Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Examiner Editorial: Abusive lawsuits: Suing America into ruin


March 19, 2009

To save jobs, stop abusive lawsuits. That was the gist of the timely message Monday at a hearing on legal reform sponsored by the Senate Republican Conference.

The hearing’s biggest emotional punch was delivered by Crystal Chodes of Rancho Cordova, who in May of 2006 worked for Basketball Town, a special-events sports facility serving as many as 100,000 families. When one family scheduled a birthday party for the facility’s upper floor, the wheelchair-bound uncle of an invited friend could not attend. Basketball Town offered to move the party downstairs, and the facility was fully compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The uncle still sued, and, Chodes said, “The cost of defending the lawsuit ultimately became more than we could bear. After about a year of fighting the lawsuit, we were forced to settle and to close our doors forever.”

Some 100,000 families lost a valued facility, 12 employees were forced out of jobs and a small, family-owned pizzeria inside the facility also shut its doors at the loss of the family’s life savings because of an abusive lawsuit that in a reasonable world would flunk the common-sense test.

One of Chodes’ co-panelists was Philip Howard, author of “The Death of Common Sense.” Howard has a new book out called “Life Without Lawyers.” His biggest recommendation: Give judges the authority to define the limits of reasonableness in cases like that of Basketball Town. He said the alternative of more litigation in a bad economy is the equivalent of a dog biting its own wounds.

Panelist Ted Frank of the American Enterprise Institute said, “The arbitrary and random nature of the American [lawsuit] system amounts, by cautious estimates, to over $400 billion a year in dead-weight loss to wages.” By contrast, orthopedic surgeon David Teuscher, a Desert Storm veteran, told how doctors are literally flooding into the state as a result of a series of lawsuit reforms Texas adopted in 1995. Putting reasonable limits on lawsuits, he said, is working for jobs, its working for small business and its working for health care. Teuscher’s U.S. senator, former Texas Supreme Court Justice John Cornyn, summed it up nicely: America cannot sue itself back into prosperity. We can, however, sue America into ruin.



under the dome

Mayor Gavin Newsom successfully vetoed legislation that would have extended just-cause eviction protections to those housing units built post-June 1979. There units are not...

The Board of Supervisors voted 9-0 Tuesday to place on the June ballot a charter amendment that would take away the mayor’s power to appoint all 11 film...

The Board of Supervisors voted unanimously Tuesday in a second and final vote to approve legislation that amends the park code to tighten up rules of conduct at the San...

There is so much to think about before the parking lot at 17th and Folsom streets turns to part open space haven, part affordable housing ... and so little time before the grant...


beltway confidential

You're beautiful, Chuck Todd. I mean that. (ap photo) On a day when many White House reporters (ahem) stayed away from the White House for snow or early-deadline...

Two James Madison University students are facing felony charges for throwing snowballs at a Harrisonburg city snow plow and an unmarked police car called to investigate during...

Upstart Texas gubernatorial candidate Debra Medina is gaining in the polls and now sits 4 points behind Kay Bailey Hutchison. From PPP: Medina is coming on strong and polls...

A cursory reading of this Las Vegas Sun report, "Prospects For Organized Labor's Legislative Agenda Rapidly Fading," suggests -- and not without evidence -- that Big Labor isn't...



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Brian

Mar 19, 2009

Lawyers are a huge problem, but judges are the enablers. How about a law that says the plaintiff has to pay the defendant the amount sought in damages if the plaintiff loses? That would cut way back on frivolous and unreasonable suits.

 

R, Woods

Mar 19, 2009

This is a huge problem for America. A company I once owned was in a situation such as this. Thrown into a big pot with a bunch of others just because we had some equipment on a job site with where an injury occurred. No liablity found but cost of defending suit broke the company. Lesson learned. Never accumulate assets, invest or hire people again.

 

R, Woods

Mar 19, 2009

This is a huge problem for America. A company I once owned was in a situation such as this. Thrown into a big pot with a bunch of others just because we had some equipment on a job site with where an injury occurred. No liablity found but cost of defending suit broke the company. Lesson learned. Never accumulate assets, invest or hire people again.

 

sierra

Mar 20, 2009

Let's not pretend the frivoulous lawsuits are the main problem. Main problem are the lawyers, who have no interest in law or justice, but in the money, which can be extracted from either litigant who is deemed solvent. Judges are equally complicit. In the end the law is unenforcable and the outcome unpredictable.

 

CommonSenseGuy

Mar 23, 2009

Regarding last paragraph, correct word is "it's," not "its," for the contraction of "it is." Don't you have any editors checking your copy?

 

CommonSenseGuy

Mar 23, 2009

Regarding last paragraph, correct word is "it's," not "its," for the contraction of "it is." Don't you have any editors checking your copy?

 

The Real Truth

Apr 21, 2009

Why does everyone blame the lawyers? People HIRE lawyers when they need them and many times the attorney fees are based on a contingency fee contract - this means the lawyer only gets paid if he wins. Why would a lawyer take a frivolous lawsuit, spend time and his own money - only to lose? Remember, frivolous lawsuits get tossed out by the court if they are truly frivolous. 95% of all lawsuits are brought by people who have been wronged by someone else...without the current system, that person would never have his/her day in court! People need to be careful they don't throw away their rights...lawyers DO protect people. Ask someone who has been seriously injured in an auto accident that wasn't his fault; without the lawyer and the lawsuit the person who caused the accident would not be held responsible. Don't believe everything you read about frivolous lawsuits. I'll be surprised if this gets printed; this is a biased website and full of lies.

 

May 17, 2009

There should be a max. amount and fault should be distributed to everyone! It is never singlely ones fault. the injured contributed to it also. whether the greedy family and lawyers want to believe it. My absolute insult is parents who sue providers in emergencies when they could not even provide simple CPR! who really killed your baby? YOU

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story