Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Nightclub no-no’s go to commission

By: Brent Begin
Examiner Staff Writer
October 22, 2008

Mayor Gavin Newsom

The city commission charged with overseeing San Francisco’s clubs will be granted greater powers to revoke permits and issue citations under an ordinance approved Tuesday to send to the Board of the Supervisors.

The laws were part of a package of legislation announced by Mayor Gavin Newsom in February, aimed at reforming San Francisco’s nightclub industry.

“People are going to these nightclubs, carrying guns and committing violent crimes,” Newsom said in February.

Violence has plagued The City’s popular party districts in recent years, including the South of Market Area and North Beach, with fights, shootings and killings outside entertainment venues.

Four of The City’s 98 homicides in 2007 were nightclub-related, and 15 percent of assaults occurred from disputes either inside or outside of nightclubs, according to San Francisco Police Department statistics.

One of the two laws approved Tuesday by The City’s Entertainment Commission grant greater powers to the city agency to suspend permits; the second piece of legislation is for clubs with “extended-hours” permits, requiring such nightclubs to create security plans.

The Entertainment Commission was created in 2002 to take over the nightclub permitting duties of the SFPD. If the legislation approved Tuesday is passed by the Board of Supervisors, the commission would also be granted authority to cite businesses with administrative citations.

In the past, police officers would give tickets to businesses that didn’t comply with nightlife-related codes. Those charges would often be dropped later in court, according to commission President Bob Davis.

The legislation would allow the commission to fine businesses $100-$500 for violations. The money would be directed to the Entertainment Commission, Davis said.

Another piece of related legislation championed by Newsom, a loitering law that prohibits standing within 10 feet of a club’s entrance for more than three minutes between 9 p.m. and 3 a.m., was previously approved by the commission, although it has not yet been sent to the Board of Supervisors.

bbegin@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

voice of reason

Oct 22, 2008

This still does not address the twin problems of: (1) clubgoers in thier parked cars in neighborhoods with stereos throbbing at 2am-3am after clubs close, continuing to drink and wake up the neighborhood, and (2) the spray painting many then do to vandalize the neighborhood. Since they do this outside the 500 foot radius of the club, clubowners say "not my job". The security staff that clubowners should be required to fund and have need to patrol the surrounding environs after closing and get people and the trash and bottles they leave behind out, pronto. Taking proactve responsibility would go a long way in improving neighborhood relations.

 

Question

Oct 22, 2008

I understand that certain Commissioners of the Entertainment Commission are using public venues to discuss incompatibility of housing development near night clubs. Perhaps a more relevant question that needs neighborhood discussion is why the regional servicing "big box" clubs (accommodating 100 or more)are given special dispensation? Should not neighborhoods have self determination? How about encouraging neighborhood serving clubs, small venues that encourage everyone in the neighborhood including, do we dare say families too? Why is neighborhood housing the boogie man and pitted against big box clubs that serve the "tunnel and bridges rich kids"? That is a question that needs to be discussed NOW not in the next District 6 supervisor's race, and certainly not used a lever to wedge between voting blocks.

 

celticcrone

Oct 22, 2008

Snapshot of the problem in a specific neighborhood: Polk Street between Broadway and Union Street on Friday nights where the club Rouge is rented to independent promoters. The individuals attending these functions does not respect a residential neighborhood where locals are subjected to loud, vulgar, drunken behavior by the bridge and tunnel louts. Does one ever see a police patrol on the street starting at 1 am.? NO!

 

fed up

Oct 22, 2008

thats great piece of garbage legislation. ever been on broadway at 145am. its like a zoo with no fence. oh boy fine em 100 bucks. ever seen the lines of people paying cover charges. thats a drop in the bucket or the price of doing business. its more of a nuisance. whoopdeedoo

 

fed up

Oct 22, 2008

now lets talk about loitering. do you realize there are not enough police in the bay area to enforce this junk. every bar and club require you to go outside to smoke. they all do it.. more junk.. what a city...

 

mytiffany

Jan 25, 2010

Colin Mathers tiffanys was the lead author of the study. tiffany co He is the W.H.O.'s coordinator for epidemiology tiffany rings and burden of disease tiffany jewellery. He says the research points to major differences around the world.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story