San Francisco Examiner  circulation | classifieds | autos | real estate | jobs | advertise
   
Monster
Welcome,   My Account |  Log out
Welcome, Guest  Sign In |  Register
Saturday, March 20, 2010 | Last Update 9:20 PDT
View today's E-Dition

click for forecast
Home News Politics Local Opinion Economy Sports Lifestyle Classifieds Jobs Autos Home Listings
Nation World Under the Dome Ken Garcia Beltway Confidential Weather Mobile Site Contact
Under the Dome California Nation World
Under the Dome California Beltway Confidential White House Congress Michael Barone Byron York
Under the Dome Ken Garcia Melissa Griffin Gavin Newsom City Hall People Real Estate Events Calendar
Editorials Nate Beeler's Toons Blogs Michael Barone Byron York
Economy Page Real Estate Technology
49ers/Raiders/NFL Warriors/NBA Sharks/NHL Giants/A's/MLB Soccer Colleges Golf
Movies Television Health Events Calendar

Local
[Print]  [Email]         Share    

Passionate pleas on parking policy

By: Will Reisman
Examiner Staff Writer
October 21, 2009

Contentious: A proposal to extend parking meter hours — until midnight in some areas — is under consideration. (Examiner file photo)

SAN FRANCISCO — The contentious debate over whether to extend the hours of enforcement for parking meters is far from complete.

After hours of passionate pleas from citizens both for and against the controversial proposal at the department’s Board of Directors meeting on Tuesday, Muni executive director Nathaniel Ford said the agency would hold public outreach meetings over the “next couple of months” before deciding whether to move forward with the plan.

Ford said his department will reach out to business groups, neighborhood associations, and transit advocates to gather more feedback on the proposal, which would extend the running time on all 24,000 of The City’s parking meters, with motorists being charged in some neighborhoods until midnight.

The department would net about $8.8 million annually if the plan is approved, with the funding going toward Muni operations.

“We’re going to develop our outreach strategy and come back with either a revised, modified, or same version of our plan,” said Ford. “We’ll know in a few months whether to move forward with this plan or to pull it back.”

The department’s board of directors is ultimately responsible for the approval of the plan.

wreisman@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines
  1. Muni may cut down on stops
  2. Scoop: Bullock’s marriage called a total sham
  3. Presidio Trust, nonprofit team up for pet cemetery
  4. Olympic gold medalist to lead AT&T Park stair-climb
  5. Mexican Museum closer to a full-time home
  6. Rec and Park to reinterview more than 130 employees
  7. Court: Anna Nicole Smith gets none of oil fortune
  8. Sequoia assistant supe promoted to top job
  9. Bullies prompt reaction from Peninsula schools
  10. Kidnapping report on Facebook leads to standoff





ING | Bay to breakers
99 years, 99 reasons to register. What's yours? Pink Participant

 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 200 words.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Local

Animal court keeps the peace

It’s been almost a decade since 33-year-old Diane... Full story

Scoop

Scoop: Bullock’s marriage called a total sham

More revelations are emerging about the... Full story

Sports

Dickey: Terrible time for a 49ers shakeup

Scot McCloughan’s apparent dismissal as general... Full story

Olympic Coverage | RSS | Twitter | Facebook | Mobile | Contact Us | Rack Locations | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy