Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Tattoo parlors feeling pinched by rising fees

By: Joshua Sabatini
June 22, 2009

Getting word out: Paul Stoll, owner of Body Manipulations in the Mission district, has started a campaign in hopes that The City will repeal the $1,263 permit fee increase. (Cindy Chew/The Examiner)

SAN FRANCISCO — San Francisco’s tattoo parlors were socked with a whopping annual business permit increase that is more than 12 times the current fee, and owners warn it could drive operations underground and jeopardize safety.

San Francisco’s liberal views and general acceptance of what some consider strange has contributed to the success of tattoo and piercing businesses in The City. These colorful operations and talented artists serve as an attraction for visitors from around the world.

Tattoo and piercing shops are also generally small businesses, in some cases with only one or two workers, and they are finding a bill in the mail that shows their annual business fee for the fiscal year beginning July 1 has increased from $109 to $1,372.

Paul Stoll, owner of Body Manipulations, a piercing and tattooing business, has become a frequent visitor to City Hall since receiving the bill about four weeks ago. He’s attempting to convince city officials that there’s something wrong with the fee hike. He’s worried the fee will be tough to shoulder for small shops and will cause others to go underground to escape regulations, putting people at risk.

“We have some of the best artists here,” Stoll said of San Francisco’s tattoo industry. “[San Francisco] is one of the premier places. We are a destination location. People come from all over the world to visit us.”

The Department of Public Health, which increased the fee and is in charge of inspecting the establishments, recently sent a letter to the 47 permitted businesses in The City explaining the fee hike and apologizing for not offering an explanation earlier.

Rajiv Bhatia, a health department director, said in past years the department failed to fully account for the cost of inspecting the tattoo and piercing shops, and set the new fee to ensure the program comes at no cost to The City.

“The program net cost with shared operations and city overhead in the current fiscal year is estimated at $64,500, and the license fees reflect this cost appropriated among an inventory of 47 establishments,” Bhatia wrote. He also said the fee increase was approved last year with an effective date of July 1, 2009.

Stoll has launched an online petition and also dropped off hard-copy documents at various establishments in hopes of persuading city officials to decrease the fee.

“I understand they are up against the wall budgetwise, but The City should figure out ways to decrease the inspection costs,” he said.

The fee hike “probably will result in the exact opposite of what we are trying to achieve here,” Stoll said.

The cost of doing body art

Tattoo shops face a substantial fee increase July 1 to operate in The City.

47 Number of permitted tattoo businesses in The City

$109 Previous annual fee for tattoo and/or piercing businesses

$1,372 Annual fee for tattoo and/or piercing businesses starting July 1

$64,500 Public Health Department cost to inspect 47 such businesses

jsabatini@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Welcome to the world of business regulation and taxation

Jun 22, 2009

Dear tats man, welcome to the tax man. Why not call your local Supervisor and tell him or her that you want them to cut the budget rather than tax NOT ONLY YOU but other business as well. Otherwise why should you be "special".

 

Jun 22, 2009

Dear Above Commentator,

People shouldn't pay taxes like this without some kind of reasonable and justifiable explanation. There's a lot of rich people floating on the backs of our tax dollars-maybe you're one who's benefitting. Sure sounds like it.

 

Haight Ashbury Tattoo and Piercing

Jul 8, 2009

What the article does not mention is how much we are paying compared to other businesses, such as fast food or restaurants, which cost the city more money to regulate.
Also I would like to mention this letter we were sent that was suppose to explain this new "program" which s supposed to cost $6500 had NO information about what this program is. When I called the manager of this program at the Health Department, he was unable to find any kind of price breakdown or fully explain what they are doing. As it stands, the health inspector comes once a year to 41 shops. That does not add up to the kind of money they are claiming it costs.
We don't mind paying a higher tax, but paying twice as much as restaurants and fast food is unacceptable. I believe this is very obvious discrimination against our industry. For a city that claims to be so liberal, this is disturbing.

 

lord paul

Nov 9, 2009

hi im paul from UK Tattoo on the mission,i payed the full amount of $1372. that was on the 4th sept, im still waiting for my overpayment of $900 back from the city. ive called at least 5 times asking for my money back,i could do with the money at this time of the year, the old excuse , "its on its way to you, its in the post" so were do i stand , can i sent collectors to city hall and get my momey back? im sure as soon as i owe the city money they would be on my door step wanting there money back with interest, any one with any ideas to get this money back let me know thanks. tatpaul2002@yahoo.co.uk

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Cardinal has Luck going into Big Game showdown

Though he’s just a redshirt freshman, Andrew Luck... Full story

Entertainment

Reno Santa event inspired by SF revelers

About 5,000 Santa costume-clad folks are expected to... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Is J. Lo having ex tailed?

Is Jennifer Lopez playing hardball in her battle with... Full story