Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Study reignites push for soda fee

By: Mike Aldax
Examiner Staff Writer
September 18, 2009

Rising costs: Marvin Orellana and others buying sugary drinks in S.F. may have to pay an extra fee in the future. (Cindy Chew/The Examiner)

SAN FRANCISCO — Buying a soda or other sugary drink in San Francisco will cost you more if Mayor Gavin Newsom has his way.

As a nationwide debate rages about taxing soft drinks and a new health study says sodas are linked to obesity, Newsom said Thursday that he is prepared to push legislation that would impose a fee on sugary drinks sold in The City by large retailers.

The mayor first pitched the fee idea in 2007, but it fizzled due to legal restrictions. Under state law, new taxes require voter approval.

Local governments, however, can charge a fee for programs if they can prove there’s a cause-and-effect link.

To gather that evidence, Newsom ordered the Health Department to launch a two-year study on the subject. The study is now complete, Newsom said, but has not been released.

Since sweetened drinks can be linked to obesity, and since obesity-related illnesses cost The City and state billions of dollars a year, large stores such as Safeway should pay a fee to offset those soaring medical costs, Newsom said.

The amount of the proposed fee will not be released until legislation is formally introduced, Mayor’s Office spokesman Nathan Ballard said.

Newsom said the fee would only add “a few million” dollars annually to city coffers, but it’s “the right thing to do” and would help tackle costly problems with obesity and other medical conditions.

The renewed push by Newsom comes as UCLA researchers on Thursday released a report showing that adults who consume at least one soda daily are 27 percent more likely to be overweight. Also, 41 percent of children between ages 2 and 11 and 62 percent between 12 and 17 are drinking at least that amount.

“Not enough teens know about the health and dietary risks of drinking huge quantities of what is essentially liquid sugar,” said Dr. Susan H. Babey, the study’s lead author.

The UCLA report helped reignite soda-fee legislation in San Francisco.

“The study ... got my staff to say, ‘You know what, maybe the time is right now,’” Newsom said. “We now have legislation and a city attorney’s opinion on how to [impose a fee in San Francisco].”

It won’t be easy, however. City Attorney Dennis Herrera’s report to the mayor cautioned that the legislation would spark legal action.

The mayor said he expects California’s biggest retailers to “bring their lobbying efforts to the floor, like they did with our plastic bag ban.”

Newsom hopes that businesses tagged with the fee would force companies that supply them with  sweetened drinks to pay more for distribution.

Christina Goette, senior health program planner for The City’s Health Department, said she sees fees less as a revenue maker for San Francisco and more of a deterrent for youths who want to purchase sugary drinks.

“When they talk about taxing sodas or sweetened beverages, you take a look at the tobacco model,” Goette said. “It became more expensive for children, it was harder for kids to afford them. And if it becomes less available, it becomes harder to do.”



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

gnome chompski

Sep 18, 2009

Soda is linked to obesity, but then so is sitting around on your duff all day like a slug. How is taxing soda going to make people stop drinking it? Cigarettes are ridiculously expensive now, but people still smoke...

If the mayor & co were really concerned about San Francisco's health, maybe they should institute a different plan: Mayor Noisome could appoint a new "fitness czar" ($150K/year plus full benefits) who would sit on the roof of City Hall with a PA system and a large gong. Four times a day, at the sound of the gong, all San Franciscans would immediately stop what they were doing, and the czar would cheerfully lead them through a series of calisthenic exercises. Failure to comply would result in massive fines or something. Of course, that would require another new department, that of "fitness enforcement bureau" or somesuch...

 

East Bay Resident

Oct 12, 2009

I believe that this fee will not hurt anyone. It would allow the city to specifically combat the public health catastrophes that result from the ongoing, onslaught of marketing from these sugar pushers. Obesity is a national, public health crisis in children. For those that say they don't care, shame on you for disregarding the health of America's children.

For those that talk about the issue as if it's only about choice. Tell the multi-billion corporations to stop marketing to children who have not reached full mental developmental capacity.

Also, having studied public relations and marketing fully, I also know that cigarette companies sponsored atheletes, vocalists, and other public celebrities to boast about how it helps them do better and it was widely accepted at the time. Corporations that thrive off of ignorance, and build value into a product that produces harm deserve to crumble.

 

mytiffany

Jan 25, 2010

Colin Mathers tiffanys was the lead author of the study. tiffany co He is the W.H.O.'s coordinator for epidemiology tiffany rings and burden of disease tiffany jewellery. He says the research points to major differences around the world.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story