Local

[Print]  [Email]        

City could cash in with more parking meters

By: Mike Aldax
Examiner Staff Writer
July 22, 2009

Parking problems: Bill Seto feeds a meter Tuesday on Geary Boulevard. A recent study says free street parking creates traffic issues that will only worsen in the future. (Cindy Chew/The Examiner)

SAN FRANCISCO — Installing rows of parking meters in every city neighborhood is one idea for wringing money from what transit officials have called an untapped resource — parking spots.

Of the 320,000 on-street spaces in The City, only about 24,000 are metered — an equation that is now under attack.

Residential areas are packing in more people — The City is projected to take in more than 150,000 new residents in the next three decades — and the need to manage traffic and parking availability is becoming a key concern for transportation planners, according to a new study by the San Francisco County Transportation Authority.

“Many travelers, particularly in areas where people can afford cars, are driving more,” said Jesse Koehler, a transportation planner with the transit agency in charge of long-term infrastructure planning.

Adding meters to neighborhoods — and increasing parking enforcement in those areas — would add revenue to improve city services such as Muni and other transportation needs, the study said. Most residential neighborhoods in The City do not have parking meters.

It also recommends other citywide “pricing programs,” such as hiking meter rates, extending meter operating hours, increasing parking enforcement and raising permit fees to “more rationally priced” levels. Residential parking permits are currently $76 a year.

Raising the prices at meters — which currently range from $3.50 per hour downtown to $2 per hour in outlying neighborhoods — and installing new ones is a move to decrease the time people park their cars in one location.

When cars do not leave their spaces the resulting parking scarcity creates traffic jams and congestion, as more drivers are prone to double-park or circle city blocks while hunting for spots, according to the report. Increased traffic also worsens air quality and makes it difficult for Muni buses and streetcars to reach stops on schedule, the study said.

New parking meters would also increase the turnover of street spots, ensuring vehicles owned by nonresidents don’t sit in free zones for too long.

In a move to make sure that city residents do not outright reject the idea of putting meters in neighborhoods, the study recommends the affected areas receive a portion of that new revenue for street fixes and other “neighborhood-level” transportation improvements.

The study is part of an extensive 30-year plan that will help guide transportation planners in the future. The County Transportation Authority board of directors, which includes five members of the Board of Supervisors, opted to hold off on approving the study as a guiding principal.
One outstanding concern was how adding meters and increasing parking fees would affect low-income San Franciscans.

“I know there are a number of neighborhoods where there are low-income and working-class residents who may not have garages [and] rely heavily on their cars to get to work, and there have been questions that have arisen because of that,” Board of Supervisors President David Chiu said.

Chiu said he would most likely support new parking-management measures, but asked the County Transportation Authority board to delay approving the item to allow for more input from residents.

Planning for a crowded future

A recent study points out that as The City’s population grows, street parking will be at a premium. Some key points include:

  • Increase parking meter rates to market levels
  • Extend parking meter operation hours until 10 p.m.
  • Upgrade parking technology so drivers can use the phone or Internet to pay or search for parking availability
  • Expand meters into more neighborhoods
  • Increase residential parking permit fees
  • Increase parking enforcement, including upgrading technology used to cite violators
  • Offer residents more of a say in how parking is managed
  • Offer neighborhoods where parking fees are added or increased a share of the revenue for transportation improvements

 

Source: San Francisco County Transportation Authority

maldax@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Big G

Jul 22, 2009

When are they just going to start living within there means. Why are they always looking to take people's money, we are in this recession too, Citizens have to live on there budget, the CIty Leaders need to take more cuts from there on checks & perks, before they keep asking us or keep raising fees & fines & parking. This does not solve the problem of overspending & way overpaid top elected officals. They are not worth 6 figures a year. Time for them to be releived of there duties if they can't get this right. The new supervisors all they have come with is more fees & taxex, go away with that crap & start making the necessary cuts to your own checks, before you take any more of my money.

 

D

Jul 22, 2009

Just got to cut the fat from the top. Keep raising taxes, meters,& their will be no more working class. Let them put meters in their house.

 

Jul 22, 2009

If City residents have to live within their means, so should the City, stop taxing the downtrodden. Those of us lucky enough to still have jobs can't afford to pay to park in front of our own homes...and for what...to fund some City workers' $100K retirement pension? I don't have a magic solution to the budget crisis, but maybe they should look at what new staff positions and programs were implemented in the last 10 years and consider cutting those first. Prediction... watch out for the influx of disabled placards. One SF Gate article reported there are over 50,000 placards for San Francisco, and this article says "only" 24,000 meters.

 

absolutelycrazy

Jul 22, 2009

I am going to lease out my rent-control apartment to 10 illegals who don't drive or pay taxes. I am moving to San Mateo county and spending my money in that county....like the rest of the bay area folks.

 

SuckSuckSuck

Jul 22, 2009

Putting up meters is ust an excuse to right tickets to pay for the excesses at City Hall. Time to run these !@#@!#!@s out of office.

 

DAVE

Jul 22, 2009

In fariness should this idea go through there should be a drawing lottery style for all streets to determine which get the meters first. I suspect Nancy Pelosi won't get one in her neighborhood. If I have to have a meter who is to say somone in say the richmond should not have one at the same time. I hope the process is open for comment as I have about 100 people in my neighborhood who will make input. DAVE

 

Talia

Jul 22, 2009

I personally would love to drive less in the city, but as long as Muni sucks so bad, I need a car to drive to many appointments and errands. I'm driving my son to get a haircut next week and will have to circle the block, take up a meter -- do all those bad things -- because I don't have two hours that day to spend in transit.

 

Fedup

Jul 22, 2009

Any supervisor that supports this ridiculous proposal will have to deal with the voters. i will make it a personal crusade to vote out anyone who supports such an insane proposal. I'm pretty sure that those officials who support this idea would probably not want meters in front of their house. Oh, by the way, if this does pass, make sure we also meter Sea Cliff and St. Francis Woods area. I'm sure they'd love that idea.

 

Spencer

Jul 22, 2009

This all comes back to building parking garages in the neighborhoods... needs to happen ASAP. Life will be so much easier for us all.

 

Larry Liberal

Jul 22, 2009

Hey, our betters at City Hall need your money to maintain their lavish lifestyles! As a resident of San Francisco, you must support your betters by paying to park in your own neighbourhood!

Next up should be a renter tax because it's a privilige to live in San Francisco!

 

FedUp

Jul 22, 2009

The median income in my neighborhood is more like $40k, not the usual 6 figures salaries that all the City Workers are getting! Parking fees and parking tickets are high enough in SF and meters should not be in neighborhood where parking is scarce and where houses don't have garages! Why should I have to pay to park in front of my house?

 

myturnagain

Jul 22, 2009

This is the stupidest idea I have heard of yet and you can rest assured that I will not support this and I seriously doubt that any resident in the City in their right mind would.

 

Starchild

Sep 16, 2009

If you're sick of these kinds of attempts to balance the budget on the backs of the people, stop voting for Democrats and Republicans who propose and go along with these increases. They won't get the message otherwise. Dump your establishment party registration, and register and vote Libertarian.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Cardinal has Luck going into Big Game showdown

Though he’s just a redshirt freshman, Andrew Luck... Full story

Entertainment

Reno Santa event inspired by SF revelers

About 5,000 Santa costume-clad folks are expected to... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Is J. Lo having ex tailed?

Is Jennifer Lopez playing hardball in her battle with... Full story