (which is HIGHLY probable), then we get the pleasure of having an inexperienced woman become our nation's leader. If the economy is bad now, imagine when it's run by someone that can't even keep her daughter's legs closed. Sounds great.

 

Sandy Egan

Sep 25, 2008

Palin will never be presidential and McCain is ancient. Can't we ever have anything other than old white guys ruling this country. Obama has the dynamism that we need at this time.

 

Aburg

Sep 25, 2008

It is amazing how angry everyone is. Everyone blaming the financial situation on the Republican's do you know that the top three politicians that got the most money from Fannie and Freddie are democrats, with your man Obama being #3. But no one is reporting on that. They weren't worried about this crisis because they were getting their pockets stuffed with cash. I think it is pathetic have everyone is caught up in Obamania when the man has accomplished nothing. He just talks about change. Well what is he going to change, he is going to raise taxes and spend more. All you have to do is look up the small record that he does have when he hasn't just voted present. And get of the McBush propaganda. McCain in nothing like Bush, he has disagreed with him many times. Do research people before you screw america up.

 

Charlie

Sep 25, 2008

You McCain/Palin people are so unbelieveably blind. Doe you ever wonder where McCain got his whole "Change" idea? I believe he was running on the platform of experience during the primaries. Oh, but the he chose his little trophy wife, oops I mean, Palin whose only experience lies in corruption and charging women for rape tests. The under current of rascism in the minds of McCain/Palin supports makes me ashmed to live in a country who surrenders it's principles to selfish, flip-flopping power-mongers.

 

Obama 2008

Sep 25, 2008

Are you kidding? This must be a joke. Obama/Biden '08

 

KellsMae

Sep 25, 2008

Absurd. The Examiner makes more sense lining bird cages than endorsing McCain-Palin. Though even the bird may have better taste.

 

Leigh Rowan

Sep 25, 2008

I'm so glad I'll never have to read the Examiner again after this endorsement. What a terrible choice you've made!

 

KEPM

Sep 25, 2008

Wow - you are such a disappointment...

 

j lowe

Sep 25, 2008

We should all ignore this, and the SF Examiner from here on out. OUT OF TOUCH.

 

maggie

Sep 25, 2008

the fact that McCain's team suspended their campaign as polls were slipping, wanted a media blackout when Palin met with heads of state for THE FIRST TIME EVER, and wanted to postpone a public debate, shows the McCain/Palin ticket's true colors... Palin should never have even been considered for vp and the only reason that this is even a race is because McCain is white and Obama is black..if Obama was white this would be a land slide election in his favor... thank you for endorsing a woman with NO global political background and the old man who thought it was a good idea to choose her...

 

fatruca

Sep 25, 2008

YOUVE GOOOOTTTTTSSSSS TO be kidding. WTF. that's like a woman that's NOT for womens rights... someone is severely disturbed at the examiner, so much for your credibility.

 

Candy Barr

Sep 25, 2008

Even if I did like McCain, there is no way I would vote for some old dude who has seven kids, and a VP who has five, with the fifth being the one she didn't really need after already having four, anyway. And then she has the nerve to have a pregnant teen-aged daughter! She can't even run her own household, why do we need her in the White House? I am not in the mood to see her children and grandchildren running around on the WH lawn. What would the population do while those two are in office, quadruple?

 

Joe C

Sep 25, 2008

What a breath of fresh air in a liberal town. I respect the position you took and the courage you had to make it. Thank You.

 

Sarah

Sep 25, 2008

I will never, ever, purchase another copy of the examiner. They're obviously staffed by uneducated personnel.

 

appalled

Sep 25, 2008

That's disgusting!

 

NR

Sep 25, 2008

After reading some of the comments from readers it would seem that many consider SF as the sole propriety for electoral advice and commentary. I thought that people should be permitted to have an opinion without being insulted and condemned in these UNITED States...sounds like some of you would shove a dogma down everyone's throats more so than those you proclaim as narrow minded and backwards.

 

Han

Sep 25, 2008

This opinion is just to sell papers and stir up controversy. Why else would you proudly put this in the paper of the most liberal city. Anyone with half a brain knows by now the Obama/Biden ticket is the only way our country has a chance anymore. It's funny how people are so narrow minded they are sheep being led to the slaughterhouse and they act like it's ok. If McCain is elected he will probably die sometime during the presidency and Palin will be president. Yes, I said it, Palin will be president. Very scary thought.

 

Suzanne

Sep 25, 2008

WHAT????? I am in shock. How unconscionable! Do you not know your readers values at all? You had better be glad you are a free paper, because you'd have lost a lot of subscribers over this. I am sickened.

 

John Aguilar

Sep 25, 2008

Well, you are owned by a neocon conservative conglomerate. What else should we expect?

 

mary

Sep 25, 2008

WTF???

 

eeb

Sep 25, 2008

Um, Examiner? UR DOIN IT RONG.

 

USA

Sep 25, 2008

Good to see San Fran has not been totally taken over by leftist anti-americans. A vote for McCain is a vote for America!

 

hue

Sep 25, 2008

shut up about that mccain/palin bs. ridiculous.

 

Josh

Sep 25, 2008

If the people of San Francisco don't support McCain, then I know for certain it is the right choice for America. Thank you SF Examiner for standing on principle and not on the whims of the Democrats. From a former Bay Area resident.

 

sfgirl

Sep 25, 2008

Those outside the Bay Area may not know this, but The Examiner isn't a real newspaper. Nobody takes anything in it seriously. It's basically a few pages of ads and local gossip. This was probably just a publicity stunt to make more people read it, and therefor earn more money from advertisers. This is SF after all. No one here is voting for McCain.

 

Lindsay Q in Canada

Sep 25, 2008

I cannot believe that a newspaper would endorse the ridiculously unprepared campaign put forward by McCain and the republican party. Palin has no experience. The Alaskan National Guard? She could be PRESIDENT. Look at your facts. Even the British Prime Minister has come out (first time in history) to support Obama. The rest of the world knows that Obama is what the US needs. Why don't you?

 

Chris

Sep 25, 2008

I am astonished that you have shown such courage and wisdom to make this endorsement. The events of the past two days show us who the true leaders are and who will truly put country first. Would that all elected officials would do the same! McCain demonstrates this unselfish style of leadership over and over. His running mate is truly gifted and shares his love of country and servant leadership style. Bravo to the Examiner!

 

Bill

Sep 25, 2008

Wow finally something resembling common sense finally coming out of San Francisco! I know it happens about as often as a lunar eclipse but good to see there are smart, thinking people still live in the SF area. Actually most of the people I know and work with in Nor CA can't stand the leftist facists who dominate the area.

 

John Windsor

Sep 25, 2008

Always nice to see the fair minded and balanced comments coming from the "tolerant" liberals when someone disagrees with them. Fruits and nuts indeed.

 

Tracy

Sep 25, 2008

I cannot believe what I am reading-this is the last time I will pick up an examiner. This article is beyond ridiculious I dont know even where to hegin. This man's entire campaign is made up of lies. More so then any other presidential candidate in our history! And ps mccain and palin are ANTI GAY!!! The examiner must of been paid to print the F#$%ing S*&^!!!!

 

Shayla

Sep 25, 2008

Great choice! I think it's quite a risk for you to back these candidates, so kudos to you for going against the grain!

 

BETTY BLERSCH

Sep 25, 2008

I READ WITH GREAT ALARN YOUR FRONT PAGE ENDORSEMENT OF MCCAIN/PALIN IN THIS MORNING'S EXAMINER. I FEEL SO STRONLY ABOUT THIS ELECTION AND ITS EFFECT ON THE FUTURE OF OUR COUNTRY THAT I REQUEST THAT YOU INFORM YOUR ADVERTISERS THAT I WILL NO LONGER PICK UP A COPY OF THE EXAMINER EXCEPT TO WRAP MY FISH AND CHIPS. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

 

Marlys

Sep 25, 2008

You've got to be kidding. Is this a joke? The Examiner has just fallen below "bird cage liner" level.

 

Andrew Mager

Sep 25, 2008

I used to love the Examiner... now I hate the Examiner :(

 

Taylor

Sep 25, 2008

Are you kidding? The last thing our country can afford is another Bush-like presidency. Get ready for more secrecy, croynism and media manipulation. I have defended the Examiner in the past but will never again. You are now in the ranks of Fox & Friends.

 

NoBama

Sep 25, 2008

My GOD the paper has finaly come to its senses please, stay awake!! You have shown a lot of guts to write this, and by the way I will subscribe to your paper now because of it, you keep it up most of the left are not informed enough to see the big picture in this election you are endorsing the Hero not the Zero

 

Jak Klinikowski

Sep 25, 2008

You FILTHY Bastards....I sincerely hope your rotten rag goes straight down the toilet after you have the unmitigated nerve to endorse this disgusting liar and the idiot he's chosen to run with.

 

Lisa

Sep 25, 2008

Instead of opinions, try reporting the facts and letting your readers decide. This is a NEWSpaper, isn't it?

 

jamesshot

Sep 25, 2008

I approve the endorsement of McCain/Palin.

 

lesley

Sep 25, 2008

WTF?!!!!!!!!!? san francisco is a small town in texas now?? get the f**k outta here

 

ben

Sep 25, 2008

this is a joke, right?

 

Truthiness

Sep 25, 2008

Thanks for the free birdcage liner and dishes wrapping for when I move! That's all your paper is going to be good for now. And I won't feel bad about grabbing the entire bin-full for my purposes either. It's not like I am depriving others of anything but junk.

 

Chad

Sep 25, 2008

Living in the only truly liberal city in Florida (Orlando) - we are appalled that the city that paves the way for human rights has a newspaper that would endorse this ticket! Even our crazy conservative newspaper endorses Obama!

 

TRUTH

Sep 25, 2008

Hello, my name is John McCain and I approve this message. Because my campaign dollars paid for it, but we'll call it journalistic integrity.

 

stevev

Sep 25, 2008

In how many ways is this endorsement a parody? Nothing stated therein resembles the reality we face in this country or McCain's role in it. The Examiner conveniently ignores McCain's role in the Keating Five debacle - it goes against his self-proclaimed image of standing up to monied interests. McCain doesn't put Country First, he puts McCain first. Why else would he pick an unqualified inexperienced woman to be VP? I used to pick up the Examiner occasionally, after all they give it away for free because they know no one would pay for it. But I'll never open that rag again. They're too lame to justify the advertising dollars they get. Sorry, Examiner - you're not even worth fishwrap!

 

Matt

Sep 25, 2008

OK. So now you know why this paper is free.

 

Jenna

Sep 25, 2008

GOOD!!!

 

csquid

Sep 25, 2008

If this is a joke -- you should leave the jokes to the Onion and just do the news. If it isn't a joke -- then your newspaper is a joke. I'm starting to lose faith in America, as is the rest of the world. Snap out of it people.

 

Sep 25, 2008

which city do you think you are representing?

 

Irritated from Bernal Heights

Sep 25, 2008

What a disgrace to pick up the Examiner this morning to see that the paper has endorsed McCain-Palin! Clearly the majority of voters in this city do NOT agree with you. However, what I take issue with is that you declared your support one way or the other. From here on out none of us should bother looking at your election coverage. We can be pretty certain that it is not "fair and unbiased" as it should be. Your public endorsement flies in the face of good journalism. Shame on you!

 

MHughes

Sep 25, 2008

When half the country believes one way, and the other half another, is it wise to criticize each other for our views? The ideal probably lies somewhere in the middle. We should respect that there are differing opinions and not berate or rail against each other for expressing them. This country is founded on the premise that each of us has the freedom to feel and speak what we believe. However, does that mean we should so harshly deride the opinions of the 50% of Americans that feel differently than we may? Since none of us has all the answers, let's give the arrogance a rest.

 

Figures

Sep 25, 2008

The Examiner is owned by Philip Frederick Anschutz is an American businessman and supporter of conservative Christian causes. With an estimated current net worth of around $7.8 billion, he is ranked by Forbes as the 31st richest person in the USA. OF COURSE he's endorsing McCain Palin.

 

Ben Haus

Sep 25, 2008

When they say the examiner, they must mean the owner, Philip Anschutz. It's no surprise he would support a McCain-Palen ticket. The guy is an oil demagogue who wants creationism taught in public schools. If you want more unilateralism, Us vs Them, end-of-the-world ideology, then Anschutz is preaching to the choir. I'm thinking maybe instead of "Drill Baby, Drill," the new McCain slogan should be "Deregulate, baby, deregulate! Now crash and burn! [stall campaign]." I'm not one to shoot the arrow over the bow of religious beliefs, but many of our greatest thinkers like Jefferson, Franklin, Paine, and Martin Luther King realized that the Bible was not the unadulterated word of God. My guess is that both Anschutz and Palin don't fall into this category! But if the Bible is the true word of God, then how can the Q'uran be the true word of God also? Something that will make Mr Anshutz happy, this issue of the examiner is great carbon-based fuel to start your bonfire or BBQ :)

 

Bryce King

Sep 25, 2008

You have got to be kidding me," Many of her citizens believe the country is on the wrong track. It is for times such as these that men like John McCain are made, to put country first so that it can be put right in its time of need" Isnt McCain one of THE reasons why we are on the wrong track? McCain=4 more bush years. Enough on his service record. This man has been milking that for decades.

 

tina kemp

Sep 25, 2008

Wasn't Cindy McCain the one who was wearing $313k for the RNC?? How can they expect to relate to the average American family that is either losing their home or is dangerously close? Also, does anyone remember McCain calling Vietnamese people "Gooks", or how he refused to apologize? I realize the man has had experiences that have changed him for the rest of his life, but he doesn't belong at the head of a country with that kind of bias. How would he handle international affairs??

 

joe anderson

Sep 25, 2008

You guys must be kidding. Let me get this straight. McCain has run the most lying campaign EVER. He and his running mate are liars. McCain does not the support of the young people of this country or any other country. If his war record is so great WHY will he not let the pentagon release them. I know because he lied about his time as a POW. Yeah, read his book and you can tell that it did not take much to get him to start talking to the VC (his fellow service members called him the SONGBIRD). So let's stop talking about his POW time unless he is will to release his stella records.

 

Joanne

Sep 25, 2008

What the hell! San Francisco is suppose to be Liberal center! What about women's rights, gay rights really! This is not Kansas this is California.

 

Brent

Sep 25, 2008

*wow* ... watch Palin's interviews w/Couric. Just watch them .... this person has 10% chance of being President?! *omg* hahahahahahahahahahaha this is insane!!!!!!!!!

 

WTF???

Sep 25, 2008

Are you freakin' kidding me?

 

Sep 25, 2008

B.S.

 

Guy Zakrzewski

Sep 25, 2008

Is this for real? If it is, how much money did you receive from the Republicans?

 

Rachel

Sep 25, 2008

Thank God a media outlet other than Fox News is putting real facts out there and not being completely left wing and biased.

 

Brittany Smith

Sep 25, 2008

ARE YOU SERIOUS!!!! The examiner may want to think about that again. Obama is the best candidate for this country!!!!!

 

James Whitfield

Sep 25, 2008

I AM NEVER READING THE EXAMINER EVER AGAIN!!!!!!!! This really offends me!!!

 

No.to.socialism

Sep 25, 2008

This is great to see coming out of SF. People need to wake up. Giving a good speech (written by someone else) does not qualify one for the presidency. Obama is nothing but fluff.

 

101

Sep 25, 2008

Publicity Stunt!

 

Dennis

Sep 25, 2008

What a bunch of WHINERS!!!!! Cancel your subscription? ITS FREE!!! Maybe you want to question the endorsements of the papers who simply go along to mollify their readers, subscribers, so as not to ruffle their feathers and actually ask them to THINK about the choice. What ever happened to "questioning the conventional wisdom". Thanks to the Examiner for thoughtfully presenting this endorsement and also exposing the righteous indignation of this nation's new "Moral Majority"!

 

Kathy

Sep 25, 2008

OH MY GOODNESS!!! Someone in California has a brain?? WOW, I am completely impressed. You see, it showed a glimmer of hope when you guys in CA voted Schwarzenegger in but then oh GOD, Nancy Pelosi was still representing you guys, so Californias' chances of actually having someone ANYONE in office with any character WHATSOEVER was lost.( She is a JOKE!) BUT, here is the San Fran Examiner, having a real life, real people opinion. Not some " I'm an gazillionaire actor/actress, I know what REAL people in America are going through." opinion. GOOD FOR YOU! Great Endorsement. Go MCCAIN/PALIN!

 

L.Rosas

Sep 25, 2008

This is so sad...Wake up and see with your own eyes.This is so scary.and now they want us The Working POOR to bail them out..Hell No..I want a better future for my childern and family not just Palin's. We must stop the maddness.Obama is our only way out of this terrible mess Bush and his people have put us though.We can not afford anther Four years with these types of policy.They do not care about Us...The bail-out.Give me a break.We are all broken down.How much more can the american people take? God help Us..

 

Nancy

Sep 25, 2008

You are so brave. This is the kind of editorial fortitude this city has been sorely lacking for decades. Good for you. You've gained the undying loyalty of one reader today. Whether I agree with you or not, you stood up for an unpopular opinion!

 

OBAMA08

Sep 25, 2008

VOTE OBAMA!!!

 

imadjanation

Sep 25, 2008

they do resemble quite a few husband/ wife,CEO/manager couples in SF sadly. Hopefully their arrogant blunders will mislead them when it counts.

 

Rob Spectre

Sep 25, 2008

I'm grateful that the editorial board of the SF Examiner took the time to acknowledge their own irrelevance today. America and San Francisco are better for it.

 

susan

Sep 25, 2008

I think whomever wrote this needs to wrap their mind around the fact that this "dangerous world" was only rendered so by America's inability to cooperate and grow with it. Sounds sappy, but look at the economy, look at the world's view of us. "Defending and enriching America," the McCain/Palin way, would be assuming we're all white, Christians (when it's convenient), and terrified of change. I don't see any of those qualities when I look in the mirror- when I look at America

 

ugghhh

Sep 25, 2008

This endorsement was actually the work of the parent company that owns the examiner. This same exact endorsement also appeared in the baltimore examiner and the D.C. examiner. It was not a local decision to endorse mcpalin. The SF examiner is owned by Colorado based Clarity Media which is owned by the conservative billionaire and Colorado resident Phil Anshutz.

 

Canadian

Sep 25, 2008

is this a joke?

 

S.

Sep 25, 2008

I find it funny that the only reason why so many people "like" McCain is because of Palin. She's the one winning people over not him. He's supposed to be running for president and he's not - he's using her to get the voters he needs. The word "change" is being thrown around quite loosely this election so let's do exactly that - let's change our Republican president for a Democrat and see how that works.

 

You can't be serious

Sep 25, 2008

Is this a freaking joke?

 

Sep 25, 2008

I cannot believe that you would endorse McCain and Palin.The entire first col. describes Senator Obama down to the last sentence and then you turn around and make this absurd endorsement.Amazing.

 

babspmalone

Sep 25, 2008

This is a hack, right?

 

Rebren

Sep 25, 2008

I will NEVER read your paper again. In spite of all that's going on with our economy and unemployment you actually endorse four more years of this? shame on you! You DO NOT represent the SF BAy community AT ALL. *spits on ground in your name*

 

Go away

Sep 25, 2008

Jesus...will you guys just FOLD already. What a waste of paper (and time) you are!

 

piegirl

Sep 25, 2008

America is often the reason why the world is a 'dangerous place.' The last thing our people need is another leader who jokes about bombing other countries and spreads hate and bigotry. How can the Examiner exclaim over his solid experience when his running mate has absolutely none, and flip-flopped amongst several colleges (flunking out of one) before finally graduating? I want to vote for someone who believes in change that will improve the well-being of people in our country and across the globe. McCain certainly is not that candidate.

 

patate

Sep 25, 2008

really?! is this the work of the palin hacker?

 

Dlerue

Sep 25, 2008

I am finally proud to be a San Franciscan. I completely agree with the Examiner.

 

hardlinemike

Sep 25, 2008

Is this possible? A San Francisco newspaper that has the courage to support a non Democrat? I almost passed out when I read your headline. Congrats! Not only do you have guts, but brains too!

 

katrink2

Sep 25, 2008

Hello, This is absolutely an accurate reflection of the Examiner's values. You can read a dandy of a bio on its owner here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Anschutz

 

Nosy Parker

Sep 25, 2008

Well that's just a shame! You would sell out the country for your own interests, Philip Anschutz. SHAME!

 

Jen

Sep 25, 2008

Is this the Twilight Zone? Who did your research? This is one of the last straws. Insane. These two make Bush look almost good! Well, almost. Unbelievable - too compare McCain to Truman? WTF? And you best check again into his *stellar* service record. You have your facts totally wrong. Oh, well, good birdcage material. Sigh.

 

MONTE RODRIGUEZ

Sep 25, 2008

Iam from San Francisco and I am gay but IAM VOTING FOR MCCAIN/PALIN TICKET. I would rather have another 4 years of the same ( anything already rock bottom will tend to go up anyways ) than TOTAL UNCERTAINTY WITH AN INEXPERIENCED AMBITIOUS SENATOR. WHO WANTS THIS COUNTRY TO BE RUN LIKE OAKLAND AND DETROIT ?

 

Henry De La Rosa

Sep 25, 2008

There is now no reason to purchase the San Francisco Examiner. All TRASH like this should be strictly boycotted!

 

andrew french

Sep 25, 2008

ive been a loyal sf examiner reader for quite a while. i will be no longer because of your decision to endorse the mccain/palin ticket. i will also inform my friends so that they, too, will hopefully stop reading your publication.

 

carrie hart

Sep 25, 2008

is this a joke?

 

Mindful in Los Angeles

Sep 25, 2008

This is ridiculous. I've never seen anyone make so many poor choices in such a small amount of time. And the fact that most of it was of a posturing nature, makes me sick to my stomach. I actually always had a fair amount of respect for McCain but it's become obvious that the principals that he had so readily at his disposal in the past have left him. Defenseless and senseless. Pathetic. Sarah Palin's credentials hardly need any clarification from anyone. She is unfit for any public office, let alone the Vice Presidency. God save us all.

 

C Mathiieson

Sep 25, 2008

When I saw your paper's front cover this morining endorsing John McCain and Sarah Palin, I first thought I must be looking at cover of the satirical 'Onion' newspaper. Sadly, this was not the case. Whatever credibilty your paper had, just went out the window. From now on I'll only pick up the Examiner to line the bottom of my parrot's cage with. Chris Mathieson 415 954-6326 San Francisco

 

Bob johnson

Sep 25, 2008

HAHAHA - hilarious....I knew the Examiner was ridiculous...now I know - there's a reason why this RAG is free!

 

disappointed

Sep 25, 2008

i think the author was being facetious. This election is no joke and this is clearly a satire because no intelligent person would reasonably support mccain/palin. Palin is an idiot...one that has zero foreign policy experience and is certainly not suited to be the first in command should something happen to sen. mccain. I think it would be highly irresponsible to elect the duo. Not to mention the rep party has destroyed our economy during the last eight years they have been in power!

 

Samantha

Sep 25, 2008

Wow! I expected more from my lovely city of San Francisco. Excuse me, I think I might lose my lunch...

 

Theo Logian

Sep 25, 2008

This is the last time I buy your paper.

 

Julie

Sep 25, 2008

Is this a joke?

 

JJ

Sep 25, 2008

Thank you Examiner. People are far to emotional about this campaign. The fact of the matter is that McCain, not Obama, will be the one to initiate Change that is so desperately needed in thee times. While Obama will sway with whatever will earn him popularity, McCain will be the solid character who will help the US regain her strength. Democrats and Republicans want the same things in the end: peace, liberty, justice; as an ex-democrat, I truly believe that the Republican party is the more efficient catalyst to effect change than the democratic one.

 

Peter Gillen

Sep 25, 2008

thats the sound of the examiner losing thousands of subscriptions.

 

Sep 25, 2008

I'll stop reading the Examiner because they stopped caring for America by endorsing McSame and Pitbul with lipstick! - What a joke!

 

AubreyLC

Sep 25, 2008

Wow...I am in shock. Why would they write this? Most likely a large donation was made in John McCain'$ name....

 

sherman

Sep 25, 2008

i will no longer read or support your less than credible journal. this is absolutely ridiculous. i would rather you not endorse any candidate than print this propaganda!

 

Mr M

Sep 25, 2008

I'll take McCain over the empty suit, socialist, Chicago machine creation named Barack Hussien Obama any day. Thank you for a glimmer of sanity from la-la land.

 

JohnM

Sep 25, 2008

I am shocked that in San Francisco, you would endorse a ticket that does not believe in civil/equal rights for the gay community. And also a ticket that would turn over the rights a woman has to her own body. I do not find that inspirational. I will burn all my papers and cancel my subscription. I hope others will join me.

 

Heather

Sep 25, 2008

Hey, Cody L, for example (as well as others), before you start bashing on Obama and praising McCain/Palin, learn how to spell "non-existent", especially since this COMMENT BOX FIXES YOUR SPELLING ERRORS. And, seriously? You support people who think women should not have any rights, based off their Christian "values"? DISGUSTING.

 

Sep 25, 2008

You have got to be kidding.

 

Sep 25, 2008

Their Wikipedia entry ...

"On February 19, 2004, Philip Anschutz of Denver, Colorado purchased the Examiner and its printing plant. His new company, Clarity Media Group, launched the Washington Examiner in 2005 and Baltimore Examiner in 2006. The Examiner is currently run by Anschutz subsidiary SF Newspaper Company."

Publications under this type of umbrella should no longer be considered "local."

 

Shocked Beyond Belief

Sep 25, 2008

It took enormous courage to even contemplate endorsing a Republican/Conservative for anything at all. Your detractors are beside themselves that it was “allowed” in San Francisco, of all places. A city that protects, aids and abets felons, uses taxpayers money to pay for their tickets to travel out of the country until "things cool off" enough for the felons to come back “home” and commit more crimes. You'll also be attacked by the 33% of the hypocritical racist liberals who have a problem voting for Obama anyway because of his skin color. Hats off to whoever convinced the rest of the Examiner’s powerful to let this endorsement stand. I have no doubt that you’ll try to publish this comment.

 

SF N8iv

Sep 25, 2008

did i miss a memo or something? is today april fool's day? seriously.

 

plainly stated

Sep 25, 2008

Seriously? What is all of this Republicans vs Democrats nonsense? And another thing, John McCain is not George Bush. Sorry, I didnt think people were so stupid to have gotten that mixed up. I would really love for those of you who are bad mouthing any of the Presidential candidates or the current President for that matter to be elected, have to deal with a crisis or a few crises like we have right now, try your damnest to do the best you possibly can, and still get crap for it. You guys are terribly mistaken to think that the President is somehow God. They are still people, they make mistakes. Sometimes they are costly, but none the less, mistakes. In the words of Kid Rock, stop pointing figers and take some blame America! I'm sure everyone of you are practically perfect in everyway. FALSE! I loved this article.

 

Dave Murphy

Sep 25, 2008

I am shocked and appalled that a "news" organization in this day and age has chosen to endorse a particular candidate. Even Fox News maintains a veil of impartiality. If this paper was distributed in a mostly Republican area this would be ridiculous. The fact that it is distributed in a mostly Democratic area makes this absurd. I will never read your paper again.

 

Heather

Sep 25, 2008

AH! AND ALL OF YOUR GRAMMAR! It's appalling! Christian values shouldn't reign supreme in a nation where Christianity is not the sole religion. Way to be exclusive.

 

Tori

Sep 25, 2008

Don't need another... said "(with the un-qualified Palin included)"... That's one of my biggest issues with Obama supporters- how is it that you see that Obama is qualified to run the country and Palin- with more experience- is not qualified to take the second seat? I was thrilled to see McCain get some positive coverage. He will turn this county in the right direction, if given a fair chance.

 

Phippsie

Sep 25, 2008

You are all mentally ill

 

Jenna

Sep 25, 2008

Not at all surprising, considering the owner of the Examiner is a staunch Bush supporter/ultra-conservative. If you go to the Washington Examiner and the Baltimore Examiner online (also owned by Philip Anschutz), you will see the EXACT SAME ARTICLE on the front page. Clearly, this article represents the view of a very biased right-winger who probably acquired the SF Examiner solely to broadcast his views to a polar audience. I can only assume that this acquisition was his feeble to attempt to inflict change on a grand city that he must surely hold in high contempt and disregard. Keep your head up, San Francisco. We are a proud, beautiful, progressive, intelligent group -- I feel blessed to be part of such an amazing community. Don't throw out your Examiners quite yet; they can be useful. I used quite a few to house train my new puppy and wrap up my dishware for transport.

 

Chris

Sep 25, 2008

Eric: " The surge in Iraq worked wonders and he cannot bring himself to admit he was wrong." You obviously haven't read the latest on this have you, Eric? The "Wonders" you are talking about have little to do with the surge and more to do with ethnic cleansing.

 

JOYCE

Sep 25, 2008

Changing political parties in the White House is not change. That's politics as usual. That is what got us in the mess we are in with the economy. It is not one party or the other. Both parties have people in the Senate and Congress that are on the take and have corrupted our system. Wake up people, you have to change the way things are done in Washington to change politics. John McCain wants to do that.

 

Donny

Sep 25, 2008

This is ludacris! I wont be reading the Examiner anymore...EVER! Do they not understand who makes up their reader-base???

 

Megan Porter

Sep 25, 2008

Like many readers, I believe this to be a poor choice.

 

Jennifer

Sep 25, 2008

DISGUSTING

 

Jerry

Sep 25, 2008

I would say that Jamie Whitaker is decribing Mr. Obama. Mr. Obama has not been truthful about anything so far.

 

Jess

Sep 25, 2008

I actually did a double take to make sure I wasn't linked to an Onion article. This is outrageous--especially after McCain's debacle yesterday.

 

Eric

Sep 25, 2008

This reads like a McCain campaign press release. Seriously, you use the same exact empty slogans he and his surrogates spout non-stop. This endorsement does not contain one iota of critical thinking-- It just repeats approved phrases that are provably false or transparently ridiculous. This seems like an attempt to generate buzz by publishing something guaranteed to anger San Franciscans. From the 447 comments posted before mine, I'd say it worked. Congratulations in the success of your shameless, McCain-style faux-maverick ploy.

 

annagal

Sep 25, 2008

Examiner: This is an embarrassment.

 

Lindsey K.

Sep 25, 2008

What?!

 

Abe81

Sep 25, 2008

You're Done.

 

WestPortal

Sep 25, 2008

I knew there was a reason that those FREE plastic-wrapped Examiners went straight from my sidewalk directly into my recycling bin. The Examiner literally and figuratively is littering the landscape of this beautiful city.

 

mtl550

Sep 25, 2008

I thought that the endorsement of McCain-Palin on 9/25 Editorial was a satire but it is not. Right, this nation needs "an inspirational leader providing energy and innovation", except for that these characteristics should never be mentioned together with Sen. McCain, if one really sees his heart-warming smile. Ya, about the courageous takedown of corrupted Alaskan Republicans by Gov. Palin we heard so much. The corrupted Republican who was taken down, GOP chairman Randy Ruedrich , was hugging her and applauding her nomination speech which made him the "bad guy" in RNC. Is it just me, or something does smell rotten here? Also, please ask how her good friend, Sen. Ted Stevens is doing recently. If you don't know a person in person, just watch the companies he/she keeps. Picking Gov.Palin as VP is the final verdict of Sen. McCain's (in)competence.

 

lezzy.minell

Sep 25, 2008

I really hope this is a joke. If not, you guys should alll join the armed forces because McCain and Palin will certainly need your help fighting their wars

 

Oh Happy Day!

Sep 25, 2008

It's a joy and a relief that there are some in the City who still have the fortitude to express an a locally unpopular endorsement. McCain and Palin are NOT perfect, however they are the best option our country has right now. McCain is a hero who has proven his tenacity and skill during a lifetime of public service, and Palin a ground-breaker. They are both patriots who truly appear to want the best for our society as a whole - not their personal cronies first. We need smaller government, less taxes, more personal freedoms, and lots more personal responsibility. I'm hopeful that this is a step in the right direction. Thanks you SF Examiner for this article!

 

Steph

Sep 25, 2008

Look at this BS.

 

JimmyJ

Sep 25, 2008

What the hell?! This paper has officially jumped the shark, I will never read this paper again.

 

dta

Sep 25, 2008

way to go, guys. i am so impressed with this your courage to speak the truth that I may well consider a subscription to your newspaper.

 

dpace

Sep 25, 2008

/groan. This is laughable. Well thank you, SF Examiner. You just lost any credibility you had with this Bay Area native. I miss the days when the media pretended to be non-partisan.

 

Elle

Sep 25, 2008

Florida Loves McCain!

 

Barbara

Sep 25, 2008

I am disgusted by this. How can they POSSIBLY thing that McCain/Palin is the right choice for America? Are they even reading the headlines, they are the ones writing them aren't they!!!???? I am disgusted, appalled, mind boggled by this completely MORONIC choice to support the most corrupt party we've ever seen. Simply shocked.

 

S

Sep 25, 2008

EXAMINER IS OWNED BY REPUBLICANS FROM TEXAS....OF COURSE THEY"RE GOING TO ENDORSE MCCAIN AND PALIN.

 

dannyocean

Sep 25, 2008

really??? i am so sick of this crap. I will never touch this rag again and please stop polluting the environment by putting every issue in a plastic bag even if there is no chance of rain. the examiner=FAIL

 

Linny

Sep 25, 2008

The Examiner is commanded by total idiots. I hate republicans. it's your fault that this country is crumbling. I hope you get "raptured" real soon and get sent to Mars. Fricking ignorant fools!!!!

 

Sep 25, 2008

I a WTF is in order here.

 

Robert Shimmon

Sep 25, 2008

This is a load of crap. Show me an instance about being an inspriational leader!

 

Chrissy

Sep 25, 2008

Bogus. OBAMA FOR PRES

 

Nick

Sep 25, 2008

Wow, there actually is some sanity left in San Francisco. AMAZING! and very welcome!

 

Sam F. Park

Sep 25, 2008

This is the most unbelievable endorsement I have ever read from what I formerly considered a respectable and intelligent newspaper with an experienced editorial staff. With McCain's campaign staff rife with lobbyists that have put our country in much of its economic and political peril all with McCain's support over the years I can only imagine that someone spiked the Examiner editorial board's drinking water with LSD to cause them to make such an asinine endorsement in light of the facts.

 

NP

Sep 25, 2008

I will NEVER read your publication again!! EVER

 

Just Perfect

Sep 25, 2008

Heaven forbid that anyone endorse anyone other than the ObaMessiah. Everyone is entitled to their opinion unless it's different from yours. Typical liberal stance. Because if you live in SF, it's the law that you must be a Democrat. It's even more pathetic that the only reason you favor Obama is that "He's not Bush." Last time I checked, Bush isn't running in this election. Vote for who you want to, but vote because they're going to make a difference based on their history, not what they're hoping to do.

 

taylor

Sep 25, 2008

I used to be proud to live in San Francisco

 

Unbelievable BS

Sep 25, 2008

Where was John McCain's Judgement in 2004 when we was an advocate for privatizing Social Security?! How quickly we forget such things. Just imagine the nightmare that we would be living in if John McCain and the Republicans would have had their way and privatized it 4 years ago.

 

Jarvisjn

Sep 25, 2008

Finally some common sense and TRUTH from something in San Francisco. Kisses to the Examiner!! There is some American values and positivity in this filthy dirty cess pool of liberal corruption. Bring us more good news Examiner!! We support you on this. To you witches and anti-Americans who left your filthy mouth comments. Read the story it tells WHY we support MCCain & Sarah Palin and not the gangster racist from Chicago :) :) :)

 

Skip

Sep 25, 2008

Hilarious! This is the worst Republican ticket in my lifetime, and you endorse it! No thanks, I will vote Barr.

 

SF resident

Sep 25, 2008

How do I stop your free paper from being thrown on my doorstep every morning at 4am? Why am I not surprised that this paper is endorsing mccain plain.

 

erik

Sep 25, 2008

This is inane. Are you really comfortable with a future where Palin may be the president of the United States of America? Seriously? The fact that she is unable to distinguish between mythology and reality renders her unfit to govern. And McCain selecting her purely for political gain knowing that she is irrational is an act of lunacy. It appears that the Examiner has lost the ability to think critically. Faith based Bush government got us in the mess we're in now. John & Sarah should be able to finish us off nicely!

 

jonjy

Sep 25, 2008

Thank God for the comments which show there are plenty of sane people out there who will not swallow this cretinous editorial. I sincerely hope the Republicans get their fat, bigoted asses handed to them on a plate come November

 

Chris

Sep 25, 2008

I have no idea how I can consider this a serious publication anymore. Good luck in this city.

 

lp

Sep 25, 2008

this is a truly sad day. a city as liberal as SF has a paper endorsing people who's views could takes us back 50 years. Sarah Palin is not qualified. And McCain made a ridiculous announcement yesterday when he said he'd be putting his campaign on hold. All stunts for the media. I guess he fooled you. Not to mention, I'm not even swayed by your reasons for endorsing McCain. As a news outlet you should be a little embarrassed. At least give me something though provoking if you're going to print something as outlandish as this.

 

ds

Sep 25, 2008

Okay, let's support a woman with a background in communications and a minor in political science, who by the way originally aspired to be A FREAKING NEWSCASTER, and let her be second in command to one of the most powerful nation in the world. McCain is such a joke, I've lost all respect for him because he chose Palin. She's a publicity stunt!!! The lady has no experience in foreign policy, UNTIL LAST WEEK! If you could even call it that! Your audience is a city full of liberals and pro gay marriage! You're endorsing someone who is VERY HOMOPHOBIC. Are you kidding me? You guys can suck my toe!!!

 

mat rice

Sep 25, 2008

Shocking. To endorse a candidate that supports (with his selection of Palin) that homosexuality is a learned trait and not something your born with. How did Palin put it? ..."pray the gay away." He's lied over and over again, just to get elected. O'Bama offers real solutions to the problems that career Washington insiders, like McCain, have gotten us into. O'Bama has been right all along about Afganistan, the economy, Iraq, the declining middle class and foreign policy. Is it now wonder why Gordon Brown, British Prime Minister broke with tradition and endorsed O'Bama. Luckily, more Americans like myself, can read through the so-often-used Republican fear tactics that only produces more trouble. How were you 7.5 years ago compared to right now??

 

B

Sep 25, 2008

I had heard the Examiner was nearly bankrupt ... at least its moral and intellectual bankruptcy is now firmly established. Amid all its rounds of layoffs, the Examiner's lack of researchers seem to be the most dire in its bid for survival. How else would its editorial board have forgotten about McCain's involvement in the Keating Five and his handling of the largest savings-and-loan scandals in history, as well as his penchant for deregulation, which laid the groundwork for the catastrophe which now threatens our very livelihood (though perhaps not McCain and his wife's inherited wealth as well as their 9 houses). A sad day for the Examiner.

 

huh?

Sep 25, 2008

Is this a joke, or did your brain just melt?

 

Melanie

Sep 25, 2008

Everyone makes mistakes once in awhile. If you should decide to change your endorsement after McCain and Palin get creamed by Obama and Biden in the debates, people will understand, and just be happy you came to your senses.

 

Brett

Sep 25, 2008

Now I understand why this a free paper, it isn't worth the paper it is printed on.

 

a joke

Sep 25, 2008

I hope you fired whoever put this up on your site :)

 

Paul Stokell

Sep 25, 2008

San Francisco still has brains. Thank you, Examiner.

 

sarah bruner

Sep 25, 2008

unbeleviable

 

DouG Molidor

Sep 25, 2008

I used to read the delivered Sunday edition and then use it for firestarter to keep warm in my foggy hood. Now I'll save the time and place it right on the woodpile.

 

Daniel

Sep 25, 2008

To see a media outlet in one of the most liberal areas of the country support the right candidate. Obama is a hot air balloon that will ruin our country. McCain might not be the perfect candidate (too bad Ron Paul looks like a keebler elf), but he's a proven leader that will protect America's interests.

 

miguel tamayo

Sep 25, 2008

finally a breath of fresh air in a nation that has been blinded by pop culture obsesions, "obama is my homeboy" t-shirts, and a deluded notion that hating everything american (as is trendy with our loyal and friendly pals across the atlantic) is the equivalent of '"making a change". bring your heads back down from the clouds and take your nose out of the incessant drivel that is being propagated left and right about this chic candidate and make a decision on your own. mccain is a man of conviction, he loves our country, he is a true patriot, and has all the tools to lead our nation out of this holding pattern in which we have found ourselves. obama may very well be considered one of the greatest orators that we have ever seen in a presidential race, but his equivocations and inability to take a firm position on ANYTHING is a little more than foreboding, its downright scary.

 

Sep 25, 2008

I canceled my subscription

 

DouG Molidor

Sep 25, 2008

I used to read the delivered Sunday edition and then use it for firestarter to keep warm in my foggy hood. Now I'll save the time and place it right on the woodpile.

 

g2tha_k

Sep 25, 2008

The responses of outraged leftists makes me lol just a little bit. I can't wait to see what this city does on November 5th when everyone realizes their new messiah is not as holy as they'd like to think.

 

STOP JUNK MAIL

Sep 25, 2008

TO STOP RECEIVING THIS "News"paper ON YOUR DOORSTEP CALL 415-733 7323. Stop the junk back with real news bbc.co.uk.

 

very upset

Sep 25, 2008

I understand that we live in a free country where any ONE person can endorse a candidate, but a corporation should not do so, for many reasons. It is wrong for a news source, whose job it is to remain objective, is choosing sides in this presidential campaign. It is not your job to choose sides; it is your job to report the news. I caution every citizen who continues to read this paper and claim to be getting facts and not opinions. Those who work for the Examiner (or own it) should be able to independently express their own opinions about who should be the next president. Shame on you Examiner, you do not have the right to choose!

 

Susan

Sep 25, 2008

OMG I will stop reading this crappy newspaper. I agree with Jamie.

 

cng457

Sep 25, 2008

that is it i am moving to texas!

 

Lovin' It

Sep 25, 2008

Meltdown in Frisco! Wow, this is too cool! Meanwhile, Obama is preparing for the debates in the Scientology "Vatican City" of Clearwater, Florida? Does Oprah or Travolta have a place there or something?

 

JP

Sep 25, 2008

Last time I ever read this paper!!

 

PIKE

Sep 25, 2008

I am singing your praises! Finally some of the media and journalist have gotten it right! Thanks for the great article, and being in reality as we face it.

 

BB

Sep 25, 2008

Yay! I'm voting McCain/Palin!

 

BB

Sep 25, 2008

Yay! I'm voting McCain/Palin!

 

David Fast

Sep 25, 2008

This clinches it. Cancel my FREE subscription to your rag. You are as far out of touch with reality as the Republicans and its new leader John "Bush Again" McCain. All we need is another Republican cabinet member like Paulson and we will really be in a fix. I have been a life long Republican and am now changing parties because the Republicans have done such an abysmal job over the last 8 years, they have no clue as to how to govern this country, and stand up for the people. Obama is my man!

 

David Fast

Sep 25, 2008

This clinches it. Cancel my FREE subscription to your rag. You are as far out of touch with reality as the Republicans and its new leader John "Bush Again" McCain. All we need is another Republican cabinet member like Paulson and we will really be in a fix. I have been a life long Republican and am now changing parties because the Republicans have done such an abysmal job over the last 8 years, they have no clue as to how to govern this country, and stand up for the people. Obama is my man!

 

Beside Self

Sep 25, 2008

Show the examiner what you really think. If you don't like the examiner, turn the examiner back in to them: 450 Mission St # 500 San Francisco, CA 94105 Get Directions (415) 359-2600

 

Thoat Krakker

Sep 25, 2008

What??? I didn't even know the Examiner was still in business, now someone forwards this to me. No wonder I thought you guys were gone, you suck!

 

Richard

Sep 25, 2008

I will stop reading your newspaper because of this inept endorsement.

 

Meg

Sep 25, 2008

While I admire McCain for what he has given to this country. He served in our military and was very heroic. THIS does not make him a good match for President. He will overturn Roe Vs.Wade. We will have no allies. Our country will be run by lobbyists and oil companies. No earmarks? Sarah Palin is the queen of earmarks. Sarah Palin is someone who has tried to BAN BOOKS. Each day this country comes closer and closer to Orwell's vision. Obama may not fix all of our problems. He is not perfect. BUT, he is a step in the right direction, especially for the kind of world I want my children to live in.

 

Yo Mama

Sep 25, 2008

PR stunt.

 

Anne

Sep 25, 2008

Thank you, thank you, THANK YOU for finally standing up for the right team amongst a media that seems to be doing all it can to stop him. Obama is most definitely not ready for the presidency, is not at all patriotic, and I do not believe he actually has any opinions of his own, but simply does and reads whatever people tell him to. Thanks again for endorsing the clear choice for president.

 

Alex

Sep 25, 2008

That's great! A paper in one the most liberal cities in the country has some sense and endorsing an empty suit. I am renewing my subscription early.

 

patty

Sep 25, 2008

Thank you for writing what so many of us in California feel! Great job!!!

 

kawoh

Sep 25, 2008

Ya-HOOOO!

 

kay

Sep 25, 2008

NOOOO! How can anyone with any amount of education endorse these people? They will ruin the world

 

Im leaving

Sep 25, 2008

Im moving out of the country if McCain or better yet Palin becomes president.

 

Bob

Sep 25, 2008

you've got to be kidding me... If you hate America and the world, vote McCain/Palin.

 

Jonathan

Sep 25, 2008

This is absolutely insane! I'm at a loss...

 

McCain/Palin

Sep 25, 2008

Thanks for this article. My dog enjoys taking her biggest poops on anything related to MaCain/Palin. He's a 2 year old pitbull named Maverick but he doesn't wear lipstick.

 

McCain/Palin

Sep 25, 2008

Thanks for this article. My dog enjoys taking her biggest poops on anything related to MaCain/Palin. He's a 2 year old pitbull named Maverick but he doesn't wear lipstick.

 

kathismom

Sep 25, 2008

I no longer will read, advertise in or support this "newspaper". Money talks. I'm taking my business elsewhere.

 

Sep 25, 2008

#1 the media is supposed to report the facts, not their opinion. #2 if they were going to report on their opinion should't it be one that reflects the voice of it's citizens You struck out Examiner.

 

Sep 25, 2008

#1 the media is supposed to report the facts, not their opinion. #2 if they were going to report on their opinion should't it be one that reflects the voice of it's citizens You struck out Examiner.

 

Sep 25, 2008

YES! YES! YES! There's a possibility that California will go red this election. I was a Democrat until the party selected a racist, elitist fraud. Be afraid people. He doesn't have enough paper on his resume to wipe your sullied behind.

 

Kelly

Sep 25, 2008

I wonder how well the writer of this article knows McCain, better yet, when does the writer of this column intend on pulling his/her head out of the sand. This a great work of fiction at best, a horrible raping of the truth at it's worse, take your pick.

 

chubs4u

Sep 25, 2008

You've got to be kidding! These times call for real leadership and reform, not phony posturing and a fictitious record. Barack Obama is right man for the job and it appears America is going to get it!

 

schuylarblu@hotmail.com

Sep 25, 2008

That's great! A paper in one the most liberal cities in the country has some sense and NOT endorse the empty suit Nobama. I am renewing my subscription early.

 

STOP JUNK MAIL

Sep 25, 2008

"TO STOP RECEIVING THIS "News"paper ON YOUR DOORSTEP CALL 415-733 7323. Stop the junk back with real news bbc.co.uk."

 

STOP JUNK MAIL

Sep 25, 2008

"TO STOP RECEIVING THIS "News"paper ON YOUR DOORSTEP CALL 415-733 7323. Stop the junk back with real news bbc.co.uk."

 

I_live_in_SF

Sep 25, 2008

Hilarious. It's like the Examiner is bending over backwards to underscore its irrelevance. Unless this is a joke and you're just trolling us?

 

Chris L.

Sep 25, 2008

YIPEEEE! Finally, some sense from a media outlet. Thank you for being brave because this is not the popular view here in CA. STOP BEING YELLOW DOG DEMOCRACTS! Look at Obama's history and accomplishment (or lack of) and you will not vote for him. Do your research and don't throw away your vote by being lazy and oblivious.

 

Stephen Wilson

Sep 25, 2008

You are using fallacies to support your argument. You should demand a refund from whatever school you graduated from. You apparently did not learn what the difference between a logical form of argument is, and an illogical form of argument. We are in a lot of trouble if there are people using the same type of argument structure you are using here. Why has critical thinking vanished from our society?

 

Woody

Sep 25, 2008

This newspaper just earned itself a new subscriber. I could not have written the endorsement better. Well said.

 

mtl550

Sep 25, 2008

Can't help to notice that someone said Republican (and Democratic) want "peace, liberty and justice". Five words for you: Peace: Iraq Liberty: Guatanamo Bay Justice: Alberto Gonzales (or Scooter Libby)

 

Stephen Wilson

Sep 25, 2008

Is this a JOKE? The editor needs to go back to school and learn how to use logical forms of argument.... and how to be objective.

 

Fark-tard

Sep 25, 2008

I didn't know Rove worked for the examiner. There goes my subscription.

 

Jay

Sep 25, 2008

AWESOME!!! THE SFE got it EXACTLY right. Obama is all talk, no action, no record, no experience. Her doesn't like America, probably like the rest of you SF loons. Obama has very scary bad terrorist friends he's had long associations with including Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright, etc, etc. He is however the pefect candidate for those who can't think for themselves and are blinded by that tenant of liberalism - accepting of every body and everything as if there is no moral compass....yeaaaaa right... so compassionate in their response to Palin....blind leading the blind, calling you stupid to your face and you don't even know it!!

 

lauren

Sep 25, 2008

aside from the fact that this is a blatant PR stunt, don't you think it's a little irresponsible/insensitive for a newspaper for San Francisco - a city that has a high number of homosexuals AND other minorities - to endorse the team that wants to take away all their rights? You all suck.

 

lauren

Sep 25, 2008

aside from the fact that this is a blatant PR stunt, don't you think it's a little irresponsible/insensitive for a newspaper for San Francisco - a city that has a high number of homosexuals AND other minorities - to endorse the team that wants to take away all their rights? You all suck.

 

skdowd

Sep 25, 2008

Is this the Hearst Corporation endorsing the candidates, or an unbiased endorsement?

 

malvenkemo

Sep 25, 2008

What a joke of a newspaper.

 

MAbercrombie

Sep 25, 2008

Is this a joke? I don't think I will ever be able to think of the Examiner as a serious new source again! Shame on you guys.

 

JON

Sep 25, 2008

THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!

 

JON

Sep 25, 2008

THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!

 

Sep 25, 2008

i am canceling our subscription

 

Wester

Sep 25, 2008

Well, I'm never buying your paper again. Not because they're Republicans; I'm open-minded and am an independent, not a Democrat. But Sarah Palin is, quite bluntly, a political idiot. One can only hope this is a joke.

 

Alex

Sep 25, 2008

I feel bad for you guys. You will lose a lot of business. No more Examiner

 

Ingrid

Sep 25, 2008

While McCain deserves our respect and admiration for serving his country, he is NOT an inspirational leader. He is not a maverick, but rather a flip-flopper. As a journalist, you should really look at his record and what he has voted for and against in his career as a senator. He wants the country to think he is a maverick, but he is another GOP puppet. Remember, he is a part of the government too, and he has taken plenty of money from lobbyists. We are in the mess we are in because of his view of a free market economy and trickle-down economics. If we had put some regulations on mortgage companies and banks, the government wouldn't have to use our tax dollars to bail out these companies. I will never subscribe to the Examiner.

 

Ingrid

Sep 25, 2008

While McCain deserves our respect and admiration for serving his country, he is NOT an inspirational leader. He is not a maverick, but rather a flip-flopper. As a journalist, you should really look at his record and what he has voted for and against in his career as a senator. He wants the country to think he is a maverick, but he is another GOP puppet. Remember, he is a part of the government too, and he has taken plenty of money from lobbyists. We are in the mess we are in because of his view of a free market economy and trickle-down economics. If we had put some regulations on mortgage companies and banks, the government wouldn't have to use our tax dollars to bail out these companies. I will never subscribe to the Examiner.

 

Justin K.

Sep 25, 2008

you have lost me as a customer and as of now, i will no longer buy your newspaper or visit your website again.

 

Rade

Sep 25, 2008

I am always shocked and dismayed to see veterans who still support the McCain lie, as he has NOT supported them in over 90% of the Veterans issues. He uses his war record as a club to beat the drums of war to send more of our people to die on foreign soil in the interest of Corporate interests. Maybe all the old style basic training in which the ability to think for yourself is drummed out of you, as well as the ability to question your orders if they might be unconstitutional pervades for years after they leave service. Like a knee jerk reaction.

 

yoohoo

Sep 25, 2008

So there are some logical people in San Francisco after all! Have always wanted to visit that city, but knowing that its filled with nothing but radical homosexual liberals, I would have passed. This endorsement may be the only glimmer of light...

 

Mcalin

Sep 25, 2008

Great choice! I know that Mcain/Palin will do wonders in the White House. I can't wait until they take Office!!! Obama will just raise our income tax to pay for the lazy/poor folks who don't want to work and are irresponsible with their money.

 

Mary

Sep 25, 2008

Thank you for having the courage to back who you believe it despite being in one of the most liberal cities in the US. People in this country are too consumed with what Hollywood thinks or who is the 'popular' candidate to back and I really applaud you sticking your neck out to do the right thing.

 

erika

Sep 25, 2008

for those that stated that they're not reading the examiner because of this, you are just plain immature. Americans are entitled to their opinion and just because they don't agree with YOU doesn't mean it's not a reputable paper. Obama is a great speaker, but has no experience whatsover. His only strategy of winning is to put down others that stand in his way. Even Hillary thought the same.

 

Russ

Sep 25, 2008

well, its pretty clear from alot of these comments that alot of you don't actually live in the City or have any idea what the examiner is. First of all, the examiner is free. Always has been. So to everyone saying "Im never going to buy your newspaper again", knock it off. We know you don't live here. Also, for all of you crying about how your "not going to subscribe anymore", or "cancel subscription", welcome to the rest of SF society. Very few people actually subscibe to this newspaper. Most pick it up from the dispensers on the street in the morning. On the way to our jobs. To support a capitalist society that you are apart of, but seem to forget just about all the time. Lastly, everyone here seems to be forgetting the biggest point" The Examiner has and will probably always be much more conservative than the Chronicle. Sorry, thats the way it is. So I dont understand this backlash, as if you idiots are just now figuring this out, which is sad, truly.

 

Russ

Sep 25, 2008

well, its pretty clear from alot of these comments that alot of you don't actually live in the City or have any idea what the examiner is. First of all, the examiner is free. Always has been. So to everyone saying "Im never going to buy your newspaper again", knock it off. We know you don't live here. Also, for all of you crying about how your "not going to subscribe anymore", or "cancel subscription", welcome to the rest of SF society. Very few people actually subscibe to this newspaper. Most pick it up from the dispensers on the street in the morning. On the way to our jobs. To support a capitalist society that you are apart of, but seem to forget just about all the time. Lastly, everyone here seems to be forgetting the biggest point" The Examiner has and will probably always be much more conservative than the Chronicle. Sorry, thats the way it is. So I dont understand this backlash, as if you idiots are just now figuring this out, which is sad, truly.

 

thats a shame...

Sep 25, 2008

OBAMA/BIDEN '08 BABYYYYYYYYYY. I LOVE THE SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE.

 

San Fran Sandy

Sep 25, 2008

It's no wonder the Examiner would endorse McCain-Palin. Look at the Examiner STAFF---or lack thereof! A bunch or morons who are so confused that they don't know whether to scratch their watches or wind their butts!

 

San Fran Sandy

Sep 25, 2008

It's no wonder the Examiner would endorse McCain-Palin. Look at the Examiner STAFF---or lack thereof! A bunch or morons who are so confused that they don't know whether to scratch their watches or wind their butts!

 

whitney

Sep 25, 2008

What exactly does "men and women who always put country first, no matter the cost to them personally"even mean? A vote for more stupid republicans is a cry for no one to respect our county for a long time to come.

 

pofool

Sep 25, 2008

anyone who is offended by this should stop receiving The Examiner. This baffles me!

 

Katie Kaliszewski

Sep 25, 2008

I prefer to get my news from unbiased news sources. Now if I could only find one....

 

The Anti-Lib

Sep 25, 2008

You loony socialist SF libs get your panties out of the complete wad they're in. And that goes you YOU TOO ladies! This is just an endorsement, not the election results. I am a Libertarian voting for Barr but I have to say, reading a bunch of left-wing loons' comments on this has been entertaining. By the way, your Messiah WILL NOT be elected. Thank God the rest of this country doesn't share your imbecilic values. DODGERS CLINCH THE WEST!!! Man, nothing's right in SF!!! Go Dodgers!

 

Sasy

Sep 25, 2008

Wow...is the paper going broke? serisouly i am struggling to understand why they published this....somebody got PAID!

 

kkko

Sep 25, 2008

To stop having this piece of trash land on your doorstep, go to: http://www.examiner.com/delivery/

 

Lulee

Sep 25, 2008

I almost feel like I'm reading a satirical piece. Wow. America needs...Sarah Palin? You actually wrote this? I just have no words.

 

Philip Wing

Sep 25, 2008

Thank you, SF Examiner for an interesting endorsement with specific reasoning. You've changed since the Fangzaminer days. Maybe I can put that McCain/Palin bumper sticker safely on my car (although I still expect it to get keyed). :) 1994 Republican Nominee, California State Assembly, 12th District

 

Russ

Sep 25, 2008

also, understand that the "Examiner" is a national newspaper that has a local SF office. So when they say they are endoirsing a candidate, its not SF Examiner doing it, its the entire company.

 

Russ

Sep 25, 2008

also, understand that the "Examiner" is a national newspaper that has a local SF office. So when they say they are endoirsing a candidate, its not SF Examiner doing it, its the entire company.

 

alison

Sep 25, 2008

obviously the examiner doesnt have the pulse of this city - so much for their claim they are the "local" paper..ha!

 

alison

Sep 25, 2008

obviously the examiner doesnt have the pulse of this city - so much for their claim they are the "local" paper..ha!

 

alison

Sep 25, 2008

obviously the examiner doesnt have the pulse of this city - so much for their claim they are the "local" paper..ha!

 

alison

Sep 25, 2008

obviously the examiner doesnt have the pulse of this city - so much for their claim they are the "local" paper..ha!

 

Michelle H.

Sep 25, 2008

By-bye Examiner. Very, VERY disappointing.

 

Anti-Anti-Lib

Sep 25, 2008

Hey Anti-Lib: What does baseball have to do this? Get your jockstrap out of your mouth and move out of SF if you can't hang. Poor, poor BABY! WAAAAAAAH!

 

Anti-Anti-Lib

Sep 25, 2008

Hey Anti-Lib: What does baseball have to do this? Get your jockstrap out of your mouth and move out of SF if you can't hang. Poor, poor BABY! WAAAAAAAH!

 

Vanessa

Sep 25, 2008

GOOD FOR YOU, EXAMINER! MAY GOD BLESS YOU. YOU MADE THE RIGHT DECISION.

 

Vanessa

Sep 25, 2008

GOOD FOR YOU, EXAMINER! MAY GOD BLESS YOU. YOU MADE THE RIGHT DECISION.

 

Bryan

Sep 25, 2008

I will never read your newspaper again. Bryan O Session

 

allison

Sep 25, 2008

I am shocked that a newspaper would take a stance so opposed to the spirit of the city its supposed to reflect. I hope the Examiner got a lot of money for taking this stance....since it will surely (hopefully) lose many readers and advertisers for this. I definitely will not be reading it anymore.

 

Ashley Dudleston

Sep 25, 2008

Well, you just lost my business.

 

goober

Sep 25, 2008

i iz fo mccain cuz i iz real stupid n the personal attacks by the gop on obama has swayed me.

 

Rian Malan

Sep 25, 2008

"America remains for billions of people around the world the light of freedom, the shining city on a hill that must be defended and preserved." - This is an ambitious statement, American democracy is a shadow of what it should be. Hunter Thompson would be ashamed of his old paper, American sabre-rattling is getting old. America is getting old.

 

Rian Malan

Sep 25, 2008

"America remains for billions of people around the world the light of freedom, the shining city on a hill that must be defended and preserved." - This is an ambitious statement, American democracy is a shadow of what it should be. Hunter Thompson would be ashamed of his old paper, American sabre-rattling is getting old. America is getting old.

 

Eric Shubert

Sep 25, 2008

I also endorse John McCain. He is quite familiar with saving the butts of the rich. He was part of the "Keating Five" that helped save the leaders of the S&L crisis that cost this country hundreds of billions of dollars back in the 80's and 90's. Sounds like he would be the perfect candidate to save the current corrupt leaders of the failed banks from being brought to justice. He's got the experience and the know how to fleece the tax payers and get as much of that $700B into the hands of his rich buddies. He's great at flip flopping on every issue. He's also just as knowledgeable as George Bush when it comes to the economy. He's also great at avoiding media scrutiny. Why answer questions when you don't have to. He's just like the previous administration, and that's working out perfectly for us. Why just last week he told us the economy was fundamentally strong. Obviously he was right. Vote McCain...Vote for more of the same!

 

cmhockeygirl

Sep 25, 2008

so much for the examiner being the "local" paper - no pulse on the city..while they are free to endorse anyone they wish the "in our face" endorsement is a bit much..they obviously could care less about their readers but about this city as well

 

cmhockeygirl

Sep 25, 2008

so much for the examiner being the "local" paper - no pulse on the city..while they are free to endorse anyone they wish the "in our face" endorsement is a bit much..they obviously could care less about their readers but about this city as well

 

sandra

Sep 25, 2008

Now that was funny!

 

Golie

Sep 25, 2008

You people do not have a clue if you think John McCain and his even less clueless VP can run this country. I keep telling myself that there are intelligent news media out there and you guys just proved that no, unfortunately your editor is the world's biggest idiot. you are soooooooooooooooooooooooo clueless. thank God most people don't follow your paper.

 

Clint Mcclintic

Sep 25, 2008

Amazing! But, I read the Chronicle.

 

RDMurphy

Sep 25, 2008

I'm impressed. Many of us in the rest of the country have been laboring under the apparently false impression that absolutely everyone in SF is a left-wing idiot who'll jump on the most frighteningly under-qualified candidate in U.S. political history just because he's an ultra-leftist who is going to bring "change" and "hope." Thank you, Examiner, for showing the rest of us that not all hope for common sense and pragmatic effort is lost.

 

Alyssa

Sep 25, 2008

Luckily this terribly reasoned endorsement will fall on deaf ears. San Francisco, the United States, and the world needs Barack Obama and Joe Biden. I think it's a safe bet that you have lost many readers after today.

 

E

Sep 25, 2008

This is so ridiculous. I can't believe any media outlet would endorse such a deceptive and heavily veiled candidate. Not to mention the fact that your staff is clearly not doing their job if they don't know that most of the things McCain claims to do have absolutely no backing in fact. I've lost a lot of respect for your staff.

 

varga

Sep 25, 2008

Is this a joke??!! You have got to be kidding me!! Coming from such a progressive city you guys are so the opposite! Do you have ties to him? Are so easily fooled by the spectacle that republicans' have created? Have we been reading the same news? Wow my confidence in you paper has gone way down and your endorsement is just ridiculous. Your paper is no longer welcome at my table.

 

Steve Hander

Sep 25, 2008

You just got your non-conformist cred back. Thank you for recognizing that ONLY McCain/Palin have the experience needed at this place and time. Obama will be ready in 2012 and is so young he has several more shots at election to the Presidency.

 

Karen Kero

Sep 25, 2008

Good Job! Thank you for showing great support for McCain/Palin.

 

Mandy

Sep 25, 2008

What a wonderful and brave choice!!

 

Mandy

Sep 25, 2008

What a wonderful and brave choice!!

 

JoeyP

Sep 25, 2008

I will never pay another $0.75 for your news paper. It hurts me deeply to know that the news source i most rely and trust upon could be so ignorant and misinformed!!! Unreal!!

 

colleen

Sep 25, 2008

Thank you. You may lose some readers, but you've gained my family.

 

Nolan Caldwell

Sep 25, 2008

Are you kidding me? This is honestly a Joke, isnt it? How could a researched man/woman ever support this bumbling lying buffoon. He wants to bomb Iran, gamble social security, disregulate wall street, Opress freedom of who to marry, and destroys womans right to choose.

 

Jay

Sep 25, 2008

san francisco's the last place I would expect this! come one!

 

Jay

Sep 25, 2008

san francisco's the last place I would expect this! come one!

 

Vic

Sep 25, 2008

Wow, something out of San Francisco that finally makes sense. Kudos...

 

Andrea

Sep 25, 2008

:)

 

WorldsWorstMayor

Sep 25, 2008

Well said. Now if these nincompoops would just go back to drinking their Palin Syrah and caring about only themselves we will be able to throw out the Dodds and Franks who are raping the country for a few votes, and by the way, doing it with the same lying eyes as John Edwards.

 

samantha

Sep 25, 2008

WOW! this is unheard of! some major paper is endorsing mccain?! especially from the bay area! HAHA I LOVE IT! finally someone got some sense knocked into them. Mccain/palin 08 babyy!!!!

 

DB

Sep 25, 2008

The San Francisco Examiner is owned by Philip Anschutz since 2004. Google him and maybe the endorsement might make sense.

 

City Native

Sep 25, 2008

Guess who owns the newspaper? A conservative Christian named Philip Anschutz, who lives out of state. My question is why would the newspaper want to alienate itself? People, if this offends you then do not pick up another copy. They will get the picture when their news stands go untouched. Examiner, why don’t you go be a painfully simple tabloid somewhere else….like Alaska. The Anchorage Examiner….

 

City Native

Sep 25, 2008

Guess who owns the newspaper? A conservative Christian named Philip Anschutz, who lives out of state. My question is why would the newspaper want to alienate itself? People, if this offends you then do not pick up another copy. They will get the picture when their news stands go untouched. Examiner, why don’t you go be a painfully simple tabloid somewhere else….like Alaska. The Anchorage Examiner….

 

Joy

Sep 25, 2008

you can't be serious

 

Kate

Sep 25, 2008

I no longer live in my native California and I am thrilled with your endorsement of McCain. He is the most qualified and truly will bring change to our country. I firmly believe in him. As my huband has said, how many do you let the freshman quarterback run the squad? Obama is a freshman senator. Thank you.

 

olivia

Sep 25, 2008

Ridiculous. I'm never picking up this paper again and will advise my friends to do the same.

 

Anna Higley

Sep 25, 2008

If you were looking for a little attention...congrats! Keep in mind though you've completely lost any credibility you had. What a laugh!

 

OBAMA 08

Sep 25, 2008

F*CK THE EXAMINER ANYWAY YOUR PAPER IS A JOKE

 

lee chen

Sep 25, 2008

Sanity still lives in the City. This is amazing. Thanks for showing some common sense in these tough times. (caused by the democrat congress and things that were done during Billys time in office.) Do the research people and check out the democrats who caused this melt down.

 

Maria

Sep 25, 2008

Is it April Fools today? McCain has lost all credibility and integrity in his desperate attempt to win at no cost. Sweeping in pretending to save the day, evoking communist Russia in his treatment of the press by keeping Palin from talking to them, running from a debate and trying to get the VP debate cancelled. I could go on and on. SHAME ON YOU.

 

EJ from the Bay

Sep 25, 2008

Kudos to the Editorial Staff!! Happy to see there are a few clear thinking individuals here in our little corner of the world.

 

amy

Sep 25, 2008

This article is absolutely foul and a complete outrage.

 

kitten

Sep 25, 2008

Even if John McCain and Sarah Palin skinned babies alive and ate them in front of live press coverage, Republicans would still endorse them.

 

jann

Sep 25, 2008

You HAVE to be KIDDING!!! I will never again read the Examiner as you, by this ludicrous endorsement, haven't been doing any reading or research! If McFibber and Sarah Pinocchio are voted in, we will driving our country further into the ground! Isn't someone on your staff looking at the FACTS??!!

 

cw

Sep 25, 2008

This is revolting, unobjective BS. 'Journalism' at it's worst.

 

Andie C

Sep 25, 2008

Bravo for standing up for american ideals. And the rest of you - use your minds. Don't be so manipulated by the media. Pay attention to what is really going on.

 

Drake Garrett

Sep 25, 2008

Its about time they put a man and woman filled with integrity and honor in the White House who places country first. Shudder to think this country would want a soft puff muffin who cant even make a decision as a Senator. God forbid he really had to make a serious decision as our President. I guess though he would gather Michelle, light candles with terrorist leaders and sing quiet chants with them.

 

sonar

Sep 25, 2008

All liberals are good at is making up catchy slogans for their bumper stickers.

 

sonar

Sep 25, 2008

All liberals are good at is making up catchy slogans for their bumper stickers.

 

Makes Sense

Sep 25, 2008

I would like to APPLAUD The Examiner. The fact that this newspaper had the guts to put out something is this liberal community makes me happy. All you liberal lefties should come on over to our side - after all, McCain WILL be the next president. Bank on it.

 

Ant

Sep 25, 2008

"America remains for billions of people around the world the light of freedom, the shining city on a hill that must be defended and preserved." Phrases like that represent the height of American conceit, and as a citizen of the world I find it, quite frankly, disgusting. The notion that it is proper that you dominate the globe, and that you do it out of a sense of responsibility for us? Outrageous. I'll admit, the promise of America must've seemed glorious in the previous century -- but it's a promise that has long since been betrayed. Now we're stuck with this manifest destiny garbage.

 

tennisfan

Sep 25, 2008

you are a disgrace to san francisco...you are absolutely delusional and your paper will be automatically thrown in the trash from now on

 

RL2385

Sep 25, 2008

I have just cancelled my subscription.

 

MetalMom24

Sep 25, 2008

If the Examiner had endorsed Obama bin Laden would people still think they should keep their opinions to themselves? Between the two...I'm for McCain...whose to say whose gonna fix the economy...but again between the two..McCain appears to be the one that will keep us safe.

 

Bravo SFE

Sep 25, 2008

Just for fun how about a story about all of the "subscibers" who threaten to cancel their subscriptions, vs. the actual number. Again, Bravo, for taking an intelligent, unpopular (at least with the noisy minority) stand instead of following along with the rest of the drive by media.

 

Susan

Sep 25, 2008

I'm voting for Obama. Stop delivering your free crappy paper to my home.

 

Susan

Sep 25, 2008

I'm voting for Obama. Stop delivering your free crappy paper to my home.

 

Curt

Sep 25, 2008

Wow , there is hope for SF afterall. Great choice. Nobama, no communists. McCain/Palin 08

 

donka

Sep 25, 2008

To all the liberals complaining about this "article" or "lack of journalistic integrity" --it's the OPINION page. Everyone has the right to state their own opinion. That is unless you're Joe Lieberman, who supports McCain, and is possibly facing censure or forced resignation by his own Democratic party. The liberals can really dish it out, but they sure can't take it. Talk about double standard. Living in SF for so many years has led me to the opinion that most liberals are whiny, hypocrites.

 

donka

Sep 25, 2008

To all the liberals complaining about this "article" or "lack of journalistic integrity" --it's the OPINION page. Everyone has the right to state their own opinion. That is unless you're Joe Lieberman, who supports McCain, and is possibly facing censure or forced resignation by his own Democratic party. The liberals can really dish it out, but they sure can't take it. Talk about double standard. Living in SF for so many years has led me to the opinion that most liberals are whiny, hypocrites.

 

Bravo SFE

Sep 25, 2008

"Ant: ""America remains for billions of people around the world the light of freedom, the shining city on a hill that must be defended and preserved." Phrases like that represent the height of American conceit, and as a citizen of the world I find it, quite frankly, disgusting. The notion that it is proper that you dominate the globe, and that you do it out of a sense of responsibility for us? Outrageous. I'll admit, the promise of America must've seemed glorious in the previous century -- but it's a promise that has long since been betrayed. Now we're stuck with this manifest destiny garbage." Ant, Please do us all a favor and go forth as a citizen of the world and spread the word to EVERYONE, "The shows over, no need to risk your life trying to immigrate to the US!" Please be quick about as it will free up a great deal of border patrol resources.

 

Roger

Sep 25, 2008

Your endorsement is nicely put. Thank you.

 

Jason in the OC

Sep 25, 2008

What a joke, the newspaper is obviously trying to drive traffic to its site. Glad I'm using AdBlocker here. And how many more newspapers can they sell by having more Sarah Palin slams on "San Francisco."

 

Ken

Sep 25, 2008

Obama uses his "change" to promote his career, while McCain uses his career to promote change

 

Karen Hansen

Sep 25, 2008

The SF Examiner is on drugs. the next time I see your paper, I will consider it one big paper to roll a joint with.

 

Karen Hansen

Sep 25, 2008

Jesus was a liberal See www.matthew25.com or maybe org -

 

Bonnie

Sep 25, 2008

Wow. This is the best practical joke ever. Thanks for the laugh.

 

linda

Sep 25, 2008

What a surprise. Maybe there are really people in the San Fran area that are like my husband's Italian, Catholic grandparents, that learned English from a dictionary, worked hard at jobs all their lives, and believed in, & lived their Catholic faith.

 

lm

Sep 25, 2008

examiner trying to get a little press...puhleeeeze

 

joshua

Sep 25, 2008

This article and others in the past may be the reason I would usually find the examiner being blown around the city. It was always a good measure of wind speed. Ben Franklin would not be happy.

 

ella

Sep 25, 2008

this can't come as a surprise. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Anschutz

 

Joanne600

Sep 25, 2008

It's good to see that all of SF is not populated with radical leftists. The mainstream media has studiously avoided looking into Obama's background. There is no one from undergrad, Harvard Law, community organizing, Davis Miner, the Illinois senate - NO ONE has stepped up to attest to his character except his wife. What 47 year old man has no one who can speak up for him? Who is Obama and who is behind him?

 

Canceling_Subscription

Sep 25, 2008

This is seriously coming from a SF paper??? Ok, hell has officially frozen over.

 

Canceling_Subscription

Sep 25, 2008

This is seriously coming from a SF paper??? Ok, hell has officially frozen over.

 

S. Ingraham

Sep 25, 2008

Whatever happened to the the objectivity of journalism? In a city where we pride ourselves on the idea of "choice", it seems odd to have such a swayingly saccrine and partisan article supported. Shame on you Examiner.

 

S. Ingraham

Sep 25, 2008

Whatever happened to the the objectivity of journalism? In a city where we pride ourselves on the idea of "choice", it seems odd to have such a swayingly saccrine and partisan article supported. Shame on you Examiner.

 

Jan

Sep 25, 2008

To vote for John McCain and his totally unqualified sidekick is the same as voting for Bush/Cheney for a third term. McCain has sucked up to Bush for years even after Bush trashed him in the 2000 primaries. This man who says he is honorable has run one of the more dishonorable campaigns in history. As for Palin, do we really need a vice-president (or future president) who bases her foreign policy "expertise" on the fact that she can see Russia from Alaska. That the Examiner chose to endorse this doubtful duo reflects badly on the paper and its editorial staff. If McCain/Palin go into the White House, the US and the world will be in for very hard times.

 

fritzi

Sep 25, 2008

Is this really the SF Examiner? Do you have new owners. I thought everyone in SF was deranged. Wow, I'm impressed a thinking newspaper in such proximity to such craziness. I hope you have guards at the doors. Good job.

 

Aaron Paulley

Sep 25, 2008

Really? Wow, this is a very poor choice and certainly doesn't represent the majority of your readers' views, that's for sure.

 

smYth

Sep 25, 2008

Stop leaving your crappy newspaper on my doorstep. Nobody reads it and it just ends up as litter.

 

Chrissy SF

Sep 25, 2008

I have to say as a Bay Area native, THANK YOU for endorsing the conservative ticket in this election. It's funny to talk to the left-wing liberals in SF. When I ask if they are Bay Area natives it turns out for the most part they are transplants from other parts of the country or even different countries. It offers a glimmer hope in my eyes that SF may not be the crazy liberal stereotype in this country.

 

Chrissy SF

Sep 25, 2008

I have to say as a Bay Area native, THANK YOU for endorsing the conservative ticket in this election. It's funny to talk to the left-wing liberals in SF. When I ask if they are Bay Area natives it turns out for the most part they are transplants from other parts of the country or even different countries. It offers a glimmer hope in my eyes that SF may not be the crazy liberal stereotype in this country.

 

zette16

Sep 25, 2008

"unrelenting toughness and uncompromising character to wage and win the war against al Qaeda and other terrorists who seek the destruction of America." Are you serious... He didn't have the foresight to know that a war with Iraq was a huge mistake and that we should have focused on Afghanistan. Second, his character has been twisted into knots so he can appeal to his base. Wheres the McCain of 200-2002? And if he was truly tough, he would have been able to handle the bailout, his campaign, and the debates all at once. He also would have put his country first and not choose such a clueless running mate in Ms."Pit bull" Palin. They have been handling her with kid gloves since the beginning. If she were truly qualified she would have been able to pick up some of his campaign duties while he is "focusing" on the bailout. Laughable! Who paid you off! Thank god I don't have to pay for this crappy publication. May the rapture come and save us all if they win.

 

Kathy Davidson

Sep 25, 2008

It is with profound joy that I write to congratulate the decision makers at the San Francisco Examiner for endorsing the McCain/Palin ticket in an erudite and insightful editorial. As you so masterfully stated, "No one is perfect." But we, the people of this nation, must take a good, hard look at the big picture and make the choices that will ensure the TRUE liberty, justice and FREEDOM to ensure a free and prosperous democracy for all of our futures. Promises of higher taxes and more government regulations and oversight should be deeply feared by all of us. Anyone who simply lives within the confines of ANY other country will quickly see that America's opportunities, freedom and ingenuity come from our democratic, capitalist system. I sincerely believe that those who want Barack Obama as their president really have no idea that their, and their children's freedoms will be GREATLY diminished. It's time to stand up and reclaim our personal responsibility and take care of each other.

 

erin sullivan

Sep 25, 2008

I am delighted to see what is almost my hometown paper endorse McCain and Palin.

 

c

Sep 25, 2008

I'll leave you alone now... going to bed.

 

c

Sep 25, 2008

I'll leave you alone now... going to bed.

 

Sandy

Sep 25, 2008

Thank you - thank you - thank you! I was so stunned to see your endorsement I nearly dropped the paper. It made my week. I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment of the McCain/Palin ticket. Not a fan of McCain, I feel he is head and shoulders above his slick opponent. And I just love Sarah. You took a courageous stand for outstanding reasons in a County where the majority simply hates Republicans and conservatives. You speak for me.

 

Mayor of the Sunset

Sep 25, 2008

WOW. I used to read the examiner every day. I think I'll switch to the Onion. At least they have a clearer head.

 

Peter Kuhbach

Sep 25, 2008

You're kidding, right? McCain-Palin is the most pathetic ticket EV-ER!

 

rob

Sep 25, 2008

gotta go with mccain when his vp pick has more experience than b h o himself.

 

Ana

Sep 25, 2008

That's a pretty ballsy stance in the age of decreasing readership. Was this suicide? Indeed. I'm also deeply embarassed for your newspaper. What a shame.

 

emily

Sep 25, 2008

awesome! i am so proud of the examiner for choosing to endorse mccain!

 

m@

Sep 25, 2008

April Fools!! Wait, what? This is for real? You're supposed to represent San Francisco! WOW... did you see McCain on the View? How about Palin with Katie Couric? How can neither of those two things worry you?!

 

not happy

Sep 25, 2008

media is not trustworthy. whoever has a financial interest in this endorsement is the only reason for it. this candidacy race is a circus. why can't we see that they are both puppets attached to the same strings.

 

claire

Sep 25, 2008

A gun toting redneck already resides the White House, let's not spoil tradition. Palin is running for the vice presidency and she was only granted a passport last year, i find that beyond astonishing. I wouldn't deem this woman qualified if she were to teach a high school politics class, an 18 year old could outline the Bush Doctrine, and a significant percentage have crossed the Atlantic? Oh and i can see mexico from my window does that mean i have sufficient foreign policy credentials? I can also formulate a cohesive argument, this woman has given only four interviews and none have shown her articulate an intelligent, validated and consistent argument, the woman is unedcucated to the highest degree. Mccains peddlers have resorted to an incredulous vp pick, in an attempt to woo women that will only sway to their own genitalia. Thank-you America, while the right wing nuts elect, the world will laugh. Ps. Shes not a pitbull with lipstick, she's Bush with lipstick.

 

phrozt

Sep 25, 2008

I would just like to say, that in no way is leaving your duty as a presidential elect patriotic. The man has said on numerous occasions that he cannot help financially as he doesn't know it well enough. Also, WHY ISN'T SARAH PALIN STEPPING UP TO THE PLATE FOR THE DEBATES... oh yeah, thats right, worst running mate ever. So in conclusion, no matter who you vote for this election, think of Mccain leaving his place as leaving our country, not as helping. He has the lowest attendance record of any senate ever, that means that this is not to help anyone other than his polls, which is ONLY going down from this mess. What an idiot.

 

Eric Miles

Sep 25, 2008

Good endorsement. Country first. Demonstrated by suspending campaign to take care of our country as his solemn duty as a senator.

 

bob

Sep 25, 2008

I have seen convoluted spin in my day, but this is a double helix corkscrew gainer with a full twist and a half. Where did you find somebody so oblivious to reality, capable of writing?

 

Denise Sims

Sep 25, 2008

I can't believe it.

 

Mimi

Sep 25, 2008

I'm never buying this magazine again.

 

Jay

Sep 25, 2008

Wow, finally a media source in SF got it right. Bravo, even knowing you're going to have a mob screaming for your heads in front of your offices tomorrow! Now that's rad!

 

Chloe N.

Sep 25, 2008

this is the WORST endorsement I've ever read. Is the Examiner trying to be controversial so that their circulation will go up to, like, five for once? McCain and Palin hate The Examiner, and all things San Francisco related. What a disgusting pathetic gossip-rag this once reliable publication has turned into. I feel sick.

 

Mr Patriot

Sep 25, 2008

"It says something about a newspaper that endorses the sleeziest campaign in the last 40 years." Non, no - you misunderstand - the endorsement is not for Obama.

 

Triumph The Insult Comic Bird

Sep 25, 2008

Hey Examiner, Your paper is great, and this endorsement is awesome... FOR ME TO POOP ON!

 

cuttyj

Sep 25, 2008

pityful. i wont pick up your paper any long. it sucked anyhow. stop throwing at my doorstep.

 

McCain/ Palin Supporter

Sep 25, 2008

Congratulations to the San Francisco Examiner for their position in the face of so much local opposition!!!! As a wife of a deployed solider, I hope and pray that John McCain wins this election. VOTE McCAIN/ PALIN 2008!!!!

 

Jay Morales

Sep 25, 2008

I WILL NEVER READ THE EXAMINER AGAIN.

 

Stephen & Susan Bell

Sep 25, 2008

You must be drinking the Kool-Aid (just like the folks at Jonestown). This man will do anything, say anything just to get elected. In his book "Worth Fighting For", McCain said he didn't want to be president to advance any great agenda or cause in which he believed. He just wanted to be president and, at that time, he was 62 and felt that if he was going to make it happen, he had better get to it then or never. This is not what we need in a President! Especially when the country is led by a pack of pathological prevaricators and inveterate liars. McCain has proven to be of the same mold and he should be rejected now and for all time!

 

Sep 25, 2008

Thank you so much for stating your support. Alot of the rest of the journalistic community seem to be afraid of making the wrong person or celebrity upset.

 

Phoenixsf

Sep 25, 2008

What the hell are the editors of the examiner smoking. The Republicans got us into this mess, (Iraq war. credit crisis.) McCain might have been a "maverick" eight years ago but he is now the lap dog of the republican party neo cons. By picking Palin as his VP he has shown contempt for the American voters. He must think we are stupid to fall for this cheap stunt. By endorsing MaCain Palin the examiner has shown itself to be completely out of touch with San Franciscans and totally irrelevant. The best use for the examiner would be lining for a birds cage.

 

joanie c

Sep 25, 2008

you are idiots.

 

DunnoHead

Sep 25, 2008

Fair is fair, the Examiner also runs ads for used cars and since Obama sounds like a used car salesman I would say that is fair play. A man that refuses to reveal/come up with a plan just keeps spouting one word.. Change. Would that be, Give him your spare change ? He has spare change? He endorses change? He wants a sex change? He needs to change his socks? He wants to change his mind? He still remains very vague and uncertain to many things, but still keeps spouting that word.. "Change"

 

fsteele

Sep 25, 2008

I supported Hillary, but McCain/Palin is the next best choice. At least they are decent, sane people who will work for common ends, as Sarah did in Alaska. See "Palin governs from the center."

 

Melissa Schumann

Sep 25, 2008

Is this a joke? Pathetic!

 

LisaMarie

Sep 25, 2008

are you joking???? I wonder who in the Examiner owed a favor to Mccain!? Mccain is a man who does deserve our respect, and if it were 8 or even 4 years ago he would have had my vote all the way. I cannot understand who in their right mind would want a republican in office when out economy is in such termoil. As for the "terrorists" WHERE ARE THEY?? There is no threat of terror at the moment. The only terror is poor American troops in a country that we should have never been messing arounf with in the first place! The republicans want to win our votes based on fear and that is not right. Instead of the American tax payers paying a billion dollars a month in Irag we should use that money HERE AT HOME where it counts! Go Obama!!! Also, Palin is SO underqualified! She's only quilified to be a PTA leader at a small school in Alaska! HA

 

LisaMarie

Sep 25, 2008

are you joking???? I wonder who in the Examiner owed a favor to Mccain!? Mccain is a man who does deserve our respect, and if it were 8 or even 4 years ago he would have had my vote all the way. I cannot understand who in their right mind would want a republican in office when out economy is in such termoil. As for the "terrorists" WHERE ARE THEY?? There is no threat of terror at the moment. The only terror is poor American troops in a country that we should have never been messing arounf with in the first place! The republicans want to win our votes based on fear and that is not right. Instead of the American tax payers paying a billion dollars a month in Irag we should use that money HERE AT HOME where it counts! Go Obama!!! Also, Palin is SO underqualified! She's only quilified to be a PTA leader at a small school in Alaska! HA

 

Alesia

Sep 25, 2008

As an Australian who has no say in who becomes the next President in the USi am very afraid. Both McCain and Palin are frightening in their ignorance and stupidity regarding so many issues. Why not just keep George Bush? Because a McCain/Palin is leadership is just about as bad.

 

Alesia

Sep 25, 2008

As an Australian who has no say in who becomes the next President in the USi am very afraid. Both McCain and Palin are frightening in their ignorance and stupidity regarding so many issues. Why not just keep George Bush? Because a McCain/Palin is leadership is just about as bad.

 

ccinatl

Sep 25, 2008

There are many reasons I support John McCain, but earmarks is one of the biggest. The Democratic Congress passed a $630 billion budget bill Wednesday that included 2,322 earmarks totalling $6.6 billion. This is inexcusable in light of the financial crisis this country is facing today. McCain will put an end to that nonsense. McCain/Palin '08

 

Erin

Sep 25, 2008

Wow. I'm actually ASHAMED of you.

 

Clyde

Sep 25, 2008

Re-education camps may be required to make people understand why they must vote for Obama.

 

OneCitizenSpeaking

Sep 25, 2008

It is about time the good people of San Francisco realized that far-left politics and socialism will not help our nation, but create more fear, uncertainty and doubt. The acid test: cite one significant accomplishment of a man who has written two autobiographies and not one significant piece of legislation or legal opinion. Congratulations to your paper for its perceptual analysis. All candidates leave a lot to be desired, but McCain seems to be the best of the worst or the worst of the best. Either way, he is heads and shoulders above Obama in experience in matters that count.

 

mgLover

Sep 25, 2008

OK so I have read the Examiner for what seems like forever. I refuse to even pick it up now. I seriously hope they take back this article. -Once loyal reader

 

AMy

Sep 25, 2008

Thank you!! It's so nice to see that not all the media have gone Obama-crazy.

 

aaron

Sep 25, 2008

its funny how when 1 newspaper actually endorses mccain the liberals are beside themselves. this just further speaks to the fact that the media has always been in obamas camp and this dissention is a total shock McCAIN / PALIN 08

 

aaron

Sep 25, 2008

its funny how when 1 newspaper actually endorses mccain the liberals are beside themselves. this just further speaks to the fact that the media has always been in obamas camp and this dissention is a total shock McCAIN / PALIN 08

 

HollywoodKirk

Sep 25, 2008

This is why I moved out of San Francisco 7 years ago, it just ain't what she used to be!!! Seriously?! This is disgusting and embarrassing.

 

marie miller

Sep 25, 2008

THANK YOU! You made my day for endorsing the better team to lead the United States of America!

 

marie miller

Sep 25, 2008

THANK YOU! You made my day for endorsing the better team to lead the United States of America!

 

burritoboy

Sep 25, 2008

I am so embarrassed for San Francisco.

 

SD

Sep 25, 2008

Way to go Examiner. Thanks for having the huevos to stand up to the liberal loons. Awesome...Go MCCAIN/PALIN 2008

 

SD

Sep 25, 2008

Way to go Examiner. Thanks for having the huevos to stand up to the liberal loons. Awesome...Go MCCAIN/PALIN 2008

 

Heather

Sep 25, 2008

"While no candidate is perfect..." LOL!

 

Heather

Sep 25, 2008

"While no candidate is perfect..." LOL!

 

THIS IS RIDICULOUS

Sep 25, 2008

the last time i checked, newspapers arent supposed to endorse candidates, they are supposed to deliver the news. talk about coming out with a stint like this in such an open, inviting, and liberal city such an san fran. your people are gravely dissapointed in you. subscription canceled.

 

Whatever

Sep 25, 2008

This sounds more like a test for a job writing speeches for McCain. An unabashedly partisan endorsement like this from a newspaper is both unprofessional and a disservice to the community it serves.

 

Nan Shaw

Sep 25, 2008

Statement President Bush made in 2002.... "There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." "...Palin possesses magnificent political gifts".."McCain....ever the maverick..says will cut $100B in earmarks out of the budget (The Office for Management and the Budget came up with a figure for $16.9 billion in the 2008 appropriation bills. Taxpayers for Commonsense, an independent watchdog group that focuses on wasteful spending, identified $18.3 billion worth of earmarks in the 2008 bills, a 23 per cent cut from a record $23.6 billion set in 2005.)"...will restore foundational ideals of individual freedom"...are they delirious? Clearly, the only thing the Examiner does know is how to do cut and paste directly from the McCain campaign talking points. http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/the_budget_according_to_mccain_part_i.html

 

norma

Sep 25, 2008

You've got to be kidding!

 

Marcy

Sep 25, 2008

Are you absolutely crazy? Have you lost your minds? You have lost me as a reader.

 

Eric Mendoza

Sep 25, 2008

The American People are behind MCcain and Palin!! For God and for Country!

 

albert poland

Sep 25, 2008

You are not living up to your name. You should call yourselves The Overlooker.

 

albert poland

Sep 25, 2008

You are not living up to your name. You should call yourselves The Overlooker.

 

nixonandreagan

Sep 25, 2008

How GREAT!!! You just got a new LIFE TIME customer. A million thank yous!!! What a breath of fresh air...

 

Susan Kuypers

Sep 25, 2008

Question: Who did the SF Examiner endorse in the last 2 presidential election?

 

Olivia

Sep 25, 2008

This is BS, no wonder no one reads this paper. Come on your in San Fransisco, not small town USA. America needs Obama, everyone will see after the debates, I hope by then it won't be too late for you to change your minds.

 

Kermodehouse

Sep 25, 2008

Is this a joke? Good Luck keeping your subscribers!

 

hal9000

Sep 25, 2008

I find it irresponsible for a newspaper representing the San Francisco bay area, to help put McCain into office. shame on you.

 

ribby m

Sep 25, 2008

The Examiner is a trashy rag like the New York Post or the media brat Fox News, all three of which endorsed Bush throughout his 2 terms and pumping for more with McCain. The Examiner should be delivered to your recycling bin, not your doorstep.

 

B

Sep 25, 2008

I do not endorse McCain/Paling and I don't believe in any papers endorsing any candidate at all. What happened to true reporting without a bias?

 

Pati the Nurse

Sep 25, 2008

You've got to be kidding!

 

DMS1

Sep 25, 2008

Excelent News. Way to go Sf Examiner. The reason they couldent pass a recovery bill tonight is that Noboma and some of his cronies insisted that ACORN get 100 Billion. Even Hillary supporters are against this.

 

Johnson

Sep 25, 2008

this is really disgusting and I can't believe that one of the greatest city's newspapers would do something so stupid... so much for an unbiased news media or anything close to it, as long as the owner supports a campaign i guess the paper he owns does too

 

MB

Sep 25, 2008

Booooooooooooooooo

 

Louise

Sep 25, 2008

Also, do "you people" know who your elected city, county, state legislators, congressman, or senators are and is their represention for "you" or the higher cost of living in your area. You need to take a good look at what is happening in SF and state before you start whinning about any President-elect.

 

Reformed Democrat

Sep 25, 2008

Thank you, SF Examiner,for putting our country first in this wonderful endorsement of John McCain and for the reasons you listed and you had the courage to do this in the Kool-Aid drinking, delusional and oh-so-blue city of SF!! The comments that I have read below are an example of the angry and petty mindset which prevails in the Obama camp. They do NOT put our country first. Thank you for seeing the truth and for having the courage to say it. I am now a fan of your paper! I have become truly disgusted with the blatant bias of almost all the media outlets these past 8 years or so. How wonderful it is to read an article such as yours! This is the clearest and best article I have read anywhere in a very long time.

 

a Bangkokian

Sep 25, 2008

are you sure this is not a joke???

 

Val Handlery

Sep 25, 2008

Finally some common sense and pride in America prevails and I'll back this paper all the way. Obama's friendships are who he is and Farrakhan, Resko, Rev Wright over 20 years and bomber Bill Ayers and more in Chicago's hateful area where Whites, Jews, Gays, American's are crucified is not the man we want to know all our national security. McCain and Palin are the only ticket that will insure our welfare in every way. McCain has a proven record he can cross party lines comfortably as a long time hero and now the Examiner is proving they are proud Americans without being compromised by following the ignorance of others. I'll buy their paper from now on every day and I'll support their advertisers who support Americans.

 

Val Handlery

Sep 25, 2008

Finally some common sense and pride in America prevails and I'll back this paper all the way. Obama's friendships are who he is and Farrakhan, Resko, Rev Wright over 20 years and bomber Bill Ayers and more in Chicago's hateful area where Whites, Jews, Gays, American's are crucified is not the man we want to know all our national security. McCain and Palin are the only ticket that will insure our welfare in every way. McCain has a proven record he can cross party lines comfortably as a long time hero and now the Examiner is proving they are proud Americans without being compromised by following the ignorance of others. I'll buy their paper from now on every day and I'll support their advertisers who support Americans.

 

chouchou

Sep 25, 2008

i love it! what a fabulous way to gain readership. nothing like a little (negative) publicity to garner some attention. this is the only possible explanation for your "endorsement" of mccain/palin. right? right????

 

chouchou

Sep 25, 2008

i love it! what a fabulous way to gain readership. nothing like a little (negative) publicity to garner some attention. this is the only possible explanation for your "endorsement" of mccain/palin. right? right????

 

emma

Sep 25, 2008

hahahaha. You libs kills me. The NY Times and the Washington Post are practically making love to Obama with their op-ed pieces, yet you immediately spout "non-bias journalism" to a paper that doesn't agree with your view. I thought the Liberal party is an inclusive one. You are showing your narcissism and self-righteousness. Go ahead and don't read this paper, you have many others to choose from. And find the compassion you are so proud of announcing yet never practicing. The middle of this country has a big juicy population that have just as much of a say as the coasts.

 

JD

Sep 25, 2008

Wow, I guess I'll take the coupons and throw out the paper, or wipe my ... with it.

 

boogieboyhlwd

Sep 25, 2008

if i hear one more person scream "country first" i'm going to throw up. as if obama doesn't care about his country? "country first" is what got us into this mess to begin with. or have you forgotten about the past 8 years of this country's existance? a never-ending war, a deficit that is multiplying exponetially, an economy that is on the verge of collapse - what country are YOU living in? wake up. obama puts his country first and he will turn this country around and put us back on the path we were on before bush and these right wing nuts destroyed our country. my god, if this is your idea of "country first", then god help us because we are all going to hell.

 

boogieboyhlwd

Sep 25, 2008

if i hear one more person scream "country first" i'm going to throw up. as if obama doesn't care about his country? "country first" is what got us into this mess to begin with. or have you forgotten about the past 8 years of this country's existance? a never-ending war, a deficit that is multiplying exponetially, an economy that is on the verge of collapse - what country are YOU living in? wake up. obama puts his country first and he will turn this country around and put us back on the path we were on before bush and these right wing nuts destroyed our country. my god, if this is your idea of "country first", then god help us because we are all going to hell.

 

strikland

Sep 25, 2008

How refreshing this Opinion piece is in leftist San Francisco. Kudos ot you, Examiner for standing up! Readers, if you want higher taxes, more regulation, weakend defense and limits on your liberties, vote Obama. You libs, as usual, are being seduced with words like "hope" and "change". Blah, blah, blah. Get your naive head out of the sand and look at this man's acutal deeds, actual legislation, actual personal beliefs. It's all fluff and you're all buying it.

 

strikland

Sep 25, 2008

How refreshing this Opinion piece is in leftist San Francisco. Kudos ot you, Examiner for standing up! Readers, if you want higher taxes, more regulation, weakend defense and limits on your liberties, vote Obama. You libs, as usual, are being seduced with words like "hope" and "change". Blah, blah, blah. Get your naive head out of the sand and look at this man's acutal deeds, actual legislation, actual personal beliefs. It's all fluff and you're all buying it.

 

nosey

Sep 25, 2008

i smell a turd.

 

KJC

Sep 25, 2008

Wake up, you liberal fools! Do you honestly believe that the Bush Administration caused our economic problems? Blame your liberal buddies in Congress! This problem dates back to the Clintons, and the extremely corrupt Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac! Listen closely: You can't give mortgages to people who can't afford to pay them and then not expect the economy to falter when the deadbeats default on their loans. Giving away houses to people who can't afford them is not something conservative politicians do, it's what socialist, liberal politicians do. So please put blame for the economic crisis where it is rightly due: in the laps of liberals! And then ask yourself how the No Integrity, No Experience, No Accomplishments Nobama is going to fix the economy? He's going to tax the hell out of everyone to pay for all the socialist programs he wants to put in place, and when he does, expect the economy to completely collapse. Stupid, stupid liberals!

 

Louise

Sep 25, 2008

KJC , very well put!

 

Louise

Sep 25, 2008

KJC very well put!

 

what?

Sep 25, 2008

one more reason why the examiner is a tenth rate paper. Do you not refer to the news? you should be so ashamed. pathetic fools.

 

what?

Sep 25, 2008

to NixonandReagan-- you are an idiot reagan was the push that created the demise of the middleclass.

 

gspecial1

Sep 25, 2008

great article!

 

dbudd

Sep 26, 2008

the endorsement reads like a SNL skit or that deep voiced soliloquizing bald eagle from the muppet show.

 

SF Expat

Sep 26, 2008

WTF? When did the Examiner's editorial staff turn into utter, blazing, contemptible idiots? The country needs McCain like a drowning man needs a bazooka. The man is a principle-less sellout liar with no plan and no clue, something he obviously shares in common with the Examiner. Wake up, morons!

 

Louise

Sep 26, 2008

"I find McCain/Palin not in support of many of the liberties we enjoy here in the SF Bay Area." No statement could be truer. McCain/Palin have morals, diginty, honor, and counrty first, not SF liberal liberties first.

 

R U Kidding?

Sep 26, 2008

Is this the Onion? You can't be serious? If this was humor I would say good job. If you are serious, I hope there is a god to save us.

 

Sep 26, 2008

I am from San Francisco and I am shocked, disappointed and speechless! I don't even know what to say...The SF Examiner is pathetic.

 

CC

Sep 26, 2008

I am amazed at the vitriol of some of the comments about this endorsement. I had concluded some time ago NOT to read the local papers (Chronicle, Valley Times, etc...) due to obvious left-leaning editorial bias, but I am now inclined to give the Examiner another chance. I feel this endorsement is a good one and one that took courage to publish to a left-leaning San Francisco readership. I hope thoughtful people read and consider the points made and don't just react in posting angry comments.An angry person does not try to persuade, just to overwhelm.

 

Jess Clement

Sep 26, 2008

Oh no, you did not just do that. San Fran Examiner! Are you mental? This comment comes from Australia where we can't believe there is even a chance in steaming hell the US would consider McCain/Palin. Sheesh you guys

 

Disappointed Examiner Reader

Sep 26, 2008

I was pretty shocked to see the Examiner endorse McCain/Palin - yuk-o! My stomach clutched immediately. This whole 'maverick' thing - hogwash, made up! Wish we had a truly non partisan or just left of center paper option, maybe owned by Google to balance out papers on the 'right'.

 

Gill

Sep 26, 2008

As a Irish person it breaks my heart to read that a newspaper in supposedly one of America's most liberal city's would endorse such a right wing facist and his inexperienced 'token' of a sidekick, the very fact that Palin has been elected as Vice both shocks and amazes our country- what experience does she have??Somehow I think governor of Alaska really does not prepare you for vice-president of one of the most powerful countries in the world. In a recent poll the whole of Europe, Asia and Australia voted that they would hope that Obama wins and I certainly hope he does. The war against 'terrorists' is a joke, he will McCain fronting the next Vietnam. I, as does Europe, pray that nobody listens to this right-wing tripe and votes obama

 

WTF

Sep 26, 2008

Burn in hell examinor

 

lilb0yb1ue

Sep 26, 2008

disgusting

 

PULL YOUR ADVERTISING FROM THIS PAPER

Sep 26, 2008

it may be the only way to get through to a clearly out of touch Editorial Department.

 

Posting in blind support of party and a failed policy platform is a failure to put Country First. Wake up McCain supporters and the examiner editors, your candidate is spinning wildly out of control, and does not appear presidential in the least.

Sep 26, 2008

seriously. take an honest unbiased look at the GOP ticket... really.

 

can't stop laughing...

Sep 26, 2008

at this ridiculous endorsement, and the even funnier comments and screen names from the conservative McCain supporters (and clearly, some staffers at the McCain/Palin campaign...). as they say on the innernets, roflcopter.

 

vintagepop

Sep 26, 2008

if mccain/palin win. i'm out.

 

dulce

Sep 26, 2008

Philip Frederick Anschutz owner of the Examiner is a supporter of conservative Christian causes. Anschutz, a Republican donor and supporter of George W. Bush's administration, has been an active patron of a number of religious and conservative causes: Helped fund Colorado's 1992 Amendment 2, a ballot initiative designed to overturn local and state laws that prohibit discrimination against individuals on the basis of sexual orientation. Helped fund the Discovery Institute, a think tank based in Seattle, Washington that promotes intelligent design and creationism and criticizes evolution.

 

Bret

Sep 26, 2008

You seriously have the temerity to compare John McCain to Harry Truman? I think it's time to give up the crack pipe. You must have gone insane. The country is in the middle of a financial meltdown and you have John McCain running around saying "the fundamentals are strong." You know who else said that the fundamentals of the economy were strong? Herbert Hoover. Can you say father of the Great Depression? Personally I don't want to have leaders who think that the best option is to bomb those that don't agree with us into submission. Call me crazy. What a freaking joke!

 

mariaconz

Sep 26, 2008

I support John McCain and Sarah Palin on issues of character and putting country first. I distrust Big Media, the Democratic National Committee, the Leftists who have hijacked the Democratic Party, and the Obama campaign's philosophy that the ends justify the means. I used to be a Democrat; now I am an Independent who is proud to turn away from the Left that I used to think supported women's rights and vote for the better of the two male candidates. I still think that Hillary Clinton would have been the best candidate.

 

Vlaovik

Sep 26, 2008

Wow! Even if McCain is all the things you claim - he picked Palin - who you adoringly gloss over. That in itself is evidence of shockingly damaged decision makingon his part. Doesn't bode well at all.

 

Simon Murphy

Sep 26, 2008

The Examiner has just lost a customer in me.

 

tonje

Sep 26, 2008

what is WRONG with you people??? dont you understand that Obama is the only hope for your country? he is the only one that UNDERSTANDS what will happen to THE WORLD if things in america don't change!! McCain only chose Palin becuase she is a woman, and hoped that she could get the womens votes!! how SAD AND PATHETIC IS THAT!she knows NOTHING about foreign politics, and if McCain and Palin win, than god help us all! and i dont get why you are so afraid of socialism, it is NOT THE SAME as communism. So what if you pay more taxes, if it goes to free health care, more unemployment benefits, better schooling, than WHAT IS SO WRONG WITH SOCIALISM!! VOTE OBAMA AND SAVE THE WORLD FROM DESTRUCTION!!!!!

 

Martha from Connecticut

Sep 26, 2008

And here I thought San Francisco was purely liberal. :laughing: Do I feel a breath of fresh air rolling off those blue Pacific waves???

 

Nancy

Sep 26, 2008

My mind is blown. I never thought I'd see a SF newspaper endorse the conservative candidate. I'm overjoyed and elated. Thank you.

 

aghast

Sep 26, 2008

Wow, some common sense exists in the cultural armpit of America!

 

JKIR

Sep 26, 2008

McCain and Palin with both work their hearts out trying to do right by all Americans. You won't be sorry that you endorsed McCain/Palin.

 

AmberRM

Sep 26, 2008

What a great article and a clever endorsement! McCain/Palin!!!!

 

M. J.

Sep 26, 2008

From the most liberal city in America. I see this right wing talking point endorsement of a 2 faced, out of touch millionaire. On TV more of the same, turn on the radio we have 3 neo con filled stations with Limbaugh,Hannity, Savage Etc.... I hear them all whining about the "liberal media bias"! I can’t believe our obviously corrupt government and mainstream media fool so many of us. Why have we not seen any dead bodies in all these years since we attacked Iraq, yet before every election we are subjected to people jumping from the Twin Towers and the Planes Slamming into them? Who controls what we see and when we see it? This "Endorsement" should give you a clue.

 

London1

Sep 26, 2008

Good Choice. That's who I will be voting for come Nov, Obama is far to Socialist bordering on Communisim. Before you argue with me RESEARCH his actual policies, taking 30% from home equity is INSANE in this economy.

 

Caitlin B

Sep 26, 2008

Anyone who would choose a VP as inexperienced, as unworldly, as corrupt as Sarah Palin is not fit to be president of the United States of America. I am absolutely shocked that a respectable newspaper would endorse these two candidates who if elected will destroy everything that is decent about this country. I will never read the Examiner again as they have shown to have an appalling understanding of the kind of leader this country needs and obviously pay no attention to facts. "First, the next president must have the hard-earned experience" - so should McCain die or become too ill to stay in office exactly what experience will Sarah Palin be bringing to office? Anyone who can say with a straight face that she has international experience because she can see Russia from her state is a moron who has no place in public office. This editorial is an absolute farce. There are not enough words for my disgust. Shame, shame on you San Francisco Examiner.

 

Jody Colley

Sep 26, 2008

Corporate media sucks.

 

Catherine Samose

Sep 26, 2008

Way to go! Thank you so much! Two of my Connecticut kids used to live in SF. It's a great city!

 

AmericanAbroad

Sep 26, 2008

"the only reason you're upset though is because they're not endorsing your candidate." Amen. Just as SF prides itself on being a city unique among others, let SF pride itself on its diversity of ideas. The other side of each of our opinions feels just as passionate as each of us do, and that is what makes us a better nation. Disagreement moderates extremity. God bless America!

 

M. Keller

Sep 26, 2008

Have the members of your editorial board gone completely insane with frothing Christian fundamentalism? Sarah Palin alone is enough to negate any qualifications Joh McCain may have had to become President. This mass insanity in your endorsement demonstrates the end of objective journalism from the Examiner and causes me to long for your eventual demise as a publication of significance.

 

Adam Dudeguy

Sep 26, 2008

Pathetic. McCain wouldn't scare me as much if he didn't pick a horrible, no-nothing, gee-I-want-the-female-vote-so-I'll-choose- a-woman, running mate. I tip my hat to him for serving our country, but that has NOTHING to do with running it. I'm appalled.

 

NeverBAMA

Sep 26, 2008

Look at all these pansy liberals getting their panties up in a bunch...I LOVE IT!

 

Janice

Sep 26, 2008

My dad served in the Navy with McCain, and everyone knew what McCain was best at: chasing his penis around. He crashed FIVE jets and cost the taxpayers a lot of money due to his ineptitude (which got him his POW stint that he now uses as an excuse for everything). He left his injured first wife and then married Mr$. Bud for his own financial and political gain. Without Cindy, this guy would not even BE running. McCain got his bailout, now he can't even remember how many houses he has, while staring at Palin's ass during speeches. I can only suppose his economic bailout plan is just two words: MARRY RICH.

 

ck307a

Sep 26, 2008

This is really sad. How is it "Country First" to put Sarah P. one-72-year-old heartbeat away from running our country? See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6c1oL5V_4U | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQRGsZ0SN7E

 

LM

Sep 26, 2008

@dood: "I will literally never pick up the Examiner ever again. Talk about being deaf tone to your target market." So basically what you're saying is that the Examiner is allowed to have an opinion unless it differs from yours? Intelligent...

 

Stevie Coyle

Sep 26, 2008

This endorsement is full of classic logical fallacies. Perhaps even more disappointing, it's just more party-line rhetoric. Zero in the way of true insight here or convincing argument. At any rate, Sarah Palin is the real problem with this ticket. McCain is a 71-year-old cancer survivor. Vetting his second becomes more important than ever. Can America not do better than Sarah Palin? Uneducated, untraveled, aggressively ignorant, and clearly ineffective as a parent and role model. But what makes her truly dangerous is evangelical "end times" beliefs driving both personal arrogance and political rectitude.

 

SeattleDem

Sep 26, 2008

This is disgusting. I am at a loss for words. It's really unfortunate when then views of an paper(owner) are so out of touch with the community it resides and relies upon. Way to boost circulation! Dummies.

 

Mark

Sep 26, 2008

A controversial stand in what is often considered a narrow-minded city. Thank you. Thank you for bringing diversity of thought and opinion.

 

Caitlin B

Sep 26, 2008

Have just read a fantastic editorial from an a newspaper I DO respect, The NY Times. Now this is an editorial that makes sense: "I’m going to try to make this simple. On the Democratic side you have a guy whose campaign has been based on the Internet, who believes America may have something to learn from other countries (like universal health care) and who’s unafraid in 2008 to say he’s a “proud citizen of the United States and a fellow citizen of the world.” On the Republican side, you have a guy who, in 2008, is just discovering the Net and Google and whose No. 2 is a woman who got a passport last year and believes she understands Russia because Alaska is closer to Siberia than Alabama. If I were Obama, I’d put it this way: “Senator McCain, the world you claim to understand is the world of yesterday. A new century demands new thinking. Our country cannot be made fundamentally secure by a man who thought our economy was fundamentally sound.”

 

Brian

Sep 26, 2008

Who is Joe Mama?

 

Joe Doniach

Sep 26, 2008

Is this April Fools Day?

 

june22

Sep 26, 2008

As others have already mentioned, the Examiner (can't bring myself to put San Francisco in front of it) is owned by a man who belongs to the top 2% of our country's economic strata. As of 9/17/2008, Forbes features him in their 400 Richest People in America at #36. He is so afraid that he's finally going to get taxed under a Democratic administration. http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/54/400list08_Philip-Anschutz_DSAK.html

 

Canadian Student

Sep 26, 2008

Horrible.

 

EatingMyHead

Sep 26, 2008

This has to be some sort of joke. Was this from the Onion?

 

slb94134

Sep 26, 2008

wow. how appaling and lame. will be reading the chronicle from now on.

 

danilo

Sep 26, 2008

the examiner is dead to me.

 

David

Sep 26, 2008

This is the most insane endorsement I have ever seen. What is the examiner thinking. I guess it is time to cancel.

 

pete

Sep 26, 2008

Remember a maverick is an outlier, an oddball, an erratic individual. Definitely not a leader.

 

logicaldefiance

Sep 26, 2008

maverick: a person who refuses to conform to a particular group of party. I dont know why people keep calling McAin't-the-one-for-us that. By choosing Palin as his vp, he's clearly conforming to a group that republicans have dominated for years: morons good at dirty politics. I'm a woman and I'd like to think a smart one at that. Mcain's choice of Palin is irresponsible and borderline crazy. His attempt to suspend today's debate is obviously in order to make it seem as though he is solution oriented regarding the current economic crisis. Here's the real solution: elect Obama. Let's stop picking "the guy we could see ourselves having a beer with." since when did womanizing self serving money grubbing wannabe starf*&##r seem like a presidential candidate choice than intelligent and credentialed legal mind. let's do the right thing shall we? that way the world and perhaps our children will think about forgiving us for the bush fiasco.

 

nja06

Sep 26, 2008

eww how could you even write this? OBAMA/BIDEN 08!!!

 

Erik

Sep 26, 2008

Corporations such as yours are the scourge of the American ideals. I am a corporation owner, but I have a clear conscience. I employ people, play by the rules and build my community. I do not change my opinions to suit a given situation and do not need lobbyists who receive millions from failed institutions like Freddy Mac or Fannie Maye on my payroll because I give no favors. McCain is an opportunist of the worst kind whose aspirations are all built on wealth and power with no regard for humankind. And for the idiots who think that success can only be accomplished by taking away from others, I got rich without ever having to squash anyone and have actually helped people on my way up.

 

birdbrain4u

Sep 26, 2008

Ridiculous and dangeriously out of touch. I'm talking about your editorial and the McCain/Palin campaign. What's next-McCain speaking in tongues at the debate?

 

McSame?

Sep 26, 2008

Are you insane? Palin is totally against women's rights. She is totally unqualified and a religious crackpot. McCain is just the same as Bush. Would you endorse 4 more years of Bush? MCSame backed pretty much everything Bush did. He is 72 and not very healthy. You lack any insight or intelligence in this matter and should be ashamed.

 

Spain?

Sep 26, 2008

McCain is so stupid he doesn't even know where Spain is? Or who the President of Spain is?

 

CRC

Sep 26, 2008

Yeah, Phil, owner of this not-so-free press. Blah blah blah. If this country ever "needs" Sarah Palin, it will be because McCain dies in office, and I shudder to think what that will mean. She just isn't up to it (and the Vice Presidency, with a 72 y.o overweight President and the current ailments of the USA at home and internationally,is not the place for her to "master the realities of higher office," for heavens sake!), so we will have ANOTHER marionette with strings attached to unelected "people" with special interests and/or serious personality disorders. No thank you. I hope San Franciscans will deplore your railroading of what should be their paper.

 

Drummer

Sep 26, 2008

Wow. Even less reason to read the Examiner. I'm a registered Republican in San Francisco, and I can't imagine voting for Palin. I say that because THAT is who would be going into office - John is too old and too likely to NOT make it through four years. I also have concerns about PTSD (aka "shell-shock") from his Vietnam days. He's exhibiting far too many of the manifestations of this disorder to be sure of his mental stability. It's rather terrifying. As for the Examiner, I just wish you'd stop dropping off copies on my doorstep each morning, as it usually goes immediately into the recycle bin. Asking nicely just doesn't seem to work.

 

David Ehrenstein

Sep 26, 2008

You forgot the "Seig Heil!"

 

Confused

Sep 26, 2008

Are you on crack? Despite everythying we know, you endorse them? Sounds like someone is getting kickbacks from the money train of corruption!

 

Catherine Samose

Sep 26, 2008

I'm glad there are some people in the great San Francisco who are wise enought to realize how much this country cannot have a president like, as some have called him, Nobama. And in my case, I'd love to have the right black man be president.

 

Muncie Fahrion

Sep 26, 2008

Gutsy move,keep saying it like it is EXAMINER.

 

NeverBAMA

Sep 26, 2008

I can't believe the number of Kool-Aid drinkers spewing disgust at this endorsement. Apparently the newspaper is showing courage and intellectual honesty by supporting a candidate who will lead this country in the right direction. Other than chanting "change, change" like a bunch of hypnotized morons, look into the past of this corrupted Manchurian Candidate, who has expressed bad judgment and self-serving political moves to achieve his aspiration of becoming leader of the world. This lying empty-suit is dangerous for this country and all the principles it stands for. The Democratic Party should be renamed for what it really is, the American Socialist Party. Obama will be our Hugo Chavez if he becomes President.

 

Oakland Transplant

Sep 26, 2008

Hip Hip Hooray! I'm glad there are news organizations willing to look at facts and make such a bold edorsment. Especially coming out of San Francisco. I am SICK of all the Obama propoganda that surrounds the bay area. I heard an interesting story about Obama's brother, George Obama, that lives in the slums of Nairobi. He lives on around $20.00 a year and has only heard from his famous brother Barack only once. You would think the candidate that talks about caring for those less fortunate would help out his own brother. If you'd like to help him, visit this website: http://townhall.com/Columnists/DineshDSouza/2008/09/08/help_obamas_half-brother_move_out_of_his_hut

 

Tony Nguyen

Sep 26, 2008

I am very SAD to hear the new , the Newspaper the Examiner is nominate M C ain/ Palin, Your guy out of your mind...no more the Examiner from now on, i will call all my friends, co worker let them know too, so stupid, wake up guys...

 

jess

Sep 26, 2008

This is bull. GOBAMA!

 

Nancy Zettler

Sep 26, 2008

ARE YOU NUTS????? This has to be a joke!!

 

DMP

Sep 26, 2008

I will never read your paper again after this.

 

RepubliCult

Sep 26, 2008

April 1st? Come on, whoever wrote this can fess-up now, we've all had a good laugh! Ha-Ha.

 

Suzanne

Sep 26, 2008

What are you thinking? McCain is out of touch with what life is like for most americans. I believe he is the puppet for those currently in control of W in running this country - that is why we have Palin . . . I really don't think it was his first choice. . . and he can't win without their help. He is a hippocrit, a gambler and a risk-taker. You're right in saying we need leader who has a steady hand and leads from his head. Obama is that one - Obama is the one who said it is more important than ever to hold the debates. Obama is the one who fully vetted his VP choices.

 

Sep 26, 2008

What a "LOSER" newspaper. !!

 

LT

Sep 26, 2008

This nation is screwed for the next 2 years regardless of who is elected. How can someone be for a senator that has no experience? His replies in interviews are well rounded avoidances. I feel sorry for those that cannot see this as a greater issue, instead of an issue for us all. There is no party anymore.

 

Jane Plain

Sep 26, 2008

Wow! To have gotten it wrong on so many levels, you Examiner folks, ESPECIALLY in light of Mrs. Palin's recent fluffs and McCain's rambling-yet-ineffective flip--floppery., doesn't speak well for powers of political analysis, your choice of candidates and, last but not least: your TIMING!! You must not utilize other media to garner a more valid view of the world out there than reading --and BELIEVING!!-- your own tripe; you obviously missed the Couric-Palin interview. Add to that the photograph at the top of your editorial: two smug poseurs, internally hoping-against-hope that the big "L-for-Loser" on their foreheads doesn't manifest itself anytime soon. If you are endorsing McC and Mrs P out of principle, despite their grossly evident lack of substance ... well,good for you for sticking to a principle. But I reiterate: your choice stinks just as badly as do your candidates. To quote a quote: "What were they THINKING????"

 

btaylor

Sep 26, 2008

Idiotic!

 

Mr. Right

Sep 26, 2008

Great news. I guess SF isn't totally dominated by mentally ill trash!

 

Jane Plain

Sep 26, 2008

The picture above your endorsement of those 2 losers IS worth more than your thousand-word endorsement of the most inept pair to have slithered down the political pike since...oh, say Warren G. Harding.

 

Steven Cohen

Sep 26, 2008

You have got to be kidding. I can't believe that a fairly well respected news paper in Northern California has bought the lies that the McCain camp has proported. Please check the facts! Steven L. Cohen

 

K

Sep 26, 2008

This is unbelievable! It has to be a joke. Sara Palin, who gets exorcised for witches, and who is being kept away from the press? And, this was McCain's first "Presidential" decision to pick her, a heartbeat away from the presidency? You call that good judgement? What??????

 

Cynthia

Sep 26, 2008

Pathetic and sad. I read you every day. You are dead to me now. People of San Fransisco revolt.

 

Moira

Sep 26, 2008

I would like this trash that is dropped on my doorstep twice a week removed. If this is how the ownership of the examiner feels, well they can recycle their paper and STOP littering my neighborhood with it. For those of you that think McCain is so country first: think rich country men first. Keating Five anyone? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five#Relationships_of_senators_to_Keating If McCain is so clean of earmarks and lobbyests, why is his campaign staff full of people who have benefited or been party to both? Yeah I'm a San Francisco Liberal, not a Democrat. Also if the Republican party is so good for our Country, have you even looked at our own State and what's happening here?

 

brain-washed liberals

Sep 26, 2008

Congratulation SF Examiner, it's nice to see that everyone in this great city isn't drinking the Obama kool-aid. For those readers who think this is a joke, they obvioulsy didn't read the article. Obama has no executive experience, no record for implementing change in Washington, no realistic goals for the country. Those readers who claim they will never read the SF Examiner again are the ones who should continue to read it. Lastly, being a conservative in San Francisco is not easy but as a conservative I reach my decisions by thinking through the issues, where the liberals act upon their emotions, the "feel that Obama will be a good president" but they don't have any facts to support their feelings. Way to go SF Examiner

 

cbeen

Sep 26, 2008

I saw this on the cover of the Examiner on the way to work yesterday. I stopped and stared at the cover for 2 minutes searching for the punchline! I guess the Examiner itself is the punchline!

 

mom

Sep 26, 2008

Here's an interesting endorsement from the San Francisco Examiner. I would have assumed they would endorse Obama.

 

kiko

Sep 26, 2008

That's why we don't read the examiner, McSame and Palitology, silver spoons and tax cuts for the rich, lobbyists running his campaign (sorry, they are not lobbyist from campaign beginning to end, only before and after), and my most famous quote "john mccain does not necessarily speak for the john mccain campaign", crazy.

 

shane

Sep 26, 2008

Wow. I'm blind. I liked the Examiner, but will not be reading it anymore.

 

brendanb

Sep 26, 2008

John McCain can't even inspire his own party much less the nation at large, and Palin can't even substantiate talking points about her own running mate with things called 'examples.' If McCain can't even run an organized campaign, how is he supposed to run the country? Could the Examiner be any more out to lunch?

 

Irene Bachran

Sep 26, 2008

McCain would do well to take Newt Gingrich very seriously. He should have a cabinet position and the ear of the president. He might also mentor Sarah Palin to her benefit.

 

marian parker

Sep 26, 2008

This must be a joke, right? McCain is a dishonest, shallow lightweight who will say anything to get elected and Palin is an unmitigated disaster. I cannot believe that this is a real endorsement!

 

BEACHlE22

Sep 26, 2008

WOW! In San Franciso, huh? Let's not even talk about how his view on social issues don't match up with the lives lived in this city. Oh and for all you veterans out there, maybe you should start fact-checking: McCain voted AGAINST giving $20 million in veterans medical benefits and also voted AGAINST adding a full college scholarship after 3 years of service to the GI Bill. Yea let's keep talking about how he was a POW..and forget how he doesn't care about vets in this country. Obama doesn't forget where he came from.

 

Michael

Sep 26, 2008

Isn't the Examiner supposed to be an objective news source? How the hell is endorsing any candidate with a front page "opinion" piece objective reporting? I don't care what your paper thinks about the candidates. Leave the formation of opinion to the reader and let them make their own decisions.

 

Bill Black

Sep 26, 2008

You are insane! What you say about why you are endorsing McCain might make sense if your characterization of him was accurate but it isn't! John McCain is not a maverick, he only plays the part of one. Just look at his voting record, when he bothers to show up that is.

 

Bruce Peltier

Sep 26, 2008

Unbelievable.

 

john king

Sep 26, 2008

No wonder this paper is free,i've never read such drival that must be coming straight from the RNC headquarters...is this not the same mccain who has tried for years to eliminate all government regulations on banks and wall street that has led straight to our current finacial meltdown...as far as Palin is concerned;you've got to be kidding!!

 

john king

Sep 26, 2008

No wonder this paper is free,i've never read such drival that must be coming straight from the RNC headquarters...is this not the same mccain who has tried for years to eliminate all government regulations on banks and wall street that has led straight to our current finacial meltdown...as far as Palin is concerned;you've got to be kidding!!

 

Joni

Sep 26, 2008

VOTE OBAMA!!! Sen. Mccain will only go along with whatever it is he's told to do. We NEED change! So much went wrong in our great country these last eight years! Please help fix it by voting for Sen. Obama! Thanks!

 

cbrewer

Sep 26, 2008

Thank goodness at least one paper in the country is not run my a bunch of miserable bleeding heart liberals. can't wait to find out the outcome of the Attorney Generals investagtion of misapproriation of funds in Chicago that has Obama's hands all over it. Where do you liberals think all of his programs are going to get money from to implement, at a cost so far of 70 billon in programs. I am sick of paying for programs for people that don't pay any taxes at all and have their hands out constantly. Speaking of dirty politics when the polls get tight the black congressional politicans come out and start chanting racial bias, in others the race card; now trivial is that.

 

Allen Yu

Sep 26, 2008

I don't think I even want to use the Examiner to lay out as pee pads for my dogs. I think they deserve better.

 

Josh

Sep 26, 2008

I cannot believe this. I will never read your paper again.

 

Larry S in Florida

Sep 26, 2008

I agree that it is time for the voters of this great country to stand up and say: "Enough" - enough of the character assassinations and rhetoric which is unfounded. The one and only issue is who would you hire to be your next President and Vice President. You must admit that if you were in a position to hire a new manager or other executive, the first thing you would consider would be the experience on the resume. Is it the right kind of experience for the job opening? McCain-Palin have the character and experience needed in the tough times we are facing. Now is not the time for on-the-job training for someone without the required resume. Wake up America!

 

Larry S in Florida

Sep 26, 2008

Your courage overwhelms me. After posting my comment, I read through the comments, apparently from locals in San Francisco. Why should I be surprised that there are so many folks who cannot think for themselves. I thought that Florida had a lock on senility. I was wrong! California has it locked up! It does not take a rocket scientist to see that Obama is not even in the same league as McCain. Gov Palin has more executive experience than Obama will ever have! Perhaps the social experiments that lead to the financial meltdown did not get your attention. If Obama is elected, you will be taxed out of existance. America simply cannot afford his social programs and "redistribution of wealth". Capitalism, with all its faults, still is the best system in the world. What would you change? Obama speaks of change, but has he defined what that means? Would you give a man with his background your checkbook to manage? I think not! Wake up California!

 

Really?

Sep 26, 2008

Judging from the ensuing comments, it looks like Examiner just lost 850 of it's 856 subscribers/readers.

 

Andy Crawford

Sep 26, 2008

You should really do some fact checking before spewing garbage like this. Palin courageously standing up to corruption? You obviously haven't done any research into Governor Palin's background. Mirroring McCain's record, which mirrors President Bush's record is a good thing? Four more years of Bush policies is a good thing? Hoping he can reign in a temper that he hasn't ever been able to reign in over his 26 year political career is seriously wishful thinking. McCain can't even decide which way the economy is going from day to day and his Mighty Mouse escapade into Washington served absolutely no purpose other than to grandstand. There is a reason news papers are going down the drain and this article is a prime example.

 

dre

Sep 26, 2008

What a joke! I'm done with this rag.

 

vendetta

Sep 26, 2008

Whatever happened to the FREEDOM OF THE PRESS? So much for the democracy you hold so dear.

 

RKhera

Sep 26, 2008

This is insane! No wonder people prefer the Guardian and the SFWeekly to this junk! Lord!

 

MP

Sep 26, 2008

This is pathetic. The paper is pathetic. Solace for many of lies in knowing that your voice in San Francisco is minimal and that it will make not one iota of difference in the Obama California landslide. If you fully believe what you wrote you are truly both ignorant and deluded.

 

j.s.

Sep 26, 2008

well, i don't think i can ever read this paper again! you have got to be kidding me! you clearly don't represent the majority of san franciscans. fools!

 

marnan

Sep 26, 2008

Wow I am shocked and pleasantly surprised at the courage of the Examiner to speak the truth in the Bay Area. Wow. Thank you, from East Bay.

 

will

Sep 26, 2008

as if i needed another reason not to bother picking up your paper ever again, this certainly sealed it. you guys are a joke.

 

ssg

Sep 26, 2008

Where does Robyn Beck get her info? Disappointing read for sure.

 

rrow

Sep 26, 2008

Congratulations for resisting the pressure to give the "cool" endorsement, and having the courage to do the right thing.

 

john

Sep 26, 2008

Praise the Lord, we have already overcome, how refreshing that people can run for office and stand on their beliefs and not be bought . It's about time someone had the moxy to not give in to what other people want to hear.

 

Maria Arapakis

Sep 26, 2008

You've GOT to be kidding. McCain is pathetic flip-flopper and is now trying to disown decades of connection to disastrously wrong solutions and approaches. And are you really saying that Palin would be fine as President of the United States? Are you mad?

 

Jeni Williams

Sep 26, 2008

I am disappointed by your endorsement of McCain. All I see in your reasoning for endorsing him is the talking points from his campaign. The McCain in the article above was the McCain of 2000. He has completely sold his principles down the river to follow his campaign's Rove-ian strategy to win the White House. He is no longer the maverick. You are endorsing a candidate that no longer exists.

 

DumbExaminer

Sep 26, 2008

This is San Francisco! not Kansas! Idiots! You guys did the biggest mistake ever... Vote Obama 08!

 

Melanie

Sep 27, 2008

Well done! I am so glad to see that not all of CA has fallen under the Obamessiah spell. I think the country has a much better chance of getting back on track with McCain/Palin in Washington. I shudder to think what America will look like for my grandchildren if Obama gets to appoint Federal and Supreme Court Justices. . .

 

mike

Sep 27, 2008

Change - With close ties to Rezko, Rev. Wright, William Ayers and other left wing people and organizations. That is not want my President to have as a background. He and Biden also took every earmark they could get. These two will spend us into the poorer house as well. Obama is a media creation and an empty suit. I approve of this endorsement. Bravo!

 

mike

Sep 27, 2008

Change - With close ties to Rezko, Rev. Wright, William Ayers and other left wing people and organizations. That is not want my President to have as a background. He and Biden also took every earmark they could get. These two will spend us into the poorer house as well. Obama is a media creation and an empty suit. I approve of this endorsement. Bravo!

 

Debbie Davis

Sep 27, 2008

I concur! I believe John McCain has shown he has the integrity, humility, experience and fortitude to lead our beloved country through the tough times we are currently encountering. Thank you for speaking out to America regarding your support for a man who has proven he is courageous and will work tirelessly for what is best for the USA.

 

david a

Sep 27, 2008

um...i think The Onion has more credibility than the SF Examiner!!! WOW. I'm dumbfounded. (Really?????)

 

marge

Sep 27, 2008

You have to be kidding. Inspiring? No. Good judgement? No. Magnificent political gift? Palin can barely string words together to create a coherent sentence. (Just ask Katie Couric) What were you thinking? Take a page from your candidate's book and think about the good of the country first and retract this rediculous endorsement.

 

dBDave

Sep 27, 2008

Is that the kind of paper the Examiner is? Proud, gutless? I think if God chose to speak to me, he'd look me in the eye.

 

God

Sep 27, 2008

I knew the was a reason I don't read your paper...

 

Sean

Sep 27, 2008

There is a ray of hope for San Fran. It appears that not all on the left coast are fully enthralled by "Obamessiah" the charletan. McCain is exactly what America needs right now. He will not be 'another Bush' like the parroting idiots on the left say. He has ideas, principles, values and above all, experience. Obama has dreams, dreams don't fill a gas tank. Obama says he's about hope, hope doesn't put food on the table. When pressed for what he'd actually dohe has no plan other than spend everyones tax money. McCain will not do this, will not raise taxes, will not unfairly tax businesses, will not pander to the socialists. McCain will allow this country to do what it does best: Pull itself up by it's own bootstraps. Of course the leftists out there wouldn't understand the concept, having never worn anything but flip-flops.

 

Amy Sherman

Sep 27, 2008

If we're on the wrong track, we don't need someone who voted with the current president over 90% of the time! You are dead wrong on this one.

 

amf

Sep 27, 2008

how exciting and rare to see a diversity of political thought coming from san francisco! perhaps there's hope yet for critical thought in that town!

 

amf

Sep 27, 2008

how exciting and rare to see a diversity of political thought coming from san francisco! perhaps there's hope yet for critical thought in that town!

 

Jim Bourell

Sep 27, 2008

A life-long Democrat, eight years ago I actually gave my financial support to John McCain's presidential bid because I strongly supported his election reform legislation. Now, he has forgone his maverick principles and gotten into bed with the right wing fringe, blinded by his desire for power. Lies, tricks, and deceit; this is what Republicans, John McCain, and now The Examiner, stands for. I am canceling an over 20 year subscription, immediately!

 

coach

Sep 27, 2008

A man who puts country first doesn't pick Sarah Palin as his running mate. If she's ready to be a heartbeat away, why can she answer any questions?A man who is a veteran shouldn't vote against veterans when it comes to medical care, body armor, educational benefits etc. A man of integrity doesn't run ads that completely mislead on almost every topic (taxes, sex education, inexperience, see Palin above). If you are looking for an inspiring leader to lead us into the future and regain the respect of the world you endorsed the wrong candidate.

 

Barbara

Sep 27, 2008

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING???!!!! McCain couldn't even reach across the stage to LOOK at Obama last night, much less reach across the aisle and deal with foreign leaders. What a ridiculous endorsement -- pathetic and ill-conceived in such dangerous times. I may cancel my subscription . . .

 

Rob

Sep 27, 2008

Well, what can you expect from this biased left-wing media outlet? Of course a S.F. paper is backing Obama, what else could we expect from the Liberal Media?

 

ExaminerNoMore

Sep 27, 2008

This can't be real. This must be some kind of joke. I know the Examiner would never do this. But if it has, I will never look at this site again and I STRONGLY urge all advertisers to boycott the Examiner. I'm disgusted with this.

 

bmrgrl

Sep 27, 2008

Oh please! Uncompromising character? When considering John McCain’s history of unethical behavior, the list usually starts with the Keating Five scandal in the 1980s and clearly shows John's lack of judgement. Judgment is far more important than "unrelenting toughness" in a president. As the saying goes, a leopard can never change its spots. Honestly, this man scares me, and your endorsement shows a serious lack of judgement.

 

Shelley Evans

Sep 27, 2008

Are we seeing the influence of conservative owner Philip Anschutz here?

 

Shelley Evans

Sep 27, 2008

Are we seeing the influence of conservative owner Philip Anschutz here?

 

McCaneAllTheWay

Sep 27, 2008

Yeehaaaaaaaaaw!!! i knew there was some smart peoples in Calefornya! THANKYOU Examiner!! good fer you!!! We need 4 more yeers of a good ole boy in the white horse! that other guy Obama is just too smarts. We don't need a guy like him runnin the country. we been doin plenty fine wit Mr McCane's party runnin the show. first we conkered them A-Rabs in Irack, and now, we been conkerin our economee. things been just fine in the usa and we expect 4 more yeers of the same. i got a 7th grad educacheon and im smart enough to know what the examiner knows: McCane is the one. shoot, you examiner folks should come on down here to my trailer park in Kansas. we got plenty more peoples just like me, so you folks ed fit in right nicely down here. hell, maybe we could get sarah to come on down n go shoot things with us! take care now examiner and stay strong, ya hear?!

 

McCaneAllTheWay

Sep 27, 2008

Yeehaaaaaaaaaw!!! i knew there was some smart peoples in Calefornya! THANKYOU Examiner!! good fer you!!! We need 4 more yeers of a good ole boy in the white horse! that other guy Obama is just too smarts. We don't need a guy like him runnin the country. we been doin plenty fine wit Mr McCane's party runnin the show. first we conkered them A-Rabs in Irack, and now, we been conkerin our economee. things been just fine in the usa and we expect 4 more yeers of the same. i got a 7th grad educacheon and im smart enough to know what the examiner knows: McCane is the one. shoot, you examiner folks should come on down here to my trailer park in Kansas. we got plenty more peoples just like me, so you folks ed fit in right nicely down here. hell, maybe we could get sarah to come on down n go shoot things with us! take care now examiner and stay strong, ya hear?!

 

Advertisers, please: PULL your AD contracts, NOW

Sep 27, 2008

they need to know how people in SF feel about this. yes, i know a free 'newspaper' with distribution is hard to pass up, but the content of this paper does not reflect the values and high standards of the SF bay area. If you continue to support this paper, you continue to support the worst the right-wing religious fanatic movement has to offer. BOYCOTT.

 

Tim Turner

Sep 27, 2008

Oh My God! Are you kidding? I WILL be cancelling my subscription to your newspaper AND I will be telling all my friends and collegues to do the same....WRONG ENDORSMENT!

 

JJ

Sep 27, 2008

pathetic. i will never read this paper again.

 

principles

Sep 27, 2008

I applaud the Examiner! They obviously knew the consequences to writing this article. Yet, they still endorsed who they believed in! That's what having principles and faith is all about. Finally, a media outlet that has guts. Obama is a good talker with celebrity status, but is this what our country needs? No.

 

principles

Sep 27, 2008

I applaud the Examiner! They obviously knew the consequences to writing this article. Yet, they still endorsed who they believed in! That's what having principles and faith is all about. Finally, a media outlet that has guts. Obama is a good talker with celebrity status, but is this what our country needs? No.

 

jcb

Sep 27, 2008

Wait. Any college student can list three good things about X and pepper their essay with catchy terms like 'hard-earned', 'rough-hewn', 'life-giving', and (for the 40th time) 'maverick'. But voting is a comparative task, and many of the virtues here hold of Obama as well. Granted, Obama didn't spend many years as a POW. But he certainly shows the unwavering commitment, the obvious leadership skills, and even (so early in his career) the willingness to stand alone on matters of principle. Moreover, both candidates actually have proposals that can be compared. Too bad our author didn't see the need to actually weigh McCain's plan against his rival's. In fact, if one were to argue that Obama is the better candidate, it's not clear that they'd need to counter anything in this reason-lite piece.

 

lol - principles? this is just a partisan puff piece.

Sep 27, 2008

perhaps the examiner editorial staff should consider being 'mavericks' themselves, and go against management expectations. it's hard to believe that anyone making an honest comparison could come to the conclusion that McCain /Palin is the best choice, or even the 'lesser of two evils'. this is a bad call... in fact, it is irresponsible and dangerous.

 

Marlene HUNTER

Sep 27, 2008

Puleeeese.... Please stop throwing your paper on my driveway. Your reasoning for endorsing McCain/Palin is pathetic.

 

Norman M Bercasio

Sep 27, 2008

We are going to have a gangster president if Obama wins... http://governor.mo.gov/cgi-bin/coranto/viewnews.cgi?id=EkkkVFulkpOzXqGMaj&style=Default+News+Style&tmpl=newsitem

 

dont support

Sep 28, 2008

hopefully this will be put you out of business. bad call...

 

ForObamaToo

Sep 28, 2008

No wonder your readership is low. I don't read your paper when it's given for free because your spewed nonsense like this before. we have one "dummy" in the white house already. Why in the world do you want another? Wake up and stop making stupid mistakes...

 

Tyler Connolly

Sep 28, 2008

Your in Blue country ! I will never buy another paper from the Examiner. Tell McCain to buy it! He has enough cash to buy them ( 7 houses ) Or start selling then in Alaska!!!

 

Teine

Sep 28, 2008

Senator McCain is the only man for the job of President of the United States. He is a proud American who you will never hear put his country down. The nerve of B. Hussein Obama mentioning in the debate that we've lost the respect of people around the world and that they now look down on the United States. Both he and his wife obviously harbor negative and ill feelings towards our great nation, if they don't like us so much, they can go somewhere else!

 

Richard

Sep 28, 2008

Disgusting. Obviously you have not been following the McCain dog and pony show all of America has. His reaction to the Wall St. crisis has been nothing short of dismal,using reckless and shameless self seeking political self-aggrandizement and then ending up looking foolish and old. Our family will never take your paper seriously again but it will make for good fire starter paper.

 

ciara

Sep 28, 2008

have you even been listening to palin's inteviews? you seriously think THAT would be better? mccain with his hotheadedness and flip flopping? i don't think so. but i think you and i know obama will be taking california.

 

Natalie

Sep 28, 2008

maybe they are trying to report on both sides..does anybody ever think of that?

 

Nick

Sep 28, 2008

Natalie, this is an endorsement for the McCain/Palin ticket. How is that representing both sides?

 

Luz Lagasca

Sep 28, 2008

Thank you so much SF Examiner. It is about time. I live in S.F. for 25 yrs. and I have grown wiser then. It is not all organics that keep you healthy, Attitude helps and makes you more balanced ...

 

Steph

Sep 28, 2008

About time!!! A sane voice in SF!!! Get rid of Pelousy as well.

 

DeniseJameson

Sep 28, 2008

I'm voting for McCain/Palin, y on k and Cindy Sheehan for Congress. Obama has several scandals the media has dared not touch-www.larrysinclair.org and the 3 gay men muredered in his church last year. In Addition he's a back supremacist--read Dreams of My Father and he's part white and part-Middle Eastern. He's what many would call multi-racial. Cynthia Mckinney is " the black female" running for President. The DNC has been a bunch of sexist bastards--first to Hillary and then to Sarah. Nancy et. al. have done absolutely nothing to stop the war or wire tapping and Obama is the same. Give me Mccain/Palin. By the way, it was a Republican who helped pass Roe v. Wade and legal abotion is a safety issue. I doubt they would overturn Roe v. Wade.

 

zowanda

Sep 28, 2008

You must be joking. As a resident of Arizona I've have personally worked with McInsane (not my doing). Everything you heard about his temperment is true. I suggest the owner of this paper read: http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2008-08-07/news/postmodern-mccain-the-john-mccain-some-arizonans-know-and-loathe/%20/2 It's what we know in Arizona. This man and his running mate are not qualified to run this country.

 

Glenn Fink

Sep 28, 2008

I have a very hard time believing that the Examiner has not noticed how often McCain has lied during his campaign. On every major issue, including the economy, foreign policy and national security. It does not take much Examining to understand this. Your endorsement sounds more like a death wish. I would much rather someone with a clear head and a cool demeanor lead our country in times of national crisis. McCain actually said "horse sh*t" twice during Friday's debate, this is not behavior that suggests McCain will be able to give a rational response to a real emergency.

 

prof

Sep 28, 2008

Like they said............ This is precisely for times like these that AMERICA nddes John McCain & Sarah Palin!!!!

 

AzFan

Sep 28, 2008

I plan to start my subscription to this paper. Perhaps they can help get rid of Pelosi too.... Proud to be from Arizona

 

ST

Sep 28, 2008

About time... I'm sure management of the paper realizes they will catch flaks from libs. I'm glad you show your courage -- country first! I am, too, sick and tired of Pelosi... any one but her please. She doesn't represent the interests of people of her district.

 

Harley S

Sep 28, 2008

http://www.reversespin.com/?p=884 The angle the MSM (D-Obama) refuses to cover.

 

MelaThinking

Sep 28, 2008

The government's job is to take care of its people. I can't think of more efficient, hard-working operations than the DMV, the Post Office, and the IRS. YES...nationalize EVERYTHING..especially healthcare. As Obama said...regulation isn't all bad. Take from the rich..give to the poor. Obama should just say...communism isn't all bad...just look at north korea! My vote is for OBAMBI. That's what America deserves.

 

MsDavidson

Sep 28, 2008

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/zieve/080927 Obama directly tied to voting fraud group The evidence against this man continues to mount. But, still Democrats and the Democrats' media want him as POTUS. Corruption recognizes and supports its own, folks. This could never happen in a sane world.

 

Napajet

Sep 28, 2008

are you kidding? after all the years of reading the SFE, i'll never pick it up again...no more Bush 3 and rat wing rule. NJ

 

Riki From OZ

Sep 28, 2008

Seriously? I'm a journalism student and there is no way NO WAY Australian's would go for this. Jouralists and papers aren't suppose to pick sides, they're suppose to report the facts and the news - this is beyond ridiculous journalism. I'd be embarrased to be an American Journalist.

 

Stupidisasstupiddoes

Sep 29, 2008

Not one comment on Obama's strengths or reasons he would make a good president. Not one comment on truth about Obama. But plenty of slander about McCain and Palin. Tell everyone what Obama has done to be qualified for president? Tell us his hard earned status? Take a good hard look at why we just bailed out wall street and who took us there, that's right, democrats. Nowhere in journalism does it say you cannot have a opinion. What journalism is reporting both sides of the story. But many of you are happy with one side in most biased MSM reporting if it glorifies Obama. Whats scary is saying SFE has no right to comment if you don't agree. That is communism.

 

CALyman

Sep 29, 2008

McCain/Palin, eh? I guess if your biggest priorities are endless war, a stagnant economy and a steady decline to 2nd-rate status, McCain's your man. Rather fitting for a 2nd-rate newspaper that's given away at BART and Caltrain stations.

 

RBC

Sep 29, 2008

Democrats have taken us into every war except the Gulf war (UN request) Afghanistan and Iraq. Tell us again about endless war? Viet Nam and all others in our history a democrat got us into. Go read democrats steal votes about a democrat pushing the YES button of a republican to get their bill passed. About the new committee saying democrats defrauded that bill by saying they won when they hid the real votes to get their way. One of their onw admitted what happened. Yes, more of this fraud in office please.

 

bigsean

Sep 29, 2008

you must be kidding me. your logic is defective.

 

Suzanne Pershing

Sep 29, 2008

McCain and Palin? You've got to be kidding. As I read your reasoning about why you endorse this team I couldn't help but think the punchbowl must have been very large for all of you at The Examiner to drink Kool Aid that led to this conclusion.

 

trudy

Sep 29, 2008

Do McCain's "bonds of faith, family" include deserting his first wife after she was crippled in a car accident? How about his flagrant adultery during that marriage? How about Palin's being pregnant before she got married, and now having a pregnant out of wedlock daughter? Just curious. It would seem to me that the Democratic ticket, with two candidates, both faithful husbands, would be exemplifying "bonds of faith, family," but what do I know.

 

ellie

Sep 29, 2008

It sickens me to see you invoke the name of Harry Truman, an honorable man who was married for over 50 years to his wife, in connection with a flagrant adulterer like McCain who deserted his first wife after she became disabled. In addition, Truman's policy stands were completely opposed to everything McCain stands for.

 

trudy

Sep 29, 2008

Norman M Bercasio: "We are going to have a gangster president if Obama wins... Really? I guess you overlook the fact that Cindy McCain's money comes from her convicted felon father's connection with the Lansky crime family.

 

Britta

Sep 29, 2008

I'll never trust the Examiner and it's writers for unbiased reporting again and am canceling my subscription. The Examiner should be ashamed for taking this position and for the stated reasons at this stage of the race.

 

mary conley

Sep 29, 2008

thank you for a wonderful and finally honest piece :)

 

Pro-McCain Democrat

Sep 29, 2008

YES!!! The future of our "world" as we know it is at stake. Thank You! Vote McCain!

 

rs

Sep 29, 2008

I can't believe that after eight years of incompetence and secret deal-making, a respected news journal (let alone any news journal) would buy into another four-to-eight years! John McCain sure sounds like another war-monger and we may be lucky to ascertain what Sarah Palin really understands- as she's been protected/kept from the public. Whether you care for him or not, we desperately need an intelligent president, like Obama (remember Clinton) who will surround himself with brilliant advisors who genuinely will put the country and working americans first- ahead of corporate/oil company interests. In addition, regarding the war on terror, we must have the cooperation of the rest of the world- especially Europe, and only Obama will assure that can happen. I guess that it's time to cancel my subscription!

 

Linda

Sep 29, 2008

Are you serious? This has put the nail in your coffin as far as I'm concerned- no more Examiner for me- ridiculous

 

Obama08

Sep 29, 2008

Luckily the Examiner has no clout or credibility & can't give it away even for free. I doubt the comment by gomccain08 is really a democrat. That's an old ploy " I used to be a Republican and but now I am voting for Obama" because..or I used to be a Democrat but now love McCain" is an often used tactic to add credibility to their statements and a wow factor that is so old that my great grandfather used to do it in the 1890s...

 

Charles Lindner

Sep 29, 2008

Concerningyour endorsement of John MCcain. is this a joke? Thanks

 

Arthur H

Sep 29, 2008

I can't believe you blockheads endorsing the old neocon and the idiot from the North. I shall never pick up your rag again.

 

alanc

Sep 29, 2008

Wow! Just for that I am no longer going to bother unwrapping the FREE copy that is left on my doorstep! It is going staight into my trash-- consider us DONE! Good Day, Examiner!

 

Boo-yah!

Sep 29, 2008

Thanks Examiner. It's nice to know not all hope is lost for the otherwise perennially upside-down city of San Francisco. I predict the shortest Presidential acceptance speech in history to be delivered by John McCain on November 4: "Boo-Yaa! Suck it, hippies!"

 

NOBAMA

Sep 29, 2008

Cry all you want. The chances of NOBAMA becomming president are slim to none!

 

Henry

Sep 29, 2008

You've got to be kidding! Has the SF Examiner forgotten about the Keating Five? The censure of John McCain by the U.S. Senate?

 

Kyle

Sep 29, 2008

I'm disgusted. The idea that someone could write this in San Francisco makes me want to move. Unbelievable.

 

kmtn

Sep 29, 2008

I'm shocked. Are you blind and deaf? McCain has shown his unbelieveably bad judgment, to put in the 2nd most important position, a person who has little experience of the magnatude necessary to be leader of the free world. He showed his temper, and horrible disdain for Obama, at the debate. Is that how he will interact with other leaders in the world? He grandstanded in the worst way by creating a media buzz last week, flying back to Washington, only to interfere with the process. He may have been a good soldier, but that does not make a good leader. Let's live in the present and the future, not the past. Say no to Gidget and the Geezer!

 

sfdave

Sep 29, 2008

Joke of a paper, joke of an endorsement.

 

Dennis

Sep 29, 2008

I stumbled across this looking for the subscription signup page. After reading the endorsement, I changed my mind.

 

Marie

Sep 29, 2008

Are you serious? I realize things are bad in this country right now, but I cannot believe you are endorsing an incompetant person for this important job. This tells me what your paper is about, maybe this is a mistake and its really the The Enquirer, Yeah thats it..whos pocket are you in???????

 

Maria

Sep 29, 2008

My subscription is cancelled!

 

Barking Dogs

Sep 29, 2008

Who cares if McCain was a POW 40 years ago. I don't give a rat's ass. The world has changed a lot in 40 years and we are no better off today because of folks like McCain, Bush and the rest of the cronies in Washington. All McCain can do is to reference a bunch of crap from the old days. And Palin is an idiot. Obama represents major change for the country and for our allies. Something that McCain/Palin do not. It's clear cut for me. I don't live in the past. I live for today. Go Obama.

 

Sep 29, 2008

how can the examiner of sf promote the self interest of their mother corporation and think that it is ok? examiner, do some research before putting a statement like this on the front page!!

 

Sep 29, 2008

great idea maria. i am going to cancel my subscription as well!

 

Jo

Sep 29, 2008

I guess crack is even cheaper downtown now than it used to be. What a joke. No wonder you can't afford a real sized paper.

 

Joshua Stithem

Sep 29, 2008

This destroys a lot of The Examiner's credibility.

 

John in Milpitas

Sep 29, 2008

Excellent endorsement! You began this with the ring of truth. The president’s job is to protect the country and enforce the law of the land. It is Congress’ job to make the laws that run the internal apparatus in this country. Restore the checks and balances and the separation of powers. All those people in Washington, D.C. and many of the people in America need to review the constitution and rethink the role of those in government. I’ll be getting a subscription to this, now, more credible newspaper!

 

JT

Sep 29, 2008

McCain/Palin? It seems to me The Examiner has seriously lost all credibility. Enjoy your last days as your subscriptions dwindle to ZERO...

 

mark 5.56

Sep 29, 2008

thank you Examiner! reading the true feelings of loony hateful left is more fun than watching sponge bob square pants with my 3-year-old... this is a hoot, I just can't put it down! we get to see just what sort of person votes for Obama

 

Bill

Sep 29, 2008

Biden: Stand up for Chuck! Barack: I have a soldier's medal too. His name was.... (?)

 

barry marchessault

Sep 29, 2008

Now I understand why Ken Garcia writes for you!

 

g-money

Sep 30, 2008

I think quite like John McCain himself, this newspaper seeks attention through grandstanding. Endorse John McCain? Yes he was tortured, and has been a great senator most liberals would feel comfortable with. But when we examine what he endorses as a presidential candidate, it negates most of his efforts as a senator. More importantly, I'd feel much safer if our president was as smart as a former president of the Harvard Law Review, rather than military royalty fifth from the bottom of his class at Annapolis. Give me a smart guy who hasn't confessed he doesn't know much about Economics; Not the jerk whose never picked up an economics text after so many years in the senate. Your endorsement is dumb. It reads like a cliche, but is short and not illuminating in the least. What little reason you include is packaged with propaganda, and not nearly as heartfelt as a piece which tries to depict an inspiring McCain ought to be.

 

vlim

Sep 30, 2008

Somebody over there is smoking a lot of WEED and isn't sharing it!!!!!!!!! Bye Bye Examiner.

 

Kirk W.

Sep 30, 2008

If it was April 1st., this would be a reasonable endorsement. The McCain-Palin ticket is a recipe for disaster. They are completely out of touch with the challenges of working people. His statements regarding Iran and Russia harken back to the cold war era. Senator McCain has surrounded himself with lobbyist. Finally, Goveror Palin has no business being a heartbeat away from the Presidency. Shame on you Examiner.

 

mer

Sep 30, 2008

Hahahahahahahahahahaha. It's like reading The Onion.

 

Crap!

Sep 30, 2008

So the Examiner endorses old man McCain who won't release his medical records, and a moose hunting lady who will be a heartbeat away from the presidency who thinks foreign policy experience is looking across the Bering Strait and seeing Russia! I will never examine the Examiner again!

 

Tim

Sep 30, 2008

It is not a wonder that this is a free newspaper, easily found on these streets of San Francisco un-read.

 

ExaminerNeverSupportingAgain!

Sep 30, 2008

I can't believe an organization within the informed fold would further the obvious sins & mistakes of these 8 years tides past. Your decision to endorse McCain is shameful and dreadful and redounds the lies of the McCain-Palin campaign's message. Laters and I'll make sure everyone I know is aware of your endorsement decision.

 

Christian.Simonetti@hotmail.com

Sep 30, 2008

John McBush is a doddering old fool who continues to dine out on his five years as a POW, never once acknowledging the innumerable barbaric and anti-human acts committed by the U.S. military during that conflict (as well as in Chile, Iran, El Salvador, Nicaragua, etc. etc). Despite his posturing as a "maverick," he's part and parcel of the insatiably greedy claque in Washington and on Wall Street that has brought our nation to the brink of economic collapse. Sarah "Caribou Barbie" Palin is a blathering idiot who was chosen for her gender and no other reason. Her grasp on foriegn policy is tenuous at best; her own record is a trail of dishonesty, nepotism, duplicity and plain old mean-spiritedness. She's also a complete hypocrite, preaching abstinence for the masses while her own unmarried teenage daughter is preggers. Put thine own house in order!

 

Robin

Sep 30, 2008

Whomever made this decision needs to be drug tested...immediately! Or do they just hate America THAT much?!?!?

 

Mabel Green

Sep 30, 2008

You've got to be kidding. Is this the SF Examiner?!

 

Mad Max

Sep 30, 2008

Amazing! Someone in SF not taken in by the BHO cult of personality and his drug-war leader VP candidate. At least McCain doesn't hang out with enemies of our country!

 

jessie-o

Sep 30, 2008

I just wanted to drop in again and let you know that I still think you guys suck. I hope your paper gets put out of business because no sponsors want to use you anymore. YOU ARE HORRIBLE!

 

John

Sep 30, 2008

Nice to see the Bay Area has at least one voice not on the far left. Mr. Obama makes a wonderful professor, not a leader. McCain/Pailin are leaders.

 

Tony707

Sep 30, 2008

It's no wonder your paper is free.

 

marco

Sep 30, 2008

What's become of the great city of SF that I USED to know and love? Once upon a time people of this fair city were friendly and TOLERANT. You looney lefties are always preaching that conservative folks are closed minded and intolerant...why don't you look in the mirror. You can't accept any opposing view points and try to shut/shout down folks with different points of view by spewung charges of RACISM, SEXISM, HOMOPHOBIA, ANTI-MMIGRANT garbage. You need to grow up and accept that,despite what you might think, even SF is still within the USA where everyone is entitled to their opinions. I wish SF would drop off the map and take all the Chavez,Castro, Che, Stalin loving bolshevik, intolerant SHEEPLE with it. GOD BLESS and GOD speed John and Sarah. Down with Barry and Joe (The Gaffemeister) Biden!

 

HaroldBeu

Oct 1, 2008

In October 1962 during the Cuban Missile Crisis, President John Kennedy withstood the advice of all his National Security staff as well as his own brother to invade Cuba. That decision very well may have saved us from World War III. I cannot imagine John McCain using the same kind of courage and restraint. Barack Obama clearly would have the more steady hand to guide our nation through a stormy time in our nation's history. Sincerely, Harold W. Beu Kalamazoo, Michigan

 

drj

Oct 1, 2008

A refreshingly objective assessment of the difficult times facing the country and the importance of having a president with the experience, judgement and just plain guts to do what is needed. "Hope" doesn't cut it in the real world unless it is backed by proven ability and willingness to make tough choices and then see them through. Obama has never exhibited either of those characterteristics in his short and undistinguished career.

 

APPALLED READER!!

Oct 1, 2008

I am appalled that this newspaper would endorse McCain & Palin. Neither one of them have shown HONESTY or KNOWLEDGE of issues. Barrack Obama has both !!! I am doubly appalled that this newspaper endorses Palin after she shows she is inept on all issues even when handled with kid gloves by hand-picked soft-ball interviewers. Whoever made the decision to endorse these 2 must not be from SF or California and maybe not even a US citizen or maybe being paid by the RNC or McCain Campaign!!!

 

guru

Oct 1, 2008

Wow this just shows you are a worthless rag without any credibility. Thats why I just read Glenn Dickey, he is the only thing worthwhile in your meaningless crappy paper

 

sfogreen

Oct 1, 2008

why isn't this not in the "Daily Outrage" section instead? Unbelievable. Thank goodness, the Examiner is a free newspaper and we don't have to pay for these sour opinions.

 

William

Oct 2, 2008

I will never read the Examiner again, way to betray your readers.

 

Roxanna

Oct 2, 2008

McCain is a man who has demonstrated quite convincingly that he loves this country, warts and all. Barack Obama is a socialist/communist/totalitarian who wants to turn America into the kind of country he thinks it should be. He's already stated that he intends to be in power for the next "8 to 10" years. No constitutional limit of two terms for him. That's the America as it is, not how it should be.

 

Monica

Oct 2, 2008

I don't get it. April 1st was months ago.

 

Cat

Oct 2, 2008

Bravo! I now want to get a subscription to your newspaper. Obama has not produced anything, needs tele-prompting/scripting for his answers and would destroy our hurting country with more taxes. He is out of touch with the U.S. Thank you for taking a stand especially in your city.

 

anne

Oct 2, 2008

This does not represent the views of your readers in SAN FRANCISCO, or me, a resident of San Francisco. John McCain and Sarah Palin are anti-choice, against gay marriage, against the rights of immigrants, pro-war, do not promote clean energy, etc ETC ETC. I WILL NOT READ YOUR PAPER ANYMORE. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!

 

CalCar

Oct 2, 2008

I just KNEW someone would say "if not Obama, then you're racist"...who is the racist? The ones that make such ignorant argument. I echo whoever said this: For those who question this endorsement, one must assume they aren't fully aware of Obama's background. He is a confirmed radical socialist. His accomplishments are non-existant, unless being deeply corrupt and deceitful count. "Change?" The mindless have embraced this motto but in essence it only means "not Bush." Perhaps they haven't noticed, but Bush is not running. McCain is far superior to the alternative. Bravo Examiner! Vote FOR America - vote McCain and Palin."

 

Truthprevail

Oct 3, 2008

Well done Examiner! Your commentary is both articulate and well balanced, something thats increasingly rare in the media today. You also hit the nail on the head regarding McCains' impressive credentials, something thats nearly absent in his opposition. And it's glaringly apparant that your readers understand this since the universal adverse reaction is nearly completely devoid of intelligent conversation. Personal and vicious attacks only bespeak of lack of credible arguement and low imagination.

 

Jim Duffy

Oct 3, 2008

You are just plain nuts!

 

Gary

Oct 3, 2008

What a joke. Just goes to prove that the "liberal media" bias is a monstrous, right-wing created myth. Come November 5, it will be President Obama. Get used to it.

 

Tom

Oct 3, 2008

Congrats to the SF Examiner! McCain is probably the last of the 'true' American heros of my generation. He is very deservant of your endorsement and the vote of every citizen who is concerned about the future of our country. Our future should not be placed in the hands of an individual who is un-tested and inexperienced. Sadly, some voters have no political knowledge or perspective when it comes to electing a president and are easily sold a bottle of snake oil when it comes to Obama's smooth talking. The next president will need to focus on the 'Big' issues confronting our nation. Really, if Obama had a history in the Senate of a few terms, maybe people might understand his focus and not the various changes in his political positions. True, John McCain and Sarah Palin are not perfect...But McCain has the experience, judgement and honesty that highlights his commitment to our country over many years of dedication and deserves to be president.

 

Troy

Oct 3, 2008

You people are nuts!Oh wait...or is it the oher side?

 

Oct 3, 2008

What an act of idiocy on the part of the Examiner!

 

Susie

Oct 4, 2008

Answer me this: How does John McCain "know how to win a war, because he was there", as Palin said during the debate. McCain was a POW, in isolation much of that time, struggling just to survive...in a "war" we didn't even win? I believe we "surrendered" by running out of Nam as fast as we could, taking whatever we could grab in the moment, before all of our people were captured as POWs, as a matter of fact & history. Maybe we're not supposed to "look back" at that reality in the past, either. War is in parentheses, because though the populace & news media call both the Vietnam & Iraq "actions" war, no "war" was ever truly declared by the U.S. in either episode. I guess that makes anything the "powers that be" do ok, then...no "real war", no need to follow the Geneva Convention...convenient. We're supposed to learn from history, not ignore it. Susie

 

Puma

Oct 4, 2008

Well written article. Most of your comments will be from "self-proclaimed open minded but blind voters" who wouldn't even consider the merits of this article. This Dem will be voting for McCain Palin this year. Thank you Examiner for daring to speak the truth that many here do not want to hear.

 

SFE Reader

Oct 5, 2008

A Big THANK YOU! This is not about being left or being right wing; it's about hiring the best man for the job! and Obama has done absolutely nothing! To those who are religious about their party: hey, I'm religious about my future, not my party, and I'm delighted that this editor gets it.

 

fygsmom

Oct 6, 2008

I am so proud of the Examiner. For once during this election cycle someone sees Barack Obama for the Empty Suit he is. Here we have the clear acknowledgement of the Corrupt nature of Barck Obama, Maxine Waters, Chris DOdd, Charlie Schumer, and Barney Frank. Had these persons not hidden the corruptio at Fannie & Freddie we would not be where we are today. Nothing in Obama's past exploits (hah) shows any promise of success in anything but lying. (just ask his co-workers in New York http://www.analyzethis.net/blog/2005/07/09/barack-obama-embellishes-his-resume/)

 

Outtie

Oct 6, 2008

I agree with every word you have written here, SF Examiner. It all comes down to motive. John McCain has walked the walk for his entire life, and that is why this formerely YDD will be voting straight R for the first time in my life.

 

fsteele

Oct 6, 2008

Very sensible endorsement! McCain 2008, Hillary 2012, Palin 2020 ... Obama 2028 maybe, if he's actually done anything by then.

 

pm317

Oct 6, 2008

You have thrown the bots into a loop and I like that. I am happy not because you endorsed McCain/Palin but because you rejected Obama. You didn't even throw a customary bone at the fraud. Smart and heartening to know that there are still sane people in SF. Palin is good for democracy and as Mandell put it good for feminism. These Democratic women crying foul now should have supported Clinton if they wanted to advance their version of feminist agenda. Too bad they missed that boat and got stuck with a male chauvinistic pig (may be with a purple lipstick. Sorry could not resist that! :) )

 

WileyNash

Oct 6, 2008

More shocking stuff out of San Francisco- From Beyondcron a while back, here's a very interesting look at Obama you woun't read in the NY Times: http://www.beyondchron.org/articles/The_Obama_Craze_Count_Me_Out_5413.html

 

Carmen Pastor

Oct 6, 2008

I congratulate you for being sincere, honest, and supportive of a candidate that is the only hope for Democracy.

 

Carmen

Oct 6, 2008

I love you!!! Glad you are one of the few braves and unbiased press still there I am part of the unheard majority!!!

 

v. baca

Oct 6, 2008

Nice to see words of Michael Savage are not wasted. I can buy a SF paper again

 

Manny Goldstein

Oct 7, 2008

BRAVO! Show me the chutzpah!

 

Gabriel Knight

Oct 8, 2008

The country is in trillions of debt, the educational and health care system wrecked by greedy business plans, Wall Street shredded by corrupt self-serving banksters, a meaningless never-ending "war" against invisible self-created enemies in full flare... Find one area of life where the republican administration has not lied, manipulated and bankrupted the nation. Go ahead, SF Examiner, endorse the candidates that will continue this proud legacy. Who bought you and for how much?

 

kellog64

Oct 8, 2008

As a local, I find this a refreshing reality check in support of John McCain by a local paper. Believe me - Obama would be very good as President - of SFSU.

 

Scott B.

Oct 8, 2008

You have been truly bamboozled. If you begin to think that any foreign leader or economist will have respect for a potential commander in chief who for his first major decision after being chosen by his party to be their candidate picks an individual who knows nothing of foreign affairs other than Putin alledgedly flying over Alaska and then wondering where he is going and what his motives are, you are truly delusional. We need to repair our image in the world both economically and in foreign relations. A McCain / Palin ticket will do nothing but isolate us further. Scott Bell Indianapolis, IN

 

Jenn M

Oct 8, 2008

Wow. You just lost a reader.

 

Seattle Reader

Oct 9, 2008

Are you kidding me? I think all credibility of the Examiner is now out the window. In the case of these two, "Maverick" means making your own rules to suit your own need at the time to elevate yourself no matter what the effects. They have run a shameful campaign and the Examiner is now a shameful paper for believing the McCain and Palin lies.

 

NCP

Oct 9, 2008

Seriously????I will no longer read the examiner- I will just continue to use the plastic bags for dog poop

 

McCain/Palin - the best Choice in '08

Oct 9, 2008

It's appaling that people would even vote for Obama. So many have forgotten that even Hillary Clinton tied him to Ayers and Rezco - both equally deceptive individuals along with Reverend Wright and his longtime support and financial contribution to ACORN. Obama is a clear radical people - get your heads out of the sand. Obama supporters also forget that Obama's choice for VP, Joe Biden, stated several months ago that Barack Obama is not prepared to be Commander in Chief. I surely wish Bush were running again - what a great American. Barack is a danger to the US and the world at large.

 

nicmcc

Oct 10, 2008

Hey, good work Examiner! Thanks for endorsing racism, xenophobia and ignorance! Is The Examiner going to change its name to "White Power and Religious Zealots Daily?"

 

Abbey

Oct 10, 2008

Are you nuts? McCain has tried to lay the blame for the current economic crisis on Obama, but look at who is economic advisor was (and still is, unofficially), Phil Gramm of Texas -- one of the top 3 people (along with Bush & Cheney) to blame for the deregulation that led to this very real American crisis. That's just one reason to hold McCain in contempt.

 

Dorothy Conley

Oct 11, 2008

Does the Examiner regard itself as a Newspaper? This foolish endorsement of a disgraceful campaign is another blot on their reputation.

 

Laura

Oct 11, 2008

A revealing endorsement, when the true character of John McCain and Sarah Palin are easily discovered by any citizen or journalist or editorial board who really wants to know. Apparently the Examiner really does not want to know. They want to believe lies, the lies of Bush, Cheney, McCain, Palin, because they are wholly creatures of the big lie that we have been suffering under for years. False leaders, false phrophets, false journalists. These people do not believe in true Democracy, they undermine it at every turn, and the facts are so easily obtained to support that statement that it is truly nauseating to imagine the contortions the Examiner must go through to avert their eyes from those facts. John McCain has always been for one thing only: himself.

 

REPUBLICAN4EVA

Oct 12, 2008

GOOD FOR YOU EXAMINER!!! TELL IT LIKE IT IS!!! YOU DEMOCRATS WHO DISAGREE SHOULD BE PUT ON YOUR OWN ISLAND WITH ALL YOUR IMMORAL WAYS OF THINKING AND DIE!!! fA@#OTS!!! LITERALLY!!!

 

Incredulous

Oct 12, 2008

Not because I disagree with this endorsement, but because this is the lamest rationale for choosing McSame that I can imagine, this is the last time I will read the Examiner. Advertisers, listen up! The Examiner is OVER!

 

William

Oct 12, 2008

Really? There's an argument to be made for McCain, even in such a progressive town as this one. But this isn't that argument; it is a senseless regurgitation of Republican talking points. Shame on you!

 

Phil

Oct 12, 2008

In light of the tumultuously October events, I hope the Examiner re-examines this endorsement. I did. In good conscience I cannot endorse two hate-mongers playing petty politics when our country is burning. This election may be called the "McCain Mutiny" because I know many who are abandoning his ship. McCain is reactionary and paranoid, obsessing about who stole the keys to the ice-cream locker when we're at war and our ship is under attack. No thanks. No McCain.

 

concerned

Oct 12, 2008

If only the article above actually described the qualities of McCain and/or Palin, this endorsement might make sense.

 

son of midwestern conservatives

Oct 12, 2008

The endorsement of John McCain by the San Francisco Examiner reveals a mindset mired in the social agenda and world view - never mind political stance - of the nineteenth century: war first, at the cost of domestic security, and allegiance to the flag over service to the citizens. Senator McCain's years in a Hanoi POW prison were, in fact, dishonorable and by no measure any reason that he should become president. McCain's years in Congress has benefited primarily the Congressional-military-industrial complex about which President Eisenhower warned. Rather than face forward and consider the opportunities for peace, prosperity and progress that define the person and platform of Senator Obama, the Examiner holds fast to outdated models of governance. Fortunately the American people, and readers of the Examiner, know better and will vote accordingly on November 4th.

 

Farren Briggs

Oct 13, 2008

Dear Examiner, now that we are in a confirmed economic crisis are you still with the 'mavericks'?

 

ziipppp

Oct 13, 2008

thanks. you just saved me from ever having to read your paper ever again. appreciate the time.

 

Oct 13, 2008

SARAH PALIN AS VICE PRESIDENT! GOD HELP THIS COUNTRY IF SOMETHING SHOULD HAPPEN TO JOHN MCCAIN

 

George

Oct 13, 2008

Is this a sick joke? If not, Examiner = Garbage liner.

 

megan

Oct 14, 2008

i really enjoyed this article and was disheartened to see all the nerves it stirred up with the other people who decided to leave comments. can anyone tell me how obama has ever done anything to effect a positive change in his political career? are those crickets i hear. i am thankful i do not live in a city full of hostile liberal nuts who have swung so far left it is scary. hopefull this is refreshing to some of you out in CA to hear something contrary to other media outlets. vote for experience, character, record of bipartisan efforts, and for those willing to stand for their country. in other words: VOTE MCCAIN AND PALIN!!

 

J.Shannon

Oct 14, 2008

Excuse me, but I grativate towards fact-based media anyway. Anyone viewed "Citizen Kane," lately? Educate yourselves...there are no surprises here.

 

Simon Templar

Oct 14, 2008

Upon reading the Examiner's endorsement, I recall one newspaper editors comments to Walt Kelly, creator of the "Pogo" comic strip. "Pogo", like "Doonsebury" today, had the knack for poking fun at politicians and other notable persons. Some stips raised the wrath of the previously referenced editor who told Kelly: "Your comics really belong in the editorial pages." To which Walt Kelly quickly replied: "Well, some of your editorials really belong in the comics section." Senator McCain has served our nation well, between his military service and his reputation as an independent thinker in the Senate. But frankly, he's become almost a cartoon of himself. So by endorsing him, the Examiner has apparently followed Walt Kelly's suggestion too much. My vote goes to Senator Obama.

 

rover

Oct 15, 2008

This is a lie. It does not endorse mccain. that's an editorial.!!

 

Media shy:

Oct 15, 2008

My "hat is off to you" to brave the criticism of the liberal City of San Francisco to bring "real news" to the readership. I'm a new devoted reader now...

 

Oct 15, 2008

I think that if John and sara just would stick to what is important to the country and not worry so much about slining mud at the other party he might be better off , As for Palin she needs to stay home and take care of her own children and not rely on the people of united state to pay for nurses drs and nannys to do the care of her children, as this I`m a soccer mom well she is not the only mom in the U,S,A that is a soccer mom that does not make her better than the real moms of our country

 

pirmin

Oct 16, 2008

People are shocked by this? Sadly, with the purchase of this paper in 2004 by the absentee, ultra-right-wing media empire of Philip Anschutz---who clearly knows nothing about his audience and/or completely disrespects it---this paper has NOTHING to do with SF anymore, besides its name and re-reporting local news that we can read virtually anywhere else in the city or online. If people stop reading simply because it's free, carpetbagger Anschutz would pack up and go back home to Colorado where he belongs.

 

skinner

Oct 16, 2008

are you nuts?

 

SFNATIVE

Oct 16, 2008

This endorsement fits perfectly with their support for jerks like Joe Alioto Jr. , Ahsha Safai and Sue Lee. If they were in another city they would be republicans.

 

Oct 16, 2008

are you joking??? Please change your mind, please come to your senses. You just lost me as a reader

 

Mark

Oct 17, 2008

Thank you Examiner! John "No earmark" McCain deserves the endorsement. Harry Truman would be proud!

 

brians3

Oct 17, 2008

Hey, editors, even the Tribune got it right this time. What in hell are you thinking? McCain? And worse, Palin?

 

Steve

Oct 17, 2008

This paper is really a joke.

 

HalK

Oct 17, 2008

An astonishing editorial.

 

Joe the Plumber

Oct 17, 2008

This editorial does nothing but confirm the fact that the Examiner really isn't a locally-based and viable community resource for San Franciscans. The profound disconnect in this editorial and its readers goes to show you what happens when you hand over the keys to an out-of-town ownership group who can use their media platforms to advocate on their own personal beliefs. The notion of being a public forum and responsibility to the community they serve is lost. Whatever faith I had left in the Examiner as a news source is all but gone now.

 

smallbiz

Oct 17, 2008

In a city that prides itself on open mindedness and tolerence, some of the negative hate-filled comments on Examiner endorsing the Republican ticket, just go to prove what has been clear all along. These people who scream for diversity and difference are all behind everyone and every cause as long as you don't step out of the box and show beliefs or opinions that differ in any way with theirs!

 

WOW cody and the Examiner are Smoking crack

Oct 17, 2008

Wow just wow!! Anyway, I am a SF resident and no one really reads the exmaminer. ITs a joke and its a wonder they are still around. Now, I finally see why!

 

Billy

Oct 17, 2008

So.... How is McCain looking nearly a month later? And Palin??? Haha, care to rewrite any of this?

 

Richard A McDavid

Oct 18, 2008

You can keep your paper and your endorsement.

 

free voice

Oct 18, 2008

MY Friends,,who does McCain think is his friends??? those who want people to go and die and engage in yet more war tactics? Please,,think twice,think 5 times before voting for this man..

 

free voice

Oct 18, 2008

MY Friends,,who does McCain think is his friends??? those who want people to go and die and engage in yet more war tactics? Please,,think twice,think 5 times before voting for this man..

 

Voter

Oct 18, 2008

"I didn't decide to run for president to start a national crusade for the political reforms I believed in or to run a campaign as if it were some grand act of patriotism. In truth, I wanted to be president because it had become my ambition to be president. . . . In truth, I'd had the ambition for a long time." - John McCain, in his book, "Worth the Fighting For"

 

T_Vu

Oct 18, 2008

This paper isn't even fit for bird cage liner.

 

Castro Resident

Oct 18, 2008

Please stop littering our sidewalks! Stop using plastic bags to stuff your newspaper in them! Maybe if we boycott all the businesses who advertise in your paper, you will just go away!

 

Todd

Oct 18, 2008

Given that substantially more information has emerged since this endorsement, care to recant? This judgment appeared too early, and suggests a partisan knee-jerk. How can readers view this paper as unbiased now?

 

Justin Smith

Oct 18, 2008

Is this a hoax? In the off-chance that Palin-McCain (yes, I put them in that order) manage to steal the White House, The Examiner is the kind of rag they would toss on to a bonfire! Palin wouldn't speak to one of your reporters if you gave her all the ammunition and wolf packs to canned-hunt that she could handle! I'm never reading The Examiner again, even if it is FREE and grossly litters the sidewalk and gutters in front of my apartment. Christ. What a desperate, transparent move to try and distinguish yourself from the Chronicle.

 

bobo

Oct 18, 2008

As one who things the price of gas was way too cheap, having retirement assets and a house and a job overrated -- and as a connoisseur of pointless, pretextual wars -- may I take this opportunity to commend the Examiner. What a great endorsement! It's so wonderful, it reminds me of McCain's first decision, his selection of Palin: impulsive, impetuous, and ill-considered. Bravo, Examiner! Please take the money we give you for reading the paper and send it off to the Republican Party. Congrats, you've just earned the "Fox News, print edition" award! Your endorsement will be useful in lining my birdcage.

 

Susan

Oct 18, 2008

Hysterically funny endorsement. When approving articles for publication, just be sure your writers use little words so Sarah Palin can understand what you are talking about!!

 

Kevin O'Rourke

Oct 19, 2008

Did your editorial board even give thought to Sarah Palin assuming the presidency? The results would be horrific!

 

E Burnam

Oct 19, 2008

I lived in SF for 15 years... With every major paper in the US including the most conservative endorsing Obama, what are you thinking. One could only hope that the city by the bay will boycott your paper. WOW...Palin!

 

Bill Crossen

Oct 19, 2008

I have never had such good news! Thank You. God Bless America.

 

Kevin

Oct 19, 2008

really, a person who picks Palin, who is grossly unprepared, and doesn't seem to be interested in learning about the rest of the world, for VP is endorsed for President? is this some kind of crude joke?

 

Kevin H

Oct 19, 2008

When Palin talks, it reminds me of the Ms. Teen USA contestant from South Carolina..."We as Americans can't pick out the US from a world map because we don't have maps." We do have rifles for hunting and we look out to Russia to prepare ourselves.

 

Andrew

Oct 20, 2008

Put Palin in the VP seat? Maybe your heads are what should be examined.

 

Dude

Oct 20, 2008

What an awful assessment and "endorsement" of a pair of misfits -- a crabby, tired old man and a numbskull/secessionist from Alaska." No wonder your paper folded and has come back as a skeleton of hype and ads, surrounded by opinion. Time for your advertisers to find a medium that really represents and appeals to the buying public in the area.

 

Jack

Oct 20, 2008

Unbelieveable bad judgement. McCain's choice of Palin alone should prevent anybody for voting for him. His choice clearly pandered to the most right wing elements of the Republican party, with little consideration for who would be the best choice for the country. Second, McCain is neither steady or reliable. He is volatile and steeped in cold war mentality. The country needs a smart, insightful leader, who will analyze situations and act with deliberate care. McCain/Palin are not up to this. As important are the fearmongering tactics of their campaign - both deceitful and shameful. Your endorsement of this ticket subverts any lingering sense of legitimacy the Examiner once enjoyed. I for one, will no longer read your paper.

 

rxday

Oct 20, 2008

This endorsement represent view of it's 'conservative christian' owner. His other papers are now also endorsing the republican ticket. So why doesn't he just write an opinion and have it published under his name. That way everyone will know who's opinion they are reading.

 

jello25

Oct 20, 2008

Hitler didn't have to read what he thought either. Just because Obama is a good public speaker doesn't mean he's not a liar or would even be an OK president. He is a socialist and his policies would be absolutely terrible and irreversible for our country.

 

Dvid

Oct 20, 2008

First time reader here. Is this a National Lampoon of Onion type of publication (like the opposite of what you say is what you mean)?

 

jay

Oct 20, 2008

I forgot we had a newspaper called the Examiner.

 

Patriot

Oct 22, 2008

I am appalled to see this endorsement . You can be sure I will cancel my subscription.

 

Jose Hales-Garcia

Oct 23, 2008

This morning driving through Malibu to work, I saw banners on homes on the hillsides with "McCain 2008" and "Democrats for McCain". Then I read this endorsement. California keeps pleasantly surprising me with its wisdom. Go McCain/Palin!!!

 

Oct 23, 2008

is this for real???

 

Oct 23, 2008

This paper does not represent us San Franciscans, boycott The Examiner.

 

kazu

Oct 23, 2008

Hello, my name is Kazumi. I would like to know if Senator Obama truly has a qualification to become a president. I found out that there is a lawsuit against him about his birth certificate by Philip J Berg since September 2008. Also, Mr. Andy Martin and his team went to Hawai and petitioned Hawai Supreme court to order Senator Obama's birth certificate on October 20th 2008. At any airport in the US, before we leave from this country we go through security check. Why some like Senator Obama who is a president candidate does not go through a similar process? If Senator Obama cannot prove his natural born citizenship, we as American corporate to violate our constitution. You are one of the people who represent American people under the democracy. I am asking you to stand up for US democracy for our future. I think McCain's closing argument should be "protect our constitution." Here is an article I would like you to read. http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=66787

 

Jim Grace

Oct 24, 2008

Great news to someone from the Midwest...It's great to see that NOT every source of media on the west coast is Liberal. Obama is inexperienced, his tax plan is too socialistic...and Frank Davis, Bill Ayers, Rev Wright, and Saul Alinsky...separately may not mean much...but together....they point to a trend of how he has developed his mindset.

 

AmityfromSF

Oct 24, 2008

I think the "Examiner" need to be the "Examinee." Get your head checked people--it is your job to represent and reflect the heartbeat of this city. This endorsement is NOT in the best interest of this city. A vote for McCain/Palin would be a vote for everything that is socially unjust and deranged in the Neocon movement. Everything the beautiful, progressive city of San Francisco does not stand for.

 

IvanSF

Oct 24, 2008

This is absolute tripe; badly written too.

 

josparke

Oct 25, 2008

Wow! Thank you... In the coming year, the economy, taxing and spending are my biggest issues. Obama has looked wrong on all these, especially his flippant attitude towards the capital gains tax. McCain is the best chance for a recovery.

 

Anonymous

Oct 25, 2008

This makes perfect sense look at the conservative (pro-confederacy/pro-slavery) history of The Examiner: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_San_Francisco_Examiner&oldid=246802085 And look at the background of Philip Anschutz, (an oil man and ) the current owner of the newspaper: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philip_Anschutz&oldid=246704243 This man, and his companies, benefited from Bush's policies and would benefit from McCain's. What a stupid business move to lose readership base over a personal political endorsement for selfish interests.

 

thetruth

Oct 26, 2008

This makes total sense. They also endorsed rupublicans in D1, D3 and D11. Ahsha Safai, Alioto and Sue Lee are tools of downtown buisiness.

 

kriemhilt

Oct 26, 2008

Have just read in a German newspaper which took a general international poll showing which countries endorsed Obama...turns out the Arab countries are 100% behind him! Wonder why...must be something they like about him.

 

Mike Mc.

Oct 26, 2008

I'm amazed. McCain's cowardice and erratic decision-making during the past several months of this campaign lead me to infer he is hardly the kind of man made to lead in these times. I'll be voting for the winner this time, not McCain.

 

Kahleeka

Oct 27, 2008

GREAT! I wish Obama fans would actually name ONE thing that Obama has done in the Senate? PLEASE, find ONE thing! Do you know his record as a JR Senator in IL? He voted "standing" 130 times - not a YES, not a NO - but a "maybe"?? Check just that ONE fact out! Do you want a president that can't make a stand on anything?

 

Jerry

Oct 29, 2008

This endorsement just says how good McCain is but doesn't explain what's bad about Obama.

 

you hey

Oct 30, 2008

FAT ABOOT ROCKS

 

Bob

Oct 31, 2008

I live in Los Angeles, and am a proud gay man in middle age. I was honored to cast two vital votes when I marked my absentee ballot. The first was a NO on Proposition 8. The 2nd was to vote my conscience, and that was a vote for John McCain for President. I know this makes me almost unique, but like the Examiner, be it an individual or a newspaper, we all have a duty to do what we think is right.

 

Gio

Oct 31, 2008

I have now canceled my subscription to the Examiner, as a result of reading what could normally pass off as a sick joke. But if they are serious, I do not want to be associated with supporting such a loony, out of their mind, newspaper. That this is true requires no argument on my part; its self-evident. No one who STILL supports Bush today (or the McShame/Palin carbon copy) is of a sound mental disposition. They are sick and this newspapers endorsement establishes their mental insanity.

 

JP

Nov 2, 2008

Wow, I'm never buying or reading another Examiner again. What a joke of a publication that can endorse McCain/Palin after 8 years of Bush.

 

Liberal

Nov 3, 2008

There should be a shift in power from the elderly and persons who don't spend time with their children. We need young and energetic people not old fuddy duddies and mothers who neglect their children to run this country, both should sit down and shut up. These two candidates constantly talk about Barack Obama instead of what they will do for the American people, personally I'm sick of hearing them talk about people and not talk about issues and how they can help solve them.

 

Chicago Jim

Nov 3, 2008

Thank you for your courage! Sen Obama is a marketer's "perfect prodect"--he came up through Mayor Daley's political machine, is guided by master manipulator David Axelrod to appeal to the young and the very rich. He originally said that he would accept the spending limits that came with public finding, but then changed his mind when PAC's and well-to-do waved the hundreds of millions at him (and McCain stuck to his principles, which is why you see so many Obama ads and so few for McCain). They will definitely want a return for their investments. I will be hoping for "change"--a change from the corruption of Democrat domination.

 

Sheep

Nov 3, 2008

"POSTED Sep 25, 2008 Stephen: "OMG - you're kidding... McCain?.... PALIN?!?! She's a total idiot!!!!!"" And that's why you, Stephen, are governor of Alaska. Oh wait, you aren't. Nevermind.

 

Andrew

Nov 3, 2008

He should surround himself with the best appointees available, then demand their candid advice, especially when it hurts. Palin possesses magnificent political gifts now, but her limited experience in national and international affairs makes it incumbent on her to be extra diligent in mastering the realities of higher office. Yep, like she learned after her Katie Couric interview? I wonder if she'd do the same thing in office and then learn later? I'd like to see Bush/Palin ticket for 2012 - to hell with the constitution!

 

Tim McHill

Nov 3, 2008

Cancel my subscription. How can you be serious. I will never read your paper again

 

Nov 3, 2008

how can there be individual freedom under McCain when he is pro life? That alone takes away a woman's freedom of choice. The key word here is freedom.

 

Wilford Herrick

Nov 3, 2008

If only it was only McCain vs Obama. Unfortunately, McCain picked an unacceptable possible replacement for himself in case anything might happen, which with his age and health conditions, is a real possibility. Other than sit in a POW prison for five years, what heroic deeds did he do? He crashed five US Navy planes (see his biography for info). His health is not good , thanks to the NV. He has sworn to get even with the Vietnam government for his capture. He gets confused as to whether the people he is talking are his fellow prisoners or citizens. This is not the person he was eight years ago. We cannot risk having Palin as the President of our country. Obama-Biden may not be the best alternative, but they are better than what my GOP party has put forth this year.

 

Brooks

Nov 3, 2008

You can see a break down of the pros and cons from the various newspaper endorsements at Debatepedia.org http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Debate:McCain_vs._Obama#Yes

 

goodmaab

Nov 4, 2008

well since the examiner may lose the election, maybe than ken garcia, and the examiner (republican) party will move out of the country?

 

Joshua Garrett

Nov 16, 2008

I'm glad I finally figured out how to cancel my Examiner "subscription" (forced) today through the website. This proves that this paper is not truly local.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Cardinal has Luck going into Big Game showdown

Though he’s just a redshirt freshman, Andrew Luck... Full story

Entertainment

Reno Santa event inspired by SF revelers

About 5,000 Santa costume-clad folks are expected to... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Is J. Lo having ex tailed?

Is Jennifer Lopez playing hardball in her battle with... Full story