Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Transportation dollars halted

By: Will Reisman
Examiner Staff Writer
February 20, 2009

(Examiner file photo)

SAN FRANCISCO — The state budget deals a wallop to local transportation agencies — and it’s likely to hit you straight in the pocketbook.

Increased fares and service cuts are likely on the horizon for local transit agencies after state funding, which was trimmed back this year, will be axed in 2010.

The state budget, which was approved by the Legislature on Thursday, slashed $61 million in funding originally allotted for Bay Area transportation agencies, including a combined $36 million reduction in transit assistance funds for BART and Muni.

The news only gets worse for the 2010 fiscal year, when transit assistance funds — which topped $700 million in 2008 — are expected to be discontinued completely. The funding comes from a portion of the state’s fuel taxes and is supposed to be dedicated to transportation agencies.

Among Bay Area providers, Muni will be hit hardest. The Municipal Transportation Agency will lose $68 million in funding in the next two years — including $25 million this year — a loss that is contributing greatly to the transit agency’s two-year, $100 million projected deficit.

Muni spokesman Judson True said the transit agency was preparing for the sour news for months and is working on ways to alter its budget in the absence of state funding.

It will investigate the possibility of service reductions to deal with the deficit, True said, but there are no immediate plans to increase fares, other than a $10 increase to monthly Fast Pass prices, which was approved last year by the board of directors.

BART — a transit agency that relies heavily on regional tax funding and is struggling with the dwindling economy — will lose more than $15 million in state funding this year, accounting for more than half of this year’s $34 million budget deficit, according spokesman Linton Johnson.

“Losing this funding is the equivalent of us leaving the fare gate open every weekday for nearly a month,” he said.

BART is already mulling a number of measures to deal with its current deficit, including raising parking fees by $1 at some stations, reducing service intervals on trains from 15 to 20 minutes and extending its current hiring freeze. One proposal also calls for increasing ticket fares by as much as 10 percent.

Caltrain and SamTrans, which both recently increased fares by 25 cents, will likely have to consider another raise to ticket prices, or reduce service, because of the state cuts, according to Christine Dunn, spokeswoman for both transit agencies.

The loss of funding is particularly troublesome because it goes toward immediate operating costs, said Randy Rentschler of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, a regional agency.

“At some point, operators are going to have to reduce service or increase fares to make the system work,” he said. “There aren’t really any other options.”

wreisman@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

AA

Feb 20, 2009

"The funding comes from a portion of the state’s fuel taxes and is supposed to be dedicated to transportation agencies." So much for legislators and the law. The whole point of fuels taxes is to enhance and support transportation. It's not supposed to be another slush fund to dip into. Public transportation, especially in traffic congested cities like those in the Bay Area, is what gets people to work. Making that more difficult is another impediment to an eventual economic recovery.

 

Hmmm

Feb 20, 2009

This runs opposite to the federal stimulus package. That helps funding capital projects while a cut in state money will remove dollars from agencies ability to actually operate what's been built with all these federal dollars. What a travesty.

 

WYC

Feb 20, 2009

We should be looking at turning over these somewhat public agencies to private companies. Government agencies were never about making money but to cover their behinds or start blaming other people for their mistakes, just a bunch of crying babies or girlly man. If they have a mind at all, they should figure new programs for people to commute, say a City/County funded City Car Share program, smaller buses, fewer stops or stations, and non-union part-time drivers/operators. The union has already destroyed our Auto Industries, now our public transportation too. What's next for them? Construction and Infrastructure maybe?

 

mytiffany

Jan 24, 2010

I went to three cities Tiffany to play during last summer holidays tiffany & co. They are Beijing, Dalian and HuHehot tiffany and co. I went to Beijing more than tiffany bracelet eight times. Beijing is the capital of China.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story