Local

[Print]  [Email]        

More legal challenges to city's bike plan


July 17, 2009

New design: A rider travels down Second Street, which would see restrictions on left turns and less parking under the bike plan, which also proposes traffic signals for cyclists. (Cindy Chew/The Examiner)

SAN FRANCISCO — Two groups are trying to put the brakes on a major plan to add 34 miles of bike lanes to city streets along with other amenities for two-wheelers.

The  Planning Commission and the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency last month approved an extensive environmental review of the San Francisco Bike Plan, which would nearly double the number of bike lanes currently on city streets.

The proposed bike network is lauded by cyclists, city officials and Mayor Gavin Newsom, who say bike improvements will make the streets safer and lure commuters into cycling rather than driving, thus reducing vehicle emissions.

The ambitious plan, however, has been delayed for three years after a Superior Court judge barred projects from moving forward until their impacts to traffic, transit and other factors were more extensively reviewed.

The completed environmental review flagged more than two dozen intersections thatwould be significantly disrupted by new bike lanes.[end hyperlink]

On Wednesday, two separate appeals of the Planning Commission’s decision to approve the bike plan review were filed with the Board of Supervisors. Supervisors are expected to vote on the plan next month. If they approve it, the city attorney will ask the Superior Court to lift the injunction so construction of the bike projects can begin.

Mary Miles, an attorney for the complainants who brought the original lawsuit before the Superior Court judge three years ago, filed one of the appeals Wednesday. The other was filed by Catherine Liddell of the South Beach-Rincon-Mission Bay Neighborhood Association.

 



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

GregM

Jul 16, 2009

Thank God!!! When Bicyclists follow ALL the vehicle rules of the road, then maybe I'll be for this. I don't own a car and have been stuck on busses thanks to Critical Mess! Heaven forbid I ever need an ambulance during this mayhem!

 

Who Needs Reporters?

Jul 17, 2009

SF Examiner's idea to change the date and rerun a story three days is slick.

 

Lea are you there?

Jul 17, 2009

OK so the bike coalition leader (personal pronoun queen) is very quiet....hello?

 

Missiondweller

Jul 17, 2009

Isn't Treasure Island supposed to be a bike Mecca? Have them move there. Don't slow down Muni even more with lost auto lanes.

 

Anne

Aug 3, 2009

The plan to install additional bike lanes must go forward. The city of San Francisco needs to implement the program successfully to get more people out of their cars and onto bikes as a great alternate to being stuck in traffic. Getting stuck in traffic cost money, wastes gas and also creates health problem due to stress. Bicycling encourages people to lose weight, to get engaged along with nature, to breathe the freshest air that San Francisco has to offer, and especially gives them the needed workouts due to hills and other challenges.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story