Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Bay Area transit is cheaper than driving to work

By: Mike Aldax
Examiner Staff Writer
January 8, 2009

Getting around: A study has found that use of public transit such as Muni adds up to thousands of dollars in annual savings in several large cities, including San Francisco. (Examiner File Photo)

SAN FRANCISCO — No matter how low gas prices go, it still doesn’t pay to drive to work in the Bay Area, a new study says.

On average, Bay Area drivers lose nearly $1,000 in monthly income — and more than $11,000 annually — by driving to work as opposed to riding BART, Muni or Caltrain, according to a new report from the American Public Transportation Association.

The nationwide study compares a horde of miscellaneous automobile fees drivers must pay — including depreciation, finance charges and license registration — to the monthly cost of riding their area’s local transit.

Nationally, public transit riders save on average $8,368 annually by not driving, which is almost one-third more than the average amount a household pays for food in a year, according to data from the Food Institute.

While the cost per gallon of unleaded gasoline is more than a dollar less than last year — down Wednesday to an average of $2.01 in The City — the San Francisco Bay Area is one of the nation’s most expensive urban regions in which to operate an automobile, particularly when it comes to gas prices, parking and maintenance costs, the study says.

Only in Boston ($1,024 per month) and New York ($1,021) can you save more by taking the bus rather than the car to work, the study said.

“I think what people tend to forget is that the cost of driving is more than just gasoline,” said APTA spokesman Mantill Williams.

Muni spokesman Judson True said the price of a monthly Muni pass has remained stable for years — while gasoline costs have spiked and fallen.

“We’re a great deal,” he said.

Economic travel

A new study said commuters save money by using public transportation rather than driving.

City

Monthly savings

Annual savings

Boston

 $1,024

$12,285

New York

$1,021

$12,258

S.F.

$944

$11,325

Chicago

$871

$10,456

Philadelphia

$848

$10,171

Seattle

$844

$10,123

Source: American Public Transportation Association



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines



 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

bumbler

Jan 8, 2009

of course it's cheaper. most people can't put up with it though. missed buses, late buses, crowded buses. most people simply don't have the patience to deal with transit

 

Someone who drives a car...

Jan 8, 2009

How much does it cost when Bart Police shoot you in the back? How much do really save when have to ride to work in a sardine can and freeze your rear off waiting for the bus? 2 of my friends have been robbed on the bus of thier Ipods and Laptops..Right in front of everybody...How much fun is it to be haggeled everyday and have to sit next to the smelly homeless person?? Your stupid calculations dont figure that in..

 

JoeBlow

Jan 8, 2009

One thing for sure is that nobody in thier right mind WANTS to ride the bus. they either cant afford a car or dont have a licence for whatever reason.

 

JoeBlow

Jan 8, 2009

One thing for sure is that nobody in thier right mind WANTS to ride the bus. they either cant afford a car or dont have a licence for whatever reason.

 

Matt

Jan 9, 2009

The article compares taking public transportation with driving a car to work but my guess is that when they say taking public transportation they mean taking public transportation and NOT owning a car is cheaper than driving to work. I take the train but also own a car and last I checked, I am not saving the $ they seem to indicate by this sentence: "The nationwide study compares a horde of miscellaneous automobile fees drivers must pay — including depreciation, finance charges and license registration — to the monthly cost of riding their area’s local transit." The article indicates that those that take public transportation don't have to pay any fees associated with owning a car.

 

Remi

Jul 4, 2009

Well, when it comes to saving over $10,000 a year, I do rather take the bus! We don't have that problem around where I live. People are quite clean, it's never too crowded where you can't find a comfortable seat and they're always on time and a block away from my front door! There are 2 things I rather have a car: Laundry and 2 heavy bags or more of groceries and that's when I drive my uncle's truck! It's always available, he hardly uses it so, can anybody tell me a single reason why should I not save those $10,000? ONE single reason! I will get a car when I get older and can't walk around as easy as now...but until them I welcome those juicy savings towards that retirement. Now, JoeBlow, what person in THEIR RIGHT MIND would let pass such an splendid oportunity like this?? Only the rich I'd say! ...and of course...you!

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Local

Strike outside Grand Hyatt, Newsom gets involved

Hotel workers in San Francisco are continuing to picket... Full story

Entertainment

Blackbird boasts fun, classic cocktails

A long list of stunning and proper classic cocktails,... Full story

Sports

Cal QB looking to erase bad memory against Beavers

Two years after his fourth-quarter mistake against Oregon State cost California a shot at becoming the top-ranked team in the nation, Kevin Riley can't escape the images of his blunder. Full story