Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Departments ordered to budget in carbon footprint

By: Joshua Sabatini
Examiner Staff Writer
February 23, 2009

Mayor Gavin Newsom wants San Francisco departments to pay 13 percent of their air-travel costs to generate money for a carbon-offset fund to pay for local projects that would reduce emissions. (ASSOCIATED PRESS)

SAN FRANCISCO — If city employees take to the friendly skies, their departments’ budgets are going to lose more than just airplane fare.

Mayor Gavin Newsom wants San Francisco departments to pay 13 percent of their air-travel costs to generate money for a plan he announced more than a year ago, a carbon-offset fund to pay for local projects that would reduce emissions. The idea is similar to what is commonly referred to as carbon credits.

Department heads were not only ordered by Newsom to submit by Friday proposed budgets identifying 25 percent in cuts, but for the first time to declare how much they plan to spend on air travel. They were also ordered to budget for 13 percent of air-travel cost.

The amount generated by the 13 percent fee would be socked away into the special carbon fund, overseen by the Department of the Environment, to fund a variety of projects that would reduce emissions.

It’s unknown how much money the 13 percent fee could generate. No one is exactly sure how many times a city employee flies in an airplane on taxpayers’ dime. In the past, city departments paid for air-travel costs from a lump “travel” budget item, which included the cost of hotels and per diem, among others. Departments budgeted this fiscal year a total of $2.5 million for travel costs, of which some fraction was spent on airfare. Municipal employees fly for such reasons as conferences, meetings, escorting mentally ill patients back to their hometown and meeting with potential witnesses.

“Typically, [city] employees fly to conferences and the like,” said Newsom’s spokesman Nathan Ballard.

The City won’t have a sense of how much the fee would generate until the budget proposals are reviewed, Ballard said.

Departments are being asked to cut costs as The City faces a $460 million budget deficit next fiscal year.

The 13 percent charge is seemingly also seems to be an effort to eliminate nonessential air travel.

“If the 13 percent charge causes departments to reconsider and reduce air-travel expenses, all the better,” Ballard said. “We expect that departments will budget only for what travel is absolutely necessary.”

Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, who sits on the Board of Supervisors’ Budget and Finance Committee, said it made sense to incorporate a greening category in the budget to mitigate carbon emissions.

“The jury is still out on the whole carbon-credit system,” said Mirkarimi. “Does it actually drive toward the ultimate goal of meaningfully reducing one’s impact on the environment, or is like going to confession and simply getting absolution for your green sins?”

Earth comes first

  • Departments must contribute 13 percent of their air-travel costs to a carbon fund
  • The fund would be overseen by the Environment Department
  • Projects to be funded would include anything from biodiesel pumping machines to energy-efficiency work
  • The fund could be established by the next fiscal year, which begins July 1

jsabatini@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

SFnative

Feb 23, 2009

It seems that these ideas are used to fund new city agencies that we can't afford at this time. By the use of hybrids cars and trucks and the use of bio-diesel , this seems to be the job of the city corporation yard to purchase these vehicles and to modify or get rid of over polluting vehicles. Each department head has staff that can make their own green changes without creating a new high priced staff that would duplicate what they have people on staff to do already.

 

TaxThisSucka!

Feb 23, 2009

Another stab at the taxpayers. Get lost Newsom!

 

GlenParker

Feb 23, 2009

ha ha suckers! Pay for those carbon-indulgences. Good one; we aren't born with mortal sins we're born with green sins.

 

Native2

Jun 10, 2009

Clearly, there is no budget crisis when Newsom can add 13% to the City taxpayer's so he can run for governor. We already spend 20% for materials and supplies because our Departments must purchase from "approved" vendors.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Cardinal has Luck going into Big Game showdown

Though he’s just a redshirt freshman, Andrew Luck... Full story

Entertainment

Reno Santa event inspired by SF revelers

About 5,000 Santa costume-clad folks are expected to... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Is J. Lo having ex tailed?

Is Jennifer Lopez playing hardball in her battle with... Full story