Local

[Print]  [Email]        

S.F. libraries' going green means money

By: Brent Begin
Examiner Staff Writer
November 18, 2008

Meeting demands: Developers renovating San Francisco libraries must consider lighting pollution, among other requirements, to achieve LEED certification. (Examiner file photo)

SAN FRANCISCO — Library branch improvement projects, already beset by delays and cost overruns, are up against another costly mandate: a requirement by The City that new buildings must be environmentally friendly.

Sixteen branches were originally scheduled for a makeover, thanks to a voter-mandated general-obligation bond measure in 2000.

Since January, when the final allocation was dispersed, several projects have racked up about  $3.7 million in costs related to complying with a city law signed in August that requires all major buildings be certified by Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, or LEED, according to a memo from city Librarian Luis Herrera.

The Board of Supervisors is set to approve $34.75 million in additional bonds today to continue renovations.

In November 2007, voters approved a proposition that granted The City authority to issue revenue bonds to ensure the delays and budget overruns would not kill the Branch Library Improvement Program. Much of the money will go toward green innovations, such as a living roof on the Ortega branch.

But while green improvements may cost The City in the beginning, the innovations will pay for themselves, according to officials involved with the projects.

“We do have initial costs today, but in the long term we will recoup that investment,” said Brian Bannon, chief of branches for the library.

LEED certification requires a number of energy-efficiency and conservation requirements. Developers must consider criteria such as lighting pollution, water efficiency, percentage of recycled materials and insulation. Developers are also required to hire consultants to guide construction through the certification process.

Energy and water efficiency, natural lighting and insulation are all innovations that save money and will serve as lessons in environmental awareness for library visitors, Bannon said.

Several projects already completed, such as the Excelsior branch, did not have to get LEED approval, but do contain green initiatives, including 1,800 square feet of solar panels, according to Edgar Lopez, bureau manager for the Department of Public Works.

Green buildings also provide a healthier environment for the many children and elderly visitors, Lopez said.

“It’s a smart investment,” he said. “It pays off in the end.”

bbegin@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

libraryuser

Nov 18, 2008

Libraries have been "green" leaders since inception. Books, magazines, video's etc. are "recycled" as they pass through the hands of numerous users. How fitting that they attempt to address "green" in their renovations as well.

 

mytiffany

Jan 25, 2010

Colin Mathers tiffanys was the lead author of the study. tiffany co He is the W.H.O.'s coordinator for epidemiology tiffany rings and burden of disease tiffany jewellery. He says the research points to major differences around the world.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story