Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Safety concerns abound following officer killings

By: Tamara Barak Aparton
Examiner Staff Writer
March 30, 2009

An Oakland police honor guard stands his post Friday next to the caskets of the four officers killed earlier this month. The S.F. Police Commission recently said money should not be an obstacle in protecting The City’s officers. (AP)

SAN FRANCISCO — In response to the deaths of four Oakland officers who were shot with an assault weapon by a parolee, San Francisco officials say it’s time to beef up protective gear for The City’s police force.

Regular Kevlar protective vests are insufficient when it comes to withstanding bullets fired from a high-powered assault weapon, Deputy Police Chief Kevin Shinn told The City’s Police Commission last week.

San Francisco officers recently began using vests capable of deflecting high-velocity shots, but their cost and cumbersome design means a limited amount are issued to each station. Officers who receive a specific call alerting them to a suspect with an assault weapon wear the vests, Shinn said.

“Unfortunately, officers are on the street working day and night and they can’t say, ‘Time out. Let me call for this protective-type vest,’” he said. The vest’s lack of flexibility also makes it impractical to wear on a regular basis, Shinn said.

Commissioners have requested that the Police Department research the latest technology in protective gear — despite the cost.
“Money should be no excuse,” said Commissioner Thomas Mazzucco. “It would be my opinion that every officer out there on the streets should have one of those vests.”

Commission President Theresa Sparks said the money must be found, even with The City’s deflated budget. “If budget is an issue, I’m guessing we can impact that and we can take that to the people, the mayor and the Board [of Supervisors] to make sure we do get the funding for the highest level of protection available,” she said.

The March 21 slaying of Oakland police Sgts. Mark Dunakin, Ervin Romans and Daniel Sakai and Officer John Hege has raised concerns about how to best protect San Francisco’s officers, Sparks said.

Parolee Lovelle Mixon shot the men with an AK-47, which he possessed illegally. San Francisco police seized 1,230 guns last year, but many more illegally possessed weapons, including assault rifles, continue to flood San Francisco streets, police said.

“I call them weapons of mass destruction,” Shinn said, adding that weapons that don’t conform to California’s gun laws are often purchased legally out of state.

Semiautomatic weapons can be converted to fully automatic “by anyone with a home workshop,” Shinn said. Police Department officials said they would come back to the Police Commission with an update on the protective gear needed.



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

leopard_colony

Mar 30, 2009

First AK-47's are already banned automatic weapons. So-called assault weapons can NOT be legally purchased out of state and brought to California. Federal law prohibits that, with a 10 year sentence for the seller. The castrated copies of assault rifles that we can own are NOT easy to convert to full auto! BATF classifies any easy to convert firearm as a machine gun, making it very illegal. Sparks needs to review gun laws, she seems to be very ignorant of the laws she is supposed to enforce.

 

soccerninja

Mar 30, 2009

No wonder the police commission can't get anything done. Why is this being discussed before them? Next time the department can't decide what type of pencil to buy is that going to go before the commission? Worry about getting your discipline cases done. No wonder there is such a backlog.

 

Sailorcurt

Mar 30, 2009

Let's see: The perpetrator was a felon. It is illegal for him to touch a gun. So-called "assault weapons" are already banned in California. It is illegal to carry a loaded weapon in California without a very difficult to obtain permit. It is illegal to discharge a firearm in the City of Oakland. It is illegal to kill people. But one more law SURELY would have stopped this tragedy right? Don't be ridiculous.

 

leopard_colony

Mar 30, 2009

It is a violation of federal law to sell anyone a firearm that is illegal in the buyers state. Licensed dealers face 10 years in jail for each violation. Even private cash sales are required to go through a licensed dealer in the buyer's state. Again, if the private seller or dealer violate the law they face 10 years in prison.

 

Apr 23, 2009

It is unfortunate that despite all the laws already on the books, our Police Officers still get killed. Yes, every effort must be taken to ensure their protection, as they protect us.

 

CLARENCE LEE CLINE

May 19, 2009

I see that this paper refuses to allow me to tell the truth because they cannot handle the truth. prepare for a lawsuit over civil rights and the refusal to honor my right to free speach.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Cardinal has Luck going into Big Game showdown

Though he’s just a redshirt freshman, Andrew Luck... Full story

Entertainment

Reno Santa event inspired by SF revelers

About 5,000 Santa costume-clad folks are expected to... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Is J. Lo having ex tailed?

Is Jennifer Lopez playing hardball in her battle with... Full story