Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Cat declawing now a crime in The City

By: Joshua Sabatini
Examiner Staff Writer
November 4, 2009

For the couch: Some pet owners have their cats declawed to prevent damage to household items. (AP File Photo)

SAN FRANCISCO — San Francisco has become the first major city in the nation to outlaw the declawing of cats.

Some pet owners declaw their felines to protect themselves, or their furniture, from scratches. But pet advocates condemn the practice as animal cruelty.

On Tuesday, the Board of Supervisors voted 9-2 to enact a ban on the declawing of cats. Supervisors Sean Elsbernd and Michela Alioto-Pier voted against the legislation.

“It is well-documented and well-understood from a medical prospective that [declawing] is torture. It is a form of animal cruelty,” said Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, who introduced the legislation.

Other California cities are considering adopting similar bans. The Los Angeles City Council is expected to vote on whether to enact a ban by the end of the year. West Hollywood banned declawing in 2003. Santa Monica, Beverly Hills and Berkeley are considering similar ordinances. Declawing is illegal in 20 countries, including most of Europe, Brazil, Japan and Israel.

The California Veterinary Medical Association opposed the legislation. The group said declawing should be left up to veterinarians and not politicians.

“I don’t support the board making those types of medical decisions,” Alioto-Pier told The Examiner after the meeting. “It seems misplaced. I think that the doctors and the vets should be making those decisions. And if it’s a bigger issue than that then the state of California should be outlawing that.”

Violators of the ban, such as anyone who declaws a cat or a pet owner who approves of a declawing, could face up to six months in jail or a fine of up to $1,000.

Many cities have decided to consider such a ban because a state law was recently adopted that would prohibit cities from enacting the bans after Jan. 1.



IN OTHER ACTION

  • In an 11-0 vote, a 66-year lease between the Port of San Francisco and the Exploratorium was approved. The museum plans to relocate from the Palace of Fine Arts to Port property.
  • A vote on Mayor Gavin Newsom’s veto of The City’s sanctuary policy legislation was scheduled for Tuesday. The legislation prohibits city officials from reporting undocumented youths to federal authorities for possible deportation unless they are convicted of a felony.
  • In an 11-0 vote, legislation empowering the Entertainment Commission to shut down problem nightclubs was approved.


To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Michael 289

Nov 4, 2009

Please verify that cat declawing is illegal in 20 countries because I do not believe that is even remotely true. You should check facts before publishing them.

 

check this webpage out

Nov 4, 2009

www.PawProject.org
It has all the details you need Michael 289

 

Fed Up

Nov 4, 2009

Thank you Supervisor Mirkarimi and to all Board members who voted in favor of this ban.

 

JWP

Nov 4, 2009

I fully support this ban, it is long over due. I hope we abolish this barbaric practice worldwide. Thank you to the Supervisors who voted in favor of this ban.

 

Everycat

Nov 5, 2009

It's a wonderful step forward for cat welfare that this barbaric practice has been banned in SF. Well done to those who voted for the ban.

Michael289. Declawing is actually illegal/banned or severely restricted in 38 countries worldwide, it's easy to check yourself as each country publishes their legislation/veterniary practice policy/rules/guidelines. Google is your friend.

 

Nov 5, 2009

Finally the USA is starting to catch up to the other civilized countries by outlawing declawing. Many argue that this should not be a governmental decision. However, sadly, we cannot trust American veterinarians to abide by the recommendations of the AMVA and perform declawing ONLY as medically necessary for the CAT. Not for the convenience of lazy owners. As long as there is a market, money hungry vets will continue to misinform the public to make a few bucks disabling felines. Legislation puts an end to the vicious cycle. Kudos San Francisco!

 

Troublesniffer

Nov 5, 2009

I highly applaud the action that was taken by the Board of Supervisors. We who understand the necessity of cats having their claws intact continue to hope that the rest of the country will follow in your footsteps, and finally join the 38 other countries where this surgery is already banned. Disfiguring a cat just for owner convenience is must end. Amputation of these important toes is an abomination. I cannot express my gratitude to the Board for the action that they took in support of our wonderful cats.

 

Susan

Nov 5, 2009

Thank You for taking measures to protect cats from this painful mutilation! With all of the easy alternatives to manage claws, this is a completely needless "convenience" cruelty and has no place in our society. Cats deserve to live with those that understand & are willing to acommodate natural behaviors, & love their pets unconditionally, as they love us. I THANK YOU for enacting this law & setting the precedent for other cities to follow. How wonderful that San Francisco will be treating their cats with kindness & respect, and stop crippling them for convenience & profit. Our country is more civilized than that! Kindness to animals spreads to kindness to humans, BRAVO San Francisco!

 

TN vet tech

Nov 5, 2009

Thank you SF for contributing to the euthanasia of the cats that destroy their owners furniture. As a Vet tech, I have assisted in many declaw surgeries. The cats are ASLEEP. They don't feel it, and after 3 days the soreness is gone. What remains is the owners' peace of mind, home life not wrecked by clawing cats, and the cat has a forever home. Now once the destruction starts by these kitties, the shelters of SF will find many cats being dropped off or abandoned. Smart thinking!!
Medical decisions should be left to the owner and their veterinarian. Not a bunch of "feel-good" animal rights activists. Everyday our constitutional rights are being stripped away. Well folks, here's another one! Enjoy!!

TN vet tech

 

Nov 5, 2009

GOOD for us-the city of Saint Francis. No longer will this barbaric practice be sold. The city council meetings were a true education for those of us who had little or no understanding of what de-clawing means- an amputation of ten toes!

 

Rick/MN

Nov 5, 2009

If not for de-clawing we would not have or Kittie(Georgie)whom I LOVE very much!!You FREAKS in Cali.(SF) would kill babies(Abortion)and don't think that is CRUEL??? This world is traveling down a VERY stange path!!! GOD help us all!!!

 

alice in LALA land

Nov 5, 2009

Nothing will stop people from ging to another city to have the surgety.. hek some people might even try it at home.. what are the supervisors thinking? Decision like this are MEDICAL ones.. between the pet owner and the veterinarian.. Politicians have NO BUSINESS in my bedroom.. or cat house ( excuse the pun) THEY are not veterinarians but they love to play them on TV.. watch the cat killings at the "shelters" skyrocket..
Thank you to the two council memebers who seem to know their place.. Leave medical decisions to the experts...meanwhile vote the others OUT..

 

Erik/SF

Nov 5, 2009

Why in the world is the Board wasting time on stuff like this? The City has major problems, and we do not elect them to spend time on cat de-clawing legislation.

 

Nov 5, 2009

the same group who "worries' about the Blue Angels flyover scaring people.. this council is a JOKE... don;t like them.. show up at the voting booth

 

Mary

Nov 5, 2009

The alternative to declawing is not death. The alternatives are nail caps, training, trimming, getting another cat.... Kudos to the council for banning the inhumane practice of declawing cats.

 

Nate Holden

Nov 5, 2009

The council is able to vote on big and little issues at the same time. Voting on this issue didn't take any of their time. The pro and con people did all the research for them. They just read it and voted. Voting for cats doesn't mean they aren't voting for the economy or health care. Weak arguments by paid lobbyists.

 

Sammy S

Nov 5, 2009

Thank you Council for voting for the humane treatment of animals. As Ghandi says, you can judge a society by the way they treat animals. Animals need us to speak up for them. So do children and the elderly.

 

AnnetteB

Nov 5, 2009

Yipee! I am so very happy this passed. As an animal lover, I am very proud to live in SF. Declawing is just sick and wrong. Veterinarians know better but most don't care enough about the animals to refuse to declaw cats. If all veterinarians refused to declaw, there would not be a need to legislate against this. But they do not. Most veterinarians are business people who do things like declaw to make a buck. Even many vets who do not declaw, including the vet organizations, were against this ban because they do not want their "procedures" legislated. It is not a personal decision between a vet and an owner, because the patient, the cat, does not have a say! Again, if most veterinarians stood up for the animals they care for and refused to declaw, there wouldn't be a need to legislate. Thank you to the 9 BOS who stood up for what's right.

 

B in SF

Nov 5, 2009

It's interesting how many of these comments in support of a ban on declawing look like they were cut and pasted from an anti-abortion website: defend the voiceless, barbaric practices, etc. And in both cases, the government is being asked to outlaw a practice that some feel is horrific, and others see as a medical decision best left to the "parent" and their doctor. I wonder how the pro-ban people would have reacted to anti-abortion activists supporting their cause?

 

Richard

Nov 5, 2009

It is obvious that many people who have commented here do not fully understand exactly what declawing involves and its horrible effect on cats. This procedure involves digit-joint amputations and is terribly painful for the cat even long after it recovers from the surgery. Cats balance on their toes and as a result of declawing have to learn how to walk all over again. The list of injuries goes on and declawed cats are more likely to become "biters" but there is a major point that is being overlooked by many: This is not a matter of human rights being taken away or private medical matters being controlled by the state--it is a matter of the animal's rights being taken away and law by its very nature prohibits some of our basic human rights. You might say that law prohibits my God-given right to murder others or rape your children. Sometimes we need laws to make us do the right thing. And the cats certainly need the protection from many ignorant self-serving citizens.

 

Pemmom

Nov 6, 2009

Congrats SF - you can now see a rise in surrenders of cats to shelters. GOOD job! Way to protect those cats - take away a last resort tool for owners to keep their cats. GREAT! Bravo to ARistas, you are eroding the ability of people to own pets.

 

Pemmom

Nov 6, 2009

BTW - why is it okay to spay/neuter a cat (a very invasive and painful surgery)which violates all kind of the cat's rights, but declawing is not? Hmmm.

 

JP

Nov 6, 2009

Alioto Pier, in opposing the ban on declawing, describes this as a'medical decision'. The ban takes this into account and when it IS a medical decision - for the wellbeing of the cat - the procedure can take place. But regrettably this is not normally a 'medical' decision but a lifestyle choice, for the owner.

 

antonio

Nov 6, 2009

I fully support the supervisors that voted to ban declawing. It's obvious that those that took the opposite opinion especially the vet technician do not appreciate the emotional distress to the cats. Declawed cats suffer pain long after the surgery. It is disturbing to see them try to strop their nails when they have none.

 

Journalism student in SF

Nov 18, 2009

Are there any cat owners out there who are concerned they might not be to keep their cat because of the ban? If so, I'd be interested to hear your story...

 

christian louboutin

Dec 11, 2009

one day i went shopping outside,and in an ed hardy store,I found some kinds of ed hardy i love most they are: ed hardy ed hardy Ed Hardy Clothing Ed Hardy Clothing Abercrombie & Fitch Abercrombie & Fitch Abercrombie and Fitch Abercrombie and Fitch Gucci Shoes Gucci Shoes christian louboutin christian louboutin cheap christian louboutin cheap christian louboutin gucci boots gucci boots Thanks of your infomation i have read it is very help full for me.

 

MissCB

Dec 27, 2009

TN Vet Tech, I don't remember seeing where in the Constitution you have the right to mutilate and abuse animals. I must have missed that part.

 

Booksie

Dec 31, 2009

Of all the asinine overreaching of government, this has to be among the most idiotic. Small wonder California in general and San Francisco in particular are the laughing stocks of all the liberty-loving people of the country.

 

Jan 15, 2010

Thanks for sharing. i really appreciate it that you shared with us such a informative post..
Online Special Education degree | Online Teaching learning degree | health science degree

 

Jan 15, 2010

I'm the same way, I do my best to remain neutral. It's hard, if you communicate with the person the other person dislikes, then you fall out of favor with them! I simple can't dislike a person, just because someone else does, I just can't.
Online Law Degree | online human services degree

 

GerryG

Jan 19, 2010

Interesting post and I really like your take on the issue. I now have a clear idea on what this matter is all about. Thank you so much.
Small business loans

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story