Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Chief wants to beef up homeland security prep

By: Brent Begin
Examiner Staff Writer
October 13, 2009

‘Major target’: Police Chief George Gascón proposes to change Police Department rules that make gathering intelligence impossible as a means of improving the city's homeland security preparedness. Gascon said he considers San Francisco a major target for terrorists. (ASSOCIATED PRESS)

SAN FRANCISCO — San Francisco is “terribly underprepared” to deal with an act of terrorism and the new police chief said steps must be taken to protect The City, which he considers to be a top choice for terrorists.

Chief George Gascón told The Examiner that homeland security is the one topic that keeps him awake at night.

“I think we are terribly underprepared to deal with an act of terrorism, and this city is a major target,” he said.

One of the many changes Gascón is looking at is a beefed up homeland security unit. The federal Department of Homeland Security has already given The City $1 million for an operations center that will be independent of the emergency management center on Turk Street.

“So you’re going to see me in the next few months talking about the need for us to develop a robust homeland security process,” Gascón said. “And we do have to collect intelligence and we have to be able to act upon it.”

The issue of gathering intelligence — which, along with working with landlords to increase building security and better collaborating with the FBI and other federal agencies, is a top priority for Gascón — will require a change in Police Department rules.

The City has strict limits on gathering intelligence and keeping files on people or groups, unless they are suspected of a crime. Those rules sprung from a scandal two decades ago involving an investigator who sold confidential SFPD information to an undercover spy.

San Francisco stopped gathering intelligence when roughly 10 different organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Asian Law Caucus, sued The City after the scandal hit in 1993. The lawsuit was eventually settled with assurances that police would revise policies.

General guidelines, which govern day-to-day operations, now hamper intelligence-gathering efforts.

“This city is a major target and [the] Police Department today can’t even collect intelligence,” Gascón said. “We’re the only major police department in the world that cannot collect intelligence.”

The proposal could also face opposition from outside groups.

Veena Dubal, a staff attorney at the Asian Law Caucus who represents people targeted by FBI surveillance, said the proposal is troubling.

“What I find problematic is that this city is on the cutting edge of political thought and free speech,” Dubal said. “A local intelligence-gathering effort will definitely have a chilling effect on First Amendment activities.”

The proposal has yet to go to the Police Commission. Gascón said he wants to reach out to the public and civil liberties groups before proceeding.

Gascón, however, said he thinks it’s odd that the SFPD would ban a practice because of one abuse.

Security breach prompted SFPD unit to close its doors

The Police Department’s counterintelligence unit was disbanded more than 15 years ago, in part as a response to an ugly chapter in The City’s history.

It all started with Tom Gerard, a former CIA agent and San Francisco police inspector, releasing confidential files on thousands of individuals under surveillance by the SFPD.

Gerard supplied the information, which included intelligence on more than 500 organizations and 100,000 individuals of every political stripe, to a man named Roy Bullock, according to a lawsuit settled in 2002.

Bullock admittedly collected the information on groups targeted by the Anti-Defamation League, an organization that fights anti-Semitism and bigotry. Much of the information would end up in the hands of the South African government, which was allied with Israel at
the time.

The scandal erupted after Gerard fled to the Philippines and left behind a briefcase in his Police Department locker. Its contents included “passports, driver’s licenses and identification cards in 10 different names; identification cards in his own name for four American embassies in Central America; and a collection of blank birth certificates, Army discharge papers and official stationery from various agencies,” according to a Los Angeles Times article on the incident.

Gerard later pleaded no contest to a misdemeanor charge of illegally accessing government information. He was sentenced to 45 days in jail and ordered to pay a $2,500 fine.

The scandal prompted the Police Department to immediately shut down its intelligence-gathering unit. Guidelines for personnel also reflect the sensitivity the SFPD now uses, which basically bans investigations unless a crime has occurred or is about to occur.

Money to protect the Bay Area

Region receives millions of dollars annually from the Department of Homeland Security.

Regional funding
   
Urban Area Security Initiative      

2008  $40,638,250

2009  $37,155,000

Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grant Program   

2008  $3,617,000   

2009  $7,500,000

Source: Department of Homeland Security

bbegin@sfexaminer.com
 



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

SFnative

Oct 13, 2009

The SFPD homeland security unit has been in place for many years since 911. Its one of the smallest units that has it's own Commander, a Lieutenant at least two Sergeants and maybe 5 officers, they go to training all the time and yet there is not a lot coming out of it. Glad to see Gascon'sees the waste.

 

snoo

Oct 13, 2009

and now you see he is already getting opposition from gathering information on terrorist. Gascon, do not give up, we need you to straighten out the mess that was left behind...stay strong as you are going to encounter resistance from the liberal left

 

Yo

Oct 13, 2009

The SF Sheriff's Dept also has a homeland security unit which has been in place for some time.
SF badly needs an intelligence unit, no matter if it's PD,SD, FBI or otherwise. We have a gang intel unit, so why not on other people as well? Criminals are criminals

 

JC

Oct 13, 2009

The Chief has just discovered the tip of the iceberg. I wish him well but until we give up being enablers and start enforcing the law and protecting those that want to live a life with values and common sense, Good Luck.

 

grf

Nov 3, 2009

When does "collecting intelligence" fall into abuse of power and how would one stop it? Police departments throughout the US have had an unfortunate history of "Red Squad" activity designed to spy on and intimidate legitimate political activity. Even if the department in question does not engage in intimidation the materials they might collect have historically been vulnerable to use by Federal agencies quite willing to do so. I support the SFPD, but I don't want to see another Red Squad in San Francisco. I would hate to think that Gascon has in mind a model that would mimic LAPD's notorious Red Squad, which trampled civil liberties as a matter of course.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Cardinal has Luck going into Big Game showdown

Though he’s just a redshirt freshman, Andrew Luck... Full story

Entertainment

Reno Santa event inspired by SF revelers

About 5,000 Santa costume-clad folks are expected to... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Is J. Lo having ex tailed?

Is Jennifer Lopez playing hardball in her battle with... Full story