Local

[Print]  [Email]        

City’s sanctuary policy battle far from over

By: Joshua Sabatini
Examiner Staff Writer
October 22, 2009

(Courtesy photo)

SAN FRANCISCO — Some city workers will be faced with the dilemma of whether to violate San Francisco law or violate state and federal law after the approval Tuesday of The City’s new sanctuary policy.

The guidelines, which set out rules for how city employees handle undocumented immigrants, previously mandated that illegal immigrant youths arrested on suspicion of a felony be reported to federal authorities at the time of arrest. The Board of Supervisors on Tuesday approved legislation by Supervisor David Campos that would change the rules so illegal immigrant youths are turned over only after being found guilty.

The San Francisco Deputy Probation Officers Association, whose workers deal with juvenile offenders and have been tasked with reporting illegal immigrant youths to the federal government, “strongly disagrees with any local legislation that puts its members at risk of violating state or federal law,” association president Gabriel Calvillo said Wednesday.

And Calvillo threw his support behind Mayor Gavin Newsom.

“The DPOA agrees with Mayor Newsom’s decision to continue to follow the guidelines dictated by federal law on this matter,” he said. “It was my call, after consulting with our legal counsel, that this will be the best course of action to safeguard our members.”

Calvillo’s position has done little to change the Campos’ stance.

“The fact remains that the policy is legally defensible and we expect them to follow it,” Campos said. “Until a court says it is unconstitutional or illegal, city officials should be expected to follow the law.”

The law is unclear, according to a recent memo from the City Attorney’s Office about Campos’ legislation, and “until the federal courts clarify whether sanctuary city ordinances are preempted by federal law, [the office] will continue to advise city officials that The City may not penalize its employees for reporting this information to ICE.”

Officials in City Hall expect Newsom’s stance to ignore the law will ultimately be decided by the courts when a lawsuit is filed against The City, either for violating the new policy or for adhering to it.

It’s not uncommon for The City to enact legislation that becomes the target of legal challenges.

“The legislative authority of the Board and the Mayor includes the prerogative to push the limits of existing law, and even to attempt to shape case law, as long as there are legally tenable arguments to support doing so,” a recent city attorney memo said.

jsabatini@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Richard Hanlin

Oct 21, 2009

I for one when I go into the voting booth am not looking for a candidate who will "push the limits of existing law," as the phantom memo says.

 

geezee

Oct 21, 2009

I for one will never vote for Campos again, my theme will be: "Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me."

 

Jacko

Oct 22, 2009

Boneheads.....do you all feel safer now? You vote the I am soooo glad I moved out of this zoo. Sorry, I didn't mean to demean the animals in the zoo.

 

Pancho

Oct 22, 2009

The mexican mantra


All of the laws should be enforced equally, regardless of race, religion, and/or national origin. That is with the exception of mexicans, and they should be above the law and exempt from the law. And the only purpose that a tonto gringo serves is to pay taxes to support the superior and noble mexican.


Anyone who disagrees with this philosophy is Xenophobic and a Racist.


All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, Animal Farm, ch.10, 1945

 

The Redskin Redneck

Oct 22, 2009

Man, the picture of the guy above has entitled government employee freak written all over him. That would be bad enough, except he's even a reconquista fifth columnist for Mexico, otherwise he wouldn't be proposing something so dangerous towards American citizens. Man, do people have to wake up in this country.

 

Atomic

Oct 22, 2009

Campos is more concern about putting his face before the public and has little concern about victims of crime. Just look at his supporters.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Cardinal has Luck going into Big Game showdown

Though he’s just a redshirt freshman, Andrew Luck... Full story

Entertainment

Reno Santa event inspired by SF revelers

About 5,000 Santa costume-clad folks are expected to... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Is J. Lo having ex tailed?

Is Jennifer Lopez playing hardball in her battle with... Full story