Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Fewer vehicles on Market speeds Muni service

By: Will Reisman
Examiner Staff Writer
November 18, 2009

Saving time: An experimental project diverting eastbound private vehicles off of Market Street at Eighth and Sixth streets has sped up transit service by 50 seconds. (Cindy Chew/The Examiner)

SAN FRANCISCO — Muni service has sped up by about a minute on Market Street along the stretch involved in the trial program that aims to limit vehicle traffic along the busy artery to downtown.

The test, which began Sept. 29, forces private vehicles traveling eastbound on Market Street to make right turns at Eighth and Sixth streets. The program has been met with some success, though transit officials say they are going to continue the study longer than initially expected and possibly expand it.

The number of motor vehicles decreased by 54 percent on eastbound Market Street, according to new numbers from the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, which also oversees Muni. On average, there was a decline of 130 vehicles an hour on eastbound Market Street as a result of forced right turns on Eighth and Sixth streets, said Debra Johnson, administrative director for the MTA. All the traffic data was recorded on Market Street, east of Eighth Street, where the restrictions began.

On eastbound Market Street approaching Montgomery Street, the decline was considerably less, at approximately 5 percent.

Transit service also sped up along the route by nearly a minute. Muni vehicles traveling eastbound on Market Street recorded 50-second savings as a result of the automobile restrictions.

Quickened Muni service was among the goals of the program’s backers, which include Mayor Gavin Newsom, former Mayor Willie Brown and Supervisor Chris Daly, whose district includes the section of Market Street being studied. The trial is a small rollout of the oft-proposed idea of limiting or banning private automobiles along Market Street.

And though there were improvements along Market Street, a portion of the traffic was deflected to Mission Street, which runs parallel. Traffic on Mission Street, where some of the private vehicles were diverted, increased by 15 percent, Johnson said.

The trial on Market Street — which was the beginning phase of a prolonged effort to revitalize the thoroughfare — was initially pitched as a six-week pilot program, but MTA officials will continue with the project to collect more data, said Johnson, who spoke before the transit agency’s board of directors meeting Tuesday.

Johnson said the department is also examining the possibility of moving the forced-right turn from Eighth Street to 10th Street, where right turns are encouraged but not mandatory.

Fewer cars

Key findings from the study limiting private vehicles on Market Street:

  • Eastbound traffic volume east of Eighth Street decreased 130 vehicles per hour, a 54 percent decrease.
  •  
  • Eastbound traffic approaching Montgomery Street decreased 5 percent.
  •  
  • Traffic on Mission Street increased 15 percent.
  •  
  • Traffic counts on Folsom Street were inconclusive as to an increase or decrease.
  •  
  • Muni times sped up by about 50 seconds.
  •  
  • Before the study, bikes made up 60 percent of the traffic.
  •  
  • During the study, bikes made up 75 percent of the traffic.
  •  
  • Three officers are required at the corner of Eighth and Market streets to enforce rules.
  •  
  • One or two officers are required at the corner of Sixth and Market streets.
  •  
  • After officers leave, many vehicles violate the vehicle ban.
  •  
  • Cars turning right from the center lane at Eighth Street are a safety issue for cyclists.

Source: SFMTA

wreisman@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Punishment/Reward

Nov 18, 2009

Here we go again - another plan to punish all the tax paying citizens by making their commute to work more difficult. This is going to revitalize the area? How? when you have nothing but human waste crusing the area. Get rid of them - not the cars. I ride my bike along this corridor everday - it's not the cars that cause problems it's the losers that have nothing better to do but cross the street by jaywalkiing to deal their drugs. Get with it you idiots in City Hall - but then again Chris Daly has his suburban retreat to escape to.

 

theyrejusthuman

Nov 18, 2009

Muni has to have gotten faster by more than a minute - it takes so much less time for me to get to work using the bus in the morning from 7th and Market...at least 10 minutes less. Is the one minute an average over 24 hours? Because during the morning rush hour, Market Street is remarkably less crowded and Muni much, much easier to use.

 

enough already

Nov 18, 2009

DUH! The Bay Bridge was CLOSED during much of the test period so OF COURSE traffic in San Francisco (and on Market Street) was reduced during that time. Wow, we really let these folks make decisions for us?!?

 

Better Alternatives

Nov 18, 2009

I have avoided downtown since the Market Street closure. I don't need to deal with the experiment. There are other places to shop, like the peninsula.

 

critic of critics

Nov 19, 2009

To Enough Already: Maybe that's why they've extended the trial. Besides, I don't think simple traffic volume reduction is the endpoint; that's just a means to the end. Was Muni service faster everywhere? If the study is purely BB-closure effect, it should affect the entire city. Right?

To Punishment/Reward: The "losers that...jaywalk" were still there, only cars were blocked. Apparently it IS the cars that cause congestion and delay.

 

Melburnian

Nov 24, 2009

It's astounding that 60% of the traffic on Market Street was bikes before the trial, and yet San Francisco still can't tie its shoelaces together to build a *single* street where bicycles are prioritised by design. How about coloured bike lanes surrounded by greenery? Perhaps bi-directional ones on each side of the street, like Amsterdam uses?

When 60% of the traffic is bikes, 60% of the street space should be available for bikes.

 

The Market Street Changes Are Wonderful!

Nov 24, 2009

I love the changes. It makes biking and walking much more pleasant. I really hope they expand it and would love to see it work in both directions. There is no reason why the city should be catering to car traffic when we are facing issues of global warming. And if muni saves a minute in just a few blocks of traffic closure, imagine what it could be like with no cars.

 

daily commuter

Nov 25, 2009

I now commute to work by bike, like the majority of Market Street morning commuters. The car-free zone has definitely make that stretch safer, which is a great improvement. Congratulations to city transportation leaders for navigating the issues of shared road space for transportation. I believe that having bike-friendly and pedestrian friendly streets downtown help make the area more vibrant and the city more livable. I believe it's in the city's best interest for development and staying a world-class city to enhance and encourage safe, efficient bike-friendly transportation.

 

markermiller

Nov 25, 2009

The forced turns on in-bound Market have (finally!) made the bike commute downtown much easier. Moving the forced turn up to 10th would be a HUGE improvement, given the ridiculous Market/8th intersection.

This experiment is important... but it clearly won't heal Market Street's disease. I'm afraid that even projects like CityPlace won't succeed in that. Unfortunately, unless San Francisco admits that it's powerless over healing our huge 'pathetic class', that class is just going to keep growing. So City government will keep growing too... locked into a symbiotic, co-dependent relationship. Give it up San Francisco. Regarding trying to fix Tenderloin underclass problems with ever more attention and sensitivity and money: just like limiting cars on Market, if you don't built, they WON'T come!

 

JKallis

Jan 14, 2010

The trial is a small rollout of the oft-proposed idea of limiting or banning private automobiles along Market Street.online degree | college degree | masters degree


 

JNannes

Jan 14, 2010

I believe it's in the city's best interest for development and staying a world-class city to enhance and encourage safe, efficient bike-friendly transportation.life experience degree | bachelors degree



 

mytiffany

Jan 24, 2010

I went to three cities Tiffany to play during last summer holidays tiffany & co. They are Beijing, Dalian and HuHehot tiffany and co. I went to Beijing more than tiffany bracelet eight times. Beijing is the capital of China.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story