Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Visitors face hotel tax hikes

By: John Upton
November 4, 2009

Voters in six San Mateo County cities approved increases in hotel taxes on Tuesday. (ASSOCIATED PRESS)

Hotel visits will become slightly more expensive in some cities near San Francisco International Airport, after voters in six Peninsula municipalities approved hotel tax hikes Tuesday.

Voters in all cities where measures were proposed — San Bruno, Brisbane, Burlingame, Millbrae, San Mateo and South San Francisco — approved the minor tax hikes, which will help those cities fill recession-era budget deficits.

Taxes that a customer must pay to stay in a hotel room costing $150 per night in Millbrae, for example, will increase from $20 to $23. The measures were generally supported by the cities’ lawmakers, many of whom placed the initiatives on the ballot.

The lawmakers and some business leaders had argued that the increased taxes would help the cities continue to provide vital services.

In San Mateo, the city was counting on the increase to help close an $8 million budget hole, Hossein Golestan, the city’s finance director, had told The Examiner in June.

A proposal to increase the city’s hotel taxes to 12 percent from 10 percent calculated out to an estimated $800,000 in new city revenue annually.

Some hoteliers, on the other hand, had argued the tax increases would drive customers to stay at other cities.

“Despite an increase in the percentage of tax,” wrote five Brisbane hotel proprietors in a ballot statement before the vote, “gross tax receipts would likely decrease as this tax will push demand outside the City of Brisbane.”

Hotels on the Peninsula compete with San Francisco for visitors, particularly those that land at SFO. The tax rates in all Peninsula cities will remain lower than those in The City.

San Francisco recently increased its hotel tax rate to 15 percent, with hotels in some neighborhoods subject to a 15.5 percent increase.

Following Tuesday’s vote, most of the affected cities’ hotel taxes will increase from 10 percent to 12 percent, while South San Francisco’s hotel taxes will grow from 9 percent to 10 percent.

Burlingame expects to generate an extra $2 million annually from the increased tax — known as a transient occupancy tax — documents show.

Other cities expect more modest revenue boosts, such as $270,000 in San Bruno and $400,000 in Millbrae, according to election-related documents.

jupton@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Jeffb in Burlingame

Nov 4, 2009

All tax proposals ought to follow a clearly defined and coherent policy, based primarily on fairness and democratic principles. These new taxes do not. Hotels are unfairly singled out merely because those who would pay the taxes (visitors from other cities, states, & countries) had absolutely no say in the matter. Sadly, they will make their votes with their wallets and local businesses will suffer. These types of taxes are undemocratic and have no business being on a ballot in America.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story