Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Mid-Market billboards quashed

By: Brent Begin
Examiner Staff Writer
November 4, 2009

Sign of the times: Proponents of the mid-Market Street proposal say the stretch between Fifth and Seventh streets could easily become “Times Square of the West.” (Cindy Chew/The Examiner)

SAN FRANCISCO — Voters rejected the most contentious issue on the November ballot, a plan to dot mid-Market Street with billboards and advertisements in an effort to create a theater and arts district.

The failure of Proposition D means there will not be a formation of a special area that allows moving signs, electronic ads and illuminated billboards smaller than 500 square feet on the busy thoroughfare between Fifth and Seventh streets, an area known for its grimy streets, strip clubs and shuttered storefronts.

In 2002, more than 77 percent of voters approved a measure that prohibited new outdoor billboards citywide, but it allowed for exceptions with voter approval.

The main opponent of the proposition, San Francisco Beautiful, said Prop. D would actually increase blight in the area. The organization sees billboards as eyesores that would distract drivers and drain electricity.

The group also argued that allowing one area to be an exception to the law is the first step towards easing billboard restrictions citywide.

Owners of billboards in the area would have profited from the proceeds with 20 to 40 percent going toward arts-themed projects, including a ticket booth in nearby Hallidie Plaza, regular cleaning in the neighborhood and arts education for children and youth.

The measure’s main backer, David Addington, said allowing billboards that promote the arts could attract businesses to the neighborhood, eventually turning the area into the “Times Square of the West.”

Several city officials at different ends of the political spectrum threw their weight behind the issue and Addington threw his money at it as well.

In the early stages he pumped $190,000 into the measure, and then another $80,000 on Oct. 27, according to campaign filings.

bbegin@sfexaminer.com
 



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Nov 4, 2009

The people behind San Francisco Beautiful should now be held accountable for the look of Market St between 5th and 8th St. What's their plan to improve its look and what to do with the street people. Their credibility hangs on this.

 

What!

Nov 4, 2009

Ahhh! another example of San Francisco's prozac popping liberals voting down a proposition that would go to improving the quality of life. I guess unhappy people would rather see blight - so it makes them feel better about their situation. I thought liberals were progressive and caring - if so - why are there so many homeless in San Francisco - where are all the kind hearted liberals that care so much for humanity??? Oh! I forgot their to worried about cats being de-clawed.

 

Curtis Fields

Nov 4, 2009

Earlier commentor:

More advertisements improves quality of life? *HOW*?

If you actually had read the law, you'd have realized that the "money for the arts" would have been managed by a private organization, and could have been spent on *anything* they wanted, including "administrative overhead" and salaries, as well as anything they felt "promoted the arts".

It was a government mandated blank check to set of private individuals, and in exchange, we'd get an eyesore.

Take your "liberal" hate and ranting and shove it.

 

Mickey Disend

Nov 4, 2009

I'm delighted Proposition D was voted down. Bravo! Since the onslaught of "twenty year old miliionaires" a decade ago, this rare and freedom loving city has been swamped by toxic materialism. Endless gentrification of neighborhood after neighborhood, ugly building after ugly building, yuppies hordes everywhere, the intentional economic pushing out of artists, rebels, theaters, and spiritual seekers by the Technocracy and its minions. Thankfully this nail was checked before it slammed into the coffin.

 

Nov 4, 2009

A slum by any other name...

 

KH

Nov 12, 2009

I don't see the problem with a specific area for billboards. It's just another type of out of home media.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Cardinal has Luck going into Big Game showdown

Though he’s just a redshirt freshman, Andrew Luck... Full story

Entertainment

Reno Santa event inspired by SF revelers

About 5,000 Santa costume-clad folks are expected to... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Is J. Lo having ex tailed?

Is Jennifer Lopez playing hardball in her battle with... Full story