Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Union, Palace in war of words over strike

By: Tamara Barak Aparton
Examiner Staff Writer
November 10, 2009

About 300 hotel workers walked off the job Thursday morning at the Grand Hyatt Union Square. (Examiner file photo)

SAN FRANISCO — Workers at the Palace Hotel walked off the job Tuesday morning, taking to the streets with picket signs, drums and whistles.

The action is the second three-day strike at a San Francisco hotel in as many weeks, despite the involvement of Mayor Gavin Newsom, who rushed home from a Hawaiian vacation last week to address the labor dispute.

Approximately 350 workers are participating in Tuesday’s strike, which began at 4 a.m.

Members of Unite Here! Local 2 held a strike last week involving 300 workers at the Grand Hyatt Union Square. Workers say they will continue to urge boycotts at San Francisco’s hotels if talks remain stalled. Workers at 29 other upscale San Francisco hotels have authorized work stoppages if necessary, union officials said.

The union contract expired Aug. 14. At issue are health benefits, wages and the length of the contract, according to labor leaders. Hotel management has proposed deals lasting several years, while union leaders are pushing for a one-year contract in anticipation of an economic recovery, according to Riddhi Mehta, union spokeswoman.

Workers point out the Palace’s parent company, Starwood Hotels and Resorts, earned $180 million in profits during the first nine months of the year and its stock price has risen 85 percent since Jan. 1

“There has never been a question of whether they can afford what’s on the table,” said Mike Casey, President of Local 2. “The question is whether these companies will make a business decision that’s in the best interests of workers, The City, and the hotels themselves.”

Rich Curiale, chief negotiator for The Palace Hotel, said the union was being unreasonable.

“There’s no issue on the table that’s worth this kind of response,” Curiale said. “The union is playing the part of the big bad wolf – give me what I want, exactly how I want it, or I’ll blow your house down. Unfortunately, the house is the city of San Francisco, it’s the hotel, it’s the employees.”

Curiale said Starwood did propose a generous one-year contract and that the current dispute is focused solely on health care.

Workers have paid $10 a month for benefits since 1972, and Starwood would like to raise it to $15 in the first year of the contract to cover Kaiser’s price increase, he said. Starwood currently pays $1,080 a month per employee toward benefits, according to Curiale.

On Monday, Newsom met with managers of four major hotel chains and the union representing 9,000 workers at 61 city hotels for what was described as an informational session. A federal mediator attended but only listened to both sides, an attendee said.

The Palace is functioning normally during the strike, Curiale said.

tbarak@sfexaminer.com
 



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

City Guy

Nov 10, 2009

Owners should lock them out. There need for unions in California is long gone. Unions cost the consumer, the tax payer far too much money. It's time to bust these unions.

 

Jack Kirkpatrick

Nov 10, 2009

These workers are paid well for the value of the work they do. Not all jobs should pay a living wage for a single earner. If people want more they may have to find jobs that pay more or retrain.

Go to a nonprofit hotel - not all hotels make a profit (some just break even in a local market) and are carried by other hotels in the chain so that they remain in the market and can pay for jobs that may be lost in losing markets.

 

Hospitality Gal

Nov 10, 2009

This strike is fueled by greed and selfishness. To argue over a measly 5 dollars when they have high paying jobs for doing little work is ludicrous. As a manager in the Hospitality industry, I can tell you first hand, these people arguing over the increase make more money than some of the highest paid managers on a salary. Maybe they should all turn on the news every once in awhile and be thankful they still have food food on the table and a bed to sleep in.

 

PT

Nov 10, 2009

"Workers say they will continue to urge boycotts at San Francisco’s hotels." Isn't that a bit dumb considering that a boycott means workers aren't needed?

 

Whatever

Nov 11, 2009

I have friends in both management side and union. I see my friends on the union side driving better cars than the friends on the management side. My union friends kids go to nice universities and my friends on the management side struggle to put their kids through community college. My union friends do nothing but brag about how little they have to do because of past practice rules and how they can get away with murder because the union will protect them. On the management side, they do nothing but work long hours and worry if they can make the next round of lay offs.

This is real world stuff that I see. I am an accountant so I choose no side, but this is what I see.

 

Auditor

Nov 11, 2009

Maybe the government should get involved and audit the many tipped employees to see how much they really make to make a fair assumption. Many of these union people say that they won't be able to feed their families(really...) for $5 more a month- GET REAL!!!!

I am sure the 10% of unemployed Californians would do the unions jobs at a lower rate of wage and health care and appreciate having a job and do the job way better!!

Boycotts?? Doesn't this hurt the unions own members? If the union urges boycotts, many of the hotels won't have functions or events to host. If the hotels don't have business, many of the union members would be laid off. Isn't the idea to make money on both ends? The union is shooting itself in the foot.

 

Nov 28, 2009

The most commonly fake handbags goods include upmarket designer clothing,replica chanel,replica gucci,replica louis vuitton,replica shoes,replica chanel,replica gucci,replica louis vuitton designer handbags.

 

Nov 28, 2009

The most commonly fake handbags goods include upmarket designer clothing,replica chanel,replica gucci,replica louis vuitton,replica shoes,replica chanel,replica gucci,replica louis vuitton designer handbags.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story