Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Old North Beach library may withstand razing

By: John Upton
September 3, 2009

Protected: The Historic Preservation Commission will start determining whether to save the North Beach Branch Library building. (Mike Koozmin/Special to The Examiner)

SAN FRANCISCO — North Beach could soon be home to two library buildings, although only one would likely be filled with books.

The San Francisco Public Library is forging ahead with plans to begin building a two-story branch next year on a triangular parking lot between Mason and Lombard streets and Columbus Avenue.

The City plans to demolish the old branch and create public parkland on the site, and also on the short stretch of Mason Street that divides the new and old branch sites.

But the recently formed San Francisco Historic Preservation Commission agreed Wednesday to hold a hearing later this month to begin the process of determining whether the existing branch should be designated a historic landmark.

A historic landmark designation would prevent the 50-year-old building from being demolished.

City Librarian Luis Herrera told The Examiner that plans to begin building a new branch in North Beach won’t be affected if the existing branch is protected from demolition.

“The plan is to proceed with a new library in the triangle site,” Herrera said Wednesday.

The triangle was the Library Commission’s preferred site for a North Beach branch in the 1950s, but Mayor George Christopher rejected that plan because it required a partial street closure, according to a report by San Francisco architecture firm Carey & Co.

Christopher governed during an automobile-dominated period and oversaw construction of the now-felled Embarcadero Freeway and the dramatic widening of Geary Boulevard.

The section of Mason Street between the old library and the new branch site was temporarily closed this month by The City, which is testing the impacts of the proposed closure on traffic. It’s expected to reopen before October.

A half-century ago, to avoid a partial street closure, Christopher ordered the branch built on city parkland, according to the report. The library was designed by Appleton & Wolfard and constructed from 1958 to 1959.

Preservationists told commissioners Wednesday that the branch has historical significance because it was built during a revolutionary period in the history of libraries, when books started being placed on shelves for perusal by users.

They also said the work of Appleton & Wolfard, which designed other branches in The City, is historically significant.

“It’s a wonderful building,” architect Howard Wong said. “It fits really well into the neighborhood.”

The preservation commission is scheduled Sept. 16 to begin the historic landmark initiation process related to the old branch.

The Board of Supervisors must ultimately decide whether the building is a historic landmark.

jupton@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Two Too Much. Too Too Much

Sep 3, 2009

How many problems Mr Herrera? Let me count but a few.

1) The triangle lot was acquired by the city specifically for OPEN SPACE. The suggestion of two buildings is so illegal it is plain stupid.

2) Every significant community group in North Beach is opposed to the library going on the triangle and blocking Mason Street. So much for working for the people of SF. Who are you working for Mr. Herrera?

3) EIR. The environmental impact report isn't even close to being finished. Even though this report will be heavily slanted in favor of the project you (Mr. Herrera) still have to wait to see if the project gets a preliminary nod.

Unfortunately for Mr Herrera he has already expended about $800,000 on a project (including architects fees) most of which are likely to be illegal because the EIR has not been completed.

You're in a tough spot Herrera. Have cool drink of water.

 

Fall of Common Sense

Sep 3, 2009

The plan put forth by Mr Herrera is so convoluted that his competence must be called into question. Every part of his North Beach library proposal is flawed.

Instead....how about this:

Expanding the existing North Beach library with improvements including a seismic upgrade means: a complete project that is more green, retains the historic Appleton & Wolfard building, uses about 1/2 the tax dollars , creates more library space, retention of the triangular lot for an open space park(which is why the city got the lot in the first place), saves bond money that could be used on another neighborhood branch, and it is better for pedestrian/bicycle safety because it keeps busy Mason Street open and traffic off of adjacent residential streets.

The city has done just about everything wrong with this proposed new library.

 

lyqwyd

Sep 3, 2009

Historic, what a joke. It is a clear abuse of the historic preservation ordinances, and this kind of abuse jeopardizes the legitimately preserved buildings in the city.

 

Sep 3, 2009

99.9% of San Francsico's buildings were built after the city was leveled in the 1906 earthquake and fires. That means that our architectural history is as precious as it is young. A fifty year old vital community structure representative of the North Beach community of that era and a building that was designed by a significant architectural firm isn't a joke. It isn't a joke to those of us who grew up in North Beach. It isn't a joke who want to maintain the charming character of North Beach.

 

lyqwyd

Sep 3, 2009

Is your argument then that 99.9% should be considered historic?

I repeat, WHAT A JOKE!

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story