Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Meter hours put Muni budget in limbo

By: Joshua Sabatini
Examiner Staff Writer
May 20, 2009

(Cindy Chew/The Examiner)

SAN FRANCISCO — Muni’s budget is stalled because of the issue of how late parking meters should be enforced and whether motorists should be charged for Sunday street parking.

Supervisor John Avalos pushed the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday to again reject Muni’s budget, and said the transit agency is mistakenly giving up revenue by refusing to enforce parking meters after 6 p.m. and on Sundays. The board postponed a decision.

The Municipal Transportation Agency’s board of directors dismissed a proposal to extend meter hours as late as 8 or 10 p.m. when it voted April 30 to approve the budget and send it to the Board of Supervisors. The plan could generate about $9 million. Avalos has outlined one scaled-down version for The City’s “inner core” that would generate about $3.7 million. He said such measures are crucial to preserving services.

In a 7-4 vote, supervisors scheduled a special meeting at noon May 27 to hold what is expected to be the final hearing on the Muni budget, giving board members until then to negotiate. The Muni budget includes a July 1 fare increase from $1.50 to $2, among other fare hikes and service reductions. Additional revenue could offset some of the impacts.

Avalos said that by not rejecting the budget, “we are socking it big time to riders all across San Francisco.” He thinks there is now “supermajority” support to see the parking-meter proposal enacted.

Seven votes are needed to reject the Muni budget. Last week, the board voted 6-5 to pass it. Some members, however, are backtracking on their previous support.

Supervisor Sophie Maxwell, who last week supported the budget, said, “I was one that said I don’t know about Sundays. I don’t know about 10 [p.m.], but I am reconsidering that.”

Last week, transit agency chief Nat Ford said his department would study the idea. But on Tuesday, supervisors asked for a stronger commitment.

Supervisor Carmen Chu was not one of them.

“I remain concerned with parking increases,” she said. “In my neighborhood commercial area, a lot of folks had talked about the hardships that would impose upon them.”

jsabatini@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

gdewar

May 20, 2009

Parking is free in most neighborhoods, especially in Ms. Chu's district...maybe she forgot that?

 

May 27, 2009

I'm very concerned...
It is already hard to drive through the city and park for only 30 to 60 mins.
The parking system is not effective for the working class, it is expensive to park in parking lots as well as risky to park at park-meters due to time restraints, not enough coins, and the fact that is already difficult to even FIND A SPOT!
I wouldn't mind giving up my personal car use if the system restrained parking to zipcars style parking only... which is an extraordinary idea that could revolutionize the driving/commuting/parking system in the city if it was encouraged a bit more.
This could dramatically help the working class of San Francisco spending ridiculous amounts on parking tickets we can't afford to pay every year.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Cardinal has Luck going into Big Game showdown

Though he’s just a redshirt freshman, Andrew Luck... Full story

Entertainment

Reno Santa event inspired by SF revelers

About 5,000 Santa costume-clad folks are expected to... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Is J. Lo having ex tailed?

Is Jennifer Lopez playing hardball in her battle with... Full story