Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Transit-fare hikes becoming norm

By: Mike Aldax
Examiner Staff Writer
March 18, 2009

More money: Muni is already planning to increase the cost of its monthly Fast Pass from $45 to $55, but Municipal Transportation Agency directors say that’s not enough. (Examiner file photo)

SAN FRANCISCO — The cost of commuting is creeping up.

Agencies across the Bay Area have either increased the price of their service or are planning to do so as they struggle to make ends meet.

BART has warned that it may be increasing ticket prices in July, Caltrain began charging an extra 25 cents in January for trips and last week AC Transit also decided to charge an extra quarter for regular adult fares.

Drivers have not avoided price hikes either, with all eight Bay Area toll bridges enforcing dollar increases. There’s even a suggestion to raise the toll for carpoolers on all crossings except the Golden Gate Bridge, which is the most expensive at $6 for a southbound trip.

Now Muni, which transports about 700,000 riders daily, is the latest transit agency to lean toward increasing its price, with members of its board on Tuesday saying they should look at raising fares in the coming year to close a $129 million projected budget gap.

The options are to raise the Fast Pass price another $5 and to hike single-fare ticket prices by as much as 50 cents, or $2 per trip, in order to close the projected budget deficit. The price of a Fast Pass is already set to increase from $45 to $55 in July.

“I strongly would favor increasing the single-ride cash fare,” Director Malcolm Heinicke said Tuesday.

Muni points to the same problems as other transit agencies when explaining why it needs to turn to its riders for revenue: The recession has cut state transit funding significantly and dwindled public transportation’s portion of regional tax revenue.

Director Cameron Beach agreed that the Municipal Transportation Agency, which oversees Muni, needs “to take a good, hard look at raising our cash fares.”

“We’ve always had the lowest fares in the Bay Area — not only in the Bay Area but the U.S.,” said Director Bruce Oka. “Had we kept up with the rest of the country, we wouldn’t be in the state we are in now.”

Riders have mixed reactions on transit-fare increases.

Terri Larson, 32, a Sunset district resident, said she will “have a hard time coming up with another $15 each month” for a Muni Fast Pass, and said higher fares will drive away riders. Brent Baumgartner of Menlo Park said he’d rather pay an extra 25 cents for his Caltrain ride into The City than see the frequency of train service cut.

Irwin Lum, head of Muni’s worker union, proposed Thursday charging riders for Muni transfers as a way to grab more revenue.

Bay Area transit agencies dig into riders’ pockets

Transit Agency Fare increases, other proposed actions

Muni:

Increasing Fast Pass to $55 in July; considering charging $60 next year and $2 (from $1.50) for single rides

BART:

Considering fare increase of as much as 10 percent next year and cutting off-peak service

Caltrain:

Increased base fares by 25 cents in January

SamTrans:

Increased adult local fares 25 cents to $1.75 in February, and express cash one-way fares 50 cents to $4.50

Source: Transportation for America

 

maldax@sfexaminer.com

 



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Common Sense

Mar 18, 2009

well, duh! If the unions demand "the highest pay in the country" like MUNI drivers do, of course the cost has to be borne by the riders!

 

Wake Up!

Mar 18, 2009

Public Transportation should be considered part of the municipal infrastructure and funded in the same manner. It is also a public good that will be used in proportion to its quality and reliability. Often, it is the sole means of transport which people with low-paying jobs rely on. Fares should be LOWERED, not increased. The money is there, people. It is sitting in the mayor's pet programs, it is sitting in 'sister city' programs, it is sitting in the money that could be collected from big businesses (I don't mean small, 30-man operations). It is sitting in all of the waste buckets of this city. It is sitting in the salaries of overpaid staff...

 

Rip Off!

Mar 18, 2009

It is also sitting in the pockets of the riders that board at the back of the bus without paying fare like those of us that commute to the city daily.

 

Dr Rod

Mar 18, 2009

Transport is priced to low and its got to meet a market level to maintain the services. What is with the free transfer? Stop that.

 

Dr Rod

Mar 18, 2009

Transport is priced to low and its got to meet a market level to maintain the services. What is with the free transfer? Stop that.

 

JSS

Mar 18, 2009

Many countries has free public transportation, and people prefer more public transport then using their cars. Its a good incentive for working towards green earth (save earth). Increasing price will make people use less of this facility and use their own means of transportation. I am not saying make it free, as it is impossible in this materialistic/corporate world, but atleast make it affordable and encourage more people to use it, then discouraging them.

 

Jiny

Mar 18, 2009

Increases for "loyal" riders, like fastpass holders and frequent and long-time users of MUNI (of course with everybody else) and yet the number of slippin'-through-the-back door riders goes unabated. Is this fair? From 4th St. to Van Ness the F Market is constantly boarded by freeloaders. Or on the front by those who lean in to quietly plead to the driver that they don't have the fare. The drivers almost always acquiesce. Put inspectors on the F-Market! Otherwise tell the free-loaders to walk (it does a body good).

 

Jiny

Mar 18, 2009

Increases for "loyal" riders, like fastpass holders and frequent and long-time users of MUNI (of course with everybody else) and yet the number of slippin'-through-the-back door riders goes unabated. Is this fair? From 4th St. to Van Ness the F Market is constantly boarded by freeloaders. Or on the front by those who lean in to quietly plead to the driver that they don't have the fare. The drivers almost always acquiesce. Put inspectors on the F-Market! Otherwise tell the free-loaders to walk (it does a body good).

 

Mike Smith

Mar 18, 2009

Prices are going up for everyone, including local governments. I am more than happy to pay $5 or $10 more for my monthly pass. Those that rely on MUNI to get around are not an issue, they have no other choice. Everything should be done to retain and attract those who have a choice. That means more buses/trains, drivers, and mechanics and that all costs money.

 

Jones

Mar 23, 2009

I think everyone will move to cheaper nations...

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Cardinal has Luck going into Big Game showdown

Though he’s just a redshirt freshman, Andrew Luck... Full story

Entertainment

Reno Santa event inspired by SF revelers

About 5,000 Santa costume-clad folks are expected to... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Is J. Lo having ex tailed?

Is Jennifer Lopez playing hardball in her battle with... Full story