Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Presidio Museum better off downtown, group says

By: Joshua Sabatini
Examiner Staff Writer
October 3, 2008

Gap founder Don Fisher’s proposed contemporary art museum for the Presidio would be better placed downtown, not on federal parkland, neighborhood groups told city legislators Thursday. (Examiner file photo)

SAN FRANCISCO — Gap founder Don Fisher’s proposed contemporary art museum for the Presidio would be better placed downtown, not on federal parkland, neighborhood groups told city legislators Thursday.

The Presidio is a former military base that was designated a national park in 1994. As a condition of its preservation, the federal government is requiring that the 1,491-acre park become financially self-sufficient by 2013. It is governed by a seven-member board called the Presidio Trust.

Last year, Fisher announced an offer to fund the building of a contemporary art museum to house his personal art collection at the Presidio’s Main Post, an area comprised of historic buildings and a large parking lot on land that was previously used as the military parade ground.

The 100,000-square-foot Contemporary Art Museum at the Presidio, or CAMP, would disrupt the historic setting of the Presidio’s Main Post and create “severe parking and traffic problems both in and near the park,” according to the recently re-established Presidio Neighborhood Representative Working Group, a coalition of 13 neighborhood groups and other organizations. 

The group was first established in 2001 to offer streamlined feedback on Presidio development projects, in particular the building at that time of George Lucas’ digital-arts center at the Letterman Complex.

Speaking before the Board of Supervisors City Operations and Neighborhood Services Committee on Thursday, the chair of the neighborhood coalition, Redmond Kernan, said Fisher’s gesture was praiseworthy, but the museum would be more appropriately placed downtown by the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art and other cultural institutions, not within the historic heart of the Presidio.

“The transit infrastructure is available downtown and it would increase tax revenues to The City,” Kernan said. “We think that the Presidio should focus on its main mission of being a national park.”

Public affairs consultant Alex Tourk, who is representing the Fisher family, said it’s premature to discuss abandoning the Presidio location as the Trust is engaged in closed-door meetings to discuss project details and address
concerns. 

“The Fisher family wants to play this out,” Turk said.

On Oct. 14, the Presidio Trust is hosting a community meeting on the Fisher proposal.

jsabatini@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines

 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff.

Oct 3, 2008

Thank you Mr Fisher, but your generous gift is not at all appropriate in the Presidio.

 

sfcelticcrone

Oct 3, 2008

I agree that a downtown location is much more feasible for this project. I have been saying for months now that it would be better suited for the Pier 29-31 redevelopment. Mr.Fisher could take a brisk morning walk along the Embarcadero from GAP HQ to the suggested location. Lots of public transportation available and more tourists, unlike the Presidio site.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Local

Bill to ban gun shows at the Cow Palace moves forward

A bill that would prohibit gun shows at the state-owned... Full story

Entertainment

At Home: Couple keenly mixes new and old in coveted Nopa Victorian

Derek and Sandra Kazee didn’t just luck into their... Full story

Local

Sean Randolph is the funnel for federal funding

California’s leaders have an economic problem. OK,... Full story